Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 215
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Zoo Wildl Med ; 55(3): 757-762, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39255219

RESUMEN

Administration of butorphanol, azaperone, and medetomidine (BAM) for immobilization of black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra) has not been previously reported. In this observational study, 0.02 ml/kg of compounded BAM (butorphanol 27.3 mg/ml, azaperone 9.1 mg/ml, medetomidine 10.9 mg/ml) was administered IM in 10 captive black howler monkeys. Time to immobilization was recorded, an arterial blood gas performed, and at 5-min intervals, HR, RR, oscillometric arterial blood pressure, SPO2, and rectal temperature were measured. Naltrexone and atipamezole were administered IM at procedure completion and recovery times were recorded. If invasive procedures such as surgery were necessary and additional drugs needed, further data from that individual was removed from data analysis. Final BAM dosages were 0.55 ± 0.12 mg/kg butorphanol, 0.19 ± 0.04 mg/kg azaperone, and 0.22 ± 0.05 mg/kg medetomidine. Nine of 10 monkeys achieved sedation allowing for physical exam, venipuncture, and tuberculin skin testing within 4 ± 2 min. No monkeys reached a plane of immobilization allowing for intubation. Physiologic variables were acceptable for this species. Hypoxemia (SPO2 < 95%) was observed in three monkeys via pulse oximetry, and normoxemia was observed on arterial blood gas. Recovery was smooth and rapid. Therefore, BAM is a viable option for noninvasive procedures or as a premedication prior to induction of anesthesia in black howler monkeys.


Asunto(s)
Azaperona , Butorfanol , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Inmovilización , Medetomidina , Animales , Medetomidina/administración & dosificación , Medetomidina/farmacología , Butorfanol/administración & dosificación , Butorfanol/farmacología , Azaperona/administración & dosificación , Azaperona/farmacología , Inmovilización/veterinaria , Inmovilización/métodos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Femenino , Masculino , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacología , Animales de Zoológico
2.
J Zoo Wildl Med ; 55(1): 136-142, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38453496

RESUMEN

A mixture of butorphanol, azaperone, and medetomidine (BAM) is frequently used for immobilization of North American hoofstock. Common adverse effects include respiratory depression, hypoxemia, and bradycardia. In this nonblinded crossover study the efficacy of two a-2 adrenergic antagonists, tolazoline and vatinoxan, were evaluated in alleviating adverse effects of BAM in Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus canadensis). Early administration of these antagonists was hypothesized to cause an increase in heart rate, respiratory rate, partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO2), as well as reduction in mean arterial blood pressure without affecting sedation levels. Eight captive adult female elk were immobilized on three separate occasions at least 14 d apart with 0.15 mg/kg butorphanol, 0.05 mg/kg azaperone, and 0.06 mg/kg medetomidine. Tolazoline (2 mg/kg IM), vatinoxan (3 mg/mg medetomidine IV) or sterile saline (2 ml IM) were administered 20 min postinduction. The BAM caused hypoxemia, bradycardia, and moderate hypertension, and because of the severe hypoxemia observed, all animals received intratracheal oxygen throughout immobilization. Heart rate, respiratory rate, rectal temperature, SpO2, PaO2, and systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure were monitored every 5 min throughout the immobilization. Intramuscular tolazoline caused a brief but significant drop in mean arterial pressure compared with controls and a brief but nonsignificant increase in heart rate. Vatinoxan caused a significant drop in blood pressure and a brief significant increase in heart rate. Changes in respiratory rates and PaO2 were not observed with either antagonist; however, all animals received oxygen, which may have influenced this result. The depth of sedation was unchanged after administration of either drug.


Asunto(s)
Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Quinolizinas , Tolazolina , Animales , Femenino , Azaperona/efectos adversos , Bradicardia/veterinaria , Butorfanol/efectos adversos , Estudios Cruzados , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Hipoxia/veterinaria , Inmovilización/veterinaria , Medetomidina/efectos adversos , Oxígeno , Quinolizinas/farmacología , Tolazolina/farmacología
3.
J Zoo Wildl Med ; 54(3): 455-463, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37817611

RESUMEN

Sable antelope (Hippotragus niger), a large, dominant species, often require chemical immobilization for captive management. Despite several recorded protocols, limited objective or subjective data are available to guide chemical immobilization of this species. This study retrospectively compared immobilization drug combinations of carfentanil-xylazine (CX), thiafentanil-xylazine (TX), etorphine-xylazine (EX), carfentanil-acepromazine (CA), and butorphanol-azaperone-medetomidine (BAM) for healthy sable antelope at one institution. Clinically applicable physiologic measures, subjective ratings, and timing of anesthetic milestones of 161 events for 107 individuals revealed the following statistically significant findings (P < 0.05). Induction ratings were best for TX, highest degree of muscle relaxation occurred with BAM and TX, and anesthetic ratings were best for TX and EX. Time to recovery was longest and complications 2.56 times more likely with CX. Time to recumbency was shortest in TX. Heart rate was highest in CA and lowest in BAM. For immobilization procedures, this study suggests TX would be the preferred combination for H. niger. However, all drug combinations evaluated can be used successfully to immobilize H. niger, and certain combinations may be situationally preferred based on desired muscle relaxation, expected induction or recovery times, or anticipated procedure length.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos , Antílopes , Mustelidae , Humanos , Animales , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Xilazina/farmacología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Niger , Inmovilización/veterinaria , Inmovilización/métodos , Azaperona/farmacología , Medetomidina/farmacología , Butorfanol/farmacología , Etorfina , Combinación de Medicamentos
4.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(1)2022 Dec 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36613536

RESUMEN

A precise and accurate method for the simultaneous determination of azaperone and azaperol in meat tissues has been developed. This paper describes the first method to be so fast, simple, and useful, especially for many laboratories that do not have sophisticated equipment. This method is based on LC separation and UV-Vis detection. During the sample preparation, the meat tissue was homogenized in acetonitrile at a ratio of 1:4 (tissue weight:acetonitrile volume). The homogenate was centrifuged, the supernatant was evaporated in a lyophilizator, and then the evaporation residue was dissolved in 20 µL of ethanol. For deproteinization, 15 µL of perchloric acid was added, and the sample prepared in this way was injected into a chromatographic column and analyzed using reversed-phased HPLC. The mobile phase consisted of 0.05 mol/L phosphate buffer pH 3.00 (component A) and acetonitrile (component B). UV detection was conducted at 245 nm. The experimentally determined LOQs were 0.25 µg/kg for azaperone and 0.12 µg/kg for azaperol. For both analytes, the calibration curves showed linearity in the tested concentration range from 50 to 300 µg/kg of tissue. The accuracy of the presented method did not exceed 15%, and the recovery was in the range of 85-115%. A validated analytical procedure was implemented for the analysis of various animal tissues for their content of azaperone and azaperol.


Asunto(s)
Azaperona , Riñón , Animales , Azaperona/análisis , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión/métodos , Indicadores y Reactivos , Riñón/química , Hígado/química , Acetonitrilos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
5.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 49(3): 291-298, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35370092

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the time course and certain cardiopulmonary effects of trunk-breathing elephants immobilized with thiafentanil-azaperone. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective descriptive study. ANIMALS: A convenience sample of 10 free-ranging African elephant bulls (estimated weight range: 3000-6000 kg). METHODS: Elephants were immobilized using thiafentanil (15-18 mg) and azaperone (75-90 mg) administered by dart. Once recumbent, the respiratory rate, minute ventilation (V˙e), end-tidal carbon dioxide (Pe'CO2), arterial blood pressure and heart rate were recorded immediately after instrumentation and at 5 minute intervals until 20 minutes. Arterial blood gases were analysed at the time of initial instrumentation and at 20 minutes. On completion of data collection, thiafentanil was antagonized using naltrexone (10 mg mg-1 thiafentanil; administered intravenously). A stopwatch was used to record time to recumbency (dart placement to recumbency) and time to recovery (administration of antagonist to standing). Data were compared using a one-way anova. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: All elephants were successfully immobilized, and there were no significant changes in cardiopulmonary variables over the monitoring period. Average time to recumbency was 12.5 (± 3.9) minutes. The measured V˙e was 103 (± 30) L minute-1. The average heart and respiratory rates over the 20 minute immobilization were steady at 49 (± 6) beats minute-1 and 5 (± 1) breaths minute-1, respectively. The mean arterial blood pressure was 153 (± 31) mmHg. The elephants were acidaemic (pH: 7.18 ± 0.06), mildly hypoxaemic (PaO2: 68 ± 15 mmHg; 9.1 ± 2.0 kPa) and hypercapnic (PaCO2: 52 ± 7 mmHg; 6.9 ± 0.9 kPa). Average time to recovery was 2.2 ± 0.5 minutes. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: African elephant bulls can be successfully immobilized using thiafentanil-azaperone. Recumbency was rapid, the cardiopulmonary variables were stable over time, and recovery was rapid and complete. Mild hypoxaemia and hypercapnia were evident.


Asunto(s)
Azaperona , Elefantes , Animales , Azaperona/farmacología , Recolección de Datos , Elefantes/fisiología , Fentanilo/análogos & derivados , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Inmovilización/veterinaria , Estudios Prospectivos
6.
J Zoo Wildl Med ; 53(3): 537-544, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36214238

RESUMEN

Chemical immobilization of wildlife, required for many biological studies and management events, often induces hypoxemia and respiratory depression. Laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) have shown promise as an efficient method of airway protection during anesthesia. Nineteen wild bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) lambs were immobilized using an IM combination of medetomidine (0.16 ± 0.062 mg/kg), azaperone (0.20 ± 0.058 mg/kg), and alfaxalone (0.54 ± 0.21 mg/kg) via remote injection. Upon recumbency, arterial blood gas parameters, minute ventilation (VE), tidal volume (VT), and respiratory rate were measured before and after LMA placement. The VE and VT were measured via respirometer. Time to LMA placement, cuff pressure, cuff volume, and ease of placement were measured. Medetomidine was reversed with IM atipamezole at five times the medetomidine dose upon completion of procedures. Pre- and post-LMA measurements were compared using a t test or a Wilcoxon signed-rank test based on normality of the data. The LMA provided a patent airway in all lambs with a significant (P < 0.0001) increase in VE (mean [95% CI]; pre-LMA: VE = 17.3 [16.2-18.5] L/min, post-LMA: VE = 19.8 [18.6-21.0] L/min) but did not have a significant impact on partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2; pre-LMA: corrected PaO2 = 45.2 [41.2-49.2] mm Hg, post-LMA: corrected PaO2 = 47.5 [43.3-51.7] mm Hg; P = 0.19) or partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2; pre-LMA: PaCO2 = 50.4 [46.6-53.2] mm Hg, post-LMA: PaCO2 = 51.6 [48.8-55.7] mm Hg; P = 0.035) following placement. This study demonstrated that the LMA is a viable option for airway protection in wild bighorn sheep.


Asunto(s)
Máscaras Laríngeas , Borrego Cimarrón , Animales , Azaperona/farmacología , Dióxido de Carbono , Máscaras Laríngeas/veterinaria , Medetomidina/farmacología , Oxígeno , Ovinos
7.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 48(5): 734-744, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34391667

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare induction times and physiological effects of etorphine-azaperone with etorphine-midazolam immobilization in African buffaloes. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized crossover study. ANIMALS: A group of 10 adult buffalo bulls (mean body weight 353 kg). METHODS: Etorphine-azaperone (treatment EA; 0.015 and 0.15 mg kg-1, respectively) and etorphine-midazolam (treatment EM; 0.015 and 0.15 mg kg-1, respectively) were administered once to buffaloes, 1 week apart. Once in sternal recumbency, buffaloes were instrumented and physiological variables recorded at 5 minute intervals, from 5 minutes to 20 minutes. Naltrexone (20 mg mg-1 etorphine dose) was administered intravenously at 40 minutes. Induction (dart placement to recumbency) and recovery (naltrexone administration to standing) times were recorded. Arterial blood samples were analysed at 5 and 20 minutes. Physiological data were compared between treatments using a general linear mixed model and reported as mean ± standard deviation. Time data were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and reported as median (interquartile range) with p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Actual drug doses administered for etorphine, azaperone and midazolam were 0.015 ± 0.001, 0.15 ± 0.01 and 0.16 ± 0.02 mg kg-1, respectively. Induction time for treatment EA was 3.3 (3.6) minutes and not different from 3.2 (3.2) minutes for treatment EM. The overall mean arterial blood pressure was significantly lower for treatment EA (102 ± 25 mmHg) than that for treatment EM (163 ± 18 mmHg) (p < 0.001). The PaO2 for treatment EA (37 ± 12 mmHg; 5.0 ± 1.6 kPa) was not different from that for treatment EM (43 ± 8 mmHg; 5.8 ± 1.1 kPa). Recovery time was 0.8 (0.6) minutes for treatment EA and did not differ from 1.1 (0.6) minutes for treatment EM. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Treatment EA was as effective as treatment EM for immobilization in this study. However, systemic arterial hypertension was a concern with treatment EM, and both combinations produced clinically relevant hypoxaemia. Supplemental oxygen administration is recommended with both drug combinations.


Asunto(s)
Azaperona , Búfalos , Etorfina , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Animales , Estudios Cruzados , Etorfina/farmacología , Inmovilización/veterinaria , Midazolam
8.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 48(1): 65-73, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33279394

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In ungulates, α2-adrenergic agonists can decrease oxygenation possibly through alteration of pulmonary perfusion. Sodium nitroprusside can decrease pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and increase cardiac output (Q˙t) through vasodilation. The objective was to determine if sodium nitroprusside would improve pulmonary perfusion and attenuate the increased alveolar-arterial (a-a) gradient resulting from medetomidine-azaperone-alfaxalone (MAA) administration. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, crossover study with a 2 week rest period. ANIMALS: A group of eight adult female captive white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). METHODS: Deer were administered MAA intramuscularly (IM), and auricular artery and pulmonary artery balloon catheters were placed. Deer spontaneously breathed air. Saline or sodium nitroprusside (0.07 mg kg-1) were administered IM 40 minutes after MAA injection. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), right atrial pressure (RAP), Q˙t, arterial pH, PaCO2 and PaO2 were obtained immediately before nitroprusside injection (baseline) and 5, 10 and 15 minutes afterwards. Mixed venous blood samples were obtained at baseline and at 5 minutes. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR), PVR, intrapulmonary shunt fraction (Q˙s/Q˙t), a-a gradient, oxygen delivery (D˙O2) and oxygen extraction ratio (O2ER) were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with repeated measures analysis of variance with correction factors. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: With nitroprusside, MAP, MPAP, PAOP, RAP, SVR and O2ER significantly decreased and HR, Q˙t and D˙O2 increased compared with baseline and between treatments. There was a significant decrease in PVR and a-a gradient and increase in PaO2 compared with baseline and saline treatment. Changes were not sustained. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Nitroprusside temporarily changed hemodynamic variables, increased PaO2 and decreased a-a gradient. Nitroprusside possibly led to better pulmonary perfusion of ventilated alveoli. However, IM nitroprusside at this dose is not recommended because of severe systemic hypotension and short action.


Asunto(s)
Azaperona , Ciervos , Medetomidina/farmacología , Nitroprusiato/farmacología , Animales , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Pregnanodionas , Estudios Prospectivos
9.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 48(3): 380-387, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33827780

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of butorphanol-azaperone-medetomidine (BAM) and butorphanol-midazolam-medetomidine (BMM) protocols for immobilization of wild common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus) with subsequent antagonization with atipamezole. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial. ANIMALS: A total of 40 adult wild common palm civets, 24 female and 16 male, weighing 1.5-3.4 kg. METHODS: The civets were randomly assigned for anesthesia with butorphanol, azaperone and medetomidine (0.6, 0.6 and 0.2 mg kg-1, respectively; group BAM) or with butorphanol, midazolam and medetomidine (0.3, 0.4 and 0.1 mg kg-1, respectively; group BMM) intramuscularly (IM) in a squeeze cage. When adequately relaxed, the trachea was intubated for oxygen administration. Physiological variables were recorded every 5 minutes after intubation. Following morphometric measurements, sampling, microchipping and parasite treatment, medetomidine was reversed with atipamezole at 1.0 or 0.5 mg kg-1 IM to groups BAM and BMM, respectively. Physiological variables and times to reach the different stages of anesthesia were compared between groups. RESULTS: Onset time of sedation and recumbency was similar in both groups; time to achieve complete relaxation and tracheal intubation was longer in group BAM. Supplementation with isoflurane was required to enable intubation in five civets in group BAM and one civet in group BMM. All civets in group BAM required topical lidocaine to facilitate intubation. End-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure was lower in group BAM, but heart rate, respiratory rate, rectal temperature, peripheral hemoglobin oxygen saturation and mean arterial blood pressure were not different. All civets in both groups recovered well following administration of atipamezole. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both BAM and BMM combinations were effective for immobilizing wild common palm civets. The BMM combination had the advantage of producing complete relaxation that allowed intubation more rapidly.


Asunto(s)
Azaperona , Combinación de Medicamentos , Medetomidina , Viverridae , Animales , Azaperona/farmacología , Butorfanol/farmacología , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Inmovilización/veterinaria , Masculino , Medetomidina/farmacología , Midazolam/farmacología , Estudios Prospectivos
10.
J Zoo Wildl Med ; 51(4): 825-833, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33480562

RESUMEN

Alfaxalone has been successfully used intramuscularly (im) combined with medetomidine and azaperone for immobilization of small ungulates. An experimental 40 mg/ml alfaxalone solution (RD0387) was recently formulated for reduced injection volume. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and cardiopulmonary effects of high-concentration alfaxalone combined with medetomidine and azaperone for the intramuscular immobilization of captive Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni). Seven adult female elk were used in a crossover design in which they were administered alfaxalone 1 mg/kg, medetomidine 0.05 mg/kg, and azaperone 0.1 mg/kg or alfaxalone 0.5 mg/kg, medetomidine 0.1 mg/kg, and azaperone 0.1 mg/kg im approximately 3 wk apart. Drugs were delivered to each elk in a chute by hand injection. Once recumbent, elk were placed in sternal recumbency for a period of 30 min, during which time level of sedation, response to minor procedures, heart rate, respiratory rate, rectal temperature, oxygen saturation, and direct arterial blood pressures were recorded every 5 min. Arterial blood gases were performed every 15 min. At 30 min, elk were administered atipamezole 0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg im and recovery quality and times were recorded. Statistical comparisons were made by t test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and repeated measures analysis (significance level P < 0.05). Both drug combinations provided effective immobilization for 30 min, with induction and recovery time and quality similar to other medetomidine-based combinations used in elk. Cardiopulmonary effects included bradycardia, hypertension, and hypoxemia that resolved with oxygen supplementation. The average injection volume in the low-dose alfaxalone combination was approximately 5 ml. These combinations provided deep sedation and the ability to perform minor procedures in captive elk, with acceptable cardiopulmonary parameters as long as supplemental oxygen was provided.


Asunto(s)
Azaperona/farmacología , Ciervos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Inmovilización/veterinaria , Medetomidina/farmacología , Pregnanodionas/farmacología , Anestésicos/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos/farmacología , Animales , Azaperona/administración & dosificación , Estudios Cruzados , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Medetomidina/administración & dosificación , Pregnanodionas/administración & dosificación
11.
J Zoo Wildl Med ; 52(2): 715-720, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34130416

RESUMEN

Fifty-three free-ranging moose (Alces americanus) cows were darted from a helicopter with 3-4 ml of a premix combination of butorphanol (27.3 mg/ml), azaperone (9.1 mg/ml), and medetomidine (10.9 mg/ml; BAM), equivalent to estimated dosages of: butorphanol 0.26 ± 0.08 (mean ± SD) mg/kg, azaperone 0.09 ± 0.03 mg/kg, and medetomidine 0.11 ± 0.03 mg/kg. After a mean chase time (from sighting to darting) of 6.1 ± 5.5 min, the mean induction time (from darting to recumbency) was 8.3 ± 2.6 min. This combination provided a safe and reliable sedation for minor procedures that lasted 30-60 min. Heart rate (50.4 ± 7.0 beats/min), respiratory rate (21.3 ± 11.1 breaths/minute), ETCO2 via nasal canula (43.2 ± 7.0 mmHg), and rectal temperature (38.5°C ± 0.7°C) mostly remained at expected values for wild cervid and bovid species anesthetized with this drug combination. SpO2 (90.0% ± 3.7%) was suggestive of moderate hypoxemia despite intranasal oxygen supplementation (1 L per 100 kg/min). The recovery time to standing was 6.7 ± 3.8 min after reversal with IM naltrexone (3 mg/mg butorphanol) and atipamezole (5 mg/mg medetomidine). Despite a larger volume to inject, this protocol offers an alternative to highly potent opioids, and should be considered for practical or staff safety reasons. On the basis of the results of this study, the use of 4 ml of BAM is considered a safe and effective protocol for immobilization of cow moose under comparable settings.


Asunto(s)
Azaperona/farmacología , Butorfanol/farmacología , Ciervos , Medetomidina/farmacología , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacología , Anestesia/veterinaria , Animales , Animales Salvajes , Azaperona/administración & dosificación , Butorfanol/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Inmovilización/veterinaria , Medetomidina/administración & dosificación
12.
J Zoo Wildl Med ; 52(1): 287-294, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33827187

RESUMEN

This study investigated the use of a fixed-dose combination of 30 mg/ml butorphanol, 12 mg/ml azaperone, and 12 mg/ml medetomidine for the standing sedation of captive African elephants (Loxodonta africana). In total, seven females (mean age 19.6 yr; range 6-31 yr) and six males (mean age 33.5 yr; range 9-35 yr) were sedated. The estimated dose was 0.0005 ± 0.0001 ml/kg and 0.006 ± 0.001 ml/cm shoulder height, which resulted in a dose of 0.016 ± 0.002 mg/kg or 0.19 ± 0.04 mg/cm shoulder height butorphanol, 0.006 ± 0.0008 mg/ kg or 0.076 ± 0.015 mg/cm shoulder height azaperone, and 0.006 ± 0.0008 mg/kg or 0.076 ± 0.015 mg/cm medetomidine. First signs of sedation were observed within 3-10 min (mean 6 ± 2 min) after darting, and monitoring of the animals started on average at 24 ± 9 min after darting. No bradycardia was observed in any of the elephants (mean heart rate 40.0 ± 6.55 beats/min), although all the animals were mildly hypotensive (mean blood pressure 118.5/86 [94.5]). Rectal temperatures fell within acceptable ranges, and respiratory parameters were stable in all the animals throughout sedation and fell within the standard ranges reported for conscious, standing elephants. Only one elephant had clinically significant hypoxemia characterized by a partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) < 60 mm Hg. This elephant was also hypercapnic (PaCO2 > 50 mm Hg), although pH and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation fell within acceptable ranges. None of the elephants reacted to moderately painful stimuli while sedated. The combination was reversed with intramuscular injections of naltrexone (1 mg for every 1 mg butorphanol) and atipamezole (5 mg for every 1 mg medetomidine). Recovery was smooth and calm in all the animals. Time from injection of the reversals until the first signs of recovery was 4.6 ± 2.01 min (range 1-8 min).


Asunto(s)
Azaperona/administración & dosificación , Butorfanol/administración & dosificación , Fármacos del Sistema Nervioso Central/administración & dosificación , Sedación Consciente/veterinaria , Elefantes/fisiología , Medetomidina/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Animales , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Naltrexona/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/administración & dosificación
13.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 47(4): 528-536, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32507718

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the immobilization quality and cardiopulmonary effects of etorphine alone compared with etorphine-azaperone in blesbok (Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi). STUDY DESIGN: Blinded, randomized, crossover design. ANIMALS: A total of 12 boma-habituated female blesbok weighing [mean ± standard deviation (SD)] 57.5 ± 2.5 kg. METHODS: Each animal was administered etorphine (0.09 mg kg-1) or etorphine-azaperone (0.09 mg kg-1; 0.35 mg kg-1) intramuscularly with 1-week intertreatment washout period. Time to first sign of altered state of consciousness and immobilization time were recorded. Physiological variables were recorded, arterial blood samples were taken during a 40-minute immobilization period, and naltrexone (mean ± SD: 1.83 ± 0.06 mg kg-1) was intravenously administered. Recovery times were documented, and induction, immobilization and recovery were subjectively scored. Statistical analyses were performed; p < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: No difference was observed in time to first sign, immobilization time and recovery times between treatments. Time to head up was longer with etorphine-azaperone (0.5 ± 0.2 versus 0.4 ± 0.2 minutes; p = 0.015). Etorphine caused higher arterial blood pressures (mean: 131 ± 17 versus 110 ± 11 mmHg, p < 0.0001), pH, rectal temperature and arterial oxygen partial pressure (59.2 ± 7.7 versus 42.2 ± 9.8 mmHg), but lower heart (p = 0.002) and respiratory rates (p = 0.01). Etorphine-azaperone combination led to greater impairment of ventilatory function, with higher end-tidal carbon dioxide (p < 0.0001) and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (58.0 ± 4.5 versus 48.1 ± 5.1 mmHg). Immobilization quality was greater with etorphine-azaperone than with etorphine alone (median scores: 4 versus 3; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both treatments provided satisfactory immobilization of blesbok; however, in addition to a deeper level of immobilization, etorphine-azaperone caused greater ventilatory impairment. Oxygen supplementation is recommended with both treatments.


Asunto(s)
Antílopes , Azaperona/farmacología , Etorfina/farmacología , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Inmovilización/veterinaria , Animales , Animales Salvajes , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Naltrexona/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Oxígeno/sangre , Respiración/efectos de los fármacos , Frecuencia Respiratoria/efectos de los fármacos , Método Simple Ciego
14.
J Zoo Wildl Med ; 51(2): 290-296, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32549557

RESUMEN

Fourteen lowland nyala (Tragelaphus angasii) in managed care were successfully anesthetized for a total of 17 anesthetic events using either a combination of butorphanol (0.75 ± 0.15 mg/kg), azaperone (0.25 ± 0.05 mg/kg), and medetomidine (0.30 ± 0.06 mg/kg) (BAM) or medetomidine (0.17 ± 0.01 mg/kg), azaperone (0.22 ± 0.02 mg/kg), and alfaxalone (0.52 ± 0.08 mg/kg) (MAA) delivered intramuscularly via dart. Mean time to initial effect, sternal recumbency, lateral recumbency, handling, and intubation were recorded. The nyala were maintained in sternal recumbency with supplemental oxygenation until 60 min after initial injection. Cardiopulmonary effects were recorded every 5 min after handling until reversal. Arterial blood samples were collected every 15 min for analysis. Level of sedation and quality of recovery were scored. Anesthesia was antagonized with atipamezole (at 5 mg per mg of medetomidine) for both protocols and naltrexone (at 2 mg per mg of butorphanol) for the BAM protocol delivered intramuscularly via hand injection. Mean time to extubation, head control, and standing post reversal were recorded. No hyperthermia, acidemia, apnea, or tachycardia occurred; however, animals did display hypoxemia. Two animals in the BAM cohort required supplementation to facilitate handling. These drug combinations provided satisfactory levels of sedation in most cases for safe handling and minor procedures in lowland nyala under managed care.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos/administración & dosificación , Animales de Zoológico/fisiología , Antílopes/fisiología , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Cardiovasculares/efectos de los fármacos , Anestésicos/efectos adversos , Animales , Azaperona/administración & dosificación , Azaperona/efectos adversos , Butorfanol/administración & dosificación , Butorfanol/efectos adversos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Masculino , Medetomidina/administración & dosificación , Medetomidina/efectos adversos , Pregnanodionas/administración & dosificación , Pregnanodionas/efectos adversos
15.
J Zoo Wildl Med ; 50(4): 988-992, 2020 Jan 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31926533

RESUMEN

Five free-ranging male (subadults, n = 3; adults, n = 2) plains zebras (Equus quagga) were immobilized using a combination of etorphine (0.017 mg/kg), medetomidine (0.017 mg/kg), and azaperone (0.24 mg/kg) by means of a blank cartridge-fired projector. Time to recumbency was recorded and a descriptive score used to assess the quality of immobilization, manipulation, maintenance, and recovery. Physiological parameters were recorded at 5-min intervals for 20 min. At the end of the procedure, naltrexone (0.23 mg/kg) was administered intramuscularly and time to standing documented. The combination evaluated in this study allowed for successful immobilization and safe recovery of all animals, including during the subsequent 15 days. Despite the good outcome in this pilot study, as a result of the periodic apneic events and hypercapnia documented in the zebras, the authors suggest that physiological parameters be thoroughly monitored when using this protocol. Further studies are needed to improve upon chemical immobilization protocols in free-ranging plains zebras.


Asunto(s)
Azaperona/farmacología , Equidae , Etorfina/farmacología , Inmovilización/veterinaria , Medetomidina/farmacología , Animales , Animales Salvajes , Azaperona/administración & dosificación , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Etorfina/administración & dosificación , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Masculino , Medetomidina/administración & dosificación , Proyectos Piloto , Frecuencia Respiratoria/efectos de los fármacos
16.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 46(1): 90-95, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30554889

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The butorphanol-azaperone-medetomidine fixed-dose combination (BAM, respectively, 30-12-12 mg mL-1) with subsequent antagonism by naltrexone-atipamezole was evaluated for reversible immobilization of captive cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, clinical trial. ANIMALS: Twelve cheetahs (six males and six females, weighing 37-57 kg) housed in enclosures, were immobilized at Hoedspruit Endangered Species Centre in the Republic of South Africa. METHODS: BAM volume dose rate was 0.009-0.014 mL kg-1 (mean ± standard deviation 0.010 ± 0.001 mL kg-1). Total dose in all animals was 0.5 mL. The actual doses were as follows: butorphanol (0.29 ± 0.04 mg kg-1), azaperone (0.12 ± 0.01 mg kg-1) and medetomidine (0.12 ± 0.01 mg kg-1). Physiologic variables and quality of immobilization were recorded every 5 minutes beginning at 15-20 minutes after darting. Arterial blood samples were collected three times at 20, 30 and 40 minutes after darting from all animals for analysis of blood oxygenation and acid-base status. RESULTS: The inductions were calm and smooth and mean induction time was 4.0 ± 1.1 minutes. Heart rate (50 ± 9 beats minute-1) and respiratory frequency (20 ± 3 breaths minute-1) were stable throughout immobilization. The recovery time after reversing with naltrexone and atipamezole was 9.1 ± 3.6 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: and clinical relevance BAM proved to be a reliable and cardiovascular stable drug combination for immobilization of cheetahs.


Asunto(s)
Acinonyx/fisiología , Anestesia/veterinaria , Azaperona/farmacología , Butorfanol/farmacología , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Inmovilización/veterinaria , Medetomidina/farmacología , Anestésicos Combinados , Animales , Animales de Zoológico/fisiología , Azaperona/administración & dosificación , Butorfanol/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Medetomidina/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Frecuencia Respiratoria/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 46(4): 466-475, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31176572

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare immobilization efficacy of a nonpotent opioid drug combination, ketamine-butorphanol-medetomidine (KBM) to the preferred etorphine-azaperone (EA) combination in zebras. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized crossover trial. ANIMALS: A group of ten adult zebra (six females and four male). METHODS: KBM and EA were administered once to the zebras in random order by dart, 3 weeks apart. Once a zebra was recumbent and instrumented, physiological parameters were measured and recorded at 5-minute intervals until 20 minutes. Antagonist drugs were administered at 25 minutes. KBM was antagonised using atipamezole (7.5 mg mg-1 medetomidine dose) and naltrexone (2 mg mg-1 butorphanol dose). EA was antagonized using naltrexone (20 mg mg-1 etorphine dose). Induction and recovery (following antagonist administration) times were recorded. Physiological parameters, including invasive blood pressure and blood gas analysis, were compared between combinations using a general linear mixed model. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range). RESULTS: The doses of KBM and EA administered were 3.30 ± 0.18, 0.40 ± 0.02 and 0.16 ± 0.01 mg kg-1; and 0.02 ± 0.001 and 0.20 ± 0.01 mg kg-1, respectively. KBM and EA induction times were 420 (282-564) and 240 (204-294) seconds, respectively (p = 0.03). Zebras remained recumbent throughout the study procedures. Systolic blood pressure (226 ± 42 and 167 ± 42 mmHg) and oxygen partial pressure (64 ± 12 and 47 ± 13 mmHg) were higher for KBM compared to EA (p < 0.01). Recovery time, after administering antagonists, was 92 (34-1337) and 26 (22-32) seconds for KBM and EA, respectively (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Compared to EA, KBM also immobilized zebras effectively. Systemic hypertension and moderate hypoxaemia are clinical concerns of KBM and severe hypoxaemia is a concern of EA. This occurrence of hypoxaemia highlights the importance of oxygen administration during immobilization.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/farmacología , Anestésicos Disociativos/farmacología , Equidae , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Inmovilización/veterinaria , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Anestésicos Disociativos/administración & dosificación , Animales , Animales Salvajes , Azaperona/administración & dosificación , Azaperona/efectos adversos , Azaperona/farmacología , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Butorfanol/administración & dosificación , Butorfanol/farmacología , Estudios Cruzados , Combinación de Medicamentos , Etorfina/administración & dosificación , Etorfina/efectos adversos , Etorfina/farmacología , Femenino , Hipertensión/inducido químicamente , Hipertensión/veterinaria , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Hipoxia/inducido químicamente , Hipoxia/veterinaria , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Ketamina/efectos adversos , Ketamina/farmacología , Masculino , Medetomidina/administración & dosificación , Medetomidina/efectos adversos , Medetomidina/farmacología , Oxígeno/administración & dosificación , Distribución Aleatoria
18.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 45(4): 496-501, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29853414

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The fixed-dose combination of butorphanol, azaperone and medetomidine (BAM; 30, 12 and 12 mg mL-1, respectively) with subsequent antagonism by naltrexone-atipamezole was evaluated for reversible immobilization of captive blesbok (Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, clinical trial. ANIMALS: Sixteen blesbok (four males and twelve females), weighing 52.5-71.0 kg, were immobilized in South Africa. METHODS: The total dose of BAM ranged from 0.5 to 0.7 mL for females and 0.7 to 0.9 mL for males. In seven animals chosen randomly, 8000 units of hyaluronidase was added to the dart. Physiologic variables were recorded every 5 minutes beginning at 10-20 minutes after darting. Arterial blood samples were collected three times at 20, 30 and 40 minutes after darting for analysis of blood acid-base status. RESULTS: The mean administered doses of BAM were as follows: butorphanol (0.34 ± 0.08 mg kg-1), azaperone (0.14 ± 0.03 mg kg-1) and medetomidine (0.14 ± 0.03 mg kg-1). The inductions were calm and smooth. The mean induction time was 9.6 ± 3.2 minutes with just BAM and 5.1 ± 0.8 minutes with BAM and hyaluronidase combination. Heart rate (45 ± 6 beats minute-1) and respiratory frequency (38 ± 4 breaths minute-1) were stable throughout immobilization. The mean arterial blood pressure for all animals was stable but elevated (137 ± 7 mmHg). Rectal temperature slightly increased over time but remained within an acceptable range. The recovery time after administering naltrexone and atipamezole was 4.8 ± 0.7 minutes. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The BAM combination proved to be reliable and effective in blesbok.


Asunto(s)
Antílopes , Azaperona/administración & dosificación , Butorfanol/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Inmovilización/veterinaria , Medetomidina/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Combinados/administración & dosificación , Animales , Animales Salvajes , Femenino , Inmovilización/métodos , Inyecciones Intramusculares/métodos , Inyecciones Intramusculares/veterinaria , Masculino
19.
Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd ; 160(7-8): 469-474, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29989554

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to find an intramuscularly (IM) injectable anaesthetic combination for 8 to 14-days old piglets, that guarantees a calm induction and sufficient quality of anaesthesia without excitations with a maximum of two hours long lasting recovery. In preliminary dose finding trials, different combinations of -ketamine, azaperone and romifidine were compared. A constant dose of 0.2 mg/kg of butorphanol was added to each combination and all piglets received 0.4 mg/kg meloxicam. Subsequently a dosage algorithm for the main trial was developed. In case of insufficient analgesia, lidocaine 2% (0.25 ml) was injected intratesticular. If two piglets showed an insufficient anaesthetic induction phase, depth of anaesthesia or recovery, the next dosage in the algorithm was tried. With the combination of 3 mg/kg azaperone, 0.2 mg/kg romifidine, 15 mg/kg ketamine and 0.2 mg/kg butorphanol the requirement of a smooth anaesthesia induction, sufficient anaesthesia and a recovery without excitation was fulfilled but the recovery lasted more than 120 minutes.


INTRODUCTION: Le but de la présente étude était de mettre au point une combinaison d'anesthésiques injectables par voie intra-musculaire pour les porcelets âgés de 8 à 14 jours qui garantisse une induction calme, une qualité d'anesthésie suffisante (sans mouvement de défense durant l'intervention) et une phase de réveil dépourvue d'excitation et ne durant pas plus de deux heures. Dans le cadre d'un essai préliminaire, on a comparé, afin de définir les doses respectives, des combinaisons de kétamine, d'azapérone et de romifidine. Les résultats ont servi de base pour l'algorithme de dosage de l'essai principal. Les dosages testés étaient les suivants : 1, 2 ou 3 mg/kg d'azapérone, 10 ou 15 mg/kg de kétamine et 0.15 ou 0.2 mg/kg de romifidine. En outre, tous les animaux recevaient du méloxicam (0.4 mg/kg) et du butorphanol (0.2 mg/kg) IM. En cas d'analgésie insuffisante, de la lidocaïne 2% (0.25 ml) était appliquée en intra-testiculaire. Si deux porcelets montraient une phase d'induction, de castration ou de réveil insuffisante, on passait au dosage suivant. Avec la combinaison de 3 mg/kg d'azapérone, 0.2 mg/kg de romifidine, 15 mg/kg de kétamine et de 0.2 mg/kg de butorphanol, les exigences d'une induction calme, d'une qualité d'anesthésie suffisante et d'un réveil dépourvu d'excitation étaient remplies. Toutefois les porcelets dormaient plus de 120 minutes.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Combinados/administración & dosificación , Orquiectomía/veterinaria , Manejo del Dolor/veterinaria , Porcinos , Animales , Azaperona/administración & dosificación , Butorfanol/administración & dosificación , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Orquiectomía/instrumentación , Orquiectomía/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos
20.
J Zoo Wildl Med ; 49(3): 662-670, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30212345

RESUMEN

Chemical immobilization is a key aspect of wildlife management. To minimize dose-dependent adverse effects, immobilization protocols often include two or more synergistic agents, which allows for reductions in individual drug dosages. Free-ranging bighorn sheep ( Ovis canadensis) in Canada ( n = 74) were remotely injected with a combination of medetomidine (0.16 ± 0.04 mg/kg) and ketamine (4.0 ± 1.4 mg/kg) (MK), or combination of medetomidine (0.14 ± 0.06 mg/kg), azaperone (0.21 ± 0.11 mg/kg), and alfaxalone (0.45 ± 0.21 mg/kg) (MAA). Once recumbency was achieved, arterial blood samples were collected and immediately analyzed for blood gas and acid-base status. Rectal temperature, heart rate, and respiratory rate were recorded upon recumbency and throughout anesthesia at 5-15 min intervals. At conclusion of the procedures, medetomidine was reversed by intramuscular atipamezole at five times the medetomidine dose. Induction times (mean ± standard deviation) of animals that became immobilized with one dart (8.7 ± 3.2 min, 7.3 ± 3.9 min) and recovery times of all animals (3.4 ± 1.5 min, 3.9 ± 1.6 min) were not significantly different between MK and MAA groups, respectively. Both MK and MAA groups experienced severe hypoxemia (PaO2 42 ± 9 mmHg, 40 ± 10 mmHg, respectively). PaCO2 was significantly higher ( P = 0.0248) in the MK group (median 54 mmHg) than the MAA group (median 48 mmHg) with a trend towards lower pH (7.40 vs 7.42, respectively, P = 0.07). Initially, MK animals had higher heart rates than MAA animals (median 49 vs 40 beats/min), which decreased over time. In bighorn sheep, both MK and MAA produced reliable, reversible immobilization with smooth inductions and recoveries. However, less respiratory depression was seen with MAA than MK.


Asunto(s)
Azaperona/farmacología , Inmovilización/veterinaria , Ketamina/farmacología , Medetomidina/farmacología , Borrego Cimarrón , Anestésicos/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos/farmacología , Anestésicos Disociativos/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Disociativos/farmacología , Animales , Animales Salvajes , Azaperona/administración & dosificación , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Canadá , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Medetomidina/administración & dosificación , Pregnanodionas/administración & dosificación , Pregnanodionas/farmacología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA