Accommodation response and spherical aberration during orthokeratology.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the changes in the accommodative response and in the corneal and internal spherical aberration during 3 months of wear of orthokeratology lenses from the baseline. METHODS: Fifty children aged 8 to 17 were recruited for a prospective study and were fitted with orthokeratology lenses. Refraction without cycloplegia, high and low uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), accommodation lag, horizontal near phoria without correction, corneal topography, corneal, and total wavefront aberration were performed at baseline, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. Data were analyzed by Student's t test for related samples, repeated measures ANOVA test, and Pearson correlation test. RESULTS: The spherical equivalent (SE) before and after 3 months was - 3.33 ± 1.60 D and - 0.30 ± 0.46 D, respectively. Accommodation lag was 0.53 ± 0.38 D and 0.20 ± 0.33 D at baseline and at 3 months, respectively. A moderate correlation between lag at the baseline and its change between baseline and the 3-month visit was found (P < 0.05; R = 0.748). The spherical aberration (SA) increased for anterior corneal and total measurement, being statistically significant for all visits (P < 0.05). The internal SA decreased: - 0.105 ± 0.006 at baseline and - 0.196 ± 0.203 at 1 week (P < 0.05). No difference between baseline and the follow-up visits in posterior corneal SA was found (P > 0.05) CONCLUSION: The negative SA of the lens increases during OK treatment compensated for the increase of the anterior corneal surface positive SA, in addition to increasing the accommodative response.

The Impact of Misaligned Wavefront-guided Correction in a Scleral Lens for the Highly Aberrated Eye.

SIGNIFICANCE: To achieve maximum visual benefit, wavefront-guided scleral lens corrections (WGCs) are aligned with the underlying wavefront error of each individual eye. This requirement adds complexity to the fitting process. With a view toward simplification in lens fitting, this study quantified the consequences of placing WGCs at two pre-defined locations. PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantify performance reduction accompanying the placement of the WGC at two locations: (1) the average decentered location (ADL; average decentration observed across individuals wearing scleral lenses) and (2) the geometric center (GC) of the lens. METHODS: Deidentified residual aberration and lens translation data from 36 conventional scleral lens-wearing eyes with corneal ectasia were used to simulate WGC correction in silico. The WGCs were decentered from the eye-specific pupil position to both the ADL and GC locations. The impact of these misalignments was assessed in terms of change (from the aligned, eye-specific pupil position) in higher-order root mean square (HORMS) wavefront error, change in log of the visual Strehl ratio (logVSX), and predicted change in logMAR visual acuity (VA). RESULTS: As expected, HORMS increased, logVSX decreased, and predicted VA was poorer at both ADL and GC compared with the aligned condition (P < .001). Thirty-four of 36 eyes had greater residual HORMS, and 33 of 36 eyes had worse logVSX values at the GC than at the ADL. In clinical terms, 19 of 36 eyes at the ADL and 35 of 36 eyes at the GC had a predicted loss in VA of three letters or greater. CONCLUSIONS: The placement of the WGC at either ADL or GC is predicted to lead to a noticeable reduction in VA for more than half of the eyes studied, suggesting the simplification of the fitting process is not worth the cost in performance.

Optical Quality and Visual Performance for One Year in a Sample of Scleral Lens Wearers.

SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows the optical and visual quality behavior of modern scleral lenses (SLs) in the medium and long term in patients with irregular cornea (IC) and regular cornea (RC). PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 12-month optical quality outcomes with SL in patients with IC and RC. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients completed the 12 months of follow-up (99 eyes with IC and 27 with RC). LogMAR high- and low-contrast visual acuity, whole eye aberrometry, and the size (Light Disturbance Index, %) and shape (BFCIrregSD, mm) of night vision disturbances were measured at baseline with habitual correction (HC), best spectacle correction (BSC), and SL at all the follow-up visits (1, 3, 6, and 12 months). Subjective visual quality was measured with the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire. RESULTS: After SL fitting, high-contrast visual acuity improved significantly compared with HC and BSC in the IC group (average improvement of +0.35 ± 0.32 and +0.29 ± 0.26 to +0.08 ± 0.14, P < .001) and RC group (+0.17 ± 0.23 and +0.12 ± 0.23 to +0.10 ± 0.23, P < .05). Light Disturbance Index decreased significantly with SL compared with HC and BSC from 13.85 ± 13.99% and 15.89 ± 13.38% to 5.75 ± 4.51% in the IC group (P < .001) and 6.16 ± 5.38 and 5.98 ± 5.39 to 3.99 ± 3.05 in the RC group (P < .05). BFCIrregSD also decreased significantly, namely, in the IC group (-51%). All subscales of the QoV questionnaire had a statistically significant decrease (improvement) with SL (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Scleral lenses promote a better subjective and objective visual quality, mainly in patients with IC. Additional measurements such as night vision disturbances, aberrometry, and subjective perceptions should be considered to characterize the visual enhancement promoted by SL in RC and IC patients.

Case Report: What Are We Doing for Our "20/20 Unhappy" Scleral Lens Patients?

SIGNIFICANCE: Scleral lenses (SLs) partially mask higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in highly aberrated eyes. Although visual acuity (VA) may show satisfactory quantitative clinical outcomes during SL wear, residual (uncorrected) HOAs can leave subjective visual quality goals unmet. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report a case where a "20/20 unhappy" patient with SLs was able to meet visual goals with wavefront-guided SLs. CASE REPORT: A 40-year-old male with bilateral keratoconus, whose Snellen VA with SLs was 20/20 right eye (OD) 20/16 left eye (OS), reported halos and glare at night and perceptual smearing. When viewing a point of light, a "Ferris wheel" shadowing was observed OD and a U-shaped shadowing OS. Residual higher-order root mean square wavefront error was 0.49 µm OD and 0.39 µm OS; visual image quality measured by visual Strehl ratio was 0.067 OD and 0.092 OS (pupil size, 4.00 mm). Wavefront-guided SLs reduced residual higher-order root mean square to 0.19 µm OD and 0.25 µm OS, VA improved to 20/10 OD and 20/13 OS, and visual Strehl improved to 0.150 OD and 0.121 OS. The patient reported reduced smearing, shadowing, and night vision concerns, meeting his visual expectations and goals. CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront sensing quantifies both lower and HOAs, which can cause visual dissatisfaction in individuals with highly aberrated eyes, despite sometimes reaching typical levels of VA. As wavefront-guided SLs targeting these residual aberrations to improve visual image quality become more available, they should be considered for 20/20 unhappy patients when conventional clinical options are unsatisfactory.

Multifocal contact lenses: towards customisation?

PURPOSE: Firstly, to determine if eyes with spherical aberration (SA) that deviates significantly from the average level underperform when fitted with a simultaneous-imaging contact lens (CL) with a power profile calculated for an 'average eye'. Secondly, to determine if CL customisation can improve image quality in these eyes after fitting with a bifocal CL. METHODS: A statistical model of the wavefront aberration function of normal eyes was used to generate a vector of Zernike fourth-order SA coefficients from 100 synthetic eyes. Four bifocal power profiles were modelled: centre-near (CN) or centre-distance (CD), and two-zone or four-zone. All designs had 0.1-mm-wide transition zones. Different levels of distance and add powers were modelled, using well-established computational wave-optics methods. Zone widths were optimised to obtain maximal multifocal efficiency (MFE), a metric based on the visual Strehl that synthesises the through-focus curve in one number. The MFE was calculated for each synthetic eye coupled with each bifocal power profile. RESULTS: For an 'average eye', the mean MFE values were 0.33 vs 0.25 and 0.32 vs 0.29, for CN vs CD and two vs four zone designs, respectively. When the four power profiles were assessed in eyes with non-average levels of ocular SA, the MFE decreased with higher levels of SA (eye and CL combined) for all designs. Some of this reduction in MFE could be prevented by adjusting the nominal distance and add power of the bifocal profiles to compensate for the increased or decreased level of combined SA. The four-zone CN profile showed better tolerance for different levels of ocular SA than the two-zone designs, but this was not true for the four-zone CD design. CONCLUSION: Eyes with SA levels differing significantly from the average level underperform when fitted with simultaneous-imaging CLs with power profiles calculated for average eyes. Our findings suggest that visual performance at distance and near when wearing bifocal CLs can be improved by using a semi-customised approach.

Post-LASIK Visual Quality With a Corneoscleral Contact Lens to Treat Irregular Corneas.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the visual quality results of fitting a corneoscleral contact lens with multiaspheric geometry design (MAGD CScL) in subjects with irregular corneas after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. METHODS: From a database of patients evaluated for scleral contact lenses, we identified those with irregular corneas and visual problems after they underwent LASIK surgery for correcting myopia. They manifested unsatisfactory visual quality with their current contact lenses or glasses. Therefore, a MAGD CScL was fitted and monitored according to standardized fitting methodology. A diagnostic trial set was used in the fitting process. Visual acuity (VA), subjective visual quality (SVQ), and ocular aberrations were evaluated. A new re-evaluation of these parameters was performed after 1 year wearing MAGD CScL. RESULTS: Eighteen eyes of 18 patients (10 male and 8 female) with irregular cornea after LASIK surgery participated in this study; their ages ranged from 27 to 39 years (mean±SD, 32.6±3.8 years). All patients showed good fitting characteristics: optimal values were seen for lens position and lens movement. Statistically significant differences were found between before and after fitting MAGD CScL in the VA (mean±SD, 0.14±0.03 logMAR and 0.01±0.06 logMAR, respectively; P<0.001); ocular aberrations of second-order, coma, spherical; and the total higher-order aberrations (HOAs) (all P<0.001). The total HOAs decreased by approximately 78% to normal levels after fitting MAGD CScL. In addition, SVQ was also significantly improved after fitting MAGD CScL (16 eyes were favorable or very favorable). After 1 year wearing MAGD CScL, no statistically significant differences were found in the total HOAs and VA in regard to the initial fitting. CONCLUSIONS: Corneoscleral contact lens with multiaspheric geometry design is proposed as an effective procedure, providing a good VA and an optimal visual quality on irregular corneas after LASIK surgery in myopic subjects.

Use of Wavefront Imaging Technology to Demonstrate Improvement in Corneal Aberrations Using Piggyback Contact Lens in a Keratoconus Eye With Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation: A Case Report.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify short-term changes in corneal high-order aberrations (HOA) with piggyback contact lens use in an eye with keratoconus that had undergone intrastromal ring segment (Intacs) implantation. METHODS: A patient with keratoconus reporting of distorted images after Intacs surgery was found to have HOA (trefoil, point spread function [PSF], and modulation transfer function [MTF]) as measured using wavefront technology (Nidek OPD-Scan III) and evidenced by her cylindrical correction. She underwent piggyback contact lens (silicone hydrogel and fluoroperm rigid gas-permeable lenses) fitting in an attempt to improve the HOA. RESULTS: After piggyback contact lens fitting, her visual acuity improved and all her visual symptoms resolved. High-order aberrations reduced from 3.152 to 0.490 after the lens fitting and was noted to be 0.447 at 6 months; trefoil also significantly improved (0.360-0.096; it was 0.031 at 6 months). The cylinder decreased from -4.50 to -0.75 and was stable at 6 months (-1.00). There was also significant improvement in PSF and MTF. CONCLUSIONS: Visual acuity and symptoms along with HOA and cylinder improved after fitting of piggyback contact lens in our patient with keratoconus who had undergone Intacs.

Effects of optical blur reduction on equivalent intrinsic blur.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of optical blur reduction on equivalent intrinsic blur, an estimate of the blur within the visual system, by comparing optical and equivalent intrinsic blur before and after adaptive optics (AO) correction of wavefront error. METHODS: Twelve visually normal subjects (mean [±SD] age, 31 [±12] years) participated in this study. Equivalent intrinsic blur (σint) was derived using a previously described model. Optical blur (σopt) caused by high-order aberrations was quantified by Shack-Hartmann aberrometry and minimized using AO correction of wavefront error. RESULTS: σopt and σint were significantly reduced and visual acuity was significantly improved after AO correction (p ≤ 0.004). Reductions in σopt and σint were linearly dependent on the values before AO correction (r ≥ 0.94, p ≤ 0.002). The reduction in σint was greater than the reduction in σopt, although it was marginally significant (p = 0.05). σint after AO correlated significantly with σint before AO (r = 0.92, p < 0.001), and the two parameters were related linearly with a slope of 0.46. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction in equivalent intrinsic blur was greater than the reduction in optical blur after AO correction of wavefront error. This finding implies that visual acuity in subjects with high equivalent intrinsic blur can be improved beyond that expected from the reduction in optical blur alone.

A Comparison of Three Methods to Increase Scleral Contact Lens On-Eye Stability.

PURPOSE: To quantify on-eye rotational and translational stability of three scleral contact lens stabilization methods and to model the variation in visual acuity when these movements occur in a wavefront-guided correction for highly aberrated eyes. METHODS: Three lens stabilization methods were integrated into the posterior periphery of a scleral contact lens designed at the Visual Optics Institute. For comparison, a lens with no stabilization method (rotationally symmetric posterior periphery) was designed. The lenses were manufactured and lens movements were quantified on 8 eyes as the average SD of the observed translations and rotations over 60 min of wear. In addition, the predicted changes in acuity for five eyes with keratoconus wearing a simulated wavefront-guided correction (full correction through the fifth order) were modeled using the measured movements. RESULTS: For each lens design, no significant differences in the translation and rotation were found between left and right eyes, and lenses behaved similarly on all subjects. All three designs with peripheral stability modifications exhibited no statistically significant differences in translation and rotation distributions of lens movement and were statistically more stable than the spherical lens in rotation. When the measured movements were used to simulate variation in visual performance, the 3 lenses with integrated stability methods showed a predicted average loss in acuity from the perfectly aligned condition of approximately 0.06 logMAR (3 letters), compared with the loss of over 0.14 logMAR (7 letters) for the lens with the spherical periphery. CONCLUSION: All three stabilization methods provided superior stability, as compared with the spherical lens design. Simulations of the optical and visual performance suggest that all three stabilization designs can provide desirable results when used in the delivery of a wavefront-guided correction for a highly aberrated eye.

Wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To examine the performance of state-of-the-art wavefront-guided scleral contact lenses (wfgSCLs) on a sample of keratoconic eyes, with emphasis on performance quantified with visual quality metrics, and to provide a detailed discussion of the process used to design, manufacture, and evaluate wfgSCLs. METHODS: Fourteen eyes of seven subjects with keratoconus were enrolled and a wfgSCL was designed for each eye. High-contrast visual acuity and visual quality metrics were used to assess the on-eye performance of the lenses. RESULTS: The wfgSCL provided statistically lower levels of both lower-order root mean square (RMS) (p < 0.001) and higher-order RMS (HORMS) (p < 0.02) than an intermediate spherical equivalent scleral contact lens. The wfgSCL provided lower levels of lower-order RMS than a normal group of well-corrected observers (p << 0.001). However, the wfgSCL does not provide less HORMS than the normal group (p = 0.41). Of the 14 eyes studied, 10 successfully reached the exit criteria, achieving residual HORMS wavefront error less than or within 1 SD of the levels experienced by normal, age-matched subjects. In addition, measures of visual image quality (logVSX, logNS, and logLIB) for the 10 eyes were well distributed within the range of values seen in normal eyes. However, visual performance as measured by high-contrast acuity did not reach normal, age-matched levels, which is in agreement with prior results associated with the acute application of wavefront correction to keratoconic eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided scleral contact lenses are capable of optically compensating for the deleterious effects of higher-order aberration concomitant with the disease and can provide visual image quality equivalent to that seen in normal eyes. Longer-duration studies are needed to assess whether the visual system of the highly aberrated eye wearing a wfgSCL is capable of producing visual performance levels typical of the normal population.

Wavefront error correction with adaptive optics in diabetic retinopathy.

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of diabetic retinopathy (DR), increased foveal thickness (FT), and adaptive optics (AO) on wavefront aberrations and Shack-Hartmann (SH) image quality. METHODS: Shack-Hartmann aberrometry and wavefront error correction were performed with a bench-top AO retinal imaging system in 10 healthy control and 19 DR subjects. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography was performed and central FT was measured. Based on the FT data in the control group, subjects in the DR group were categorized into two subgroups: those with normal FT and those with increased FT. Shack-Hartmann image quality was assessed based on spot areas, and high-order (HO) root mean square (RMS) and total RMS were calculated. RESULTS: There was a significant effect of DR on HO and total RMS (p = 0.01), and RMS decreased significantly after AO correction (p < 0.001). Shack-Hartmann spot area was significantly affected by DR (p < 0.001), but it did not change after AO correction (p = 0.6). High-order RMS, total RMS, and SH spot area were higher in DR subjects both before and after AO correction. In DR subgroups, HO and total RMS decreased significantly after AO correction (p < 0.001), whereas the effect of increased FT on HO and total RMS was not significant (p ≥ 0.7). There were no significant effects of increased FT and AO on SH spot area (p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic retinopathy subjects had higher wavefront aberrations and less compact SH spots, likely attributable to pathological changes in the ocular optics. Wavefront aberrations were significantly reduced by AO, although AO performance was suboptimal in DR subjects as compared with control subjects.

Contrast sensitivity function after correcting residual wavefront aberrations during RGP lens wear.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect on the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) of correcting the residual wavefront aberrations in myopic and keratoconic subjects wearing rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lenses. METHODS: Seventeen eyes of 16 myopic subjects and 20 eyes of 19 keratoconic subjects were included in this study. All eyes were habitually corrected with RGP lenses. The residual aberrations of the RGP lens-wearing eyes were compensated by an adaptive optics (AO) system. The contrast sensitivities were measured through a 4-mm artificial pupil at spatial frequencies of 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 cycles per degree (cpd) during RGP lens wear for the myopic and keratoconic groups, respectively. The CSF measurements were repeated with and without AO correction. Comparisons of contrast sensitivity at all spatial frequencies with and without AO correction were performed respectively for the myopic and keratoconic groups during RGP lens wear. RESULTS: In the myopic RGP lens-wearing group, the differences in contrast sensitivity at each spatial frequency, with and without AO correction, were not significant (all p values > 0.05). In the keratoconic RGP lens-wearing group, the contrast sensitivities at all spatial frequencies with AO correction were higher than those without AO correction, but differences only at the low (2 cpd) and intermediate (4, 8, and 16 cpd) spatial frequencies were significant (p = 0.039, 0.005, 0.001, and 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The residual aberrations significantly reduced the contrast sensitivities at low and intermediate spatial frequencies for keratoconic RGP lens-wearing eyes but did not have any effect on the CSF for the myopic RGP lens-wearing eyes. Developing techniques that could more completely correct the wavefront aberrations may improve visual performance in keratoconus.

Optical quality and visual performance with customised soft contact lenses for keratoconus.

PURPOSE: This study investigated how aberration-controlling, customised soft contact lenses corrected higher-order ocular aberrations and visual performance in keratoconic patients compared to other forms of refractive correction (spectacles and rigid gas-permeable lenses). METHODS: Twenty-two patients (16 rigid gas-permeable contact lens wearers and six spectacle wearers) were fitted with standard toric soft lenses and customised lenses (designed to correct 3rd-order coma aberrations). In the rigid gas-permeable lens-wearing patients, ocular aberrations were measured without lenses, with the patient's habitual lenses and with the study lenses (Hartmann-Shack aberrometry). In the spectacle-wearing patients, ocular aberrations were measured both with and without the study lenses. LogMAR visual acuity (high-contrast and low-contrast) was evaluated with the patient wearing their habitual correction (of either spectacles or rigid gas-permeable contact lenses) and with the study lenses. RESULTS: In the contact lens wearers, the habitual rigid gas-permeable lenses and customised lenses provided significant reductions in 3rd-order coma root-mean-square (RMS) error, 3rd-order RMS and higher-order RMS error (p ≤ 0.004). In the spectacle wearers, the standard toric lenses and customised lenses significantly reduced 3rd-order RMS and higher-order RMS errors (p ≤ 0.005). The spectacle wearers showed no significant differences in visual performance measured between their habitual spectacles and the study lenses. However, in the contact lens wearers, the habitual rigid gas-permeable lenses and standard toric lenses provided significantly better high-contrast acuities compared to the customised lenses (p ≤ 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The customised lenses provided substantial reductions in ocular aberrations in these keratoconic patients; however, the poor visual performances achieved with these lenses are most likely to be due to small, on-eye lens decentrations.

Corneal reshaping and wavefront aberrations during overnight orthokeratology.

PURPOSE: To investigate changes of corneal thickness at the vertical and horizontal meridians and of wavefront aberrations (WA) over a 30-day period of overnight myopia orthokeratology (OK) lens wear. METHODS: Sixteen subjects (11 women, 5 men, 26.3±3.2 years) were enrolled and fitted for OK lenses. Long scan depth optical coherence tomography was used to measure corneal thickness profiles at both horizontal and vertical meridians at baseline and on days 1, 7, and 30 days. Corneal and ocular WA of a 6-mm pupil were measured and the root-mean-square (RMS) of the astigmatism, coma, spherical aberration (SA), and total higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were determined. RESULTS: During the 30-day period, the central cornea thinned in the horizontal and vertical meridians, whereas corneal thickening occurred in the temporal, nasal, and inferior mid-peripheries. In contrast, the cornea thinned in the mid-peripheral superior. There were significant increases in RMS for astigmatism, SA, coma, and positive horizontal coma during the study period. After OK, there were significant positive correlations between the midperipheral-central thickness change difference and the changes in corneal and ocular RMS of total HOAs and SA (r range: 0.281 to 0.492, P<0.05). Only the change of corneal coma RMS was correlated with midperipheral-central thickness change difference (r=0.270, P<0.05). The change in corneal horizontal coma was correlated with the temporal-nasal thickness change difference (r=-0.289, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Overnight OK caused unique changes in corneal thickness profiles at the vertical and horizontal meridians and increased corneal and ocular HOAs related to corneal reshaping.

Just-noticeable differences for wavefront aberrations obtained with a staircase procedure.

PURPOSE: To explore the magnitude of aberrations that alter the subjective visual quality measurably. The suitability of a staircase procedure for threshold determination was investigated. METHODS: Spectacle correction (correction A) was achieved in 28 healthy eyes by an adaptive optics set-up, and additional astigmatism, coma, or trefoil was induced (correction B). Subjects observed a radial test pattern with noncyclopleged eyes using an artificial 5-mm pupil. They compared corrections A and B and identified the subjectively better correction. The magnitude of the aberration for each presentation varied according to the "Best PEST" staircase procedure. Just-noticeable difference (JND) was found after 30 presentations. Participants were divided into three groups, and the experiment was repeated under the following conditions: without modifications (n = 9), with a letter chart (n = 10), and with full correction of all aberrations (n = 9). RESULTS: Median JND was 0.091 µm for astigmatism, 0.059 µm for coma, and 0.108 µm for trefoil, with a large interindividual spread. Repeatability coefficient across the three aberrations was 0.095 µm. A significant correlation was found between JNDs and the residual aberrations (without the generated aberration) in astigmatism and coma. Differences between radial test pattern and letter chart and between spectacle correction and full correction were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: JNDs were lower for coma than for astigmatism and trefoil, depending on the magnitude of other residual aberrations, and showed large variations among subjects. Thus, the decision to correct more pronounced aberrations (eg, by wavefront-guided LASIK) should not depend on wavefront measurement results alone. A staircase procedure for determination of JNDs provides repeatable results.

Myopic astigmatism correction: comparison of a Toric Implantable Collamer Lens and a bioptics technique by an adaptive optics visual simulator.

PURPOSE: To compare the optical and visual quality of a simulated Toric Implantable Collamer Lens (TICL) and a bioptics technique to treat high myopic astigmatism. METHODS: An adaptive optics visual simulator was used to simulate the vision after TICL implantation and a bioptics procedure from the wavefront aberration pattern for moderate and high-myopic astigmatism. Visual acuity (VA) at different contrasts and contrast sensitivity (CS) at 10, 20 and 25 cycles degree(-1) were measured for 3 and 5-mm pupils. Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) and Point Spread Function (PSF) were calculated for a 5-mm pupil. RESULTS: At a 3-mm pupil we only found statistically significant differences in VA between the two simulated surgeries at low-contrast for moderate- and high-myopic astigmatism (p < 0.05). Statistically significant differences were found in CS at 3-mm pupil between both procedures at the highest spatial frequency for moderate-myopic astigmatism and at all frequencies for high-myopic astigmatism (p < 0.05). At a 5-mm pupil we found statistically significant differences in VA and CS between both simulated surgeries at all contrasts and frequencies evaluated for both groups (p < 0.05). In all cases VA and CS were better with the TICL than with the bioptics technique. MTFs for the bioptics technique were worse than those computed for the TICL. The TICL showed less spread out of the PSF than the bioptics procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Simulated TICL and bioptics procedures provided good optical and visual quality, although TICL implantation provided slightly better outcomes than the bioptics procedure, especially when the pupil diameter was increased.

Effects on vision with glare after correction of monochromatic wavefront aberrations.

PURPOSE: To investigate effects of optical aberration correction on vision with glare. METHODS: Correction of aberrations up to the 6th Zernike order (closed-loop correction) was compared with conventional spectacle correction in 42 healthy eyes. To create these corrections, an adaptive optics system including a thin-film transistor (TFT) monitor for displaying optotypes with additional glare sources was used. Employing both corrections, visual acuity and contrast sensitivity (CS) were tested alternately with and without glare. Disability glare was computed as the difference between log CS without and with glare. Individuals were also asked to rate subjectively the quality of three images displayed on the TFT monitor. RESULTS: Significant improvements of CS without and with glare were found with the closed-loop correction (0.147 and 0.198 log CS, respectively), whereas no significant difference in visual acuity was found in either correction. Correlations were determined between reduction of total root-mean-square error and increase of CS with glare (Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.42) and decrease of disability glare (r=-0.33). Visual acuity was correlated with the visual Strehl ratio based on the optical transfer function (r=0.46). Subjective comparison of the images showed improvements more clearly. Depending on the image, in 57% to 78% of the eyes, closed-loop correction was rated better than spectacle correction. The subjective glare effect was reduced as well. CONCLUSIONS: Investigation of vision with glare seems to be a reasonable additional test to evaluate the visual outcome of a customized correction.

Spherical aberration and higher order aberrations with Balafilcon A (PureVision) and Comfilcon A (Biofinity).

BACKGROUND: Advances in the optical design of soft contact lenses have seen certain manufacturers incorporate aspheric optics into soft lenses in an attempt to reduce spherical aberration, to provide superior visual performance. The aim of this study is to determine the on-eye differences in spherical aberration and higher order aberrations (HOA) between the Bausch and Lomb PureVision (Balafilcon A) and the CooperVision Biofinity (Comfilcon A). METHODS: Twenty subjects were recruited in a prospective, randomized, unilateral study. The right eye was dilated and HOA measured with the NIDEK OPD-Scan. Each eye was fitted randomly with a -3.00D PureVision and a -3.00D Biofinity, and HOA were measured with lenses in situ across a 6 mm pupil. Paired t-tests were performed to determine HOA differences with the lenses in situ compared to baseline. RESULTS: Aberrometry was successfully performed on all subjects. Statistical analysis indicated no changes in spherical aberration, but changes in other HOA. With the PureVision, there were increases in Zernike terms Z (3) (1) (from 0.01 µm to -0.11 µm), Z (4) (-2) (from 0.01 µm to 0.13 µm) and Z (5) (-1) (from -0.01 µm to 0.03 µm). With the Biofinity there was an increase in Zernike term Z (3) (3) (from 0.00 µm to 0.09 µm). CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant changes occurred in spherical aberration. The PureVision caused statistically significant increases in Z (3) (1) , Z (4) (-2) and Z (5) (-1) , and the Biofinity caused an increase in Z (3) (3) . Clinically significant changes (>0.1 µm) occurred with terms Z (3) (1) and Z (4) (-2) with the PureVision only.

Enhanced visual acuity and image perception following correction of highly aberrated eyes using an adaptive optics visual simulator.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the changes in visual acuity and visual perception generated by correcting higher order aberrations in highly aberrated eyes using a large-stroke adaptive optics visual simulator. METHODS: A crx1 Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator (Imagine Eyes) was used to correct and modify the wavefront aberrations in 12 keratoconic eyes and 8 symptomatic postoperative refractive surgery (LASIK) eyes. After measuring ocular aberrations, the device was programmed to compensate for the eye's wavefront error from the second order to the fifth order (6-mm pupil). Visual acuity was assessed through the adaptive optics system using computer-generated ETDRS opto-types and the Freiburg Visual Acuity and Contrast Test. RESULTS: Mean higher order aberration root-mean-square (RMS) errors in the keratoconus and symptomatic LASIK eyes were 1.88+/-0.99 microm and 1.62+/-0.79 microm (6-mm pupil), respectively. The visual simulator correction of the higher order aberrations present in the keratoconus eyes improved their visual acuity by a mean of 2 lines when compared to their best spherocylinder correction (mean decimal visual acuity with spherocylindrical correction was 0.31+/-0.18 and improved to 0.44+/-0.23 with higher order aberration correction). In the symptomatic LASIK eyes, the mean decimal visual acuity with spherocylindrical correction improved from 0.54+/-0.16 to 0.71+/-0.13 with higher order aberration correction. The visual perception of ETDRS letters was improved when correcting higher order aberrations. CONCLUSIONS: The adaptive optics visual simulator can effectively measure and compensate for higher order aberrations (second to fifth order), which are associated with diminished visual acuity and perception in highly aberrated eyes. The adaptive optics technology may be of clinical benefit when counseling patients with highly aberrated eyes regarding their maximum subjective potential for vision correction.

Subjective blur limits for higher order aberrations.

PURPOSE: We compared subjective blur limits for defocus and the higher-order aberrations of coma, trefoil, and spherical aberration. METHODS: Spherical aberration was presented in both Zernike and Seidel forms. Black letter targets (0.1, 0.35, and 0.6 logMAR) on white backgrounds were blurred using an adaptive optics system for six subjects under cycloplegia with 5 mm artificial pupils. Three blur criteria of just noticeable, just troublesome, and just objectionable were used. RESULTS: When expressed as wave aberration coefficients, the just noticeable blur limits for coma and trefoil were similar to those for defocus, whereas the just noticeable limits for Zernike spherical aberration and Seidel spherical aberration (the latter given as an "rms equivalent") were considerably smaller and larger, respectively, than defocus limits. CONCLUSIONS: Blur limits increased more quickly for the higher order aberrations than for defocus as the criterion changed from just noticeable to just troublesome and then to just objectionable.