Facedown Positioning in Macular Hole Surgery: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.

TOPIC: To assess the anatomical and visual effects of facedown positioning (FDP) advice in patients undergoing vitrectomy with gas tamponade for idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs), and to explore differential treatment effects by macular hole size and FDP duration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The necessity and duration of FDP for FTMH closure remain contentious, with no consensus guidelines. METHODS: Prospectively registered systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing FDP to no FDP (nFDP) across the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and clinical trial registries from January 2000 to March 2023 (CRD42023395152). All adults with idiopathic FTMHs undergoing vitrectomy with gas tamponade were included. The main outcomes were primary macular hole closure and post-operative visual acuity at 6 months or nearest time point. RESULTS: Of 8 eligible trials, 5 contributed IPD for 379 eyes and were included in our analysis. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for primary closure with FDP versus nFDP was 2.41 (95% CI 0.98 to 5.93, P = 0.06) [GRADE: Low], translating to a relative risk (RR) of 1.08 (1.00 to 1.11) and a number needed to treat (NNT) of 15. The FDP group exhibited a mean improvement in post-operative visual acuity of -0.08 logMAR (-0.13 to -0.02, P = 0.006) [GRADE: Low] compared to the nFDP group. Benefits were more certain in participants with larger holes of minimum linear diameter ≥ 400 µm: adjusted OR for closure ranged from 1.13 to 10.12 (P = 0.030) (NNT 12), with a mean visual acuity improvement of -0.18 to -0.01 logMAR (P = 0.022). Each additional day of FDP was associated with improved odds of anatomical success (adjusted OR 1.02 to 1.41, RR 1.00 to 1.02, P = 0.026) and visual acuity improvement (-0.02 logMAR, -0.03 to -0.01, P = 0.002), possibly plateauing at 3 days. CONCLUSION: This study provides low certainty evidence that FDP improves the anatomical and visual outcomes of macular hole surgery modestly and indicate that the effect may be more substantial for macular holes exceeding 400 µm. The findings support recommending FDP for patients with macular holes exceeding 400 µm pending further investigation.

Use of immobilisation bra for daily setup of patients with pendulous breasts undergoing radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: A feasibility study to evaluate the Chabner XRT® Radiation Bra (CIVCO Radiotherapy & Qfix, Coralville, IA, USA) as a customised immobilisation device for patients with pendulous breasts undergoing radiotherapy was conducted. METHODS: A total of 34 patients with large pendulous breasts were fitted with the Chabner XRT® Radiation Bra during RT. A mixed-method questionnaire was administered to both radiation therapists (RTTs) and patients. RTTs evaluated the effectiveness of the bra in setup. Patients appraised its comfort level and ease of wearing. Setup reproducibility was evaluated based on a departmental imaging protocol. Acute skin side effects were documented with photos and assessed using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) classification. RESULTS: Of the patients, 27 (79.4%) completed the questionnaire. 23 patients felt comfortable wearing the bra while 20 felt less exposed during treatment. Reproducibility was acceptable, with a median (range) setup error (isocentre) of 0.0 cm (-0.6 to 0.7 cm; left/right), -0.1 cm (-0.5 to 1.2 cm; posterior) and 0.2 cm (-0.5 to 0.9 cm; inferior) achieved based on matched field borders on skin. However, repeated setups and imaging were required for 3 patients due to large breast size (cups D-G; size 4-5). Minimal skin toxicity (grade 0-1) was observed. No grade ≥ 2 was reported. 10 RTTs completed the survey. Male RTTs (n = 4) were not confident in assisting patients with bra fitting. 8 RTTs agreed that although it was difficult to reproduce the breast tissue for treatment, it helped patients to maintain the treatment position. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated the feasibility of using a customised bra which provided optimal setup reproducibility while maintaining minimal skin toxicity and patient comfort, especially the value-added modesty felt among Asian women during their breast cancer radiotherapy.

Comparison of patient setup accuracy for optical surface-guided and X-ray-guided imaging with respect to the impact on intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The objective of this work is to estimate the patient positioning accuracy of a surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) system using an optical surface scanner compared to an X­ray-based imaging system (IGRT) with respect to their impact on intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: Patient positioning data, both acquired with SGRT and IGRT systems at the same linacs, serve as a basis for determination of positioning accuracy. A total of 35 patients with two different open face masks (578 datasets) were positioned using X­ray stereoscopic imaging and the patient position inside the open face mask was recorded using SGRT. The measurement accuracy of the SGRT system (in a "standard" and an SRS mode with higher resolution) was evaluated using both IGRT and SGRT patient positioning datasets taking into account the measurement errors of the X­ray system. Based on these clinically measured datasets, the positioning accuracy was estimated using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The relevant evaluation criterion, as standard of practice in cranial SRT, was the 95th percentile. RESULTS: The interfractional measurement displacement vector of the SGRT system, σSGRT, in high resolution mode was estimated at 2.5 mm (68th percentile) and 5 mm (95th percentile). If the standard resolution was used, σSGRT increased by about 20%. The standard deviation of the axis-related σSGRT of the SGRT system ranged between 1.5 and 1.8 mm interfractionally and 0.5 and 1.0 mm intrafractionally. The magnitude of σSGRT is mainly due to the principle of patient surface scanning and not due to technical limitations or vendor-specific issues in software or hardware. Based on the resulting σSGRT, MC simulations served as a measure for the positioning accuracy for non-coplanar couch rotations. If an SGRT system is used as the only patient positioning device in non-coplanar fields, interfractional positioning errors of up to 6 mm and intrafractional errors of up to 5 mm cannot be ruled out. In contrast, MC simulations resulted in a positioning error of 1.6 mm (95th percentile) using the IGRT system. The cause of positioning errors in the SGRT system is mainly a change in the facial surface relative to a defined point in the brain. CONCLUSION: In order to achieve the necessary geometric accuracy in cranial stereotactic radiotherapy, use of an X­ray-based IGRT system, especially when treating with non-coplanar couch angles, is highly recommended.

Altered probe pressure and body position increase diagnostic accuracy for men and women in detecting hepatic steatosis using quantitative ultrasound.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) for evaluating liver fat content with different probe forces and body positions, in relation to sex, and compared with proton density fat fraction (PDFF). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled a metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) cohort that underwent UGAP and PDFF in the autumn of 2022. Mean UGAP values were obtained in supine and 30° left decubitus body position with normal 4 N and increased 30 N probe force. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Among 60 individuals (mean age 52.9 years, SD 12.9; 30 men), we found the best diagnostic performance with increased probe force in 30° left decubitus position (AUC 0.90; 95% CI 0.82-0.98) with a cut-off of 0.58 dB/cm/MHz. For men, the best performance was in supine (AUC 0.91; 95% CI 0.81-1.00) with a cut-off of 0.60 dB/cm/MHz, and for women, 30° left decubitus position (AUC 0.93; 95% CI 0.83-1.00), with a cut-off 0.56 dB/cm/MHz, and increased 30 N probe force for both genders. No difference was in the mean UGAP value when altering body position. UGAP showed good to excellent intra-reproducibility (Intra-class correlation 0.872; 95% CI 0.794-0.921). CONCLUSION: UGAP provides excellent diagnostic performance to detect liver fat content in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver diseases, with good to excellent intra-reproducibility. Regardless of sex, the highest diagnostic accuracy is achieved with increased probe force with men in supine and women in 30° left decubitus position, yielding different cut-offs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The ultrasound method ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter shows excellent diagnostic accuracy and performs with good to excellent reproducibility. There is a possibility to alter body position and increase probe pressure, and different performances for men and women should be considered for the highest accuracy. KEY POINTS: • There is a possibility to alter body position when performing the ultrasound method ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter. • Increase probe pressure for the highest accuracy. • Different performances for men and women should be considered.

The effect of forearm rotation on the bone mineral density measurements of the distal radius.

INTRODUCTION: Forearm dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is often performed in clinics where central DXA is unavailable. Accurate bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is crucial for clinical assessment. Forearm rotation can affect BMD measurements, but this effect remains uncertain. Thus, we aimed to conduct a simulation study using CT images to clarify the effect of forearm rotation on BMD measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forearm CT images of 60 women were analyzed. BMD was measured at the total, ultra-distal (UD), mid-distal (MD), and distal 33% radius regions with the radius located at the neutral position using digitally reconstructed radiographs generated from CT images. Then, the rotation was altered from - 30° to 30° (supination set as positive) with a one-degree increment, and the percent BMD changes from the neutral position were quantified for all regions at each angle for each patient. RESULTS: The maximum mean BMD changes were 5.8%, 7.0%, 6.2%, and 7.2% for the total, UD, MD, and distal 33% radius regions, respectively. The analysis of the absolute values of the percent BMD changes from the neutral position showed that BMD changes of all patients remained within 2% when the rotation was between - 5° and 7° for the total region, between - 3° and 2° for the UD region, between - 4° and 3° for the MD region, and between - 3° and 1° for the distal 33% radius region. CONCLUSION: Subtle rotational changes affected the BMD measurement of each region. The results showed the importance of forearm positioning when measuring the distal radius BMD.

Efficacy and safety of video double-lumen tube intubation in lateral position in patients undergoing thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Video double-lumen tube (VDLT) intubation in lateral position is a potential alternative to intubation in supine position in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. This non-inferiority trial assessed the efficacy and safety of VDLT intubation in lateral position. METHODS: Patients (18-70 yr) undergoing right thoracoscopic lung surgery were randomized to either the left lateral position group (group L) or the supine position group (group S). The VDLT was placed under video larygoscopy. The primary endpoint was the intubation time. Secondary endpoints included VDLT displacement rate, intubation failure rate, the satisfaction of surgeon and nurse, and intubation-related adverse events. RESULTS: The analysis covered 80 patients. The total intubation time was 52.0 [20.4]s in group L and 34.3 [13.2]s in group S, with a mean difference of 17.6 s [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.9 s to 25.3 s; P = 0.050], failing to demonstrate non-inferiority with a non-inferiority margin of 10 s. Group L, compared with group S, had significantly lower VDLT displacement rate (P = 0.017) and higher nurse satisfaction (P = 0.026). No intubation failure occurred in any group. Intubation complications (P = 0.802) and surgeon satisfaction (P = 0.415) were comparable between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The lateral VDLT intubation took longer time than in the supine position, and non-inferiority was not achieved. The incidence of displacement as the secondary endpoint was lower in the L group, possibly due to changing body positions beforehand. The indication of lateral VDLT intubation should be based on a balance between the safety of airway management and the lower incidence of displacement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at Chictr.org.cn with the number ChiCTR2200064831 on 19/10/2022.

Effects of axial loading and positions on lumbar spinal stenosis: an MRI study using a new axial loading device.

OBJECTIVE: A new axial loading device was used to investigate the effects of axial loading and positions on lumbar structure and lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS: A total of 40 patients sequentially underwent 4 examinations: (1) the psoas-relaxed position MRI, (2) the extended position MRI, (3) the psoas-relaxed position axial loading MRI, (4) the extended position axial loading MRI. The dural sac cross-sectional area, sagittal vertebral canal diameter, disc height and ligamentum flavum thickness of L3-4, L4-5, L5-S1 and lumbar lordosis angle were measured and compared. A new device with pneumatic shoulder-hip compression mode was used for axial loading. RESULTS: In the absence of axial loading, there was a significant reduction in dural sac cross-sectional area with extension only seen at the L3-4 (p = 0.033) relative to the dural sac area in the psoas-relaxed position. However, with axial loading, there was a significant reduction in dural sac cross-sectional area at all levels in both psoas-relaxed (L3-4, p = 0.041; L5-S1, p = 0.005; L4-5, p = 0.002) and extension (p < 0.001) positions. The sagittal vertebral canal diameter and disc height were significantly reduced at all lumbar levels with axial loading and extension (p < 0.001); however, in psoas-relaxed position, the sagittal vertebral canal diameter was only reduced with axial loading at L3-4 (p = 0.018) and L4-5 (p = 0.011), and the disc height was reduced with axial-loading at all levels (L3-4, p = 0.027; L5-S1, p = 0.001; L4-5, p < 0.001). The ligamentum flavum thickness and lumbar lordosis in extension position had a statistically significant increase compared to psoas-relaxed position with or without axial loading (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both axial loading and extension of lumbar may exacerbate lumbar spinal stenosis. Axial loading in extension position could maximally aggravate lumbar spinal stenosis, but may cause some patients intolerable. For those patients, axial loading MRI in psoas-relaxed position may be a good choice.

Evaluation of a head rest prototype for rotational corrections in three degrees of freedom.

Cranial stereotactic irradiations require accurate reproduction of the planning CT patient position at the time of treatment, including removal of rotational offsets. A device prototype was evaluated for potential clinical use to correct rotational positional offsets in image-guided radiotherapy workflow. Analysis was carried out with a prototype device "RPS head" by gKteso GmbH, rotatable up to 4° in three dimensions by hand wheels. A software tool accounts for the nonrectangular rotation axes and also indicates translational motions to be performed with the standard couch to correct the initial offset and translational shifts introduced by the rotational motion. The accuracy of angular corrections and positioning of an Alderson RANDO head phantom using the prototype device was evaluated for nine treatment plans for cranial targets. Corrections were obtained from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. The phantom position was adjusted and the final position was then verified by another CBCT. The long-term stability of the prototype device was evaluated. Attenuation by the device along its three main axes was assessed. A planning study was performed to evaluate if regions of high-density material can be avoided during plan generation. The device enabled the accurate correction of rotational offsets in a clinical setup with a mean residual angular difference of (0.0 ± 0.1)° and a maximum deviation of 0.2°. Translational offsets were less than 1 mm. The device was stable over a period of 20 min, not changing the head support plate position by more than (0.7 ± 0.6) mm. The device contains high-density material in the adjustment mechanism and slightly higher density in the support structures. These can be avoided during planning generation maintaining comparable plan quality. The head positioning device can be used to correct rotational offsets in a clinical setting.

Setup margins based on the inter- and intrafractional setup error of left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy using deep inspiration breath-hold technique (DIBH) and surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT).

PURPOSE: The use of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), and hypofractionated regimen requires adequate patient setup accuracy to achieve an optimal outcome. The purpose of this study was to assess the setup accuracy of patients receiving left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy using deep inspiration breath-hold technique (DIBH) and surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) and to calculate the corresponding setup margins. METHODS: The patient setup accuracy between and within radiotherapy fractions was measured by comparing the 6DOF shifts made by the SGRT system AlignRT with the shifts made by kV-CBCT. Three hundred and three radiotherapy fractions of 23 left-sided breast cancer patients using DIBH and SGRT were used for the analysis. All patients received pre-treatment DIBH training and visual feedback during DIBH. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test patient setup differences for statistical significance. The corresponding setup margins were calculated using the van Herk's formula. RESULTS: The intrafractional patient setup accuracy was significantly better than the interfractional setup accuracy (p < 0.001). The setup margin for the combined inter- and intrafractional setup error was 4, 6, and 4 mm in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions if based on SGRT alone. The intrafractional error contributed ≤1 mm to the calculated setup margins. CONCLUSION: With SGRT, excellent intrafractional and acceptable interfractional patient setup accuracy can be achieved for the radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer using DIBH and modern radiation techniques. This allows for reducing the frequency of kV-CBCTs, thereby saving treatment time and radiation exposure.

Patient positioning on the operating table and patient safety: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To identify occurrence of harmful incidents related to patient positioning on operating table. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Eight databases including Ovid, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar were systematically searched from the inception of the databases to August 2023. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram depicting the flow information. REVIEW METHODS: The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools were used to assess the risk of bias. Risk of harm with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated for each included study, and an overall risk was calculated using meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of the 22 included reports, two were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), five had a prospective cohort design, three had a cross-sectional design, and 12 were register-based studies. Intraoperative peripheral nerve injuries, perioperative pressure ulcers, musculoskeletal injuries, vascular injuries, postoperative pain and eye injuries were related to supine, lithotomy, Trendelenburg, prone and beach chair positioning. Overall risk of any harm was estimated as 0.2%. Studies with patients placed in prone positioning (8 study samples) had the highest risks of harm varying from 0.19 to 0.81, with an overall risk of 0.33. Meta-analysis of the two RCTs showed higher risk of chemosis with head-down positioning than with head in neutral position (overall relative risk = 1.64; 95% CI: [1.25, 2.14]). CONCLUSIONS: Harmful incidents related to patient positioning occur and consequences can be severe. The operating room teams should be aware of the harms and prevent and treat them seriously. IMPACT: This review underlines that research is sparse on patient positioning on operating table and harmful incidents. There is a need for high-quality, well-designed studies that focus on harmful incidents and prevention of harm related to patient positioning. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution, as this is a review of previous research.

Starting position during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Traditional teaching has been to place patients in the left lateral decubitus starting position for colonoscopies. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared left lateral decubitus starting position to other approaches. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare different starting positions for colonoscopies and their effect on cecal intubation. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to July 2023. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they were RCTs comparing at least two different starting positions for adults undergoing colonoscopy. The main outcome was cecal intubation time. Meta-analysis used an inverse variance random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Tool for RCTs 2.0. RESULTS: After screening 1523 citations, 14 RCTs were included. Four studies compared left lateral decubitus to right lateral decubitus, four studies compared left lateral decubitus to left lateral tilt-down, three studies compared left lateral decubitus to prone, and three studies compared left lateral decubitus to supine. There were no statistically significant differences in cecal intubation time in seconds across all comparisons: left lateral decubitus vs. right lateral decubitus (MD 14.9, 95% CI - 111.8 to 141.6, p = 0.82, I2 = 85%); left lateral decubitus vs. left lateral tilt-down (MD - 31.3, 95% CI - 70.8 to 8.3, p = 0.12, I2 = 82%); left lateral decubitus vs. prone (MD 17.2, 95% CI - 174.9 to 209.4, p = 0.86, I2 = 94%); left lateral decubitus vs. supine (MD - 149.9, 95% CI - 443.6 to 143.9, p = 0.32, I2 = 89%). CONCLUSION: The starting position for colonoscopies likely does not influence cecal intubation time. This study was limited by heterogeneity.

Surface-guided radiotherapy systems in locoregional deep inspiration breath hold radiotherapy for breast cancer - a multicenter study on the setup accuracy.

Background: Daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique are recommended for locoregional RT of breast cancer. The optimal workflow for a combination of surface-guided RT (SGRT) with DIBH technique is of current clinical interest. Materials and methods: The setup accuracy at three hospitals was evaluated using different SGRT workflows. A total of 150 patients (2269 image pairs) were analyzed in three groups: patient setup with the AlignRT® SGRT system in Tampere (Site 1, n = 50), the Catalyst™ SGRT system in Turku (Site 2, n = 50) and the Catalyst™ SGRT system in Jönköping (Site 3, n = 50). Each site used their routine workflow with SGRT-based setup and IGRT positioning. Residual errors of the bony chest wall, thoracic vertebra (Th 1) and humeral head were evaluated using IGRT images. Results: Systematic residual errors in the cranio-caudal (CC) direction and in pitch were generally larger at Site 2 than those at Sites 1 and 3 (p = 0.01-0.7). With daily IGRT, only a small difference (p = 0.01-0.9) was observed in residual random errors of bony structures in other directions between sites. Conclusion: The introduction of SGRT and the use of daily IGRT lead to small residual errors when combining the best workflow practices from different hospitals. Our multicenter evaluation led to improved workflow by tightening the SGRT tolerances on Site 2 and fixation modification. Because of mainly small random errors, systematic posture errors in the images need to be corrected after posture correction with new setup surfaces. We recommend tight SGRT tolerances, good fixation and correction of systematic errors.

Fully automated accurate patient positioning in computed tomography using anterior-posterior localizer images and a deep neural network: a dual-center study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to improve patient positioning accuracy by relying on a CT localizer and a deep neural network to optimize image quality and radiation dose. METHODS: We included 5754 chest CT axial and anterior-posterior (AP) images from two different centers, C1 and C2. After pre-processing, images were split into training (80%) and test (20%) datasets. A deep neural network was trained to generate 3D axial images from the AP localizer. The geometric centerlines of patient bodies were indicated by creating a bounding box on the predicted images. The distance between the body centerline, estimated by the deep learning model and ground truth (BCAP), was compared with patient mis-centering during manual positioning (BCMP). We evaluated the performance of our model in terms of distance between the lung centerline estimated by the deep learning model and the ground truth (LCAP). RESULTS: The error in terms of BCAP was - 0.75 ± 7.73 mm and 2.06 ± 10.61 mm for C1 and C2, respectively. This error was significantly lower than BCMP, which achieved an error of 9.35 ± 14.94 and 13.98 ± 14.5 mm for C1 and C2, respectively. The absolute BCAP was 5.7 ± 5.26 and 8.26 ± 6.96 mm for C1 and C2, respectively. The LCAP metric was 1.56 ± 10.8 and -0.27 ± 16.29 mm for C1 and C2, respectively. The error in terms of BCAP and LCAP was higher for larger patients (p value < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the proposed method was comparable to available alternative methods, carrying the advantage of being free from errors related to objects blocking the camera visibility. KEY POINTS: • Patient mis-centering in the anterior-posterior direction (AP) is a common problem in clinical practice which can degrade image quality and increase patient radiation dose. • We proposed a deep neural network for automatic patient positioning using only the CT image localizer, achieving a performance comparable to alternative techniques, such as the external 3D visual camera. • The advantage of the proposed method is that it is free from errors related to objects blocking the camera visibility and that it could be implemented on imaging consoles as a patient positioning support tool.

Postoperative ulnar neuropathy: a systematic review of evidence with narrative synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative ulnar neuropathy (PUN) is an injury manifesting in the sensory or motor distribution of the ulnar nerve after anaesthesia or surgery. The condition frequently features in cases of alleged clinical negligence by anaesthetists. We performed a systematic review and applied narrative synthesis with the aim of summarising current understanding of the condition and deriving implications for practice and research. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched up to October 2022 for primary research, secondary research, or opinion pieces defining PUN and describing its incidence, predisposing factors, mechanism of injury, clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and prevention. RESULTS: We included 83 articles in the thematic analysis. PUN occurs after approximately 1 in 14 733 anaesthetics. Men aged 50-75 yr with pre-existing ulnar neuropathy are at highest risk. Preventative measures, based on consensus and expert opinion, are summarised, and an algorithm of suspected PUN management is proposed, based upon the identified literature. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative ulnar neuropathy is rare and the incidence is probably decreasing over time with general improvements in perioperative care. Recommendations to reduce the risk of postoperative ulnar neuropathy are based on low-quality evidence but include anatomically neutral arm positioning and padding intraoperatively. In selected high-risk patients, further documentation of repositioning, intermittent checks, and neurological examination in the recovery room can be helpful.

The Effect of Patient Positioning on Ureteral Efflux During Intraoperative Cystoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify the relationship between patient position during surgery and time to confirmation of ureteral patency on cystoscopy. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Academic tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: A total of 91 adult women undergoing laparoscopic (either conventional or robotic) hysterectomy between February 2021 and February 2022 were randomized to intervention (n = 45) or control (n = 46). Exclusion criteria included known kidney disease or urinary tract anomaly, current ureteral stent, pregnancy, malignancy, and recognized intraoperative urinary tract injury. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects in the control group were placed in a 0° supine position during cystoscopy. Subjects in the intervention group were placed in a 20° angle in reverse Trendelenburg (RT) position during cystoscopy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome, time to confirmation of bilateral ureteral patency, was measured at the time the second ureteral jet was viewed during intraoperative cystoscopy. There was no significant difference in mean time to confirmation (66.5 seconds in supine vs 67 seconds in RT, p = .2) nor in total cystoscopy time (111 seconds in supine vs 104.5 seconds in RT, p = .39). There were no significant differences in need for alternative modalities to aid in ureteral efflux visualization, delayed diagnosis of ureteric injury, and operative time. RT position seemed to have reduced the time to confirmation for the small group of patients with longer confirmation time (>120 seconds). CONCLUSION: RT position does not change time to confirmation of bilateral ureteral patency compared with supine position. However, there may be a benefit in position change if time to confirmation is >120 seconds.

Effect of ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on pain during patient positioning for central nervous blockade in hip surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes. In recent years, new indications for regional anesthesia techniques have been defined, and they have found more place in clinical practice. Herein we investigate the effect of US-guided PENG block on positioning pain and compare that effect to intravenous opioid in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia for hip fractures. Additionally, we sought to investigate the effect of PENG block on pain scores, opioid intake, time to first analgesic requirement, and quality of recovery within the first 24 h following surgery. METHODS: In this study, patients were divided into the PENG (n = 42) and control group (n = 42) one hour prior to surgery. A team who was blinded to the assigned groups, collected and evaluated all data such as spinal anesthesia positioning pain, postoperative pain, opioid requirement. RESULTS: Patients that underwent PENG had statistically significantly lower NRS scores after interventions, immediately before positioning, at positioning and at end of spinal anesthesia. Pain scores during positioning for spinal anesthesia were statistically significantly lower in the PENG group than in the control group (p < 0.001). Total morphine use over the first 24 h was extremely statistically significantly lower in the PENG group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Positive outcomes of PENG block in patient positioning pain before spinal anesthesia, postoperative pain scores, and morphine consumption are consistent with similar studies. High patient satisfaction in patients who underwent PENG block contributes to the literature. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04871061.

Systematic review of imaging comparisons of spinal alignment among standing positions in healthy adolescents or adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: SOSORT 2023 award winner.

PURPOSE: Clinicians detect scoliosis worsening over time using frequent radiographs during growth. Arms must be elevated when capturing sagittal radiographs to visualize the vertebrae, and this may affect the sagittal angles. The aim was to systematically review the published evidence of the effect of arm positions used during radiography on spinal alignment parameters in healthy participants and those with AIS. METHODS: Design was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022347494). A search strategy was run in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Healthy participants ≥ 10 years old and participants with AIS between 10 and 18 years old, with Cobb angles > 10° were included. Study quality was assessed using the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS). Meta-analysis was performed where possible. RESULTS: Overall, 1332 abstracts and 33 full texts were screened. Data was extracted from 7 included studies. The most common positions were habitual standing, fists on clavicle, and active (arms raised unsupported). Kyphosis, lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were most measured. Meta-analysis showed significantly decreased kyphosis (SMD = 0.78, 95%CI 0.48, 1.09) and increased lordosis (SMD = - 1.21, 95%CI - 1.58, - 0.85) when clavicle was compared to standing. Significant posterior shifts in SVA were shown in clavicle compared to standing (MD = 30.59 mm, 95%CI 23.91, 37.27) and active compared to clavicle (MD = - 2.01 mm, 95%CI - 3.38, - 0.64). Cobb angles and rotation were rarely studied (1 study). CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis evidence showed elevated arm positions modify sagittal measurements compared to standing. Most studies did not report on all relevant parameters. It is unclear which position best represent habitual standing.

Preanesthetic ultrasonography assessment of inferior vena cava diameter in the supine position, left lateral tilt position, and with the left uterine displacement maneuver in full-term pregnant women: A randomized cross-over design study.

Preanesthetic ultrasonography assessment of inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD) in the supine position (SP), left lateral tilt position (LLT), and with the left uterine displacement maneuver (LUD) in full-term pregnant women: a randomized cross-over design study. AIM: We pre-anesthetically measured IVCD using ultrasonography in the SP, LLT, and the LUD in full-term pregnant women, using a cross-over design, to evaluate the effectiveness of LLT and LUD on increasing IVCD, and the presence of inter-individual differences among patients in the effect of posture on IVCD. METHODS: Twenty-two parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were recruited. All patients were sequentially placed in the SP, LLT, and with LUD before spinal anesthesia induction. Indices of IVCD, measured by subxiphoid ultrasonography, including maximum IVCD (IVCDmax), minimum IVCD (IVCDmin), and collapsibility index (CI) were recorded in each of the postures. Mean or median values of all measurements were compared among the postures. RESULTS: The mean values of IVCDmax observed with both LLT and LUD were significantly larger than those in the SP, respectively (SP vs. LLT: p < 0.05, SP vs. LUD: p < 0.01), although there were no significant differences between IVCDmax with LLT and LUD. There were no significant differences in IVCDmin and CI between any of the postures. IVCDmax was highest with LUD in 11 patients (55%), in the LLT in seven patients (35%) and in the SP in two patients (10%). CONCLUSIONS: LLT and LUD might be equally effective in enlarging the narrowed IVCD as compared to SP. However, both LLT and LUD might not necessarily be appropriate treatments to relieve IVC compression in some cases.

Relative thoracic changes from supine to upright patient position: A proton collaborative group study.

This study presents position changes of a few radiotherapy-relevant thoracic organs between upright and typical supine patient orientations. Using tools in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS), key anatomical distances were measured for four-dimensional CT data sets and analyzed for the two patient orientations. The uncertainty was calculated as the 95% confidence interval (CI) on the relative difference for each of the four analyzed changes for upright relative to supine, as follows: the distance of the bottom of the heart to the top of the sternum, it changed +2.6% or +4 mm (95% CI [+0.30%,+4.9%]); the distance of the center of the C3 vertebra to the backrest, it changed +29% (95% CI [+22%,+36%]); the contoured left and right lungs increased their volumes respectively: +17% (95% CI [+12%,+21%]) for the left, and +9.9% (95% CI [+4.1%,+16%]); and lastly, the distance from the top of the sternum to the top of the liver, but its uncertainty far exceeded the average change by a factor of two. This last result is therefore inconclusive, the others show that with 95% confidence that a change in internal positions is observed for lung volumes and heart position that could be important for upright treatments.

Gap balance difference of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty between hanging leg and supine leg position: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Gap balance is critical in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA) surgery; the effect of lower limb positioning on gap balance judgements has not been reported. There are two mean operative positions for OUKA patients, the hanging leg (HL) and the supine leg (SL) position. This study aimed to investigate the gap balance achieved by current UKA surgical techniques by using a force sensor, to compare the differences in gap balance between the two different positions, and to test whether the difference in gap balance leads to different outcomes in terms of component alignment and early post-operative clinical outcomes. METHODS: This prospective study included 97 knees (76 patients), who underwent OUKA from June 1, 2020, to July 31, 2021, of which 67 knees underwent UKA in the supine leg position and the other 30 in the hanging leg position. When the operator was satisfied with the gap balance, the contact forces between the trial and the spacer block were measured at 90° of knee flexion (flexion gap) and 20° of knee flexion (extension gap) using a pre-developed matrix flexible force sensor. X-rays were reviewed three to five days after surgery. Knee Society Scores (KSS) were obtained at the six month follow-up. RESULTS: Compared to the HL group, the contact force at the flexion gap was higher in the SL group: 55.15N (SD 43.36N) vs. 34.25N (SD 27.56N) (p < 0.05), whereas in the extension gap, there was no significant difference, 90.19 N (SD 43.36N) in the SL group and 86.72N (SD 43.08N) in the HL group (ns.). The contact force was greater in the extension gap than in the flexion gap in both groups (p < 0.01). The gap balance difference in the HL group was 52.46N (SD 31.33N), which was greater than that of the SL group at 35.03N (SD 19.50N) (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in component alignment or lower limb mechanical alignment between the two groups. There was no significant difference in pre-operative and post-operative KSS between the two groups, while post-operative KSS was significantly higher in both groups compared to the pre-operative period. CONCLUSION: The intra-operative contact forces between the flexion and extension gaps differed in the two groups; the hanging leg position appeared to produce a greater difference in the judgement of gap balance than the supine leg position, but this difference did not adversely affect the alignment of the component or the early post-operative clinical outcome.