Time to second biochemical recurrence as a prognostic indicator in postprostatectomy patients who undergo salvage radiation therapy: An RTOG 9601 based post hoc analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The prognostic significance of a "second" biochemical recurrence (sBCR) after salvage radiation therapy (sRT) with/without hormonal therapy following primary radical prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer has not been examined. We hypothesized that a shorter time to sBCR will be associated with worse cancer control outcomes. METHODS: The RTOG 9601 study included 760 patients with tumor stage pT2/T3, pN0, who had either persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) postradical prostatectomy or developed subsequent biochemical recurrence with PSA levels between 0.2 and 4.0 ng/ml. All patients received sRT (with or without 2 years of Bicalutamide) from 1998 to 2015. For our study, we focused on 421 patients who had sBCR after sRT-which was defined as a PSA increase of at least 0.3 ng/ml over the first nadir. Patients were divided into two categories: early sBCR (n = 210) and late sBCR (n = 211) using median time to sBCR (3.51 years). All patients who experienced sBCR received salvage hormonal therapy. Competing-risk analysis was used to examine the impact of early versus late sBCR on prostate cancer specific mortality (CSM), after accounting for available covariates. RESULTS: The majority of patients were age 60 years or older (75.8%), had pT3 disease (74.8%), and Gleason score 7 (75.2%). Overall, 13.8% had persistent PSA initially after surgery. At 10 years, starting at the time of sBCR, CSM rate was 31.3% in the early sBCR group versus 20.0% in the late sBCR group. In competing-risk analysis, time to sBCR was an independent predictor of CSM, where patients with early sBCR had 1.7-fold higher CSM risk (p = 0.026) than their counterparts with late sBCR. CONCLUSIONS: Time to sBCR after sRT (with or without concomitant Bicalutamide) is a significant predictor of CSM following initial radical prostatectomy. This information can be used to guide subsequent treatments, and to counsel patients.

Management of Pathologic Node-Positive Prostate Cancer following Radical Prostatectomy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Approximately 15% of prostate cancer patients have lymph node metastases at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP). However, there is no universally accepted standard of care for these men. The options for treatment in this subset of patients range from observation to a combination of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (aADT) and radiation therapy (RT). RECENT FINDINGS: A recent systematic review showed that there was no clear choice out of the options above to treat these patients. Studies have shown that patients treated with adjuvant radiation therapy have lower all-cause mortality when compared to patients treated with salvage radiation therapy. In this review, we summarize treatment options for pathologic node-positive (pN1) patients and discuss the urgent need for robust clinical trials that includes observation as the control group to help establish a standard of care for treating patients with node-positive prostate cancer after RP.

Strategy for PSA progression in patients undergoing salvage radiation for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: The treatment strategy for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression in patients who receive salvage radiation therapy (RT) for biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is salvage androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, its optimal timing is highly controversial. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 77 men who underwent RP, received salvage RT against BCR, and underwent salvage ADT for PSA progression. The endpoint of this study was development to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), from the start of salvage RT. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 9.5 years, and 20 patients experienced CRPC. The multivariable analysis identified PSA-doubling time (PSA-DT) ≤ 12 months (hazard ratio, 3.5) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) (hazard ratio, 4.4) as independent risk factors. We defined the high-risk and low-risk groups as those with one or two risk factors and no risk factors, respectively. In the high-risk group, a significant difference in time to CRPC was observed between patients who received salvage ADT at PSA ≤ 1.0 ng/mL (n = 8) and at > 1.0 ng/mL (n = 27) (10-year non-CRPC rate: 100.0% vs. 46.3%, respectively). In contrast, in the low-risk group, no significant difference in CRPC-free survival was observed between patients who received salvage ADT at PSA ≤ 1.0 ng/mL (n = 14) and at > 1.0 ng/mL (n = 28) (10-year non-CRPC rate: 86.4% vs. 80.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In high-risk patients (PSA-DT ≤ 12 months and/or SVI), salvage ADT for PSA progression after salvage RT should be started before the PSA levels exceed 1.0 ng/mL.

[The actual concept of salvage therapy for local recurrence prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy].

Despite highly effective radical methods of treatment of prostate cancer (PC), 30% of patients will have a biochemical recurrence. The evolution in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy (RP) contributes to the search and development of such methods of treatment of relapses that consider not only the effectiveness, but also the quality of life of patients. This review demonstrates the actual concept of treatment of recurrent PC after RP, starting with salvage androgen-deprivation therapy with or without EBRT, and ending with minimally invasive methods such as salvage high-dose brachytherapy.

Risk of severe late toxicity after radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy - a nationwide study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the long-term risks of severe late toxicities for radiation therapy (RT) following radical prostatectomy (RP) in an unselected nationwide cohort, as severe side-effects are rare but may occur years later. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population comprised all men undergoing RP between 1997 and 2016 in the Prostate Cancer database Sweden (PCBaSe) (n = 40 962). By (1:2) matching, two cohorts were created: 2789 men exposed to postoperative RT and 5578 unexposed men with comparable age, comorbidities, and year of surgery. Cumulative incidences and rate ratios were calculated for the following outcomes: symptoms and interventions of the urinary or intestinal tract demanding inpatient care, secondary malignancies, and non-prostate cancer mortality. RESULTS: The largest differences were seen for late toxicities affecting the urinary tract. The 10-year cumulative incidences among those exposed to postoperative RT vs the RP-only group were: 17.8% vs 10.5% for procedures of the urinary tract (difference 7.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4 to 10.3; relative risk [RR] 1.74, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.05); 6.0% vs 1.2% for haematuria (difference 4.8%, 95% CI 3.1 to 6.5; RR 6.50, 95% CI 4.31 to 10.10); and 2.4% vs 1.1% for bladder cancer (difference 1.4%, 95% CI 0.4 to 2.3; RR 2.71, 95% CI 1.72 to 4.33). The groups were similar regarding intestinal toxicity, other secondary malignancies, and non-prostate cancer mortality. Adjustments for preoperative tumour risk factors did not importantly affect the rate ratios. CONCLUSION: Severe late toxicity after postoperative RT following RP predominately affects the bladder and can appear many years after RT.

Management of patients with a persistently elevated PSA after radical prostatectomy: a narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: The management of the postoperative biological relapse of prostate cancer is most often based on salvage radiotherapy (SRT) with or without the addition of a variable duration of hormone therapy (HT). The indications for SRT +/- HT are established in the setting of a rising PSA level after a period where an undetectable PSA was achieved. However, in case of detectable PSA immediately after radical prostatectomy, the treatment options and prognosis are still unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a narrative review based on an analysis of the literature focusing on articles targeting the population of patients with postoperative persistently detectable PSA level. Case reports, original articles, clinical trials, and published reviews were studied for this purpose. CONCLUSION: This article will describe current management of patients with detectable PSA immediately after radical prostatectomy, notably the contribution of modern imaging and new treatment options involving the combination of RT and HT.

Stereotactic or conventional radiotherapy for macroscopic prostate bed recurrence: a propensity score analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess outcomes between salvage radiation therapy (SRT) with curative intent and stereotactic radiotherapy for macroscopic prostate recurrence (SSRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP). In order to compare these two different options, we compared their outcomes with a propensity score-based matched analysis. METHODS: Data from 185 patients in seven Italian centres treated for macroscopic prostate bed recurrence after RP were retrospectively collected. To make a comparison between the two treatment groups, propensity matching was applied to create comparable cohorts. RESULTS: After matching, 90 patients in the SRT and SSRT groups were selected (45 in each arm). Kaplan-Meier analysis did not show any significant differences in terms of BRFS and PFS between matched populations (p = 0.08 and p = 0.8, respectively). Multivariate models show that treatment was not associated with BRFS, neither in the whole or matched cohort, with HR of 2.15 (95%CI 0.63-7.25, p = 0.21) and 2.65 (95%CI 0.59-11.97, p = 0.21), respectively. In the matched cohort, lower rate of toxicity was confirmed for patients undergoing SSRT, with acute GI and GU adverse events reported in 4.4 versus 44.4% (p < 0.001) and 28.9 versus 46.7% (p = 0.08) of patients, and late GI and GU adverse events reported in 0 versus 13.3% (p = 0.04) and 6.7 versus 22.2% (p = 0.03) of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Considering the favourable therapeutic ratio of this approach and the lower number of fractions needed, SSRT should be considered as an attractive alternative to conventional SRT in this setting.

Outcomes of salvage radiation for recurrent world health organization grade II meningiomas: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The optimal modality of radiation-intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)-in patients with recurrent WHO grade II meningiomas is not well-established. The purpose of this study was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) in patients undergoing salvage IMRT vs SRS. We compared PFS in those with and without history of prior radiation. METHODS: Forty-two patients with 71 tumor recurrences treated with IMRT or SRS were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-two salvage treatments were performed on recurrent tumors never treated with prior radiation ('radiation-naïve' cohort), whereas 39 salvage treatments were performed on recurrent tumors previously treated with radiation ('re-treatment cohort'). RESULTS: In the 'radiation-naïve' cohort, 3-year PFS for IMRT and SRS was 68.8% and 60.7%, respectively (p = 0.61). The median tumor volume for patients treated with IMRT was significantly larger than for patients treated with SRS (5.7 vs 2.2 cm3; p = 0.04). The 3-year PFS for salvage IMRT or SRS in the 're-treatment' cohort was 45.4% vs 65.8% in the 'radiation-naïve' cohort (p = 0.008). When analyzing the outcome of multiple re-treatments, median PFS was 47 months for 1st or 2nd salvage radiation (IMRT or SRS) compared to 16 months for the 3rd or greater salvage radiation treatment (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: For salvage radiation of recurrent grade II tumors that are 'radiation-naïve', comparable 3-year PFS rates were found between IMRT and SRS, despite the IMRT group having significantly larger tumors. Salvage radiation overall was less successful in the 're-treatment' cohort compared with the 'radiation-naïve' cohort. Additionally, the effectiveness of radiation significantly declines with successive salvage radiation treatments.

Progress and controversies: Radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Radiation therapy remains a standard treatment option for men with localized prostate cancer. Alone or in combination with androgen-deprivation therapy, it represents a curative treatment and has been shown to prolong survival in selected populations. In this article, the authors review recent advances in prostate radiation-treatment techniques, photon versus proton radiation, modification of treatment fractionation, and brachytherapy-all focusing on disease control and the impact on morbidity. Also discussed are refinements in the risk stratification of men with prostate cancer and how these are better for matching patients to appropriate treatment, particularly around combined androgen-deprivation therapy. Many of these advances have cost and treatment burden implications, which have significant repercussions given the prevalence of prostate cancer. The discussion includes approaches to improve value and future directions for research.

The impact of positive surgical margins on salvage radiation or androgen deprivation therapy following radical prostatectomy - a nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: The extent to which positive surgical margins (PSM) affect the risk of subsequent salvage radiation therapy (sRT) or androgen depletion therapy (ADT) following radical prostatectomy (RP) is not well described. Initiation of additional therapies after RP depend on patient preference, individual factors, local guidelines, and life expectancy. The aim of this study was to analyze differences between margin status in risk of subsequent treatment for PCa following RP in a retrospective population-based cohort from Denmark. METHODS: Patients who underwent RP were identified in The Danish Prostate Cancer Registry (DaPCaR). Subsequent sRT and ADT were assessed in uni- and multivariate settings and validated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC). RESULTS: PSM was associated with an increased risk of sRT (HR = 1.85, p < .001) and receiving ADT (HR:1.39, p = .007). Margin status only had a minor impact on the predictive ability for sRT (area under the curve (AUC): p < .001) and no significant impact for subsequent ADT (AUC: p = 1). Significant inter-institutional difference in the association between PSM with sRT or ADT was observed. CONCLUSION: PSM is associated with the risk of sRT and initiation of ADT, however this association is weak. Our results underline that factors beyond tumor characteristics play a major role for initiation of sRT and ADT.

Comparative toxicity outcomes of proton-beam therapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the postoperative setting.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing utilization of proton-beam therapy (PBT) in the postprostatectomy setting, no data exist regarding toxicity outcomes relative to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The authors compared acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC) who received treatment with postprostatectomy IMRT versus PBT. METHODS: With institutional review board approval, patients with PC who received adjuvant or salvage IMRT or PBT (70.2 gray with an endorectal balloon) after prostatectomy from 2009 through 2017 were reviewed. Factors including combined IMRT and PBT and/or concurrent malignancies prompted exclusion. A case-matched cohort analysis was performed using nearest-neighbor 3-to-1 matching by age and GU/GI disorder history. Logistic and Cox regressions were used to identify univariate and multivariate associations between toxicities and cohort/dosimetric characteristics. Toxicity-free survival (TFS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Three hundred seven men (mean ± SD age, 59.7 ± 6.3 years; IMRT, n = 237; PBT, n = 70) were identified, generating 70 matched pairs. The median follow-up was 48.6 and 46.1 months for the IMRT and PBT groups, respectively. Although PBT was superior at reducing low-range (volumes receiving 10% to 40% of the dose, respectively) bladder and rectal doses (all P ≤ .01), treatment modality was not associated with differences in clinician-reported acute or late GU/GI toxicities (all P ≥ .05). Five-year grade ≥2 GU and grade ≥1 GI TFS was 61.1% and 73.7% for IMRT, respectively, and 70.7% and 75.3% for PBT, respectively; and 5-year grade ≥3 GU and GI TFS was >95% for both groups (all P ≥ .05). CONCLUSIONS: Postprostatectomy PBT minimized low-range bladder and rectal doses relative to IMRT; however, treatment modality was not associated with clinician-reported GU/GI toxicities. Future prospective investigation and ongoing follow-up will determine whether dosimetric differences between IMRT and PBT confer clinically meaningful differences in long-term outcomes.

A phase II randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study of salvage radiation therapy plus placebo versus SRT plus enzalutamide with high-risk PSA-recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (SALV-ENZA).

BACKGROUND: In men with a rising PSA following radical prostatectomy, salvage radiation therapy (SRT) offers a second chance for cure. Hormonal therapy can be combined with SRT in order to increase prostate tumor control, albeit with associated higher rates of treatment side effects. This trial studies the effectiveness of SRT combined with hormonal therapy using a more potent anti-androgen with a favorable side effect profile. Enzalutamide, a next generation selective androgen receptor antagonist, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) where it has been shown to improve overall survival in combination with androgen deprivation therapy. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of combination SRT and enzalutamide for freedom-from-PSA-progression. Secondary objectives include time to local recurrence within the radiation field, metastasis-free survival and safety as determined by frequency and severity of adverse events. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a randomized, double-blind, phase II, prospective, multicenter study in adult males with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy. Following registration, enzalutamide 160 mg or placebo by mouth (PO) once daily will be administered for 6 months. Following two months of study drug, external beam radiotherapy to 66.6-70.2 Gray (Gy) will be administered to the prostate bed over 7-8 weeks while continuing daily placebo/enzalutamide. This is followed by two additional months of placebo/enzalutamide. DISCUSSION: The SALV-ENZA trial is the first phase II placebo-controlled double-blinded randomized study to test SRT in combination with a next generation androgen receptor antagonist in men with high-risk recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. The primary hypothesis of this study is that clinical outcomes will be improved by the addition of enzalutamide compared to standard-of-care SRT alone and pave the path for phase III evaluation of this combination. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ClinicaltTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02203695 Date of Registration: 06/16/2014. Date of First Participant Enrollment: 04/16/2015.

Randomized prospective phase III trial of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT molecular imaging for prostate cancer salvage radiotherapy planning [PSMA-SRT].

BACKGROUND: Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence after prostatectomy offers long-term biochemical control in about 50-60% of patients. SRT is commonly initiated in patients with serum PSA levels < 1 ng/mL, a threshold at which standard-of-care imaging is insensitive for detecting recurrence. As such, SRT target volumes are usually drawn in the absence of radiographically visible disease. 68Ga-PSMA-11 (PSMA) PET/CT molecular imaging is highly sensitive and may offer anatomic localization of PCa biochemical recurrence. However, it is unclear if incorporation of PSMA PET/CT imaging into the planning of SRT could improve its likelihood of success. The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the success rate of SRT for recurrence of PCa after prostatectomy with and without planning based on PSMA PET/CT. METHODS: We will randomize 193 patients to proceed with standard SRT (control arm 1, n = 90) or undergo a PSMA PET/CT scan (free of charge for patients) prior to SRT planning (investigational arm 2, n = 103). The primary endpoint is the success rate of SRT measured as biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) after initiation of SRT. Biochemical progression is defined by PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL and rising. The randomization ratio of 1:1.13 is based on the assumption that approximately 13% of subjects randomized to Arm 2 will not be treated with SRT because of PSMA-positive extra-pelvic metastases. These patients will not be included in the primary endpoint analysis but will still be followed. The choice of treating the prostate bed alone vs prostate bed and pelvic lymph nodes, with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), is selected by the treating radiation oncologist. The radiation oncologist may change the radiation plan depending on the findings of the PSMA PET/CT scan. Any other imaging is allowed for SRT planning in both arms if done per routine care. Patients will be followed until either one of the following conditions occur: 5 years after the date of initiation of randomization, biochemical progression, diagnosis of metastatic disease, initiation of any additional salvage therapy, death. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized phase 3 prospective trial designed to determine whether PSMA PET/CT molecular imaging can improve outcomes in patients with PCa early BCR following radical prostatectomy. ACRONYM: PSMA-SRT Phase 3 trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ■ IND#130649 ◦ Submission: 04.26.2016 ◦ Safe-to-proceed letter issued by FDA: 05.25.2016 ■ UCLA IRB #18-000484, ■ First submission: 3.27.2018 ■ Date of approval: 5.31.2018 ■ UCLA JCCC Short Title NUC MED 18-000484 ■ NCI Trial Identifier NCI-2018-01518 ■ ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03582774 ■ First Submitted: 06.19.2018 ■ First Submitted that Met QC Criteria: 06.27.2018 ■ First Posted: 07.11.2018 ■ Last Update Submitted that Met QC Criteria: 07.17.2018 ■ Last Update Posted: 07.19.2018 TRIAL STATUS: Current Trial Status Active as of 08/13/2018 Trial Start Date 09/01/2018-Actual Primary Completion Date 09/01/2023-Anticipated Trial Completion Date 09/01/2024-Anticipated.

Salvage radiation therapy for prostate cancer patients after prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors to predict a biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients treated with salvage radiation therapy (SRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 122 Japanese patients who received SRT for BCR after RP. Using uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, we identified the predictive factors of BCR after SRT. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 61.3 months, 45.9% of the patients showed BCR after SRT, with 61.5 and 41.8% of non-BCR rates at the second and fifth years. Univariate proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that extraprostatic disease (P = 0.029), seminal vesicle invasion (P = 0.005), microvascular invasion (P = 0.001), postoperative Gleason score (P = 0.008) and pre-SRT prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (P = 0.005) were significantly associated with BCR after SRT. However, only the presence of microvascular invasion and a higher pre-SRT PSA were significant predictors in the multivariate analysis. The non-BCR rate in the second year after SRT for 15 patients with microvascular invasion and pre-SRT PSA > 1.2 ng/ml was only 21% compared to 72.5% of 72 patients with negative microvascular invasion and a pre-SRT PSA of <1.2 ng/ml (P = 0.000031). CONCLUSIONS: While SRT is the most important secondary treatment option for patients with BCR after RP, the effectiveness of SRT may not be uniform. The combination of risk factors such as microvascular invasion in RP specimens and pre-SRT PSA may provide a better way to stratify the risk of BCR after SRT.

Use of androgen deprivation and salvage radiation therapy for patients with prostate cancer and biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy.

AIM: Overview on the use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) added to salvage radiation therapy (SRT) for prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy. METHODS: The German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) expert panel summarized available evidence published between January 2009 and May 2017, and assessed the validity of the information on outcome parameters including overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: Two randomized controlled trials and nine relevant retrospective analyses were identified. The RTOG 9601 trial showed an OS improvement for the combination of 2 years of bicalutamide and SRT compared to SRT alone after a median follow-up of 13 years. This improvement appeared to be restricted to those patients with a prostate specific antigen (PSA) level before SRT of ≥0.7 ng/mL. The GETUG AFU-16 trial showed that after a median follow-up of 5 years, the addition of 6 months of goserelin to SRT improved progression-free survival (PFS; based on biochemical recurrence) as compared to SRT alone. ADT in both trials was not associated with increased major late toxicities. Results of retrospective series were inconsistent with a suggestion that the addition of ADT improved biochemical PFS especially in patients with high-risk factors such as Gleason Score ≥8 and in the group with initially negative surgical margins. CONCLUSIONS: ADT combined with SRT appears to improve OS in patients with a PSA level before SRT of ≥0.7 ng/mL. In patients without persistent PSA after prostatectomy and PSA levels of <0.7 ng/mL, ADT should not routinely be used, but may be considered in patients with additional risk factors such as Gleason Score ≥8 and negative surgical margins.

Natural history of 'second' biochemical failure after salvage radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a multi-institution study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the natural history of prostate cancer in men who experience a second biochemical recurrence (BCR) after salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After undergoing SRT at one of two institutions between 1986 and 2013, 286 patients experienced a second BCR, defined as two rises in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of ≥0.2 ng/mL above nadir. Event rates for distant metastasis (DM) or freedom from DM (FFDM), castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used for comparative analyses. RESULTS: At a median of 6.1 years after second BCR, DM, CRPC, PCSS and OS rates were 41%, 27%, 83% and 73%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, interval to second BCR <1 year (hazard ratio [HR] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71-4.14; P < 0.001], Gleason score 8-10 (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.07-2.54; P = 0.022), and concurrent ADT during SRT (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.08-2.88; P = 0.024) were associated with FFDM, while PCSS was associated with interval to second BCR <1 year (HR 3.00, 95% CI 1.69-5.32; P < 0.001) and concurrent ADT during SRT (HR 2.15, CI 1.13-4.08; P = 0.019). These risk factors were used to stratify patients into three groups, with 6-year FFDM rates of 71%, 59% and 33%, and PCSS rates of 89%, 79%, and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Following second BCR after SRT, clinical progression is enriched in a subgroup of patients with prostate cancer, while others remain without DM for long intervals. Stratifying patients into risk groups using prognostic factors may aid counselling and future trial design.

Aetiology and management of earlier vs later biochemical recurrence after retropubic radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the characteristics and management of earlier (within 5 years) vs later (after 5 years) biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2000 and October 2009, 1597 men underwent open retropubic RP. BCRs were managed using salvage radiation therapy (SRT), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or active surveillance (AS). BCR-free survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Factors predicting earlier or later BCR and BCR after SRT were assessed using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models, respectively. RESULTS: The probabilities of developing BCR within 5 years and 10 years were 12.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.7-13.9) and 18.4% (95% CI 16.2-20.6), respectively. On multivariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen doubling time, positive surgical margins and pathological Gleason score significantly differentiated earlier from later BCR. Overall, 74.5, 12.7 and 12.7% of men developing BCR underwent SRT, ADT or AS, respectively. A significantly greater proportion of men in the earlier BCR group underwent SRT (80.8 vs 59%) and ADT (14.6 vs 8.2%), and a significantly greater proportion of men in the later BCR group underwent AS (32.8 vs 4.6%; P<0.001). The response to SRT was independent of time to BCR. On multivariate analysis, clinical stage and pathological stage significantly predicted failure of SRT. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one third of BCRs occurred between 5 and 10 years after RP. The aetiology and management of BCR was dependent on time to BCR, whereas response to SRT was independent of time to recurrence. Long-term follow-up is mandatory beyond 5 years for all men after RP.

Toxicity and efficacy of salvage carbon 11-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography-guided radiation therapy in patients with lymph node recurrence of prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To report the 3-year toxicity and outcomes of carbon 11 (11C)-choline-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-guided radiotherapy (RT), delivered via helical tomotherapy (HTT; Tomotherapy® Hi-Art II® Treatment System, Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) after lymph node (LN) relapses in patients with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to March 2013, 81 patients with biochemical recurrence after surgery, with or without adjuvant/salvage RT or radical RT, and with evidence of LN 11C-choline-PET/CT pathological uptake, underwent HTT (median [range] prostate-specific antigen level 2.59 [0.61-187] ng/mL). Of the 81 patients, 72 were treated at the pelvic and/or lumbar-aortic LN chain with HTT at 51.8 Gy/28 fr and with simultaneous integrated boost to a median dose of 65.5 Gy on the pathological uptake sites detected by 11C-choline-PET/CT. Nine patients were treated without simultaneous integrated boost (50-65.5 Gy, 25-30 fr). RESULTS: With a median (range) follow-up of 36 (9-116) months, 91.4% of the patients had a PSA reduction 3 months after HTT. The 3-year overall, local relapse-free and clinical relapse-free survival rates were 80.0, 89.8 and 61.8%, respectively. The 3-year actuarial incidences of ≥grade 2 rectal and ≥grade 2 genitourinary toxicity were 6.6% (±2.9%) and 26.3% (±5.5%), respectively. A PSA nadir of ≥0.26 ng/mL (hazard ratio [HR] 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-7.7; P = 0.001), extrapelvic 11C-choline-PET/CT-positive LN location (HR 2.4, 95% CI 0.9-6.4; P = 0.07), RT previous to HTT (HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.07-6.9, P = 0.04) and number of positive LNs (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.22; P = 0.003) were the main predictors of clinical relapse after HTT. CONCLUSIONS: 11C-choline-PET/CT-guided HTT is safe and effective in the treatment of LN relapses of prostate cancer in previously treated patients.

Adjuvant radiation therapy is associated with better oncological outcome compared with salvage radiation therapy in patients with pN1 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the comparative effectiveness of no treatment (NT) or salvage radiation therapy (sRT) at biochemical recurrence (BCR) vs adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) in patients with lymph node (LN)-positive prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 773 patients with LN-positive PCa at RP, with or without additional radiation therapy (RT), in the period 2005-2013, were retrospectively analysed. Cox regression analysis was used to assess factors influencing BCR and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Propensity score-matched analyses were performed. RESULTS: The median follow-up for the entire patient group was 33.8 months. Four-year BCR-free and MFS rates were 43.3% and 86.6%, respectively, for all patients. In multivariate analysis, NT/sRT (n = 505) was an independent risk factor for BCR and metastasis compared with aRT (n = 213). The superiority of aRT was confirmed after propensity score matching. The 4-year MFS in the matched cohort was 82.5% vs 91.8% for the NT/sRT and aRT groups, respectively (P = 0.02). Early sRT (pre-RT prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≤0.5 ng/mL) compared with sRT at PSA >0.5 ng/mL was significantly associated with a lower risk of metastasis. CONCLUSION: Patients with LN-positive PCa who received aRT had a significantly better oncological outcome than patients with NT/sRT, independent of tumour characteristics. Patients with early sRT had higher rates of response and better MFS than patients with pre-RT PSA >0.5 ng/mL.

Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage Radiation Therapy Following Radical Prostatectomy for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer.

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is now the most common definitive treatment for high-risk prostate cancer. Unfortunately, many men will have residual microscopic disease after surgery alone. Despite level 1 evidence supporting the use of adjuvant radiation therapy (ART), <10% of men with adverse pathology (positive margins or T3 disease) receive ART in the USA. Early salvage radiation therapy (eSRT) at the time of biochemical recurrence has been proposed as an alternative strategy despite the lack of published randomized trials to support this approach. Multiple randomized trials are ongoing or recently completed to compare ART to eSRT, but given the long natural history of prostate cancer, long-term oncologic outcomes from these trials will not be reported for several years. In this review, we discuss the shifting trends in the diagnosis of high-risk prostate cancer given a decline in PSA screening, use of RP for high-risk disease, and compare and contrast the retrospective and randomized evidence regarding ART and SRT.