Safety and clinical activity of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) with or without Hyper-CVAD in relapsed/refractory acute lymphocytic leukaemia.

To test the safety and activity of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphocytic leukaemia (ALL), we conducted a phase 1 study with two parts: administering decitabine alone or in combination with Hyper-CVAD (fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone alternating with high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine). Patients participated in either part of the study or in both parts sequentially. In the initial part, decitabine was administered intravenously at doses of 10-120 mg/m(2) per d for 5 d every other week in cycles of 28 d. In the combination part, patients were treated on the first 5 d of Hyper-CVAD with intravenous decitabine at 5-60 mg/m(2) per d. A total of 39 patients received treatment in the study: 14 in the first part only, 16 sequentially in both parts and 9 in the second part only. Decitabine was tolerated at all doses administered, and grade 3 or 4 toxic effects included non-life-threatening hepatotoxicity and hyperglycaemia. Induction of DNA hypomethylation was observed at doses of decitabine up to 80 mg/m(2) . Some patients who had previously progressed on Hyper-CVAD alone achieved a complete response when decitabine was added. Decitabine alone or given with Hyper-CVAD is safe and has clinical activity in patients with advanced ALL.

The risk of traumatic lumbar punctures in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic lumbar punctures with blasts (TLP+) in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) obscure central nervous system status and are associated with a poorer event-free survival (EFS). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all lumbar punctures (LPs) for children with ALL diagnosed at our institution from 2005 to 2009. We utilised random-effects and fixed-effects repeated-measures logistic regression analyses to identify risk factors for TLPs. Fixed-effects models use each patient as his or her own control. We used survival analysis to describe outcomes after a TLP+. RESULTS: 264 children underwent 5267 evaluable lumbar punctures (LPs), of which 944 (17.9%) were traumatic. In the multivariable random-effects model, variables significantly associated with TLPs were age <1year (odds ratio (OR) 3.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.06-5.81) or age ⩾10years (OR 2.00, CI 1.66-2.40); body mass index percentile ⩾95 (OR 1.44, CI 1.19-1.75); platelet count <100×10(3)/µL (OR 1.49, CI 1.08-20.7); fewer days since previous LP (OR 5.13, CI 2.34-11.25 for ⩾16days versus 0-3days); and a preceding TLP (OR 1.43, CI 1.19-1.73). In the fixed-effects model, image-guidance reduced the odds of TLP (OR 0.55, CI 0.32-0.95). The 5-year EFS (±SE) for children with TLP+ (77±8%) was significantly lower than for children with CNS1 status (93±2%; p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of TLP remains high. Consistent with previous studies, a TLP+ at diagnosis was associated with a poorer EFS. These risk factors can allow identifying interventions to reduce TLPs and directing interventions to those at highest risk.

Factores pronósticos de remisión en pacientes con leucemia linfoblástica aguda posterior a primer recaída / Prognostic factors of remission in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia after a first relapse

Objetivos: Identificar aquellos factores que impactan en la respuesta terapéutica para alcanzar una segunda remisión (2 RC) en pacientes con leucemia aguda linfobl´stica (LAL) en recaída. Métodos: Estudio observacional y analítico anidado en una cohorte retrospectiva de adultos (>18 años) portadores de LAL que fueron atendidos durante 2008-2014 y que interrumpieron el protocolo HGMLAL07 al detectarse recaída e iniciaron otro esquema. Resultados: Se estudiaron 69 pacientes y el 62,3% (n = 43) correspondía a hombres. La media de edad fue de 29 años. Los regímenes terapéuticos empleados fueron: alta intensidad (55,1%) [Hyper-CVAD (n = 34), IDA-Flag (n = 1), mitoxantrona-DARAC (n = 3) ], moderada intensidad (4,3%) [Esquemas de reinducción (n = 3) ] y tratamiento paliativo de baja intensidad con soporte transfusional (40,6%, n = 28). Solo 19 pacientes (27,5%) integraron una 2 RC. La media de supervivencia fue 120 (2- 575) días y el 29% sobrevivió al año de seguimiento. El uso de un segundo régimen intensivo o moderado no brindó ventaja sobre el esquema conservador (prueba log-Rank, p = 0,812). Ninguna variable demostró valor pronóstico sobre la supervivencia a 1 año. La duración de la primera RC (OR 6,78, p = 0,005, 95% IC: 1,7532-26,2803) y recibir un primer tratamiento intensivo (OR 0,22, p = 0,018, 95% IC: 0,0661-0,7813) fueron variables pronósticas de falla terapéutica para alcanzar la 2 RC. Conclusiones: Poseer una primera RC < 1 año fue un factor de riesgo importante para no integrar una 2 RC. No se identificaron factores pronósticos de supervivencia ni superioridad de alguno de los esquemas de rescate empleados.

Aims: To identify those factors that affect therapeutic response to achieve a second remission (2 RC) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in relapse. Methods: Observational, descriptive and analytical study nested in a retrospective cohort of adults (> 18 years-old) ALL carriers treated during the period from 2008 to 2014 that disrupted the HGMLAL07 protocol when relapse was detected and began another therapeutic scheme. Results: The study included 69 patients, of whom 62.3% (n = 43) were males, and the mean age was 29 years-old. The therapeutic regimens used were: high intensity (55.1%) [Hyper-CVAD (n = 34), IDA-Flag (n = 1), mitoxantrone-DARAC (n = 3) ], moderate intensity (4.3%) [Re-induction schemes (n = 3) ], and palliative treatment of low intensity with transfusion support (40.6%, n = 28).Only 19 patients (27.5%) achieved a 2 RC. The median overall survival was 120 (2-575) days, 29% of patients were alive at one year. Using a high or moderate intensity regime as the rescue scheme gave no advantage over the conservative one (log-rank test, P = .812). None of the variables showed prognostic value of survival at one year. The duration of the first RC (OR 6.78, P = .005, 95% CI; 1.75 -26.28) and receiving high intensity treatment (OR 0.22, P = 018, 95% CI: 0.06 -0.78) were predictors of treatment failure to achieve 2 RC. Conclusions: To achieve a first RC < 1 year was an important risk factor for not achieving a 2 RC. No prognostic factors for survival were identified. None of the schemes used for rescue showed superiority.