Pharmacological and clinical implications of local anaesthetic mixtures: a narrative review.

Various techniques have been explored to prolong the duration and improve the efficacy of local anaesthetic nerve blocks. Some of these involve mixing local anaesthetics or adding adjuncts. We did a literature review of studies published between 01 May 2011 and 01 May 2021 that studied specific combinations of local anaesthetics and adjuncts. The rationale behind mixing long- and short-acting local anaesthetics to hasten onset and extend duration is flawed on pharmacokinetic principles. Most local anaesthetic adjuncts are not licensed for use in this manner and the consequences of untested admixtures and adjuncts range from making the solution ineffective to potential harm. Pharmaceutical compatibility needs to be established before administration. The compatibility of drugs from the same class cannot be inferred and each admixture requires individual review. Precipitation on mixing (steroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) and subsequent embolisation can lead to serious adverse events, although these are rare. The additive itself or its preservative can have neurotoxic (adrenaline, midazolam) and/or chondrotoxic properties (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). The prolongation of block may occur at the expense of motor block quality (ketamine) or block onset (magnesium). Adverse effects for some adjuncts appear to be dose-dependent and recommendations concerning optimal dosing are lacking. An important confounding factor is whether studies used systemic administration of the adjunct as a control to accurately identify an additional benefit of perineural administration. The challenge of how best to prolong block duration while minimising adverse events remains a topic of interest with further research required.

Anaesthesia for mechanical thrombectomy: a narrative review.

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability, and is associated with a huge societal and economic burden. Interventions for the immediate treatment of ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion are dependent on recanalisation of the occluded vessel. Trials have provided evidence supporting the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy in ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. This has resulted in changes in management and organisation of stroke care worldwide. Major determinants of effectiveness of thrombectomy include: time between stroke onset and reperfusion; location of occlusion and local collateral perfusion; adequacy of reperfusion; patient age; and stroke severity. The role of anaesthetic technique on outcome remains controversial with published research showing conflicting results. As a result, choice of conscious sedation or general anaesthesia for mechanical thrombectomy is often dependent on individual operator choice or institutional preference. More recent randomised controlled trials have suggested that protocol-driven general anaesthesia is no worse than conscious sedation and may even be associated with better outcomes. These and other studies have highlighted the importance of optimal blood pressure management as a major determinant of patient outcome. Anaesthetic management should be tailored to the individual patient and circumstances. Acute ischaemic stroke is a neurological emergency; clinicians should focus on minimising door-to-groin puncture time and the provision of high-quality periprocedural care with a particular emphasis on the maintenance of an adequate blood pressure.

Prospective Evaluation of a Standardized Opioid Reduction Protocol after Anorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for anorectal disease is thought to cause significant postoperative pain. Our previous work demonstrated that most opioids prescribed after anorectal surgery are not used. We aimed to evaluate a standardized protocol for pain control after anorectal surgery. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated a standardized opioid reduction protocol over a 13-mo period for all patients undergoing elective anorectal surgery at our institution. Protocol components include preoperative query, procedural local-anesthetic blocks, first-line nonopioid analgesic use ± opioid prescription of five pills, and standardized postoperative instructions. Patients completed questionnaires at postoperative follow-up. Patients with history of opioid abuse or use within 30 d of operation, loss to follow-up, or surgical complications were excluded. Primary outcome was quality of pain control on a five-point scale. Secondary outcomes included use of nonopioid analgesics, opioids used, and need for refill. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were included. Mean age was 47 ± 17 y with 23 women (42%). Anorectal abscess/fistula procedures were the most common (69%) followed by pilonidal procedures (11%) and hemorrhoidectomy (7%). Most had general anesthesia (60%) with the remainder local anesthesia ± sedation. Fifty-four (98%) had procedural local-anesthetic blocks. Twenty-six patients (47%) were prescribed opioids with a median of five pills. Forty-seven patients (85%) reported the use of nonopioid analgesics. Forty-six patients (84%) reported excellent to very good pain control. About 220 opioid pills were prescribed, and 122 were reported to be used. One patient (2%) received an opioid refill. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory pain control after anorectal surgery can be achieved with multimodality therapy with little to no opioid use for most patients.

Variation Between and Within Hospitals in Single Injection Caudal Local Anesthetic Dose: A Report From the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network.

BACKGROUND: Given that variation exists in health care utilization, expenditure, and medical practice, there is a paucity of data on variation within the practice of anesthesia. The Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN) data lend itself to explore whether different medical practice patterns exist and if there are nerve blocks with more local anesthetic dosing variation than others. The primary aim of this study was to quantify variation in single injection caudal block dosing, and the secondary aim was to explore possible causes for variation (eg, number of blocks performed versus geographic location). METHODS: We queried the PRAN database for single injection caudal blocks in children <1 year of age. Data were analyzed for local anesthetic dose, variation within and across institutions, and possible causes. RESULTS: Mean dose of bupivacaine equivalents per kilogram (BE·kg) among sites ranged from 1.39 to 2.22 with an interdecile range (IDR) containing the mid 80% of all doses ranging from 0.21 to 1.48. Mean dose (BE·kg) was associated with site, age, weight, and local anesthetic used (all P < .0001). Cohen's F effect size estimate was 10 times higher for site (0.65) than for age (0.05) or weight (0.02). Variation (IDR) was not related to number of blocks done at each site (P = .23). Mean volume per kilogram was 0.9± ± 0.2 (mean ± ±standard deviation) and was more strongly associated with site (Cohen's F 0.3) than age (0.04) or weight (0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Wide variation in caudal local anesthetic dosing and administered volume exists. This variation is independent of the number of cases performed at each center but rather is determined by study site (ie, variation between centers) with considerable additional variation within study centers, suggesting additional variability dependent on individual practitioners. While there are legitimate reasons to vary dosing, the current approach is inconsistent and not supported by strong evidence over giving a standardized dose.

A Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia Versus Monitored Anesthesia Care With Local Anesthesia in Minimally Invasive Fetal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive fetal surgery is commonly performed to treat twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome with selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation and twin-reversed arterial perfusion sequence using radiofrequency ablation. Although an increasing number of centers worldwide are performing these procedures, anesthetic management varies. Both neuraxial anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care with local anesthesia are used at different institutions. We sought to determine the efficacy and outcomes of these 2 anesthetic techniques for fetal procedures at our institution. METHODS: All patients undergoing minimally invasive fetal surgery for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome or twin-reversed arterial perfusion sequence over a 6-year time period (2011-2016) were reviewed. Patients receiving monitored anesthesia care with local anesthesia were compared with those receiving spinal anesthesia in both selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation and radiofrequency ablation fetal procedures. The primary outcome examined between the monitored anesthesia care and spinal anesthesia groups was the difference in conversion to general anesthesia using a noninferiority design with a noninferiority margin of 5%. Secondary outcome measures included use of vasopressors, procedure times, intraoperative fluids administered, maternal complications, and unexpected fetal demise within 24 hours of surgery. RESULTS: The difference in failure rate between monitored anesthesia care and spinal was -0.5% (95% CI, -4.8% to 3.7%). Patients receiving monitored anesthesia care plus local anesthesia were significantly less likely to need vasopressors, had a shorter presurgical operating room time, and received less fluid (P < .001). Operative time did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Monitored anesthesia care plus local anesthesia is a reliable and safe anesthetic choice for minimally invasive fetal surgery. Furthermore, it decreases maternal hemodynamic instability and reduces preincision operating room time.

Combination Preemptive Peripheral Nerve Block in Limb Surgery. A Prospective Study.

Background and objectives: Patients often suffer from moderate to severe pain during the early recovery period in orthopedic surgery. We investigated the impact of a single-shot preoperative peripheral nerve block (PNB) on post-anesthesia recovery parameters and interleukin (IL)-6 level during limb surgery. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted, and patients scheduled for limb surgery were recruited. Sixty patients were randomly assigned to either the PNB group or control group, who received morphine as a primary analgesic. The peak verbal numeric rating scale (NRS) score in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) was evaluated as a primary outcome. We also recorded rescue analgesics requirement and wake-up time from anesthesia in the PACU. In addition, the change of plasma IL-6 level after incision was measured. Results: Fifty-two patients completed the study, 27 and 25 cases in the PNB and control group, respectively. Preemptive PNB significantly reduced peak NRS score in the PACU compared to control group. Lower rescue analgesics requirement and rapid wake-up from anesthesia were also noted in PNB group. The IL-6 concentration increased less in the PNB group at 2 h after incision. Conclusions: Preemptive PNB attenuates IL-6 expression 2 h after incision and improves pain management in the PACU. PNB was considered as an essential part of pain management in limb surgery.

Do Hospitals Performing Frequent Neuraxial Anesthesia for Hip and Knee Replacements Have Better Outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Neuraxial anesthesia is increasingly recommended for hip/knee replacements as some studies show improved outcomes on the individual level. With hospital-level studies lacking, we assessed the relationship between hospital-level neuraxial anesthesia utilization and outcomes. METHODS: National data on 808,237 total knee and 371,607 hip replacements were included (Premier Healthcare 2006 to 2014; 550 hospitals). Multivariable associations were measured between hospital-level neuraxial anesthesia volume (subgrouped into quartiles) and outcomes (respiratory/cardiac complications, blood transfusion/intensive care unit need, opioid utilization, and length/cost of hospitalization). Odds ratios (or percent change) and 95% CI are reported. Volume-outcome relationships were additionally assessed by plotting hospital-level neuraxial anesthesia volume against predicted hospital-specific outcomes; trend tests were applied with trendlines' R statistics reported. RESULTS: Annual hospital-specific neuraxial anesthesia volume varied greatly: interquartile range, 3 to 78 for hips and 6 to 163 for knees. Increasing frequency of neuraxial anesthesia was not associated with reliable improvements in any of the study's clinical outcomes. However, significant reductions of up to -14.1% (95% CI, -20.9% to -6.6%) and -15.6% (95% CI, -22.8% to -7.7%) were seen for hospitalization cost in knee and hip replacements, respectively, both in the third quartile of neuraxial volume. This coincided with significant volume effects for hospitalization cost; test for trend P < 0.001 for both procedures, R 0.13 and 0.41 for hip and knee replacements, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Increased hospital-level use of neuraxial anesthesia is associated with lower hospitalization cost for lower joint replacements. However, additional studies are needed to elucidate all drivers of differences found before considering hospital-level neuraxial anesthesia use as a potential marker of quality.

Pre-emptive ice cube cryotherapy for reducing pain from local anaesthetic injections for simple lacerations: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Subcutaneous local anaesthetic injection can be painful to patients in the ED. We evaluated the effect of cryotherapy by application of an ice cube to the injection site prior to injection in patients with simple lacerations. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomised, controlled trial in consented patients with simple lacerations needing primary repair at a single emergency centre from April to July 2016. We randomly assigned patients undergoing repair for simple lacerations to either the cryotherapy group or the control group (standard care; no cryotherapy or other pretreatment of the injection site). In cryotherapy group subjects, we applied an ice cube (size: 1.5×1.5×1.5 cm) placed inside a sterile glove on the wound at the anticipated subcutaneous lidocaine injection site for 2 min prior to injection. The primary outcome was a subjective numeric rating (0-10 scale) of the perceived pain from the subcutaneous local anaesthetic injections. Secondary outcomes were (a) perceived pain on a numeric scale for cryotherapy itself, that is, pain from contact of the ice cube/glove with the skin and (b) the rate of complications after primary laceration repair. RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled, consented and randomised, with 25 in the cryotherapy group and 25 in the control group. The numeric rating scale for subcutaneous anaesthetic injections was median, IQR, 95% CI 2.0 (1 to 3.5), 1.81 to 3.47, respectively, in the cryotherapy group and 5.0 (3 to 7), 3.91 to 6.05 in the control group (Mann-Whitney U=147.50, p=0.001). No wound complications occurred in either group. The numeric rating scale for cryotherapy itself was median, IQR, 95% CI: 2.0 (1 to 3.5), 1.90 to 3.70. CONCLUSION: Pre-emptive topical injection site cryotherapy lasting 2 min before subcutaneous local anaesthetic injections can significantly reduce perceived pain from subcutaneous local anaesthetic injections in patients presenting for simple laceration repair. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: KCT0001990.

Pre- and perioperative aspects of dermatosurgery.

Dermatosurgery occupies an exceptional position among all surgical disciplines. Above all, this includes the fact that, with very few exceptions, the vast majority of surgical interventions can be performed under local or regional anesthesia, usually in smaller procedure rooms that are spatially separated from larger operating suites. Thus, peri- and postinterventional patient monitoring is the responsibility of the dermatosurgeon and his team. Though inherently smaller, this team still has to observe numerous perioperative requirements that - in larger surgical specialties - would be attended to by a host of various specialists working in concert. Said requirements include hygienic aspects, knowledge concerning pre- and intraoperative patient monitoring, managing surgical site infections, adequate postsurgical pain management, as well as detailed pharmacological knowledge with respect to common local anesthetics and the toxic and allergic reactions associated therewith. Not only does this require interdisciplinary collaboration and shared responsibility for the patient. It also necessitates the development and implementation of quality-oriented and evidence-based guidelines that, in the dermatosurgical setting, usually extend far beyond the scope of the specialty per se. The objective of the present CME article is the condensed presentation of interdisciplinary aspects relating to the most important perioperative issues.

Guidelines for the use of local anesthesia in office-based dermatologic surgery.

There are an increasing number and variety of dermatologic surgical procedures performed safely in the office setting. This evidence-based guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise regarding the use and safety of local anesthesia for dermatologic office-based procedures. In addition to recommendations for dermatologists, this guideline also takes into account patient preferences while optimizing their safety and quality of care. The clinical recommendations presented here are based on the best evidence available as well as expert opinion.

[Technical features of intraligamental intraseptal anesthesia].

Based on personal clinical experience the authors provide clinical guidelines for periodontal anesthesia. The by-step protocol for intraligamentary and intraseptal anesthesia is presented. The basic mistakes in technique and possible complications are described. Recommendations for a local anesthetic choice and dosage for different groups of teeth are given.

[Local anesthesia in the children undergoing the fibroendoscopic study of the nasal cavity, nasopharynx, and larynx: are topical anesthetics needed?].

This prospective randomized study with double blind control was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of various anesthetic techniques employed prior to fibroendoscopy of the nose, nasopharynx, and larynx of the children. The study included 160 children at the age varying from 3 to 14 (mean 7.4±2.96) years randomly allocated to four statistically comparable groups matched for age and sex. The following preparations were used to treat the children prior to fibroendoscopy: physiological solution (group 1), a 0.05% xylometazoline solution (group 2), a 10% lidocaine solution (group 3), and a mixture of 0.05% xylometazoline and 10% lidocaine solutions (group 4). The evaluation of the tolerance to the pretreatment of the nasal cavity with lidocaine and lidocaine plus xylometazoline (groups 3 and 4) showed that it was significantly (p<0.05) worse than in groups 1 and 2. The subjective tolerance to fibroendoscopy as reported by the patients was on the average similar in the children of all four groups (p>0.05). The doctors found the tolerance of fibroendoscopy to be the worst following pretreatment with the physiological solution (group 1) and the best after pretreatment with a mixture of lidocaine and xylometazoline (group 4) (p=0.03). The children comprising groups 2 and 3 were not significantly different in terms of the tolerance to fibroendoscopy (p>0.05). It is concluded that the pretreatment of the nasal cavity of the children with a 10% lidocaine solution before fibroendoscopy has no advantage over the pretreatment with a 0.05% xylometazoline solution; at the same time, insuflation of lidocaine as an anesthetic induces more pronounced negative emotions compared with the application of 0.05% xylometazoline.

Sedation, analgesia, and local anesthesia: a review for general and interventional radiologists.

Radiologists, like other physicians, need to know how to use sedatives, analgesics, and local anesthetics; however, their exposure to patients requiring discomfort control is limited, not just during residency but also in postgraduate practice. The purpose of this article is to provide a reference guide for radiologists who need pertinent and ready information on discomfort control. The authors discuss policies and standards that the Joint Commission has established for sedation providers; also discussed are the clinical pharmacology and dosage recommendations for the sedative, analgesic, anesthetic, and reversal agents that radiologists are most likely to use. Monitored anesthesia care and patient-controlled analgesia pumps, and in what circumstances they may be appropriate, are discussed. Anesthesia consultations are not uncommon when a nonanesthesiologist needs either of these services. Stiff chest syndrome, serotonin release syndrome, and systemic toxicity due to local anesthesia, all life-threatening conditions that sedation and analgesia providers may encounter, are discussed. The causes of these conditions and their necessary treatments are included in the discussion, along with cases in which a nonanesthesiologist may need an anesthesia consultation. It is important to understand that the control of pain and anxiety are not mutually exclusive but can occur either separately or together; when an agent that controls anxiety and an agent that controls pain are given together, the overall effect is synergistic. It is also important to understand the concept of multimodal analgesia; this is the use of opioids and nonopioids together to take full advantage of the analgesic effects of each component while minimizing potential side effects. Radiologists are fully capable of providing effective and safe pain control on their own and with the assistance of an anesthesiologist.

[Castration in the bull calf and ram lamb]. / Die Kastration beim männlichen Kalb und Lamm.

This paper aims to provide an overview of the accepted techniques of pain relief and castration and guidelines of how to best perform these painful interventions in an animal-friendly way under Swiss conditions. Calves should be castrated at the age of 14 days or less, at least 10 minutes after local anesthesia with lidocaine, applying a single rubber ring. Concurrently, a NSAID should be administered intravenously (ketoprofen, 3 mg/kg of bodyweight) and Tetanus-serum subcutaneously (off label use). If possible, ketoprofen(4.5 mg/kg BW) should be orally administered for 3 - 5 days postoperatively. At 10 days after applying the rubber ring, the dried-off scrotum including the rubber ring should be removed with a clean knife or a scalpel. Local anesthesia is not necessary for this procedure. Ram lambs should be castrated at the age of 14 days or less, at least 10 minutes after local anesthesia with lidocaine, applying a rubber ring. The toxic dose of 4 mg lidocaine/kg BW (corresponds to 1 ml lidocaine 2 % per lamb of 5 kg BW) should not be exceeded. Concurrently, a NSAID (off label use) and Tetanus-serum should be administered systemically. Immunization against GnRH represents an animal-friendly and economically feasible alternative to rubber ring castration. With two immunizations at an interval of 3 - 4 weeks testicular development can be inhibited for at least 3 months and the onset of puberty clearly delayed. However, a specific vaccine for use in ruminants is currently registered neither in Switzerland nor in Europe.

Le présent travail donne un aperçu des méthodes praticables pour l'anesthésie et la castration ainsi que des recommandations pour une réalisation de cette intervention dans le respect du bien-être animal dans les conditions suisses. Les veaux devraient être castrés dans les 14 premiers jours de vie au moyen d'un élastique posé au plus tôt 10 minutes après la réalisation de l'anesthésie locale avec de la lidocaïne. Il convient d'administrer simultanément un AINS (kétoprofène, 3 mg/kg PC) en i/v lente ainsi qu'un sérum antitétanique (reconversion). Dans la mesure du possible, il convient d'administrer oralement du kétoprofène (4.5 mg/kg PC) par voie orale pendant les 3 à 5 jours suivants. Le scrotum desséché y compris l'élastique doit être supprimé sans anesthésie au moyen d'un couteau propre ou d'un scalpel stérile 10 jours après la pose de l'élastique. Les agneaux doivent être castrés dans leurs 14 premiers jours de vie, comme les veaux avec un élastique posé au minimum 10 minutes après la réalisation d'une anesthésie à la lidocaïne. On prendra garde à ne pas dépasser la dose maximale de 4 mg/kg de lidocaïne (ce qui représente 1 ml de lidocaïne 2 % pour un agneau de 5 kg). Simultanément à l'anesthésie, on appliquera un AINS (reconversion) et un sérum antitétanique. La vaccination anti-GnRH représente une alternative pratique et économique ménageant les animaux pour la castration des veaux et des agneaux mâles. Une double vaccination à 3 à 4 semaines d'intervalle permet de bloquer le développement testiculaire pendant au moins 3 mois et de retarder ainsi la maturité sexuelle. Toutefois il n'existe actuellement pas en Suisse ni en Europe de vaccin spécifique enregistré pour l'application chez les ruminants.

Knowledge of local anesthetic use among dermatologists.

BACKGROUND: Local anesthesia is widely used in general dermatology practices. The onus is on the practitioner to have a sound knowledge of the pharmacology and dosing of any drug used, including local anesthesia. The dermatologist should also be aware of the signs, symptoms, and management of toxicity of local anesthetic use. The level of knowledge of dermatologists on this topic has not been previously assessed. OBJECTIVE: To assess levels of knowledge of local anesthetic pharmacology, local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), and the management of the latter of dermatologists. METHODS: A survey designed to test knowledge of absolute dosing limits; calculation of patient-specific dosing using clinical vignettes; and awareness of the signs, symptoms, and management of LAST was distributed electronically to the membership of three professional dermatological organizations in the United Kingdom and Ireland, including one specialist dermatologic surgery group. RESULTS: Knowledge of local anesthetic use of dermatologists was comprehensive enough to practice safely, without necessarily being entirely accurate. Awareness of the signs and symptoms of local anesthetic toxicity was good, but awareness of the specific agent now recommended for the management of LAST in official guidelines was poor. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of local anesthetic dosing and toxicity is reasonable among dermatologists. Awareness of the guidelines for management of LAST, released by the American and Great Britain and Ireland associations of anesthetists, and in particular the use of lipid emulsion in this setting, could be improved.

REGIONAL ANALGESIA FOR POST-OPERATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT--INITIAL EXPERIENCE IN A LOW RESOURCE SETTING.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to demonstrate the use of some regional anaesthetic techniques in effective postoperative pain control in a low resource setting. We also wanted to find out the potential benefits and prospects of regional techniques to achieve effective postoperative analgesia. DESIGN: This study was a prospective observational study in which 25 patients presenting for various orthopaedic and general surgical procedures were recruited randomly. SETTING: Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital (ABUTH), Zaria, Nigeria from December, 2008 to May, 2009. SUBJECTS: Eligible patients were males and females aged 21-55 years. These included emergency and elective cases. RESULTS: The age range was 21-55 years with a mean age of 34 years. Of the 25 patient studied, 14 of them were men and 11 women constituting 56% and 44% respectively. Our study shows that Hausa/Fulani ethnic group made up 75% of the study population. Intraoperatively, the anaesthetic techniques used were general anaesthesia (only) in 13 patients (52%), Regional techniques consisting of spinals, epidurals, combined spinals and epidurals and brachial plexus blocks in nine patients (36%) and three (12%) of the patients had a combination of general anaesthesia (GA) and regional anaesthesia (RA). For post-operative pain management, nine patients (36%) had continuous brachial plexus block using intermittent injections, 13 (52%) patients had epidural catheters with intermittent top-up injections and three (12%) patients received combined spinal and epidural with an epidural catheter left in-situ for intermittent top-ups. The drugs used for top-ups included 0.125% plain bupivacaine (15 patients), 0.125% plain bupivacaine + 2.5 mcgs/ml Fentanyl (10 patients) in 10 ml aliquots. The outcome was good in most patients with 19 patients (82.4%) experiencing only mild pain (numeric pain score 0-3). Onset of post-operative pain was 13-18 hours in most (52%) of patients with majority of patients (80%) requiring only a single dose of opioid in 24 hours. There was no incidence of infection at site of catheter insertion one week after the procedure. CONCLUSION: Regional techniques if used properly can provide superior pain control in the post-operative period. There is reduction in the requirements of opioids in the immediate post-operative when regional techniques are used for pain management. We need to encourage the use of these techniques especially in our setting where resources are sparse and potent analgesics are not always available.

Clinical efficacy of tetracaine anesthetic paste.

Benzocaine, the most commonly used topical anesthetic in dentistry, often fails to eliminate the pain associated with injections. One type of anesthetic used frequently in medicine with success is tetracaine, but minimal research has been done regarding the application of tetracaine in dentistry. This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tetracaine anesthetic paste (TAP), a newly formulated topical anesthetic. For this study, TAP was applied to the maxillary mucobuccal fold of one side of the arch and benzocaine paste was applied to the opposite side prior to injection of anesthetic. Patients then reported the level of pain experienced on each side and were evaluated for any adverse reactions. The results showed no difference in effectiveness between TAP and benzocaine paste, and no adverse reactions were reported. Because of the safety and effectiveness of tetracaine extraorally, further research is warranted on its intraoral use.

[Oxygen provision of the brain during carotid endarterectomy in the settings of general and local anaesthesia].

Based on the indices of cerebral oximetry, analysed herein is efficiency of oxygen support of the brain in various types of anaesthesiological provision (total and general anaesthesia) in patients presenting with atherosclerosis of the brachiocephalic arteries during carotid endarterectomy. It was shown that at the expense of preserving the mechanism of autoregulation, the use of local anaesthesia provides higher efficiency of cerebral perfusion than general anaesthesia which is evidenced by the values of cerebral oximetry exceeding 60% at all stages of the operation. Dynamics of cerebral oxygenation during occlusion of the carotid arteries in the setting of local anaesthesia suggests high reactivity of the cerebral vessels in this cohort of patients and hence preservation of the cerebrovascular reserve in them.

Intraoperative local injection of uterosacral ligaments with ropivacaine during uterine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials that examined the efficacy of intraoperative local injection of the uterosacral ligaments with ropivacaine on postoperative pain and opioids consumption in patients undergoing uterine surgery for hysterectomy/myomectomy. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were screened from inception to September 5th, 2020. We appraised the risk of bias using the Cochrane's risk of bias tool. Resting postoperative pain scores and cumulative consumption of postoperative opioids were regarded as continuous data, analyzed using the inverse variance method and reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) and weighted mean difference (MD), respectively, with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs). RESULTS: Five studies met the inclusion criteria comprising 230 patients (117 and 113 patients received ropivacaine and placebo, respectively). The studies had an overall low risk of bias. Resting postoperative pain scores were not significantly different between both groups at 2 h (SMD = -0.30, 95 % CI [-0.70, 0.11], p = 0.15), 12 h (SMD = 0.04, 95 % CI [-0.26, 0.37], p = 0.81) and 24 h (SMD = -0.06, 95 % CI [-0.32, 0.20], p = 0.68). However, the ropivacaine group had significantly reduced cumulative opioid consumption during the first 24 h postoperatively (MD = -9.07, 95 % CI [-14.47, -3.66], p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative local infiltration of uterosacral ligaments with ropivacaine is technically feasible and significantly reduces postoperative opioid consumption in women undergoing gynecologic surgery of the uterus.