RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Video laryngoscope (VL) technology improves first-pass success. The novel i-view VL device is inexpensive and disposable. We sought to determine the first-pass intubation success with the i-view VL device versus the standard reusable VL systems in routine use at each site. METHODS: We performed a prospective, pragmatic study at two major emergency departments (EDs) when VL was used. We rotated i-view versus reusable VL as the preferred device of the month based on an a priori schedule. An investigator-initiated interim analysis was performed. Our primary outcome was a first-pass success with a non-inferiority margin of 10% based on the per-protocol analysis. RESULTS: There were 93 intubations using the reusable VL devices and 81 intubations using the i-view. Our study was stopped early due to futility in reaching our predetermined non-inferiority margin. Operator and patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. The first-pass success rate for the i-view group was 69.1% compared to 84.3% for the reusable VL group. A non-inferiority analysis indicated that the difference (-15.1%) and corresponding 90% confidence limits (-25.3% to -5.0%) did not fall within the predetermined 10% non-inferiority margin. CONCLUSIONS: The i-view device failed to meet our predetermined non-inferiority margin when compared to the reusable VL systems with the study stopping early due to futility. Significant crossover occurred at the discretion of the intubating operator during the i-view month.
Asunto(s)
Intubación Intratraqueal , Laringoscopios , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Equipo Reutilizado , Laringoscopía/métodos , Laringoscopía/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: We have encountered patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) who exhibited palatal prolapse (PP) during nasal expiration in the supine position while awake. This may be an overlooked cause of dyspnea in MG patients. This study aimed to examine and describe the characteristics of MG patients with PP. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 183 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with MG in our hospital from 2012 to 2021. Thirty-two patients underwent laryngoscopy because of bulbar symptoms. Eight of these patients (25%) exhibited PP on laryngoscopy. Clinical features of these eight patients were retrospectively characterized. RESULTS: Median age of the eight patients with PP was 70 years. Six were men. Median body mass index was 21.6 kg/m2 . All patients exhibited PP in the supine position but not the sitting position. Although no patient had abnormal findings on spirometry nor chest computed tomography, six reported dyspnea or difficulty with nasal expiration only in the supine position. PP improved in all four patients who underwent edrophonium testing. All eight patients eventually improved after immunotherapy. DISCUSSION: PP during nasal expiration may be a cause of dyspnea in MG patients, along with respiratory muscle impairment, lung disease, and vocal cord paralysis. Laryngoscopy in the supine position is required to confirm.
Asunto(s)
Miastenia Gravis , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Parálisis de los Pliegues Vocales , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Disnea/etiología , Edrofonio/uso terapéutico , Miastenia Gravis/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Identification of difficult laryngoscopy is a frequent demand in cervical spondylosis clinical surgery. This work aims to develop a hybrid architecture for identifying difficult laryngoscopy based on new indexes. METHODS: Initially, two new indexes for identifying difficult laryngoscopy are proposed, and their efficacy for predicting difficult laryngoscopy is compared to that of two conventional indexes. Second, a hybrid adaptive architecture with convolutional layers, spatial extraction, and a vision transformer is proposed for predicting difficult laryngoscopy. The proposed adaptive hybrid architecture is then optimized by determining the optimal location for extracting spatial information. RESULTS: The test accuracy of four indexes using simple model is 0.8320. The test accuracy of optimized hybrid architecture using four indexes is 0.8482. CONCLUSION: The newly proposed two indexes, the angle between the lower margins of the second and sixth cervical spines and the vertical direction, are validated to be effective for recognizing difficult laryngoscopy. In addition, the optimized hybrid architecture employing four indexes demonstrates improved efficacy in detecting difficult laryngoscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Ethics permission for this research was obtained from the Medical Scientific Research Ethics Committee of Peking University Third Hospital (IRB00006761-2015021) on 30 March 2015. A well-informed agreement has been received from all participants. Patients were enrolled in this research at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn , identifier: ChiCTR-ROC-16008598) on 6 June 2016.
Asunto(s)
Laringoscopía , Espondilosis , Humanos , Vértebras Cervicales , Hospitales Universitarios , Espondilosis/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The utilization of video laryngoscopy (VL) has demonstrated superiority over direct laryngoscopy (DL) for intubation in surgical settings. However, its effectiveness in the intensive care unit and emergency department settings remains uncertain. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing VL versus DL in critically ill patients. Critical setting was defined as emergency department and intensive care unit. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed Cochrane and PRISMA recommendations. R version 4.3.1 was used for statistical analysis and heterogeneity was examined with I2 statistics. All outcomes were submitted to random-effect models. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis of 14 RCTs, compromising 3981 patients assigned to VL (n = 2002) or DL (n = 1979). Compared with DL, VL significantly increased successful intubations on the first attempt (RR 1.12; 95% CI 1.04-1.20; p < 0.01; I2 = 82%). Regarding adverse events, VL reduced the number of esophageal intubations (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.24-0.80; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%) and incidence of aspiration episodes (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.41-0.96; p = 0.03; I2 = 0%) compared to DL. CONCLUSION: VL is a more effective and safer strategy compared with DL for increasing successful intubations on the first attempt and reducing esophageal intubations in critically ill patients. Our findings support the routine use of VL in critically ill patients. Registration CRD42023439685 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023439685 . Registered 6 July 2023.
Asunto(s)
Laringoscopios , Laringoscopía , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Grabación en VideoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The European Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care recommends the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) in adults, to facilitate tracheal intubation and reduce its associated complications. Children who undergo tracheal intubation may suffer some of the same complications, however, no consensus exists regarding the use of NMBA for tracheal intubation in the pediatric population. We will explore the existing evidence assessing the effects of avoidance versus the use of NMBA for the facilitation of tracheal intubation in children and infants. METHODS: This protocol follows the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses protocols recommendations. We will include all randomized controlled clinical trials assessing the effects of avoidance versus the use of NMBA for facilitation of tracheal intubation (oral or nasal) using direct laryngoscopy or video laryngoscopy in pediatric participants (<18 years). Our primary outcome is incidence of difficult tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes include incidence of serious adverse events, failed intubation, events of upper airway discomfort or injury, and difficult laryngoscopy. We will conduct a thorough database search to identify relevant trials, including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Web of Science, CINAHL, and trial registries. Two review authors will independently handle the screening of literature and data extraction. Each trial will be evaluated for major sources of bias with the "classic risk of bias tool" used in the Cochrane Collaboration tool from 2011. We will use Review manager (RevMan) or R with the meta package to perform the meta-analysis. We will perform a trial sequential analysis on the meta-analysis of our primary outcome, providing an estimate of statistical reliability. Two review authors will independently assess the quality of the body of evidence using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach. We will use GRADEpro software to conduct the GRADE assessments and to create "Summary of the findings" tables.
Asunto(s)
Intubación Intratraqueal , Bloqueantes Neuromusculares , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Lactante , Niño , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Laringoscopía/métodos , PreescolarRESUMEN
While videolaryngoscopy has resulted in better overall success rates of tracheal intubation, airway assessment is still an important prerequisite for safe airway management. This study aimed to create an artificial intelligence model to identify difficult videolaryngoscopy using a neural network. Baseline characteristics, medical history, bedside examination and seven facial images were included as predictor variables. ResNet-18 was introduced to recognise images and extract features. Different machine learning algorithms were utilised to develop predictive models. A videolaryngoscopy view of Cormack-Lehane grade of 1 or 2 was classified as 'non-difficult', while grade 3 or 4 was classified as 'difficult'. A total of 5849 patients were included, of whom 5335 had non-difficult and 514 had difficult videolaryngoscopy. The facial model (only including facial images) using the Light Gradient Boosting Machine algorithm showed the highest area under the curve (95%CI) of 0.779 (0.733-0.825) with a sensitivity (95%CI) of 0.757 (0.650-0.845) and specificity (95%CI) of 0.721 (0.626-0.794) in the test set. Compared with bedside examination and multivariate scores (El-Ganzouri and Wilson), the facial model had significantly higher predictive performance (p < 0.001). Artificial intelligence-based facial analysis is a feasible technique for predicting difficulty during videolaryngoscopy, and the model developed using neural networks has higher predictive performance than traditional methods.
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Laringoscopios , Humanos , Laringoscopía/métodos , Inteligencia Artificial , Estudios de Factibilidad , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although videolaryngoscopy has been proposed as a default technique for tracheal intubation in children, published evidence on universal videolaryngoscopy implementation programmes is scarce. We aimed to determine if universal, first-choice videolaryngoscopy reduces the incidence of restricted glottic views and to determine the diagnostic performance of the Cormack and Lehane classification to discriminate between easy and difficult videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubations in children. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study within a structured universal videolaryngoscopy implementation programme. We used C-MAC™ (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) videolaryngoscopes in all anaesthetised children undergoing elective tracheal intubation for surgical procedures. The direct and videolaryngoscopic glottic views were classified using a six-stage grading system. RESULTS: There were 904 tracheal intubations in 809 children over a 16-month period. First attempt and overall success occurred in 607 (67%) and 903 (> 99%) tracheal intubations, respectively. Difficult videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation occurred in 47 (5%) and airway-related adverse events in 42 (5%) tracheal intubations. Direct glottic view during laryngoscopy was restricted in 117 (13%) and the videolaryngoscopic view in 32 (4%) tracheal intubations (p < 0.001). Videolaryngoscopy improved the glottic view in 57/69 (83%) tracheal intubations where the vocal cords were only just visible, and in 44/48 (92%) where the vocal cords were not visible by direct view. The Cormack and Lehane classification discriminated poorly between easy and difficult videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubations with a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.68 (95%CI 0.59-0.78) for the videolaryngoscopic view compared with 0.80 (95%CI 0.73-0.87) for the direct glottic view during laryngoscopy (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Universal, first-choice videolaryngoscopy reduced substantially the incidence of restricted glottic views. The Cormack and Lehane classification was not a useful tool for grading videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation in children.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The VIDIAC score, a prospectively developed universal classification for videolaryngoscopy, has shown excellent diagnostic performance in adults. However, there is no reliable classification system for videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation in children. We aimed to develop and validate a multivariable logistic regression model and easy-to-use score to classify difficult videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation in children and to compare it with the Cormack and Lehane classification. A secondary aim was to externally validate the VIDIAC score in children. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study within a structured universal videolaryngoscopy implementation programme. We used C-MAC™ videolaryngoscopes in all children undergoing tracheal intubation for elective surgical procedures. We validated the VIDIAC score externally and assessed its performance. We then identified eligible co-variables for inclusion in the PeDiAC score, developed a multivariable logistic regression model and compared its performance against the Cormack and Lehane classification. RESULTS: We studied 809 children undergoing 904 episodes of tracheal intubation. The VIDIAC score outperformed the Cormack and Lehane classification when classifying the difficulty of videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (95%CI 0.73-0.87) vs. 0.69 (95%CI 0.62-0.76), respectively, p = 0.018. Eight eligible tracheal intubation-related factors, that were selected by 100-times repeated 10-fold cross-validated least absolute shrinkage selector operator regression, were used to develop the PeDiAC model. The PeDiAC model and score showed excellent diagnostic performance and model calibration. The PeDiAC score achieved significantly better diagnostic performance than the Cormack and Lehane classification, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97 (95%CI 0.96-0.99) vs. 0.69 (95%CI 0.62-0.76), respectively, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a specifically tailored classification for paediatric videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation with excellent diagnostic performance and calibration that outperformed the Cormack and Lehane classification.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is not certain whether the blade geometry of videolaryngoscopes, either a hyperangulated or Macintosh shape, affects glottic view, success rate and/or tracheal intubation time in patients with expected difficult airways. We hypothesised that using a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blade would visualise a higher percentage of glottic opening compared with a Macintosh videolaryngoscope blade in patients with expected difficult airways. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, patient-blinded, randomised controlled trial in adult patients scheduled to undergo elective ear, nose and throat or oral and maxillofacial surgery, who were anticipated to have a difficult airway. All airway operators were consultant anaesthetists. Patients were allocated randomly to tracheal intubation with either hyperangulated (C-MAC D-BLADE™) or Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades (C-MAC™). The primary outcome was the percentage of glottic opening. First attempt success was designated a key secondary outcome. RESULTS: We assessed 2540 adults scheduled for elective head and neck surgery for eligibility and included 182 patients with expected difficult airways undergoing orotracheal intubation. The percentage of glottic opening visualised, expressed as median (IQR [range]), was 89 (69-99 [0-100])% with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades and 54 (9-90 [0-100])% with Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades (p < 0.001). First-line hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy failed in one patient and Macintosh videolaryngoscopy in 12 patients (13%, p = 0.002). First attempt success rate was 97% with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades and 67% with Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Glottic view and first attempt success rate were superior with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades compared with Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades when used by experienced anaesthetists in patients with difficult airways.
Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Vía Aérea , Intubación Intratraqueal , Laringoscopios , Laringoscopía , Humanos , Laringoscopía/métodos , Laringoscopía/instrumentación , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Adulto , Manejo de la Vía Aérea/métodos , Manejo de la Vía Aérea/instrumentación , Anciano , Grabación en Video , Glotis , Diseño de Equipo , Método Simple Ciego , Procedimientos y Técnicas Asistidas por VideoRESUMEN
Aspiration of gastric contents is a recognised complication during all phases of anaesthesia. The risk of this event becomes more likely with repeated attempts at tracheal intubation. There is a lack of clinical data on the effectiveness of videolaryngoscopy relative to direct laryngoscopy rapid sequence intubation in the operating theatre. We hypothesised that the use of a videolaryngoscope during rapid sequence intubation would be associated with a higher first pass tracheal intubation success rate than conventional direct laryngoscopy. In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, 1000 adult patients requiring tracheal intubation for elective, urgent or emergency surgery were allocated randomly to airway management using a McGrath™ MAC videolaryngoscope (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) or direct laryngoscopy. Both techniques used a Macintosh blade. First-pass tracheal intubation success was higher in patients allocated to the McGrath group (470/500, 94%) compared with those allocated to the direct laryngoscopy group (358/500, 71.6%), odds ratio (95%CI) 1.31 (1.23-1.39); p < 0.001. This advantage was observed in both trainees and consultants. Cormack and Lehane grade ≥ 3 view occurred less frequently in patients allocated to the McGrath group compared with those allocated to the direct laryngoscopy group (5/500, 1% vs. 94/500, 19%, respectively; p < 0.001). Tracheal intubation with a McGrath videolaryngoscope was associated with a lower rate of adverse events compared with direct laryngoscopy (13/500, 2.6% vs. 61/500, 12.2%, respectively; p < 0.001). These findings suggest that the McGrath videolaryngoscope is superior to a conventional direct laryngoscope for rapid sequence intubation in the operating theatre.
Asunto(s)
Intubación Intratraqueal , Laringoscopios , Laringoscopía , Intubación e Inducción de Secuencia Rápida , Humanos , Laringoscopía/métodos , Laringoscopía/instrumentación , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Anciano , Intubación e Inducción de Secuencia Rápida/métodos , Grabación en Video , Quirófanos , Procedimientos y Técnicas Asistidas por VideoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The main cause of anesthesia-related deaths is the failure to manage difficult airways. Difficult laryngoscopic exposure is a major cause of unsuccessful management of difficult airways. Inadequate preoperative airway assessment hinders the clinical management of difficult airways cases, emphasizing the critical need for accurate identification of difficult airways. Currently, no definitive and reliable indicators are available to predict a difficult airway. Our study aims to predict laryngoscope exposure risk factors by combining ultrasonically measured upper airway anatomic parameters with physical examination indicators. METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 75 years, classified as American Standards Association (ASA) I-III, and scheduled for elective general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were included. All patients received the upper airway and ultrasonographic measurements. After anesthesia induction, laryngoscope exposure was analyzed using the Cormack-Lehane grading system, with Grades III and IV as indicative of difficult laryngoscopy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify reliable indicators for predicting difficult laryngoscopy. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was utilized to assess the predictive performance of each indicator. RESULTS: A total of 1120 patients finished the study, with 710 cases found in Grade I laryngoscopic exposure group, 360 cases in Grade II group, and 50 cases in Grade III group. There was no case observed in Grade IV group, thereby resulting in an incidence of difficult laryngoscopy of 4.46%. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that several parameters including age, Body Mass Index (BMI), neck circumference, neck mobility, snoring intensity, as well as ultrasound measurements of the pre-epiglottic space and thyromental distance were identified as significant risk factors for difficult laryngoscopy (P < 0.05). Among these, BMI, and neck circumference exhibited notable predictive value, with Area Under The Curve (AUC) values of 0.746 (95%CI 0.649-0.842) and 0.732 (95%CI 0.638-0.827), respectively. Neck mobility was also identified as an independent risk factor for predicting difficult laryngoscopy (P = 0.009) in multivariate logistic regression analysis, with an AUC of 0.672 (0.562-0.782) in the ROC curve. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings revealed a direct correlation between difficult laryngoscopy and age, BMI, neck circumference, neck mobility, snoring intensity, as well as ultrasound measurements of the pre-epiglottic space and thyromental distance. Furthermore, neck mobility was identified as an independent predictive factor. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment at clinicaltrials.gov (register no. ChiCTR2100053826, Date of registration: November 30, 2021).
Asunto(s)
Intubación Intratraqueal , Laringoscopía , Ultrasonografía , Humanos , Laringoscopía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Anciano , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven , Anestesia General/métodos , Adolescente , Índice de Masa CorporalRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The modified Mallampati classification is part of the preoperative airway risk assessment. Inconsistency in the way it is examined may contribute to heterogeneity in its diagnostic performance. The best visible Mallampati score could reduce interobserver heterogeneity but its diagnostic characteristics remain unknown. METHODS: During preoperative anesthesia consultation of adult patients with a senior anesthesiologist, we compared the modified Mallampati classification score vs the best visible Mallampati score using cervical extension, tongue in, and phonation. The primary outcome was the diagnostic characteristic of the modified Mallampati classification score vs the best visible Mallampati score as predictors of difficult orotracheal intubation (more than two direct laryngoscopies or need for an alternate device). We performed a multivariable analysis to identify independent predictors of difficult orotracheal intubation in the tested cohort. RESULTS: Difficult orotracheal intubation occurred in 77/3,243 (2.4%) patients. A best visible Mallampati score was obtained in 1,596 (49.2%) patients. Sensitivity and specificity of the modified Mallampati classification score for predicting difficult orotracheal intubation were 0.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 0.66) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.71), respectively. By comparison, the best visible Mallampati score was less sensitive (difference, -0.30; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.30; P < 0.001) but more specific (difference, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.22 to -0.25; P < 0.001). In patients with difficult orotracheal intubation, 53% were incorrectly reclassified as low risk by the best visible Mallampati score. CONCLUSION: Compared with the modified Mallampati classification score, the best visible Mallampati score decreased sensitivity for predicting difficult orotracheal intubation and falsely classified half of the patients with difficult orotracheal intubation. Taking the risks associated with difficult airways into account, our findings indicate that a careful examination of the modified Mallampati classification is required during the global preoperative airway examination. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02788253 ); 9 February 2016.
RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La classification de Mallampati modifiée fait partie de l'évaluation préopératoire des risques pour les voies aériennes. La disparité dans la façon dont elle est examinée peut contribuer à l'hétérogénéité de ses performances diagnostiques. Le meilleur score de Mallampati visible pourrait réduire l'hétérogénéité inter-observateurs, mais ses caractéristiques diagnostiques restent inconnues. MéTHODE: Lors de la consultation d'anesthésie préopératoire de patient·es adultes avec un·e anesthésiologiste senior, nous avons comparé le score de classification sur l'échelle de Mallampati modifiée vs le meilleur score de Mallampati visible en utilisant l'extension cervicale, la langue rentrée, et la phonation. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la caractéristique diagnostique du score modifié de classification de Mallampati vs le meilleur score de Mallampati visible comme prédicteurs d'une intubation orotrachéale difficile (plus de deux laryngoscopies directes ou nécessité d'un autre dispositif). Nous avons réalisé une analyse multivariée pour identifier les prédicteurs indépendants d'intubation orotrachéale difficile dans la cohorte testée. RéSULTATS: Une intubation orotrachéale difficile est survenue chez 77 patient·es sur 3243 (2,4 %). Le meilleur score de Mallampati visible a été obtenu chez 1596 patient·es (49,2 %). La sensibilité et la spécificité du score de classification de Mallampati modifié pour prédire l'intubation orotrachéale difficile étaient de 0,56 (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 0,44 à 0,66) et 0,69 (IC 95 %, 0,68 à 0,71), respectivement. À titre de comparaison, le score de Mallampati le plus visible était moins sensible (différence, −0,30; IC 95 %, −0,19 à −0,30; P < 0,001) mais plus spécifique (différence, 0,24; IC 95 %, 0,22 à −0,25; P < 0,001). Chez les patient·es présentant une intubation orotrachéale difficile, 53 % ont été reclassé·es à tort comme à faible risque par le score de Mallampati le plus visible. CONCLUSION: Par rapport au score modifié de classification de Mallampati, le score de Mallampati le mieux visible a diminué la sensibilité pour prédire l'intubation orotrachéale difficile et a faussement classé la moitié des patient·es présentant une intubation orotrachéale difficile. En tenant compte des risques associés aux voies aériennes difficiles, nos résultats indiquent qu'un examen minutieux de la classification de Mallampati modifiée est nécessaire lors de l'examen préopératoire global des voies aériennes. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02788253 ); 9 février 2016.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation is challenging during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and video laryngoscopy has showed benefits for this procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of various intubation approaches, including the bougie first, preloaded bougie, endotracheal tube (ETT) with stylet, and ETT without stylet, on first-attempt success using video laryngoscopy during chest compression. METHODS: This was a randomized crossover trial conducted in a general tertiary teaching hospital. We included anesthesia residents in postgraduate year one to three who passed the screening test. Each resident performed intubation with video laryngoscopy using the four approaches in a randomized sequence on an adult manikin during continuous chest compression. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success defined as starting ventilation within a one minute. RESULTS: A total of 260 endotracheal intubations conducted by 65 residents were randomized and analyzed with 65 procedures in each group. First-attempt success occurred in 64 (98.5%), 57 (87.7%), 56 (86.2%), and 46 (70.8%) intubations in the bougie-first, preloaded bougie, ETT with stylet, and ETT without stylet approaches, respectively. The bougie-first approach had a significantly higher possibility of first-attempt success than the preloaded bougie approach [risk ratio (RR) 8.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 62.16, P = 0.047], the ETT with stylet approach (RR 9.00, 95% CI 1.17 to 69.02, P = 0.035), and the ETT without stylet approach (RR 19.00, 95% CI 2.62 to 137.79, P = 0.004) in the generalized estimating equation logistic model accounting for clustering of intubations operated by the same resident. In addition, the bougie first approach did not result in prolonged intubation or increased self-reported difficulty among the study participants. CONCLUSIONS: The bougie first approach with video laryngoscopy had the highest possibility of first-attempt success during chest compression. These results helped inform the intubation approach during CPR. However, further studies in an actual clinical environment are warranted to validate these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov; identifier: NCT05689125; date: January 18, 2023.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Estudios Cruzados , Intubación Intratraqueal , Laringoscopía , Maniquíes , Grabación en Video , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Humanos , Laringoscopía/métodos , Laringoscopía/instrumentación , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Procedimientos y Técnicas Asistidas por VideoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pediatric airway management requires careful clinical evaluation and experienced execution due to anatomical, physiological, and developmental considerations. Video laryngoscopy in pediatric airways is a developing area of research, with recent data suggesting that video laryngoscopes are better than standard Macintosh blades. Specifically, there is a paucity of literature on the advantages of the C-MAC D-blade compared to the McCoy direct laryngoscope. METHODS: After Ethics Committee approval, 70 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 children aged 4-12 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were recruited. Patients were randomly allocated to intubation using a C-MAC video laryngoscope size 2 D-blade (Group 1) and a McCoy laryngoscope size 2 blade (Group 2). The Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) for ease of intubation was the primary outcome, while Cormack-Lehane grades, duration of laryngoscopy and intubation, hemodynamic responses, and incidence of any airway complications were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable in terms of patient characteristics. The median (IQR) Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score was better but was statistically nonsignificant with C-MAC (0 [0-0] vs. 0 [0-2], p = .055). The glottic views were superior (CL grade I in 32/35 vs. 23/35, p = .002), and the time to best glottic view (6 s [5-7] vs. 8.0 s [6-10], p = .006) was lesser in the C-MAC D-blade group while the total duration of intubation was comparable (20 s [16-22] vs. 18 s [15-22], p = .374). All the patients could be successfully intubated on the first attempt. None of the patients had any complications. CONCLUSION: The C-MAC video laryngoscope size 2 D-blade provided faster and better glottic visualization but similar intubation difficulty compared to McCoy size 2 laryngoscope in children. The shorter time to achieve glottic view demonstrated with the C-MAC failed to translate into a shorter total duration of intubation when compared to the McCoy laryngoscope attributable to a pronounced curvature of the D-blade.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Intubación Intratraqueal , Laringoscopios , Laringoscopía , Humanos , Anestesia General/métodos , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Masculino , Preescolar , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Niño , Estudios Prospectivos , Laringoscopía/métodos , Laringoscopía/instrumentación , Manejo de la Vía Aérea/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Diagnostic endoscopy with biopsy under general anesthesia (DE-GA) is still considered as the established standard to assess laryngopharyngeal cancer patients. Office-based flexible laryngoscopic biopsy (FLB) offers an alternative, but the effect on oncological outcome remains uncertain. Therefore, the diagnostic process and survival of patients undergoing FLB, compared to those undergoing DE-GA were evaluated. METHODS: Patients suspected of laryngopharyngeal cancer who underwent FLB were evaluated. Patients with FLB-confirmed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were matched with DE-GA patients based on tumor site, T-classification, N-classification, age, and p16 overexpression. Time from first visit to diagnosis (FVD), time to treatment interval (TTI), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: FLB yielded a definitive diagnosis in 155/164 (95 %) patients. No complications were observed. Ninety-eight of the 124 patients in which FLB revealed a SCC received curative treatment and were compared with 98 matched patients who underwent DE-GA. Median FVD interval was 6 days after FLB and 15 days after DE-GA (p < 0.001). Median TTI interval (FLB: 28 days, DE-GA: 28 days) was equal (p = 0.91). Oncological outcomes were comparable (p > 0.05) between FLB (OS: 2-yr: 76 %, 5-yr: 42 %; DSS: 2-yr: 86 %, 5-yr: 85 %) and DE-GA groups (OS: 2-yr: 76 %, 5-yr: 50 %; DSS: 2-yr: 81 %, 5-yr: 79 %). CONCLUSION: FLB in the outpatient setting demonstrates a high diagnostic accuracy, is safe, accelerates the diagnostic process and has no negative effects on clinical outcome compared to DE-GA. Therefore, FLB should be considered as the standard diagnostic procedure in patients suspected of laryngopharyngeal cancer.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Laríngeas , Laringoscopía , Humanos , Masculino , Laringoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Biopsia/métodos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/patología , Neoplasias Laríngeas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Laríngeas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Neoplasias Faríngeas/patología , Neoplasias Faríngeas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Faríngeas/diagnóstico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Early diagnosis of laryngeal cancer (LC) is crucial, particularly in rural areas. Despite existing studies on deep learning models for LC identification, challenges remain in selecting suitable models for rural areas with shortages of laryngologists and limited computer resources. We present the intelligent laryngeal cancer detection system (ILCDS), a deep learning-based solution tailored for effective LC screening in resource-constrained rural areas. METHODS: We compiled a dataset comprised of 2023 laryngoscopic images and applied data augmentation techniques for dataset expansion. Subsequently, we utilized eight deep learning models-AlexNet, VGG, ResNet, DenseNet, MobileNet, ShuffleNet, Vision Transformer, and Swin Transformer-for LC identification. A comprehensive evaluation of their performances and efficiencies was conducted, and the most suitable model was selected to assemble the ILCDS. RESULTS: Regarding performance, all models attained an average accuracy exceeding 90 % on the test set. Particularly noteworthy are VGG, DenseNet, and MobileNet, which exceeded an accuracy of 95 %, with scores of 95.32 %, 95.75 %, and 95.99 %, respectively. Regarding efficiency, MobileNet excels owing to its compact size and fast inference speed, making it an ideal model for integration into ILCDS. CONCLUSION: The ILCDS demonstrated promising accuracy in LC detection while maintaining modest computational resource requirements, indicating its potential to enhance LC screening accuracy and alleviate the workload on otolaryngologists in rural areas.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To develop a multi-instance learning (MIL) based artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted diagnosis models by using laryngoscopic images to differentiate benign and malignant vocal fold leukoplakia (VFL). METHODS: The AI system was developed, trained and validated on 5362 images of 551 patients from three hospitals. Automated regions of interest (ROI) segmentation algorithm was utilized to construct image-level features. MIL was used to fusion image level results to patient level features, then the extracted features were modeled by seven machine learning algorithms. Finally, we evaluated the image level and patient level results. Additionally, 50 videos of VFL were prospectively gathered to assess the system's real-time diagnostic capabilities. A human-machine comparison database was also constructed to compare the diagnostic performance of otolaryngologists with and without AI assistance. RESULTS: In internal and external validation sets, the maximum area under the curve (AUC) for image level segmentation models was 0.775 (95 % CI 0.740-0.811) and 0.720 (95 % CI 0.684-0.756), respectively. Utilizing a MIL-based fusion strategy, the AUC at the patient level increased to 0.869 (95 % CI 0.798-0.940) and 0.851 (95 % CI 0.756-0.945). For real-time video diagnosis, the maximum AUC at the patient level reached 0.850 (95 % CI, 0.743-0.957). With AI assistance, the AUC improved from 0.720 (95 % CI 0.682-0.755) to 0.808 (95 % CI 0.775-0.839) for senior otolaryngologists and from 0.647 (95 % CI 0.608-0.686) to 0.807 (95 % CI 0.773-0.837) for junior otolaryngologists. CONCLUSIONS: The MIL based AI-assisted diagnosis system can significantly improve the diagnostic performance of otolaryngologists for VFL and help to make proper clinical decisions.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Laringoscopía , Leucoplasia , Pliegues Vocales , Humanos , Pliegues Vocales/diagnóstico por imagen , Pliegues Vocales/patología , Laringoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Leucoplasia/diagnóstico , Leucoplasia/patología , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Aprendizaje Automático , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Adulto , Algoritmos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Laríngeas/patología , Neoplasias Laríngeas/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine the utility of laryngoscopy in the evaluation of liver transplant patients. METHODS: This study is a single center retrospective cohort review of patients with a diagnosis of liver failure who underwent laryngoscopy or stroboscopy exam as part of a pre-transplant evaluation from 1/1/2010 to 12/31/2022. Patients were identified using ICD 9 and 10 codes for liver failure and CPT codes for flexible laryngoscopy and stroboscopy. Only patients who underwent preoperative liver transplant evaluation were included. Demographic data was collected. Cohort analysis between patients who did or did not undergo further diagnostic intervention was undertaken. RESULTS: 1824 patients were identified. 243 of these patients underwent pre-transplant laryngoscopy or stroboscopy. 26 of the 243 (10.7 %) patients had further diagnostic work up for findings during laryngoscopy, stroboscopy, or head and neck examination. There was one patient who was found to have head and neck cancer and was excluded from the transplant list until this was treated. CONCLUSIONS: Otolaryngologic evaluation of liver transplant patients may be beneficial to identify head and neck pathology.
Asunto(s)
Laringoscopía , Fallo Hepático , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cuidados Preoperatorios , EstroboscopíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Informative image selection in laryngoscopy has the potential for improving automatic data extraction alone, for selective data storage and a faster review process, or in combination with other artificial intelligence (AI) detection or diagnosis models. This paper aims to demonstrate the feasibility of AI in providing automatic informative laryngoscopy frame selection also capable of working in real-time providing visual feedback to guide the otolaryngologist during the examination. METHODS: Several deep learning models were trained and tested on an internal dataset (n = 5147 images) and then tested on an external test set (n = 646 images) composed of both white light and narrow band images. Four videos were used to assess the real-time performance of the best-performing model. RESULTS: ResNet-50, pre-trained with the pretext strategy, reached a precision = 95% vs. 97%, recall = 97% vs, 89%, and the F1-score = 96% vs. 93% on the internal and external test set respectively (p = 0.062). The four testing videos are provided in the supplemental materials. CONCLUSION: The deep learning model demonstrated excellent performance in identifying diagnostically relevant frames within laryngoscopic videos. With its solid accuracy and real-time capabilities, the system is promising for its development in a clinical setting, either autonomously for objective quality control or in conjunction with other algorithms within a comprehensive AI toolset aimed at enhancing tumor detection and diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Laringoscopía , Humanos , Laringoscopía/métodos , Grabación en Video , Estudios de Factibilidad , Enfermedades de la Laringe/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Laringe/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Successful microlaryngeal surgery relies on an adequate laryngeal exposure. Recognizing the likelihood of challenging exposure prior to microlaryngeal surgery may assist in selecting the appropriate surgical approach and even prompt consideration of alternative treatment options. We aim to apply the mini-Laryngoscore, a preoperative assessment tool, to our study population and incorporate novel variables to optimize the prediction model. METHODS: This single-center prospective cohort study included 80 consecutive patients undergoing elective microlaryngeal surgery, from January 1, to June 30, 2023. Each patient underwent a presurgical evaluation of 15 parameters and an intraoperative scoring of the anterior commissure visualization. These parameters were assessed for their association with difficult laryngeal exposure, using multiple logistic regression analysis. We created a novel prediction model for DLE and compared it with the existing model, the mini-Laryngoscore. RESULTS: Out of 80 patients, 24 (30%) patients had difficult laryngeal exposure, including 3 cases (3.8%) in which visualization of the anterior commissure was not possible. A large neck diameter (OR, 1.4; CI 1.1-1.9) and the presence of upper teeth (OR, 8.9; CI 1.3-62.8) were independent risk factors for a difficult laryngeal exposure, while a larger interincisors gap was the only independent protector factor (OR, 0.3; CI 0.1-0.8). The logistic regression model combining these three independent risk factors displayed a high discriminative value AUC = 0.89 (CI 0.81-0.97). The predictive performance of the mini-Laryngoscore was 0.73 (CI 0.62-0.85). CONCLUSION: Combining two parameters from the mini-Laryngoscore (upper jaw dental state and interincisors gap distance) with neck circumference measurement can accurately predict the risk of difficult laryngeal exposure.