Acute hyperglycemia, a rabble-rouser or innocent bystander? A prospective analysis of clinical implications of acute hyperglycemia in STE-ACS patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute hyperglycemia is considered an independent prognosticator of both in-hospital and long-term outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed To analyze the incidence of acute hyperglycemia and its impact on the adverse in-hospital outcome in patients with STE-ACS undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: In this study, we enrolled patients presenting with STE-ACS and undergoing primary PCI at a tertiary care cardiac center. Acute hyperglycemia was defined as random plasma glucose (RBS) > 200 mg/dl at the time of presentation to the emergency room. RESULTS: Of the 4470 patients, 78.8% were males, and the mean age was 55.52 ± 11 years. In total, 39.4% (1759) were found to have acute hyperglycemia, and of these, 59% (1037) were already diagnosed with diabetes. Patients with acute hyperglycemia were observed to have a higher incidence of heart failure (8.2% vs. 5.5%; p < 0.001), contrast-induced nephropathy (10.9% vs. 7.4%; p < 0.001), and in-hospital mortality (5.7% vs. 2.5%; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, acute hyperglycemia was found to be an independent predictor of mortality with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.81 [1.28-2.55]. Multi-vessel disease (1.73 [1.17-2.56]), pre-procedure left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) (1.02 [1.0-1.03]), and Killip class III/IV (4.55 [3.09-6.71]) were found to be the additional independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Acute hyperglycemia, regardless of diabetic status, is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality among patients with STE-ACS undergoing primary PCI. Acute hyperglycemia, along with other significant predictors such as multi-vessel involvement, LVEDP, and Killip class III/IV, can be considered for the risk stratification of these patients.

The De Winter-like electrocardiogram pattern associated with multi-vessel disease.

BACKGROUND: The de Winter ECG pattern was described by upsloping ST-segment depression in leads V1-V6, tall and symmetrical T waves in precordial leads. The ECG pattern is regarded to be associated with occlusion of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. METHODS: One patient with de Winter ECG pattern was included. The 12-lead ECG of patients with chest pain showed upsloping ST-segment depression up to 3 mm at the J point in leads V2-V6; tall symmetrical T waves in leads V2-V4; 1mm J point elevation in lead aVR; ST-segment depression 1mm in I, aVL leads and inverted T waves in the inferior leads. The ECG was showed the de Winter pattern. RESULTS: The ECG was showed the de Winter pattern. CAG was performed, which showed the normal left main; 60%-80% LAD stenosis; 50%-60% ostial right coronary artery(RCA) stenosis; and 90% stenosis of the vessel at middle segment. Both proximal and middle RCA vascular lesions were dilated and successfully inserted with drug-eluting stents, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our case the ECG was showed horizontal ST depression with tall T waves in leads V2-V4 (maximal ST depression in lead V4) while only ST depression in leads V5-V6, which may result from multivessel disease.

Defining the optimal revascularization strategy during protected high-risk procedures with Impella.

Complete revascularization (CR) in patients with multi-vessel disease improves outcomes. The use of percutaneous left-ventricular assist devices, such as the Impella heart pump, is useful to minimize the risk of haemodynamic compromise in complex higher risk and clinically indicated patients. The recently published data from the PROTECT III trial suggest more CR during Impella-protected percutaneous coronary intervention with more extensive lesion preparation and treatment, resulting in the reduced need for repeat revascularization. To achieve CR and improve survival, procedural guidance by intravascular imaging, extensive lesion preparation, debulking with atherectomy devices, advanced chronic total occlusion revascularization techniques, and post-interventional treatment with modern anti-platelet medication are essential.

Is isolated ST segment elevation in Lead aVR associated with high grade coronary artery disease?

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic accuracy of lead aVR ST-segment elevation for left main or triple vessel disease (LM/3VD) has not been universally accepted. In the present analysis we sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of STEaVR in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratios were calculated using a random effects model (DerSimonian-Laird Method) for computing summary estimates and receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis for evaluating overall diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 14 studies. The pooled sensitivity of STEaVR for LM/3VD was 0.40 (95% CI; 0.38 0.43, p < 0.001), specificity 0.82 (95% CI; 0.81-0.83, p < 0.001). Pooled positive likelihood ratio 2.49 (95% CI; 1.62-3.81, p < 0.001) and negative likelihood 0.54 (95% CI; 0.39-0.76, p < 0.001). The pooled sensitivity of STEaVR for LM was 0.39 (95% CI; 0.34-0.45, p < 0.001) specificity was 0.86 (95% CI; 0.85-0.87, p < 0.001) with an AUC of 0.79. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR) for LM was 2.78 (95% CI, 2.28-3.39, p < 0.001) negative likelihood ratio 0.51 (95% CI, 0.33-0.78, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that in patients presenting with an ACS, presence of STEaVR may indicate the presence of LM or 3VD. STEaVR has a high specificity for both LM and 3VD, with a high pooled LR.

Outcomes of multivessel vs culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Evidence from an updated meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This updated meta-analysis evaluated outcomes with multi-vessel (MV-PCI) vs culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention (CL-PCI), in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS). BACKGROUND: There is considerable debate regarding the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with AMI and CS, particularly regarding management of non-culprit lesions. METHODS: Databases were searched for studies comparing MV-PCI and CL-PCI in patients with AMI and CS. The primary outcome of interest was short-term all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included long-term mortality, repeat revascularization and myocardial reinfarction. Safety outcomes were stroke, acute renal failure and major bleeding. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis consisting of 14 studies (13 observational, 1 RCT) involving 8,552 patients showed that in comparison to CL-PCI, MV-PCI was associated with similar short-term mortality (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.9-1.43), as well as similar long-term mortality (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.68-1.28). There was no significant difference in the risk of myocardial reinfarction (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.76-1.86), or repeat revascularization (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.41-1.55) between the two groups. Compared to CL-PCI, MV-PCI was associated with a similar risk of bleeding (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.91-1.40) and stroke (OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.84-1.96), but a higher risk of developing renal failure (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.05-1.65). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that there is a higher risk of renal failure with no additional benefit in efficacy outcomes with MV-PCI, compared to CL-PCI in patients with AMI and CS.

Fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 30-50% patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STMEI) were found to have non-infarct-related coronary artery (IRA) disease, which was significantly associated with worse prognosis. However, challenges still remain for these patients: which non-infarct-related lesion should be treated and when should the procedure be performed? The present study aims to investigate Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularization (CR) in comparison to culprit-only revascularization (COR) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multi-vessel disease (MVD). METHODS: Three appropriate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected from the PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library /CENTRAL databases. 1631 patients (688 patients underwent FFR-guided CR and 943 patients underwent COR) following-up 12-44 months was evaluated. RESULTS: FFR-guided CR significantly reduced major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.35-0.62, P < 0.00001) and ischemia-driven repeat revascularization (OR 0.36, 0.26-0.51, P < 0.00001), as compared to COR. However, there is no difference in all-cause mortality (OR 1.24, 0.65-2.35, P = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI and MVD, FFR-guided CR is better than COR in terms of MACE and ischemia-driven repeat revascularization, while there are almost similar in all-cause mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: All analyses were based on previous published studies, thus no ethical approval and patient consent are required COMPARE-ACUTE trial number NCT01399736 ; DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI trial number NCT01960933 .

Major adverse cardiovascular events while awaiting staged non-culprit percutaneous coronary intervention after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The optimal therapeutic strategy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients found to have multi-vessel disease (MVD) is controversial but recent data support complete revascularisation (CR). Whether CR should be completed during the index admission or during a second staged admission remains unclear. Our main objective was to measure rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) during the waiting period in STEMI patients selected for staged revascularisation (SR), in order to determine the safety of delaying CR. For completeness, we also describe 30-day and long-term outcomes in STEMI patients with MVD who underwent in-hospital CR. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective analysis of 931 STEMI patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) identified 397 patients with MVD who were haemodynamically stable and presented within 12 hours of chest pain onset. Of these, 191 underwent multi-vessel PCI: 49 during the index admission and 142 patients undergoing a strategy of SR. RESULTS: Our main finding was that waiting period MACE were 2% (three of 142) in patients allocated to SR (at a median of 31 days). In patients allocated to in-hospital CR, 30-day MACE rates were 10% (five of 49). During a median follow up of 39 months, all-cause mortality was 7.0% vs. 28.6%, and cardiac mortality was 2% vs. 8%, in patients allocated to SR or CR, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with STEMI and MVD who, based on clinical judgement, were allocated to a second admission SR strategy had very few adverse events during the waiting period and excellent long-term outcomes.

Low QRS Voltage on Presenting Electrocardiogram Predicts Multi-vessel Disease in Anterior ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Low QRS voltage was reported to predict adverse outcomes in acute myocardial infarction in the pre-thrombolytic era. However, the association between low voltage and angiographic findings has not been fully addressed. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Low QRS voltage was defined as either peak to peak QRS complex voltage <1.0mV in all precordial leads or <0.5mV in all limb leads. RESULTS: Among 190 patients, 37 patients (19%) had low voltage. Patients with low voltage had a higher rate of multi-vessel disease (MVD) (76% vs. 52%, p=0.01). Patients with low voltage were more likely to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) during admission (11% vs. 2%, p=0.028). Low voltage was an independent predictor for MVD (OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.12 to 6.03; p=0.032). CONCLUSION: Low QRS voltage was associated with MVD and in-hospital CABG in anterior STEMI.

Is multivessel intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction associated with early harm? Insights from observational data.

OBJECTIVES: Appraisal of evidence for recommendations for multivessel coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: Multi-vessel disease (MVD) is common in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Published observational data has suggested that multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MVPCI) at the time of initial hospitalization for STEMI may be harmful in contrast to evidence from recent randomized trials. METHODS: We queried the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS) to identify characteristics of hemodynamically stable STEMI patients undergoing MVPCI on index admission and subsequent mortality in raw and adjusted models. To compare our results with published observational data, we searched multiple databases from inception through July 15, 2015. RESULTS: From 2009-2012, excluding cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock, there were 11,454 MVPCI and 157,011 single-vessel PCI (SVPCI) for STEMI patients in the NIS. Compared to SVPCI, MVPCI on index admission was not associated with higher in-hospital mortality in unadjusted or propensity-adjusted models (MVPCI 1.91% vs. SVPCI 5.32%, P < 0.001). Our analysis of index hospitalization MVPCI versus infarct-related artery (IRA)-only PCI in the meta-analysis of observational studies (19 studies, N = 76,399) demonstrated no difference in in-hospital mortality with MVPCI compared with IRA-only PCI (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.65-1.17; P = 0.37), with confirmation in study sequential analysis. CONCLUSIONS: MVPCI is uncommonly performed during index hospitalization in hemodynamically stable STEMI patients, likely reflecting widespread adherence to prior guidelines. Based on observational data, there does not appear to be early harm associated with MVPCI on the index admission in hemodynamically stable STEMI patients. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Infarct-related artery only revascularization versus multi-vessel revascularization for patients with Killip I-IV acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.

BACKGROUND: The optimal revascularization strategy for non-culprit vessels is still up for debate nowadays, particularly when it comes to individuals with different Killip classes. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate whether multivessel revascularization, as compared with infarct-related artery (IRA) alone revascularization, improves long-term prognosis in patients who have experienced an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and have multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 646 patients who presented with AMI and multivessel CAD at Beijing Chaoyang hospital between November 2014 and November 2020. Based on various revascularization strategies, patients were categorised into two groups: IRA-only revascularization (n = 416) and multivessel revascularization (n = 230). The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death. RESULTS: In the following 60.6 months (60.6 ± 23.9), the primary endpoint occurred in 3% of the multivessel revascularization group versus 9.6% in the IRA-only revascularization group (HR 0.284, CI 0.120-0.669, p = 0.002). For the Killip I-II patients (n = 533), the primary endpoint occurred in 2.6% of the multivessel revascularization group versus 9.5% in the IRA-only revascularization group (HR 0.236, CI 0.083-0.667, p = 0.003). For Killip III-IV patients (n = 113), there was no significance differences in the primary endpoint. After using the inverse probability weighted method, the benefit of complete revascularization was consistently observed. CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel revascularization significantly reduced the incidence of cardiovascular death for patients presenting with AMI and multivessel CAD, particularly for Killip I-II patients. There were no significant differences in the primary outcome across the groups of patients with Killip III-IV.

Carotid Artery Doppler: A Possible Non-invasive Diagnostic Approach to Assessing the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Carotid artery Doppler ultrasound is being explored for its potential as a non-invasive tool for evaluating coronary artery disease (CAD) severity and cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to investigate the association between carotid Doppler parameters and CAD severity, as determined by the Gensini score (GS) and multi-vessel disease presence. METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) and carotid ultrasound were retrospectively analysed. Carotid Doppler parameters and CAD severity were assessed through bivariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Among the patients studied, 80% were male, with a mean age of 65.24 years (±9.91). Triple vessel disease (68.9%) and dominant vessel disease (73.3%) were prevalent coronary findings, with a mean GS of 139.2 (±76.6). Increased intima-media thickness (IMT) in the common carotid artery (CCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) showed significant associations (CCA IMT: OR = 0.312, p = 0.037; ICA IMT: OR = 0.354, p = 0.017) with high GS (>125) and multi-vessel disease. Significant carotid stenosis (>50% diameter stenosis) emerged as an independent predictor of CAD severity. Fibrocalcific plaques, detected in 62.2% of cases, correlated significantly with elevated GS. Plaque burden, especially plaques in >3 locations, indicated a higher likelihood of triple vessel disease and a higher GS. CONCLUSION: Carotid Doppler parameters, particularly IMT and significant stenosis, are robust predictors of CAD severity, including high GS and multi-vessel disease. Integrating carotid artery assessment into clinical protocols can aid in timely interventions and preventive strategies for CAD management.

Impact of sex difference on clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction patients with single-vessel and multi-vessel disease: based on Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health.

Background: Several studies have compared clinical outcomes according to sex in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, studies evaluating sex differences in clinical outcomes of single-vessel disease (SVD) and multi-vessel disease (MVD) in Korean patients with AMI are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze sex differences in the clinical characteristics of patients with AMI with SVD and MVD and to evaluate the impact of sex differences on the clinical outcomes in patients with AMI with SVD and MVD. Methods: A total of 11,002 AMI patients from November 2011 to June 2015 in the Korea AMI Registry, National Institute of Health, were enrolled. The current study was retrospective observational study. Patients were divided into SVD (n=5,644) and MVD (n=5,358) groups, and clinical impact of sex difference were analyzed by propensity score matching analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression model. Results: Women were older and had poor baseline clinical characteristics than men. Propensity score-matched analysis of men and women with SVD and MVD revealed that the adjusted 3-year risk of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (15.0% vs. 9.4%; hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.13; P=0.020) was higher in women with SVD aged <65 years. However, the incidence and risk of MACE were similar for men and women with MVD, and those with SVD aged ≥65 years. Conclusions: In the present study of Korean patients with AMI, women were older and exhibited a higher prevalence of comorbidities than men. Women with SVD aged <65 years had a significantly higher risk of MACE.

Comparison of long-term outcomes of complete vs. incomplete revascularization in elderly patients (≥75 years) with acute coronary syndrome and multi-vessel disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Background: The optimal revascularization strategy for elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains uncertain. We evaluated the impact of complete revascularization (CR) vs. incomplete revascularization (IR) in elderly ACS patients with multivessel disease (MVD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Using registry data from 2011 to 2019, we conducted a propensity-score matched cohort study. Elderly patients (≥75 years) with ACS and MVD who underwent PCI were divided into CR and IR groups based on angiography during index hospitalization. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including all-cause mortality, recurrent non-fatal myocardial infarction, and any revascularization, were assessed at 3-year follow-up. Results: Among 1,018 enrolled patients, 496 (48.7%) underwent CR and 522 (51.3%) received IR. After 1:1 propensity-score matching, we analyzed 395 pairs. At 3-year follow-up, CR was significantly associated with lower MACE risk compared to IR (16.7% vs. 25.6%, HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.47-0.88, p = 0.006), driven by reduced all-cause mortality. This benefit was consistent across all pre-specified subgroups, particularly in ST segment elevation (STE)-ACS patients. In non-STE (NSTE)-ACS subgroup analysis, CR was also associated with a lower risk of cardiac mortality compared to IR (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.12-0.75, p = 0.01). Conclusion: In elderly ACS patients with MVD undergoing PCI, CR demonstrates superior long-term outcomes compared to IR, irrespective of STE- or NSTE-ACS presentation.

Predictors of In-Hospital Death in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

OBJECTIVE: Factors such as age, vital signs, renal function, Killip class, cardiac arrest, elevated cardiac biomarker levels, and ST deviation predict survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the existing risk assessment tools lack comprehensive consideration of catheter-related factors, and short-term prognostic predictors are unknown. This study aimed to clarify in-hospital prognostic predictors in hospitalized patients with AMI. METHODS: Five hundred and thirty-six patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for AMI were divided into non-survivor (n = 36) and survivor (n = 500) groups. Coronary risk factors, laboratory findings, angiographic findings, and clinical courses were compared between the two groups. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze in-hospital death in pre- and post-PCI phases. RESULTS: In the pre-PCI phase, multiple logistic regression analysis revealed several predictors of in-hospital death, including systolic blood pressure [odds ratio (OR) = 0.985, p = 0.023)], Killip class ≥2 (OR = 14.051, p <0.001), and chronic kidney disease (OR = 4.859, p = 0.040). In the post-PCI phase, multiple logistic regression analysis revealed additional predictors of in-hospital death, including Killip class ≥2 (OR = 5.982, p = 0.039), presence of lesions in the left main trunk (OR = 51.381, p = 0.044), utilization of intra-aortic balloon pumps and percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (OR = 6.141, p = 0.016), and presence of multi-vessel disease (OR = 6.323, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Predictors of in-hospital death in AMI extend beyond conventional risk factors to include culprit lesions, mechanical support, and multi-vessel disease that manifest post-PCI.

Concomitant multi-vessel disease is associated with a lower procedural death rate in patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions within the left main coronary artery (from the ORPKI registry).

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we aimed to distinguish differences in the procedural complication rate in a group of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) between patients with isolated LMCA disease and multi-vessel disease (MVD) with LMCA involvement and to identify their predictors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We assessed 221,187 patients from the Polish Cardiovascular Intervention Society national registry (ORPKI) regarding all PCI procedures performed in Poland in 2015 and 2016. We extracted data of 1,819 patients with isolated LMCA disease and 3,718 patients with MVD and LMCA involvement. We compared those two groups in terms of procedural complications and their predictors. RESULTS: The overall rate of procedural complications was significantly higher in patients treated with LMCA PCI both in the group of patients with isolated LMCA (6.5%) and the group with MVD with LMCA involvement (7.3%) compared to the non-LMCA PCI group (1.9%, p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis confirmed that MVD with LMCA involvement is an independent predictor of decreased risk of procedural death in the overall group of patients undergoing PCI of the LMCA (odds ratio: 0.583; 95% confidence interval: 0.4-0.848; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The MVD involvement in patients treated with PCI of the LMCA may play a protective role. Patients with isolated LMCA involvement undergoing PCI should be subjected to special care and protected by various methods, such as devices to support left ventricle function.

Relationship between serum cystatin-c and coronary lesion severity in coronary artery disease patients with a normal glomerular filtration rate.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of death. This study evaluated the relationship between serum cystatin-c and coronary lesion severity in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with a normal glomerular filtration rate. METHODS: Nine hundred and fifty-nine patients were retrospectively included and divided into non-CAD and CAD groups according to coronary angiography results. CAD patients were classified into three groups by Gensini score tertiles. Multivariable logistic regression was used to study the relationship between serum cystatin-c and coronary lesion severity. RESULTS: Serum cystatin-c levels were significantly higher in CAD patients than in non-CAD patients. Correlation analysis revealed significant correlations between serum cystatin-c levels with the Gensini score and the number of diseased vessels. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of serum cystatin-c was 0.544 and 0.555 for predicting a high Gensini score and three-vessel disease, respectively. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis demonstrated that the serum cystatin-c level was an independent predictor of a high Gensini score [odds ratio (OR) = 2.177, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.140-3.930] and three-vessel disease (OR = 1.845, 95% CI 0.994-3.424) after adjusting for the conventional CAD risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Serum cystatin-c was elevated in CAD patients and may be an independent predictor of CAD severity.

Determinants of the Downward Trend in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Among Patients With Multivessel Disease and Class-I Indication for Surgery.

Introduction Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is the most effective coronary revascularization procedure, and it has been endorsed by many trials and studies over the years. However, due to CABG's immediate adverse effects, patients tend to prefer percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary revascularization over it. This article focuses on the recent downtrend in CABG procedures for revascularization among patients for whom it is indicated. This study's main objective was to identify the factors responsible for the downtrend in patients undergoing CABG despite a clear indication for it in those with multivessel diseases. Methods This study was conducted at the Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan, from August 1, 2020, to January 1, 2021. A total of 340 patients with a class-I indication (presence of conditions regarding which there is evidence and/or general agreement that a given procedure or treatment is beneficial, useful, and effective) for CABG were enrolled in the study. Data related to all the variables were collected from patients and hospital records through an adequately designed proforma. For analysis, we applied the chi-square test to elaborate on the data for information and point biserial correlation to rule out the effect of age and weight on CABG's downward trend. Results The mean age of the patients was 58.77 ± 9.54 years; 65.88% were male, and 34.12% were female. Only 17.65% of the patients underwent CABG; 71.47% opted for medical treatment, and 9.41% underwent PCI. Out of the 280 patients who did not undergo CABG, 26.76% had financial issues; 23.82% were high-risk patients and hence refused surgeries by the surgeons; 20.59% of patients were not willing to undergo surgery; 7.94% were on the waiting list, and 3.24% had deranged renal function tests (RFTs). Conclusions A limited number of patients underwent revascularization therapy even though they had clear indications for CABG. The high-risk status of patients, patients' unwillingness, and the cost of the procedure were the primary reasons behind the downtrend in CABG procedures among patients with a clear indication for the same.

Isolated Flailed P3 Scallop of the Mitral Valve Leaflet in the Setting of Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is characterized by typical fibromyxomatous changes in the mitral leaflet tissue with superior displacement of one or both leaflets into the left atrium. An echocardiogram is a fundamental study required for the diagnosis of MVP with a flail leaflet and grading of mitral regurgitation (MR) severity. Most patients with MVP have a risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality similar to that of the general population, though moderate to severe MR and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction less than 50% have been postulated to increase the risk of adverse cardiac events. In this case report, we present an isolated flailed P3 scallop of the mitral valve leaflet leading to severe MR and acute congestive heart failure. A 54-year-old African-American male with a medical history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and transient ischemic attack, presented to the emergency department (ED) for evaluation of dyspnea on exertion. The patient reported that his dyspnea started one week prior to ED visit and was associated with intermittent chest pain. He also endorsed mild orthopnea and lightheadedness, though he denied any syncopal event. Vital signs were found within normal limits on arrival. He clinically appeared to be volume overloaded which improved quickly with IV furosemide. Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) with 3D image acquisition showed significant for hyper-dynamic LV function and evidence of isolated flailed P3 scallop of the mitral valve (MV) leaflet resulting in a severe eccentric, anteriorly directed MR jet. The MV leaflets did not appear thickened, and there was no evidence of mitral or aortic stenosis. Cardiac catheterization showed multivessel disease for which the patient underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and MV repair. This patient presented with new-onset congestive heart failure secondary to severe MR associated with undiagnosed MVP. Commonly, the middle scallop (P2) of the posterior leaflet is more prone to prolapse due to its redundancy and variable thickness with the impact of greater systolic pressure. However, in this case of acute severe MR, we identified an isolated flail of the P3 segment. We believe that this rare TEE finding was associated with a torn chordae or ruptured papillary muscle secondary to ischemic disease as the posteromedial papillary muscle has a single blood supply and is particularly prompted to injury from myocardial infarction.

Complete revascularization for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after the COMPLETE trial: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The recently published COMPLETE trial has demonstrated that patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD), who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of both culprit and non-culprit (vs. culprit-only) lesions had a reduced risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), but not of cardiovascular or total mortality. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of complete revascularization on cardiovascular or total mortality reduction using available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including the COMPLETE trial, in hemodynamically stable STEMI patients with MVD. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov databases search identified 10 RCTs of 7033 patients with STEMI and MVD which compared complete (n = 3420) vs. only culprit lesion (n = 3613) PCI for a median 27.7 months follow-up. Random effect risk ratios were used to estimate for efficacy and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Complete revascularization reduced the risk of MACE (10.4% vs.16.6%; RR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.74, p < 0.0001), CV mortality (2.87% vs. 3.72%; RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.95, p = 0.02), reinfarction (5.1% vs. 7.1%; RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.86, p = 0.002), urgent revascularization (7.92% vs.17.4%; RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.73, p < 0.001), and CV hospitalization (8.68% vs.11.4%; RR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44to 0.96, p = 0.03) compared with culprit only revascularization. All-cause mortality, stroke, major bleeding events, or contrast induced nephropathy were not affected by the revascularization strategy. CONCLUSION: The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that in patients with STEMI and MVD, complete revascularization is superior to culprit-only PCI in reducing the risk of MACE outcomes, including cardiovascular mortality, without increasing the risk of adverse safety outcomes.

An Extremely Rare Case of Anomalous Left Main Coronary Artery Originating From Single Right Coronary Ostium Managed Using Heart Team Approach.

Anomalies of coronary artery origin are rare, difficult to diagnose using conventional testing methods and extremely challenging to eventually manage once diagnosed. The risk of adverse outcomes increases as such patients age and develop atherosclerosis in such vessels. A comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach may be required to best manage such difficult cases.  We present a case of a 65-year-old female with symptoms of chest pain concerning for unstable angina. She also complained of occasional diaphoresis and dizziness. Physical examination revealed a regular heart rhythm with no vascular bruits. An electrocardiogram (EKG) only showed normal sinus rhythm and left axis deviation. Non-invasive testing included an echocardiogram, which showed multiple wall motion abnormalities. A diagnostic cardiac catheterization via right radial artery approach was performed to delineate her coronary anatomy and rule out ischemic etiology. This led to diagnosis of anomalous coronary anatomy with an anomalous left main coronary artery from single right coronary ostium. Furthermore, it showed significant obstructive multi-vessel coronary artery disease involving distal left main artery, proximal left anterior descending artery, left circumflex and right coronary arteries. The patient had a right dominant system with absent left coronary cusp. Percutaneous vs surgical revascularization options were considered. Given high Syntax score and acceptable Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk, Heart Team approach was pursued and the patient was referred for multi-vessel surgical revascularization.