RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To prospectively investigate how Buscopan affects the diagnosis of bowel inflammation by diffusion-weighted imaging MR enterography (DWI-MRE) in Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Thirty CD patients without previous bowel surgery underwent DWI-MRE (b = 900 sec/mm2) before and after intravenous Buscopan. The 30 patients were randomly divided into two groups; using a crossover design, interpretations were made regarding the presence of restricted mural diffusion (i.e., bowel inflammation) in nine bowel segments in two separate reading sessions by two readers. The readers also judged restricted mural diffusion extent in each bowel segment on two side-by-side DWI-MRE images with a random right-to-left order. Ileocolonoscopy and conventional MRE interpreted by an expert panel were reference standards. RESULTS: We analyzed 262 bowel segments. DWI-MRE without Buscopan significantly decreased sensitivity for both readers (58.8 % vs. 72.9 %, P = 0.046; 57.6 % vs. 85.9 %, P = 0.001) and did not significantly increase specificity (P = 0.085 and 0.396). Two readers noted that 28.6 % and 23.3 % of 262 bowel segments had greater diffusion restriction extent on DWI-MRE with Buscopan compared with DWI-MRE without Buscopan (P < 0.001) and 68.7 % and 74 %, respectively, had similar extent between them. CONCLUSION: Omitting Buscopan caused a greater loss in sensitivity of DWI-MRE than false-positive reduction for diagnosing bowel inflammation in CD. KEY POINTS: ⢠Omitting Buscopan significantly decreases DWI-MRE sensitivity for diagnosing bowel inflammation in CD. ⢠Increase in the corresponding DWI-MRE specificity by omitting Buscopan is less apparent. ⢠DWI-MRE without Buscopan underestimates the extent of bowel inflammation in CD.
Asunto(s)
Bromuro de Butilescopolamonio/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Parasimpatolíticos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Estudios Cruzados , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/normas , Femenino , Gastroenteritis/diagnóstico , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of the administration of subconjunctival 1% atropine (SA), topical 1% atropine (A), 0.5% tropicamide (T), 1% homatropine (H), 10% phenylephrine (P), and 2% ibopamine (I) on intraocular pressure (IOP), pupil diameter (PD), ruminal motility (RM) and intestinal motility (IM) in sheep. ANIMAL STUDIED: Ten spayed ewes of Santa Inês breed. PROCEDURES: Six experiments were performed separately at 1-week intervals. One eye was randomly selected and received one drop of A, T, H, P, I, or subconjunctival injection of atropine at 8 a.m. On the following days, IOP and PD were evaluated every 8 h until the pupil returned to its normal diameter. Ruminal motility and intestinal motility were evaluated only within the first 13 h. RESULTS: The IOP did not change significantly in the treated eyes compared with the control eyes and baseline at any time point (P > 0.05). A longer-lasting pupil dilation was observed after the administration of A (96 h), SA (79 h), H (24 h), and T (24 h). Within the first 30 min after treatment, RM and IM decreased, by 78% and 82% (H), 76% and 86% (SA), 46% and 58% (A), and 62% and 70% (T) (P < 0.001), respectively, with a tendency to return to baseline values following 13 h of drug administration. Both 10% phenylephrine and 2% ibopamine did not have any effect on the parameters evaluated (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Topical and subconjunctival 1% atropine, 0.5% tropicamide, and 1% homatropine significantly reduced RM and IM, and induced pupil dilation but did not change IOP in eyes of healthy sheep. The sympathomimetics phenylephrine (10%) and ibopamine (2%) did not change the parameters evaluated.
Asunto(s)
Motilidad Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Presión Intraocular/efectos de los fármacos , Midriáticos/farmacología , Pupila/efectos de los fármacos , Rumen/efectos de los fármacos , Ovinos/fisiología , Animales , Vías de Administración de Medicamentos , Femenino , Midriáticos/administración & dosificación , Rumen/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Chronic diarrhea is usually associated with a number of non-infectious causes. When definitive treatment is unavailable, symptomatic drug therapy is indicated. Pharmacologic agents for chronic diarrhea include loperamide, 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists, diosmectite, cholestyramine, probiotics, antispasmodics, rifaximin, and anti-inflammatory agents. Loperamide, a synthetic opiate agonist, decreases peristaltic activity and inhibits secretion, resulting in the reduction of fluid and electrolyte loss and an increase in stool consistency. Cholestyramine is a bile acid sequestrant that is generally considered as the first-line treatment for bile acid diarrhea. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have significant benefits in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with diarrhea. Ramosetron improves stool consistency as well as global IBS symptoms. Probiotics may have a role in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. However, data on the role of probiotics in the treatment of chronic diarrhea are lacking. Diosmectite, an absorbent, can be used for the treatment of chronic functional diarrhea, radiation-induced diarrhea, and chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Antispasmodics including alverine citrate, mebeverine, otilonium bromide, and pinaverium bromide are used for relieving diarrheal symptoms and abdominal pain. Rifaximin can be effective for chronic diarrhea associated with IBS and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Budesonide is effective in both lymphocytic colitis and collagenous colitis. The efficacy of mesalazine in microscopic colitis is weak or remains uncertain. Considering their mechanisms of action, these agents should be prescribed properly.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Psychotropics and antiepileptics (AE) are medications commonly used among the aged with cognitive decline or dementia, although they may precipitate further cognitive decline. Our aim was to analyze the relationships between the use of (i) psychotropics (i.e. benzodiazepines or related drugs, BZD, antipsychotics, AP, or antidepressants, AD), opioids (Op), anticholinergics (ACh) or AEs or the concomitant use of two of these drugs, and (ii) the risk of precipitous cognitive decline in an older (≥65 years) cognitively disabled population. METHODS: A longitudinal population-based study of general aged community-dwelling patients was executed in two phases (1990-1991 and 1998-1999) in Lieto, Finland. Fifty-two individuals cognitively disabled (MMSE score 0-23) at the 1990-1991 baseline form this study's sample. Cognitive abilities were assessed in each phase with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and medication utilization data were collected in both phases. The mean follow-up time was 7.6 years. Multivariate models were used to analyze the change in MMSE total score between medication users and non-users. RESULTS: BZD or any psychotropic use was associated with greater cognitive decline in elders aged ≥75 years compared to non-users (change in MMSE sum score: -8.6 ± 7.0 vs. -3.3 ± 5.6 and -5.9 ± 7.0 vs. -2.7 ± 6.4, respectively). A greater decline was also associated specifically with the concomitant use of BZD and AP (-16 vs. -1.4 ± 7.8); as were BZD and any drug with CNS effects (-9.6 ± 9.9 vs. -1.3 ± 7.2) compared to non-users. The concomitant use of BZD and AD (-10.7 ± 4.7 vs. -3.2 ± 5.6) or ACh (-15.0 ± 8.5 vs. -3.3 ± 5.6) or any drug with CNS effects (-13.3 ± 6.5 vs. -3.3 ± 5.6) was associated with cognitive decline in patients ≥75 years compared to non-users of any drug with CNS effects. CONCLUSION: The use of a BZD or any psychotropic medication may be an independent risk factor for cognitive decline in the cognitively disabled aged, and patients co-prescribed psychotropic medications had greater cognitive decline. Studies with larger sample sizes and studies on possible pathophysiologic mechanisms are needed.