RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Whether long-term aspirin usage is associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk needs more evidence. The study evaluated the association between long-term aspirin use and prevalence of CRC in a large, nationally representative database. METHODS: Hospitalized patients aged ≥ 50 years during 2018 were identified in the United States (US) National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Patients without complete information of age, sex, race, income, and insurance status were excluded, as well as those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or malignancies other than CRC. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the characteristics between patients with and without long-term aspirin use. Logistic regressions were performed to determine the relationship between long-term aspirin use and the presence of CRC. CRC and aspirin use were identified through the administrative International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. RESULTS: Data from 3,490,226 patients were included, in which 688,018 (19.7%) had a record of long-term aspirin use. After 1:1 PSM, there remained 1,376,006 patients, representing 6,880,029 individuals in the US after weighting. After adjusting for confounders, long-term aspirin use was significantly associated with lower CRC odds (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62, 0.67). This association was not changed when stratified by age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), and smoking. CONCLUSIONS: From a national inpatient dataset, US adults ≥ 50 years on long-term aspirin are less likely to have CRC, regardless of age, sex, race, BMI, and smoking status.
Asunto(s)
Aspirina , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Pacientes Internos , Prevalencia , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report use trends of plasma exchange (PLEX) as well as sociodemographic and medical comorbidities associated with PLEX in the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients (≥ 18 years) admitted for inpatient hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of optic neuritis (ON). METHODS: Data from the National Inpatient Sample database was compiled to assess PLEX use rates between 2000 and 2020. The cohorts of patients receiving PLEX versus not receiving PLEX were analyzed between quarter 4 of 2015 through 2020 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10], only) for patient sociodemographic variables, medical diagnoses, insurance types, hospital characteristics, cause of disease, time to therapy, length of stay (LOS), and total charges incurred. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of ON, incidence of PLEX, demographics, diagnoses associated with PLEX therapy, total charges, and LOS. RESULTS: From 2000 through 2020, 11 209 patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of ON were identified, with a significant majority managed at urban teaching hospitals. Use of PLEX increased steadily over 2 decades from 0.63% to 5.46%. Use was greatest in the western United States and least in the eastern United States. In the subset of ICD-10 cases, 3215 patients were identified. The median time to therapy of PLEX was 1 day after admission, and PLEX use was highest in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) (21.21%) and lowest in multiple sclerosis-associated ON (3.80%). Use of PLEX was associated with significantly longer LOS and higher total charges incurred. Medical comorbidities associated with PLEX included adverse reaction to glucocorticoids (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 31.50), hemiplegia (aOR, 28.48), neuralgia (aOR, 4.81), optic atrophy (aOR, 3.74), paralytic strabismus (aOR, 2.36), and psoriasis (aOR, 1.76). CONCLUSIONS: Over the last 2 decades in the United States, PLEX therapy for ON has increased, with the highest use in the western United States and for patients with the diagnosis NMOSD ON. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Leadless pacemakers (LPM) have established themselves as the important therapeutic modality in management of selected patients with symptomatic bradycardia. To determine real-world utilization and in-hospital outcomes of LPM implantation since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration in 2016. METHODS: For this retrospective cohort study, data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database from the years 2016-2020. The outcomes analyzed in our study included implantation trends of LPM over study years, mortality, major complications (defined as pericardial effusion requiring intervention, any vascular complication, or acute kidney injury), length of stay, and cost of hospitalization. Implantation trends of LPM were assessed using linear regression. Using years 2016-2017 as a reference, adjusted outcomes of mortality, major complications, prolonged length of stay (defined as >6 days), and increased hospitalization cost (defined as median cost >34 098$) were analyzed for subsequent years using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: There was a gradual increased trend of LPM implantation over our study years (3230 devices in years 2016-2017 to 11 815 devices in year 2020, p for trend <.01). The adjusted mortality improved significantly after LPM implantation in subsequent years compared to the reference years 2016-2017 (aOR for the year 2018: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.51-0.73; aOR for the year 2019: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.41-0.59; and aOR for the year 2020: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.44-0.62). No differences in adjusted rates of major complications were demonstrated over the subsequent years. The adjusted cost of hospitalization was higher for the years 2019 (aOR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.22-1.46) and 2020 (aOR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.55-1.84). CONCLUSION: The contemporary US practice has shown significantly increased implantation rates of LPM since its approval with reduced rates of inpatient mortality.
Asunto(s)
Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial , Bases de Datos Factuales , Costos de Hospital , Tiempo de Internación , Marcapaso Artificial , Humanos , Marcapaso Artificial/tendencias , Marcapaso Artificial/economía , Estados Unidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/tendencias , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/economía , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/mortalidad , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bradicardia/terapia , Bradicardia/mortalidad , Bradicardia/diagnóstico , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Diseño de Equipo/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a medical emergency that requires immediate surgical intervention. The aim of this analysis was to identify the sex- and race-specific disparities that exist in outcomes of patients hospitalized with this condition in the United States using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to identify targets for improvement and support of specific patient populations. METHODS: In this descriptive, retrospective study, we analyzed the patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of ruptured AAA between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020, using the NIS database. We compared demographics, comorbidities, and in-hospital outcomes in AAA patients, and compared these results between different racial groups and sexes. RESULTS: A total of 22,395 patients with ruptured AAA were included for analysis. Of these, 16,125 patients (72.0%) were male, and 6270 were female (28.0%). The majority of patients (18,655 [83.3%]) identified as Caucasian, with the remaining patients identifying as African American (1555 [6.9%]), Hispanic (1095 [4.9%]), Asian or Pacific Islander (470 [2.1%]), or Native American (80 [0.5%]). Females had a higher risk of mortality than males (OR, 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-1.96; P < .001) and were less likely to undergo endovascular aortic repair (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.81; P < .001) or fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.91; P = .007). Relative to Caucasian race, patients who identified as African American had a lower risk of inpatient mortality (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.37-0.68; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study of the NIS database from 2016 to 2020, females were less likely to undergo endovascular intervention and more likely to die during their initial hospitalization. African American patients had lower rates in-hospital mortality than Caucasian patients, despite a higher burden of comorbidities. Future studies are needed to elucidate the potential factors affecting racial and sex disparities in ruptured AAA outcomes, including screening practices, rupture risk stratification, and more personalized guidelines for both elective and emergent intervention.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Rotura de la Aorta , Bases de Datos Factuales , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Pacientes Internos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/etnología , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/etnología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Anciano , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/etnología , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Medición de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Factores RacialesRESUMEN
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is the most common neurocutaneous syndrome in the United States, affecting every 1 in 3000 individuals. NF1 occurs due to non-functional mutations in the NF1 gene, which expresses neurofibromin, a protein involved in tumour suppression. As a result, NF1 typically presents with non-cancerous neoplasm masses called neurofibromas across the body. Out of all NF1 abnormalities, the most common skeletal abnormality seen in around 10%-30% of NF1 patients is scoliosis, an improver curvature of the spine. However, there is a lack of research on the effects of scoliosis on demographics and morbidities of NF1 patients. We performed a national analysis to investigate the complex relationship between NF1 and scoliosis on patients' demographics and comorbidities. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the 2017 US National Inpatient Sample database using univariable Chi-square analysis and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis to determine the interplay of NF1 and scoliosis on patients' demographics and comorbidities. Our query resulted in 4635 total NF1 patients, of which 475 (10.25%) had scoliosis and 4160 (89.75%) did not. Demographic analysis showed that NF1 patients with scoliosis were typically younger, female and white compared to NF1 patients without scoliosis. Comorbidity analysis showed that NF1 patients with scoliosis were more likely to develop malignant brain neoplasms, epilepsy, hydrocephalus, pigmentation disorders, hypothyroidism, diabetes with chronic complications and coagulopathy disorders. NF1 patients with scoliosis were less likely to develop congestive heart failure, pulmonary circulation disease, peripheral vascular disease, paralysis, chronic pulmonary disease, lymphoma and psychosis. NF1 patients with scoliosis were predominantly younger, female, white patients. The presence of scoliosis in NF1 patients increases the risks for certain brain neoplasms and disorders but serves a protective effect against some pulmonary and cardiac complications.
Asunto(s)
Neurofibromatosis 1 , Escoliosis , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Neurofibromatosis 1/complicaciones , Neurofibromatosis 1/epidemiología , Neurofibromatosis 1/genética , Escoliosis/complicaciones , Escoliosis/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pacientes Internos , Estudios Transversales , Comorbilidad , DemografíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis (AP) often presents with varying severity, with a small fraction evolving into severe AP, and is associated with high mortality. Complications such as intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) are intricately associated with AP. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical implications and predictors of ACS in AP patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database on adult AP patients, further stratified by the presence of concurrent ACS. The data extraction included demographics, underlying comorbidities, and clinical outcomes. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were performed using STATA (v.14.2). RESULTS: Of the 1,099,175 adult AP patients, only 1,090 (0.001%) exhibited ACS. AP patients with ACS had elevated inpatient mortality and all major complications, including septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), requirement for total parenteral nutrition (TPN), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (P < 0.01). These patients also exhibited increased odds of requiring pancreatic drainage and necrosectomy (P < 0.01). Predictor analysis identified blood transfusion, obesity (BMI ≥30), and admission to large teaching hospitals as factors associated with the development of ACS in AP patients. Conversely, age, female gender, biliary etiology of AP, and smoking were found less frequently in patients with ACS. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare resource utilization associated with the concurrence of ACS in AP patients. We identified potential factors associated with ACS in AP patients. Significantly worse outcomes in ACS necessitate the need for early diagnosis, meticulous monitoring, and targeted therapeutic interventions for AP patients at risk of developing ACS.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Intraabdominal , Pancreatitis , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Hipertensión Intraabdominal/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Incidencia , Enfermedad AgudaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: A surgical "treatment gap" in pediatric epilepsy persists despite the demonstrated safety and effectiveness of surgery. For this reason, the national surgical landscape should be investigated such that an updated assessment may more appropriately guide health care efforts. METHODS: In our retrospective cross-sectional observational study, the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for individuals 0 to <18 years of age who had an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This cohort was then split into a medical group and a surgical group. The former was defined by ICD codes for -DRE without an accompanying surgical code, and the latter was defined by DRE and one of the following epilepsy surgeries: any open surgery; laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT); vagus nerve stimulation; or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) from 1998 to 2020. Demographic variables of age, gender, race, insurance type, hospital charge, and hospital characteristics were analyzed between surgical options. Continuous variables were analyzed with weight-adjusted quantile regression analysis, and categorical variables were analyzed by weight-adjusted counts with percentages and compared with weight-adjusted chi-square test results. RESULTS: These data indicate an increase in epilepsy surgeries over a 22-year period, primarily due to a statistically significant increase in open surgery and a non-significant increase in minimally invasive techniques, such as LITT and RNS. There are significant differences in age, race, gender, insurance type, median household income, Elixhauser index, hospital setting, and size between the medical and surgical groups, as well as the procedure performed. SIGNIFICANCE: An increase in open surgery and minimally invasive surgeries (LITT and RNS) account for the overall rise in pediatric epilepsy surgery over the last 22 years. A positive inflection point in open surgery is seen in 2005. Socioeconomic disparities exist between medical and surgical groups. Patient and hospital sociodemographics show significant differences between the procedure performed. Further efforts are required to close the surgical "treatment gap."
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Refractaria , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Preescolar , Lactante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Epilepsia Refractaria/cirugía , Recién Nacido , Estimulación del Nervio Vago , Estados Unidos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/tendencias , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Epilepsia/cirugíaRESUMEN
AIM: Preoperative frailty has been associated with adverse postoperative outcomes in various populations, but of its use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains sparse. The present study aimed to characterize the impact of frailty, as measured by the modified frailty index (mFI), on postoperative clinical and resource utilization outcomes in patients with IBD. METHODS: This retrospective population-based cohort study assessed patients from the National Inpatient Sample database from 1 September 2015 to 31 December 2019. Corresponding International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision Clinical Modification codes were used to identify adult patients (>18 years of age) with IBD, undergoing either small bowel resection, colectomy or proctectomy. Patient demographics and institutional data were collected for each patient to calculate the 11-point mFI. Patients were categorized as either frail or robust using a cut-off of 0.27. Primary outcomes were postoperative in-hospital morbidity and mortality, whilst secondary outcomes included system-specific morbidity, length of stay, in-hospital healthcare costs and discharge disposition. Logistic and linear regression models were used for primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 7144 patients with IBD undergoing small bowel resection, colectomy or proctectomy were identified, 337 of whom were classified as frail (i.e., mFI < 0.27). Frail patients were more likely to be women, older, have lower income and a greater number of comorbidities. After adjusting for relevant covariates, frail patients were at greater odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.42, 95% CI 2.31-12.77, P < 0.001), overall morbidity (aOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.30-2.28, P < 0.001), increased length of stay (adjusted mean difference 1.3 days, 95% CI 0.09-2.50, P = 0.035) and less likely to be discharged to home (aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45-0.77, P < 0.001) compared to their robust counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Frail IBD patients are at greater risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity, and reduced likelihood of discharge to home, following surgery. This has implications for clinicians designing care pathways for IBD patients following surgery.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Fragilidad , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Proctectomía , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/cirugía , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Adulto , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Proctectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Bases de Datos Factuales , Intestino Delgado/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Liver transplant recipients (LTR) and patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) are at an increased risk of infections. AIMS: The objective of our study was to assess the incidence, and impact of vaccine preventable illness (VPI) on outcomes in LTR. METHODS: National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016-2020 was used to identify adults (age > 18) hospitalized LTR using ICD-10 codes. Data were collected on patient demographics, hospital characteristics, etiology of liver disease, hepatic decompensations and outcomes. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the presence or absence of VPI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the association between VPI and outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 170,650 hospitalized LTR, 13.5% of the patients had VPI. The most common VPI was noted to be influenza (10.7%), followed by pneumococcal infection (2.7%). Incidence of mortality (6.9% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001), ICU admissions (14.3% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001), and acute kidney injury (AKI) (43.7% vs 37.35%, p < 0.001) was higher in the VPI group. CONCLUSION: More than 13% of the LT hospitalizations had concomitant VPI. VPI in LTR was associated with worse outcomes. Our data suggests the need to identify factors associated with reduced vaccination rates and identify strategies to improve vaccination rates and responses in these patients.
Asunto(s)
Hepatopatías , Trasplante de Hígado , Vacunas , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización , Hepatopatías/epidemiología , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Vacunación , Vacunas/efectos adversos , Enfermedad CrónicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous pneumothorax (PTX) is more prevalent among COVID-19 patients than other critically ill patients, but studies on this are limited. This study compared clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes among COVID-19 patients with concomitant PTX to provide insight into how PTX affects health care utilization and complications, which informs clinical decisions and healthcare resource allocation. METHODS: The 2020 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used analyze patient demographics and outcomes, including age, race, sex, insurance status, median income, length of hospital stay, mortality rate, hospitalization costs, comorbidities, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor support. Propensity score matching was employed for additional analysis. RESULTS: Among 1,572,815 COVID-19 patients, 1.41% had PTX. These patients incurred significantly higher hospitalization costs ($435,508 vs. $96,668, p < 0.001) and longer stays (23.6 days vs. 8.6 days, p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was substantially elevated for PTX patients (65.8% vs. 14.4%, p < 0.001), with an adjusted odds ratio of 14.3 (95% CI 12.7-16.2). Additionally, these patients were more likely to require vasopressors (16.6% vs. 3.3%), mechanical circulatory support (3.5% vs. 0.3%), hemodialysis (16.6% vs. 5.6%), invasive mechanical ventilation (76.9% vs. 15.1%), non-invasive mechanical ventilation (19.1% vs. 5.8%), tracheostomy (13.3% vs. 1.1%), and chest tube placement (59.8% vs. 0.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the severe impact of PTX on COVID-19 patients, characterized by higher mortality, more complications, and increased resource utilization. Also, being Hispanic, male, or obese increased the risk of developing concomitant PTX with COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Neumotórax , Puntaje de Propensión , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Neumotórax/mortalidad , Neumotórax/terapia , Adulto , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial/economía , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Comorbilidad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) can ensue permanent neurologic dysfunction, morbidity, and mortality. While previous reports have identified disparities based on patient gender or weight, no prior study has assessed how race may influence in neonatal or infantile IVH patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of race on adverse event (AE) rates, length of stay (LOS), and total cost of admission among newborns with IVH. METHODS: Using the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample database, newborns diagnosed with IVH were identified using ICD-10-CM codes. Patients were stratified based on race. Patient characteristics and inpatient outcomes were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the impact of race on extended LOS and exorbitant cost. RESULTS: Of 1435 patients, 650 were White (45.3%), 270 African American (AA) (18.8%), 300 Hispanic (20.9%), and 215 Other (15.0%). A higher percentage of AA and Other patients than Hispanic and White patients were < 28 days old (p = 0.008). Each of the cohorts had largely similar presenting comorbidities and symptoms, although AA patients did have significantly higher rates of NEC (p < 0.001). There were no observed differences in rates of AEs, rates of mortality, mean LOS, or mean total cost of admission. Similarly, on multivariate analysis, no race was identified as a significant independent predictor of extended LOS or exorbitant cost. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that in newborns with IVH, race is not associated with proxies of poor healthcare outcomes like prolonged LOS or excessive cost. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.
Asunto(s)
Tiempo de Internación , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Femenino , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Negro o Afroamericano , Hemorragia Cerebral Intraventricular/epidemiología , Hemorragia Cerebral/etnología , Hemorragia Cerebral/epidemiología , Hemorragia Cerebral/economía , Hemorragia Cerebral/mortalidad , Población BlancaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In this study, we investigate the evolution of lumbar fusion surgery with robotic assistance, specifically focusing on the impact of robotic technology on pedicle screw placement and fixation. Utilizing data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) covering 2016 to 2019, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of postoperative outcomes and costs for single-level lumbar fusion surgery. Traditionally, freehand techniques for pedicle screw placement posed risks, leading to the development of robotic-assisted techniques with advantages such as reduced misplacement, increased precision, smaller incisions, and decreased surgeon fatigue. However, conflicting study results regarding the efficacy of robotic assistance in comparison to conventional techniques have prompted the need for a thorough evaluation. With a dataset of 461,965 patients, our aim is to provide insights into the impact of robotic assistance on patient care and healthcare resource utilization. Our primary goal is to contribute to the ongoing discourse on the efficacy of robotic technology in lumbar fusion procedures, offering meaningful insights for optimizing patient-centered care and healthcare resource allocation. METHODS: This study employed data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) spanning the years 2016 to 2019 from USA, 461,965 patients underwent one-level lumbar fusion surgery, with 5770 of them having the surgery with the assistance of robotic technology. The study focused primarily on one-level lumbar fusion surgery and excluded non-elective cases and those with prior surgeries. The analysis encompassed the identification of comorbidities, surgical etiologies, and complications using specific ICD-10 codes. Throughout the study, a constant comparison was made between robotic and non-robotic lumbar fusion procedures. Various statistical methods were applied, with a p value threshold of < 0.05, to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Robotic-assisted lumbar fusion surgeries demonstrated a significant increase from 2016 to 2019, comprising 1.25% of cases. Both groups exhibited similar patient demographics, with minor differences in payment methods, favoring Medicare in non-robotic surgery and more private payer usage in robotic surgery. A comparison of comorbid conditions revealed differences in the prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and sleep apnea diagnoses-In terms of hospitalization outcomes and costs, there was a slight shorter hospital stay of 3.06 days, compared to 3.13 days in non-robotic surgery, showcasing a statistically significant difference (p = 0.042). Robotic surgery has higher charges, with a mean charge of $154,673, whereas non-robotic surgery had a mean charge of $125,467 (p < 0.0001). Robotic surgery demonstrated lower rates of heart failure, acute coronary artery disease, pulmonary edema, venous thromboembolism, and traumatic spinal injury compared to non-robotic surgery, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Conversely, robotic surgery demonstrated increased post-surgery anemia and blood transfusion requirements compared to non-robotic patients (p < 0.0001). Renal disease prevalence was similar before surgery, but acute kidney injury was slightly higher in the robotic group post-surgery (p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: This is the first big data study on this matter, our study showed that Robotic-assisted lumbar fusion surgery has fewer post-operative complications such as heart failure, acute coronary artery disease, pulmonary edema, venous thromboembolism, and traumatic spinal injury in comparison to conventional methods. Conversely, robotic surgery demonstrated increased post-surgery anemia, blood transfusion and acute kidney injury. Robotic surgery has higher charges compared to non-robotic surgery.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Lumbares , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Fusión Vertebral/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/estadística & datos numéricos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Pacientes Internos , Tornillos PedicularesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study provides an in-depth analysis of the immediate postoperative outcomes and implications or robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) compared with conventional TKA (C-TKA), particularly with regard to mortality, complications, hospital stay and costs, drawing from a comprehensive nationwide data set. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, the largest all-payer inpatient healthcare database in the United States, was used to identify all patients who underwent RA-TKA or C-TKA from 2016 to 2019. A total of 527,376 cases, representing 2,638,679 patients who underwent elective TKA were identified, of which 88,415 had RA-TKA. To mitigate potential variations and selection bias in baseline characteristics between the two groups, a propensity score-matched analysis was employed to further balance and refine our data set, resulting in 176,830 patients evenly distributed between the groups. Analysis was performed according to demographics, immediate post-operative complications, and economic data, including payor class, length of stay and total charges. RESULTS: There was a marked shift towards RA-TKA, from an initial 0.70% in 2016 to a notable 7.30% by 2019. Patients who underwent RA-TKA were slightly younger (66.2 ± SD years), compared to the C-TKA group (66.7 ± SD years). Hospital stay was 1.89 days and 2.29 days for RA-TKA and C-TKA, respectively. Charges metrics revealed slightly higher charges for RA-TKA. Less postoperative complications were found in the RA-TKA group, such as blood loss, anaemia, acute kidney injury, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia and surgical wound complication. Even following the propensity score matching, these findings remained consistent and statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: RA-TKA use in the United States has grown substantially in the last few years and has been associated with significantly reduced immediate post-operative complications and length of hospital stay compared to C-TKA, offering safer surgical management for TKA patients. Further studies on the short- and long-term outcomes of RA-TKA would improve the understanding of the full potential of this technology. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine risk factors for poor in-hospital outcomes in a large cohort of older adult patients with acute non-traffic traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). METHODS: This is a population-based, retrospective, observational study. Data of older adults ≥65 years with a primary discharge diagnosis of acute non-traffic tSCI were extracted from the US National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database 2005-2018. Traffic-related tSCI admissions or patients lacking complete data on age, sex and outcomes of interest were excluded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine associations between variables and in-hospital outcomes. RESULTS: Data of 49,449 older patients (representing 246,939 persons in the US) were analyzed. The mean age was 79.9 years. Multivariable analyses revealed that severe International Classification of Disease (ICD)-based injury severity score (ICISS) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.77-3.57), quadriplegia (aOR = 2.79, 95%CI: 2.34-3.32), paraplegia (aOR = 2.60, 95%CI:1.89-3.58), cervical injury with vertebral fracture (aOR = 2.19, 95%CI: 1.90-2.52), and severe liver disease (aOR = 2.33, 95%CI: 1.34-4.04) were all strong independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. In addition, malnutrition (aOR = 3.19, 95% CI: 2.93-3.48) was the strongest predictors of prolonged length of stay (LOS). CONCLUSIONS: Several critical factors for in-hospital mortality, unfavorable discharge, and prolonged LOS among US older adults with acute non-traffic tSCI were identified. In addition to the factors associated with initial severity, the presence of severe liver disease and malnutrition emerged as strong predictors of unfavorable outcomes, highlighting the need for special attention for these patient subgroups.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Studies investigating the link between mental health disorders and complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have found worse outcomes in individuals with such disorders. Therefore, risk factors and outcomes following TKA in patients with schizophrenia should be better understood. This study aims to investigate cost and duration of hospital stay, inpatient complications, and mortality associated with TKA in patients with schizophrenia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Utilizing the NIS database from 2016 to 2019, patients that underwent TKA were selected using ICD-10 codes. The selected patients were classified into a schizophrenia or control group and cost, hospitalization length, complications, and mortality rates were compared between the two groups in an unmatched and matched analysis. RESULTS: Our study dataset consisted of 558,371 patients that underwent a TKA during 2016 to 2019. 1,015 (0.2%) patients in the sample had a diagnosis of schizophrenia while the remaining 557,357 (99.8%) patients had no record of schizophrenia. An unmatched analysis found that schizophrenia patients had longer duration of hospital stay and greater charges incurred. Acute renal failure, myocardial infarction (MI), blood loss anemia, pneumonia, DVT, periprosthetic fracture, prosthetic dislocation, and periprosthetic infections were post-op complications with higher rates in the schizophrenia group. A matched cohort analysis found that schizophrenia patients still had longer duration of hospital stay and greater charges incurred. However, only acute renal failure, blood loss anemia, and pneumonia were found at higher rates in the schizophrenia group following TKA. CONCLUSIONS: Schizophrenia patients had a significantly longer hospital stay and increased charges acquired during their stay compared to the control group following TKA. Acute renal failure, blood loss anemia, and pneumonia were medical complications with an increased risk following TKA in patients with schizophrenia in a matched analysis. Increased care during the perioperative period following TKA in individuals with schizophrenia is thus warranted.
RESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused several cardiovascular complications, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), in infected patients. This study aims to understand the overall trends of AMI among COVID-19 patients during the first two years of the pandemic and the disparities and outcomes between the first and second years. Materials and Methods: The retrospective analysis was conducted via the 2020 and 2021 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for hospitalizations between April 2020 and December 2021 being analyzed for adults with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 who experienced events of AMI. A comparison of month-to-month events of AMI and mortality of AMI patients with concomitant COVID-19 was made alongside their respective patient characteristics. Results: Out of 2,541,992 COVID-19 hospitalized patients, 3.55% experienced AMI. The highest rate of AMI was in December 2021 (4.35%). No statistical differences in trends of AMI mortality were noted over the 21 months. AMI cases in 2021 had higher odds of undergoing PCI (aOR 1.627, p < 0.01). They experienced higher risks of acute kidney injury (aOR 1.078, p < 0.01), acute ischemic stroke (aOR 1.215, p < 0.01), cardiac arrest (aOR 1.106, p < 0.01), need for mechanical ventilation (aOR 1.133, p < 0.01), and all-cause mortality (aOR 1.032, 95% CI 1.001-1.064, p = 0.043). Conclusions: The incidence of AMI among COVID-19 patients fluctuated over the 21 months of this study, with a peak in December 2021. COVID-19 patients reporting AMI in 2021 experienced higher overall odds of multiple complications, which could relate to the exhaustive burden of the pandemic in 2021 on healthcare, the changing impact of the virus variants, and the hesitancy of infected patients to seek care.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infarto del Miocardio , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias , Adulto , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Iodinated Contrast Media (ICM) is used daily in many imaging departments worldwide. The main risk associated with ICM is hypersensitivity. When a severe hypersensitivity reaction is not properly managed and treated swiftly, it may be fatal. Currently, there is no data to demonstrate how ICM sensitivity affects the prognosis of cardiac patients, especially those diagnosed with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), in whom urgent coronary angiography is indicated. This study aimed to identify and characterize this relationship. Materials and Methods: We included patients hospitalized with STEMI between 2016 and 2019 from the National Inpatient Sample. The population was compared based on ICM sensitivity status, sensitive vs. non-sensitive. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality, with additional endpoints: length of stay and in-hospital complications. Results: The study included 664,620 STEMI patients, of whom 4905 (0.7%) were diagnosed with ICM sensitivity. ICM-sensitive patients were older, more often white, females, and had more comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors. Both groups show similarities in management but are slightly less probable to undergo PCI or CABG. Multivariable logistic regression models found that the ICM-sensitive population had similar odds of in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.89-1.16) and MACCE (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.95-1.16), and less major bleeding (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60-0.87). Conclusions: Our study found that ICM sensitivity status was not a significant factor for worse prognosis in patients hospitalized with STEMI.
Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Humanos , Femenino , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Modelos Logísticos , Yodo/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hospitalization burden related to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is substantial. We sought to describe temporal trends in hospitalization rates before and after release of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents. METHODS: We analyzed 2000-2019 data from adults aged ≥18 years in the National Inpatient Sample. Hospitalizations were HCV-related if (1) hepatitis C was the primary diagnosis, or (2) hepatitis C was any secondary diagnosis with a liver-related primary diagnosis. We analyzed characteristics of HCV-related hospitalizations nationally and examined trends in age-adjusted hospitalization rates. RESULTS: During 2000-2019, there were an estimated 1 286 397 HCV-related hospitalizations in the United States. The annual age-adjusted hospitalization rate was lowest in 2019 (18.7/100 000 population) and highest in 2012 (29.6/100 000 population). Most hospitalizations occurred among persons aged 45-64 years (71.8%), males (67.1%), White non-Hispanic persons (60.5%), and Medicaid/Medicare recipients (64.0%). The national age-adjusted hospitalization rate increased during 2000-2003 (annual percentage change [APC], 9.4%; P < .001) and 2003-2013 (APC, 1.8%; P < .001) before decreasing during 2013-2019 (APC, -7.6%; P < .001). Comparing 2000 to 2019, the largest increases in hospitalization rates occurred among persons aged 55-64 years (132.9%), Medicaid recipients (41.6%), and Black non-Hispanic persons (22.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Although multiple factors likely contributed, overall HCV-related hospitalization rates declined steadily after 2013, coinciding with the release of DAAs. However, the declines were not observed equally among age, race/ethnicity, or insurance categories. Expanded access to DAA treatment is needed, particularly among Medicaid and Medicare recipients, to reduce disparities and morbidity and eliminate hepatitis C as a public health threat.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C Crónica , Hepatitis C , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adolescente , Hepacivirus , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Medicare , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/complicaciones , HospitalizaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is characterized by humoral and/or cellular immune-mediated hemolysis of red blood cells. The role of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in AIHA is unclear. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for 2002-2019 to identify hospitalizations with the primary diagnosis of AIHA. We included hospitalizations with the highest severity subclass identified by All Patient Refined Disease Related Group (APR-DRG). We used multivariate regression analysis to compare in-hospital mortality and other relevant in-hospital outcomes between hospitalizations that received TPE and those that did not. RESULTS: We identified 255 weighted hospitalizations in the TPE group and 4973 in the control group. Those in the control group were older (median age 67 vs. 48 years, p < .001) and had a higher prevalence of most comorbidities. The TPE group had higher odds of all-cause in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-2.11). They also had higher rates of many secondary outcomes, including requiring mechanical ventilation, developing circulatory shock, acute stroke, urinary tract infections, intracranial hemorrhage, acute kidney injury, and requiring new hemodialysis. No significant differences were noted in the rates of acute myocardial infarctions, bacterial pneumonia, sepsis/septicemia, thromboembolic events, and other bleeding events. Furthermore, the TPE group had a higher median length of hospital stay (19 vs. 9 days, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Hospitalizations with severe AIHA that received TPE had higher rates of adverse in-hospital outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Anemia Hemolítica Autoinmune , Intercambio Plasmático , Humanos , Anciano , Anemia Hemolítica Autoinmune/epidemiología , Anemia Hemolítica Autoinmune/terapia , Pacientes Internos , Plasmaféresis , HospitalizaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pancreatitis is one of the leading causes of gastrointestinal-related hospitalization, with significant morbidity and mortality. SARS-COV-2 virus can access the pancreas via angiotensin-converting enzymes and can cause direct and indirect injury to the pancreatic parenchyma. The objective of this study to understand clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with and without pancreatitis utilizing National Inpatient Sample database. METHODS: We utilized the United States National Inpatient Sample database to study clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection (a total of 1,659,040 hospitalized patients with 10,075 (0.6 %) with pancreatitis) between January 1 to December 31, 2020, along with propensity matching. RESULTS: While after propensity matching, we did not find a statistical difference in in-hospital mortality amongst COVID-19 patients with pancreatitis compared to COVID-19 patients without pancreatitis (13.2 % vs 10.3 %, adjusted odds ratio: 0.7 [95 % CI 0.5-1], p = 0.11). Patients with COVID-19 and pancreatitis had more episodes of septic shock, higher incidence of acute kidney injury and acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis. We also found an increased prevalence of NASH cirrhosis, alcohol liver cirrhosis, and a lesser incidence of pulmonary embolisms in the COVID-19 with pancreatitis cohort. CONCLUSION: Worse in-hospital outcomes, including increased incidence of septic shock, acute kidney injury, and acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection and pancreatitis, emphasize the need for more research to understand the effect of COVID-19 disease in hospitalized patients with pancreatitis and in the role of vaccination to improve long term outcome in this patient population.