Simultaneous LC-MS analysis of plasma concentrations of sildenafil, tadalafil, bosentan, ambrisentan, and macitentan in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors and endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) are standard therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The inter-individual variability of these pharmacokinetics is reported remarkably large, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can be useful to improve the likelihood of the desired therapeutic and safety outcomes. This study aimed to develop a LC-MS method to determine the concentrations of five PAH drugs (PDE-5 inhibitors: sildenafil and tadalafil, ERAs: bosentan, macitentan, and ambrisentan) from plasma samples using a simple process followed by a single mass spectrometric run, and to validate this approach through pharmacokinetic analyses in patients. A solid extraction method was used for sample preparation of the drugs from human plasma. The total run time for a single injection was within 10 min. The calibration curves for all drugs were linear, and the lower limits of quantitation were 1 (sildenafil), 2 (tadalafil), 5 (ambrisentan), and 10 ng/mL (bosentan, macitentan). The accuracy and precision values suggested that the assay had high accuracy and reliability. To prove the utility of this method, the plasma concentrations of the five PAH drugs were determined after their oral administration to nine PAH patients.

Comparison of exposure response relationship of atrasentan between North American and Asian populations.

AIMS: The selective endothelin (ET) A receptor antagonist atrasentan has been shown to lower albuminuria in North American and Asian patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. As drug responses to many drugs may differ between North American and Asian populations, we assessed the influence of geographical region on the albuminuria and fluid retention response to atrasentan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two 12-week double-blind randomised controlled trials were performed with atrasentan 0.75 or 1.25 mg/d vs placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The efficacy endpoint was the percentage change in albuminuria. Bodyweight change, a proxy of fluid retention, was used as a safety endpoint. Pharmacodynamics were determined in Asians (N = 77) and North Americans (N = 134). Atrasentan plasma concentration was measured in 161 atrasentan-treated patients. RESULTS: Mean albuminuria reduction in Asian, compared to North American, patients was, respectively, -34.4% vs -26.3% for 0.75 mg/d ( P = .44) and -48.0% vs -28.9% for 1.25 mg/d ( P = .035). Bodyweight gain did not differ between North American and Asian populations. Atrasentan plasma concentrations were higher in Asians compared to North Americans and correlated with albuminuria response (7.2% albuminuria reduction per doubling atrasentan concentration; P = .024). Body surface area (ß = -1.09 per m2 ; P < .001) and bilirubin, as a marker of hepatic organic anion transporter activity, (ß = 0.69 per mg/dL increment; P = .010) were independent determinants of atrasentan plasma concentration; correction by body surface area and bilirubin left no significant difference in plasma concentration between Asian and North American populations. CONCLUSION: The higher exposure and albuminuria reduction of atrasentan in Asian patients is not associated with more fluid retention, suggesting that Asian patients are less sensitive to atrasentan-induced sodium retention.

Plasma Drug Concentrations in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension on Combination Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) sildenafil or tadalafil and the endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) bosentan, ambrisentan, or macitentan may cause mutual pharmacokinetic interactions in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze plasma drug concentrations in PAH patients receiving different combination treatments. METHODS: PAH patients receiving a stable combination treatment with ERA and PDE-5i with targeted dosage for at least 1 month were routinely assessed, including clinical parameters and plasma drug concentrations. Concentrations were normalized considering dose and time from last medication intake and presented as multiples of the expected mean (MoM) of the respective monotherapies. RESULTS: A total of 125 PAH patients (84 female, 41 male, 57% idiopathic/heritable) were included. Sildenafil and tadalafil concentrations were lowest in combination with bosentan (MoM 0.44 ± 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.57, and MoM 0.89 ± 0.53, 95% CI 0.50-1.28, respectively) compared to the combination with ambrisentan (MoM 1.3 ± 0.97, 95% CI 0.86-1.73, and MoM 1.67 ± 0.63, 95% CI 1.40-1.94, respectively) and macitentan (MoM 1.16 ± 0.87, 95% CI 0.86-1.46, and MoM 1.59 ± 0.99, 95% CI 0.80-2.38, respectively). The combination of sildenafil and bosentan led to more than twice the expected bosentan concentrations in 53.8%. Patients switching from sildenafil-bosentan to macitentan showed a significant increase in sildenafil concentrations (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Only the combination with macitentan or ambrisentan led to targeted mean PDE-5i plasma concentrations and should therefore be preferred to combination with bosentan. Sildenafil-bosentan showed the strongest interaction, with low sildenafil and high bosentan concentrations. The study was not powered to analyze whether lower PDE-5i concentrations cause unsatisfying clinical response. However, plasma concentrations within a targeted range are desirable and may become of increasing importance.

Investigation of mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between macitentan, a novel endothelin receptor antagonist, and sildenafil in healthy subjects.

AIM: To study the mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between macitentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, and sildenafil in healthy male subjects. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, three way crossover study, 12 healthy male subjects received the following oral treatments: A) a loading dose of 30 mg macitentan on day 1 followed by 10 mg once daily for 3 days, B) sildenafil 20 mg three times a day for 3 days and a single 20 mg dose on day 4 and C) both treatments A and B concomitantly. Plasma concentration-time profiles of macitentan and its active metabolite ACT-132577 (treatments A and C) and sildenafil and its N-desmethyl metabolite (treatments B and C) were determined on day 4 and analyzed non-compartmentally. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of macitentan were not affected by sildenafil. In the presence of sildenafil Cmax and AUCτ of the metabolite ACT-132577 decreased with geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval (CI)) of 0.82 (0.76, 0.89) and 0.85 (90% CI 0.80, 0.91), respectively. In the presence of macitentan, plasma concentrations of sildenafil were higher than during treatment with sildenafil alone, resulting in increased Cmax and AUCτ values. The respective geometric mean ratios were 1.26 (90% CI 1.07, 1.48) and 1.15 (90% CI 0.94, 1.41). The pharmacokinetics of N-desmethylsildenafil were not affected by macitentan. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: A minor, not clinically relevant, pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between macitentan and sildenafil. Based on these results, no dose adjustment of either compound appears necessary during concomitant treatment with macitentan and sildenafil.

Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion of Aprocitentan, a Dual Endothelin Receptor Antagonist, in Humans.

BACKGROUND: Aprocitentan is an orally active, dual endothelin receptor antagonist that may offer a new therapeutic option for the treatment of difficult-to-control hypertension. OBJECTIVE: To investigate safety, tolerability, mass balance, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of aprocitentan. METHODS: In this single-center, open-label study, a single oral dose of 25 mg containing 3.7 MBq of 14C-radiolabeled aprocitentan was administered to 6 healthy male subjects. Metabolites were identified using mass spectrometry and, where possible, confirmed and quantified with reference compounds. RESULTS: Aprocitentan was well tolerated and there were no clinically significant findings for any safety variable. The geometric mean cumulative recovery of radioactivity from urine and feces over 14 days was 77% of the administered radioactive dose, with 52.1% cumulative recovery from urine and 24.8% from feces. Concentrations of total radioactivity in whole blood were markedly lower compared to plasma. In plasma, 94.3% of total radioactivity was aprocitentan. In urine and feces, 5 and 2, respectively (in feces one being aprocitentan) main products were identified. Metabolism data of aprocitentan identified two main elimination pathways, glucosidation to M3 and hydrolysis to M1, representing approximately 25% and 32% of the radioactive dose, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these metabolism data, aprocitentan can be concomitantly administered without dose adjustment with drugs that are inhibitors or inducers of any metabolizing enzyme, specifically cytochrome P450 enzymes.

Single- and multiple-dose tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan in healthy adult and elderly subjects.

BACKGROUND: Aprocitentan is an orally active, dual endothelin (ET) receptor antagonist developed for the treatment of hypertension in which, despite available treatments, a medical need exists for drugs with a new mechanism of action. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this study, the single- and multiple-dose tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of up to 600 mg (single doses) and 100 mg once a day (qd; multiple doses) of aprocitentan were investigated in healthy male and female subjects. The effect of age on the tolerability and PK parameters was investigated at a dose of 100 mg qd. RESULTS: Aprocitentan was well tolerated across all doses. No serious adverse events (AEs) occurred. The most frequently reported AE was headache. Small increases in body weight were recorded in subjects receiving 100 mg qd. Plasma concentration-time profiles of aprocitentan were similar after single- and multiple-dose administration, and support a qd dosing regimen based on a half-life of 44 hours. After multiple doses, PK was dose proportional. Accumulation at steady state, reached by Day 8, was 3-fold. Only minor differences in exposure between healthy females and males, healthy elderly and adult subjects, and fed and fasted conditions were observed. Plasma ET-1 concentrations, reflecting ETB receptor antagonism, significantly increased with doses ≥25 mg. Time-matched analysis of electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters did not suggest drug-induced ECG effects. Exposure-response analysis indicated no QTc prolongations at plasma levels up to 10 µg/mL. CONCLUSION: Aprocitentan was well tolerated in healthy subjects with a PK profile favorable for qd dosing.

Development and validation of UFLC-MS/MS method for determination of bosentan in rat plasma.

A rapid, simple and sensitive UFLC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the determination of bosentan in rat plasma using etodolac as an internal standard (IS) after liquid-liquid extraction with diethyl ether-chloroform (4:1, v/v). Bosentan and IS were detected using electrospray ionization in positive ion multiple reaction monitoring mode by monitoring the transitions m/z 551.90→201.90 and 288.20→172.00, respectively. Chromatographic separation was performed on the inertsil ODS-4 column with a gradient mobile phase, which consisted of 0.1% acetic acid with 5mM ammonium acetate in water for solvent A and 5mM ammonium acetate in acetonitrile-methanol (50:50, v/v) for solvent B at a flow rate of 0.3mL/min. The method was sensitive with 0.5ng/mL as the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) and the standard calibration curve for bosentan was linear (r>0.997) over the studied concentration range (0.5-2000ng/mL). The proposed method was fully validated by determining specificity, linearity, LLOQ, precision and accuracy, recovery, matrix effect and stability. The validated method was successfully applied to plasma samples obtained from rats.

Pharmacokinetics of the novel dual endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment.

Macitentan is under development for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Patients with PAH may suffer from comorbidities such as renal or hepatic impairment. Two prospective, single-center, open-label studies evaluated the pharmacokinetics of macitentan and its metabolites (pharmacologically active ACT-132577 and inactive ACT-373898) in healthy subjects and in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment or severe renal function impairment (SRFI). After administering a single oral dose of 10 mg macitentan the pharmacokinetic parameters including area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC∞) were derived from plasma concentration-time profiles. Exposure to macitentan and ACT-132577 was lower in hepatically impaired versus healthy subjects, with no correlation with the degree of hepatic impairment. Exposure to ACT-373898 was lower in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment only. Plasma concentration-time profiles for macitentan and ACT-132577 (active) were similar in healthy subjects and subjects with SRFI. AUC∞ of ACT-373898 (inactive) was 7.3-fold higher in subjects with SRFI versus healthy subjects. No safety concerns were raised in either study. Based on these observations, pharmacokinetic alterations of macitentan due to hepatic or renal function impairment are not considered clinically relevant and no dose adjustment is necessary in these patients.

Comparison of pharmacological activity of macitentan and bosentan in preclinical models of systemic and pulmonary hypertension.

AIMS: The endothelin (ET) system is a tissular system, as the production of ET isoforms is mostly autocrine or paracrine. Macitentan is a novel dual ETA/ETB receptor antagonist with enhanced tissue distribution and sustained receptor binding properties designed to achieve a more efficacious ET receptor blockade. To determine if these features translate into improved efficacy in vivo, a study was designed in which rats with either systemic or pulmonary hypertension and equipped with telemetry were given macitentan on top of maximally effective doses of another dual ETA/ETB receptor antagonist, bosentan, which does not display sustained receptor occupancy and shows less tissue distribution. MAIN METHODS: After establishing dose-response curves of both compounds in conscious, hypertensive Dahl salt-sensitive and pulmonary hypertensive bleomycin-treated rats, macitentan was administered on top of the maximal effective dose of bosentan. KEY FINDINGS: In hypertensive rats, macitentan 30 mg/kg further decreased mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) by 19 mm Hg when given on top of bosentan 100 mg/kg (n=9, p<0.01 vs. vehicle). Conversely, bosentan given on top of macitentan failed to induce an additional MAP decrease. In pulmonary hypertensive rats, macitentan 30 mg/kg further decreased mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) by 4 mm Hg on top of bosentan (n=8, p<0.01 vs. vehicle), whereas a maximal effective dose of bosentan given on top of macitentan did not cause any additional MPAP decrease. SIGNIFICANCE: The add-on effect of macitentan on top of bosentan in two pathological models confirms that this novel compound can achieve a superior blockade of ET receptors and provides evidence for greater maximal efficacy.