Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Magn Reson Med ; 92(3): 1219-1231, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649922

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We examined magnetic field dependent SNR gains and ability to capture them with multichannel receive arrays for human head imaging in going from 7 T, the most commonly used ultrahigh magnetic field (UHF) platform at the present, to 10.5 T, which represents the emerging new frontier of >10 T in UHFs. METHODS: Electromagnetic (EM) models of 31-channel and 63-channel multichannel arrays built for 10.5 T were developed for 10.5 T and 7 T simulations. A 7 T version of the 63-channel array with an identical coil layout was also built. Array performance was evaluated in the EM model using a phantom mimicking the size and electrical properties of the human head and a digital human head model. Experimental data was obtained at 7 T and 10.5 T with the 63-channel array. Ultimate intrinsic SNR (uiSNR) was calculated for the two field strengths using a voxelized cloud of dipoles enclosing the phantom or the digital human head model as a reference to assess the performance of the two arrays and field depended SNR gains. RESULTS: uiSNR calculations in both the phantom and the digital human head model demonstrated SNR gains at 10.5 T relative to 7 T of 2.6 centrally, ˜2 at the location corresponding to the edge of the brain, ˜1.4 at the periphery. The EM models demonstrated that, centrally, both arrays captured ˜90% of the uiSNR at 7 T, but only ˜65% at 10.5 T, leading only to ˜2-fold gain in array SNR in going from 7 to 10.5 T. This trend was also observed experimentally with the 63-channel array capturing a larger fraction of the uiSNR at 7 T compared to 10.5 T, although the percentage of uiSNR captured were slightly lower at both field strengths compared to EM simulation results. CONCLUSIONS: Major uiSNR gains are predicted for human head imaging in going from 7 T to 10.5 T, ranging from ˜2-fold at locations corresponding to the edge of the brain to 2.6-fold at the center, corresponding to approximately quadratic increase with the magnetic field. Realistic 31- and 63-channel receive arrays, however, approach the central uiSNR at 7 T, but fail to do so at 10.5 T, suggesting that more coils and/or different type of coils will be needed at 10.5 T and higher magnetic fields.


Asunto(s)
Cabeza , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Fantasmas de Imagen , Relación Señal-Ruido , Humanos , Cabeza/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/instrumentación , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Diseño de Equipo , Simulación por Computador , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26097442

RESUMEN

We investigated to what degree and at what rate the ultimate intrinsic (UI) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) may be approached using finite radiofrequency detector arrays. We used full-wave electromagnetic field simulations based on dyadic Green's functions to compare the SNR of arrays of loops surrounding a uniform sphere with the ultimate intrinsic SNR (UISNR), for increasing numbers of elements over a range of magnetic field strengths, voxel positions, sphere sizes, and acceleration factors. We evaluated the effect of coil conductor losses and the performance of a variety of distinct geometrical arrangements such as "helmet" and "open-pole" configurations in multiple imaging planes. Our results indicate that UISNR at the center is rapidly approached with encircling arrays and performance is substantially lower near the surface, where a quadrature detection configuration tailored to voxel position is optimal. Coil noise is negligible at high field, where sample noise dominates. Central SNR for practical array configurations such as the helmet is similar to that of close-packed arrangements. The observed trends can provide physical insights to improve coil design.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA