Addition of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Standard Bupivacaine versus Standard Bupivacaine Alone in the Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The analgesic effect of adding liposomal bupivacaine to standard bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block is not known. The authors hypothesized that addition of liposomal bupivacaine would reduce acute postoperative pain compared to standard bupivacaine alone. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients and outcome assessors were blinded. Eighty patients undergoing distal radial fracture fixation during regional anesthesia with supraclavicular brachial plexus block were randomized into two groups. The liposomal bupivacaine group received 10 ml 0.5% plain bupivacaine immediately followed by 10 ml 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine (n = 40). The standard bupivacaine group received 20 ml 0.5% plain bupivacaine (n = 40). The primary outcome was weighted area under curve (AUC) numerical rating scale pain score at rest during the first 48 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included weighted AUC scores for pain with movement, overall benefit with analgesia score, and other functional scores. RESULTS: For the primary outcome, the liposomal bupivacaine group was associated with statistically significantly lower weighted AUC pain score at rest (0.6 vs. 1.4; P < 0.001) in the first 48 h. Of the secondary outcomes, no difference between treatment groups reached statistical significance with the exception of weighted AUC score for pain with movement (2.3 vs. 3.7; adjusted P < 0.001) and overall benefit with analgesia score (1.1 vs. 1.7; adjusted P = 0.020) in the first 48 h, as well as numerical rating scale pain score at rest (0.5 vs. 1.9; adjusted P < 0.001) and with movement (2.7 vs. 4.9; adjusted P < 0.001) on postoperative day 1. Differences in numerical rating scale pain scores on postoperative days 2, 3, and 4 did not reach the level of statistical significance. There were no statistically significant differences in sensory function. CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal bupivacaine given via supraclavicular brachial plexus block reduced pain at rest in the early postoperative period.

Intravenous versus perineural dexamethasone to prolong analgesia after interscalene brachial plexus block: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of perineural vs intravenous dexamethasone as a local anaesthetic adjunct to increase duration of analgesia could be particular to specific peripheral nerve blocks because of differences in systemic absorption depending on the injection site. Given this uncertainty, we performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis comparing dexamethasone administered perineurally or intravenously combined with local anaesthetic for interscalene brachial plexus block. METHODS: Following a search of various electronic databases, we included 11 trials (1145 patients). The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia defined as the time between peripheral nerve block or onset of sensory blockade and the time to first analgesic request or initial report of pain. RESULTS: The primary outcome, duration of analgesia, was greater in the perineural dexamethasone group, with a mean difference (95% confidence interval) of 122 (62-183) min, I2=73%, P<0.0001. Trial sequential analysis indicated that firm evidence had been reached. The quality of evidence was downgraded to low, mainly because of moderate inconsistency and serious publication bias. No significant differences were present for any of the secondary outcomes, except for onset time of sensory and motor blockade and resting pain score at 12 h, but the magnitude of differences was not clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: There is low-quality evidence that perineural administration of dexamethasone as a local anaesthetic adjunct increases duration of analgesia by an average of 2 h compared with intravenous injection for interscalene brachial plexus block. Given the limited clinical relevance of this difference, the off-label use of perineural administration, and the risk of drug crystallisation, we recommend intravenous dexamethasone administration. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42023466147).

The Accuracy of the Learning-Curve Cumulative Sum Method in Assessing Brachial Plexus Block Competency.

BACKGROUND: The learning-curve cumulative sum method (LC-CUSUM) and its risk-adjusted form (RA-LC-CUSUM) have been proposed as performance-monitoring methods to assess competency during the learning phase of procedural skills. However, scarce data exist about the method's accuracy. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of LC-CUSUM forms using historical data consisting of sequences of successes and failures in brachial plexus blocks (BPBs) performed by anesthesia residents. METHODS: Using historical data from 1713 BPB performed by 32 anesthesia residents, individual learning curves were constructed using the LC-CUSUM and RA-LC-CUSUM methods. A multilevel logistic regression model predicted the procedure-specific risk of failure incorporated in the RA-LC-CUSUM calculations. Competency was defined as a maximum 15% cumulative failure rate and was used as the reference for determining the accuracy of both methods. RESULTS: According to the LC-CUSUM method, 22 residents (84.61%) attained competency after a median of 18.5 blocks (interquartile range [IQR], 14-23), while the RA-LC-CUSUM assigned competency to 20 residents (76.92%) after a median of 17.5 blocks (IQR, 14-25, P = .001). The median failure rate at reaching competency was 6.5% (4%-9.75%) under the LC-CUSUM and 6.5% (4%-9%) for the RA-LC-CUSUM method ( P = .37). The sensitivity of the LC-CUSUM (85%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 71%-98%) was similar to the RA-LC-CUSUM method (77%; 95% CI, 61%-93%; P = .15). Identical specificity values were found for both methods (67%; 95% CI, 29%-100%, P = 1). CONCLUSIONS: The LC-CUSUM and RA-LC-CUSUM methods were associated with substantial false-positive and false-negative rates. Also, small lower limits for the 95% CIs around the accuracy measures were observed, indicating that the methods may be inaccurate for high-stakes decisions about resident competency at BPBs.

Comparing the clinical features of lateral and medial approaches of costoclavicular technique versus traditional lateral sagittal technique as infraclavicular brachial plexus block methods: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: It is aimed to compare the block onset times and performance features of costoclavicular techniques (medial and lateral approach) versus lateral sagittal technique. METHODS: Patients were randomized into three groups. For costoclavicular techniques, ultrasound probe was placed parallel to clavicle obtaining nerve cords, axillary artery and axillary vein visual from lateral-to-medial, respectively. The block needle was advanced from lateral (Group CLB) or medial (Group CMB) to perform costoclavicular block. For lateral sagittal technique (Group LSB), ultrasound probe was placed sagittal and perpendicular below the coracoid process to obtain sagittal artery image with the cords around. Total 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 ml of 2% lidocaine were deposited for all groups. Sensory and motor block onset times, block performance properties, complications, and patient/surgeon satisfactions were investigated. RESULTS: Among 56 patients, the primary outcome, sensory block onset time was shorter in Group CLB than Group CMB and Group LSB (10 [5-15], 10 [10-20], and 15 [10-15] minutes, respectively, p < 0.05). Motor block onset was also fastest in Group CLB (15 [10-20] mins for CLB, 20 [15-20] mins for LSB, and 22.5 [15-25] mins for CMB, p = 0.004). Block performance properties did not differ between the groups. The only complication observed was vascular puncture with an incidence of 28% in Group CMB. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral approach costoclavicular technique provides fastest block onset than the other techniques. Considering the success and safety profile, this technique stands as a good alternative in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is prospectively registered to clinicaltrials.gov on 20/02/2022 (NCT05260736).

Ultrasound guided costoclavicular block in pediatric population: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The costoclavicular space serves as an alternative approach to the infraclavicular brachial plexus block, and numerous studies in adults have demonstrated promising outcomes for distal upper limb surgery. Blocking the brachial plexus at this level is potentially advantageous because the cords are relatively superficial, located in close proximity to each other and easily identified using ultrasound. AIMS: This study aimed to assess the success rate and feasibility of costoclavicular block in children undergoing unilateral below elbow upper limb surgery. METHODS: Thirty children aged 2-12 years scheduled for unilateral below elbow surgery under general anesthesia were included. Costoclavicular block was performed under ultrasound and nerve stimulator guidance with 0.5% ropivacaine, 0.5 mL/kg. Success was evaluated based on the absence of significant hemodynamic response to skin incision made 20 min after the block. The sono-anatomy of costoclavicular space, ease of needling, complications, and the post-operative pain scores were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age and weight of the children were 6.5 ± 3.8 years and 19.7 ± 9.1 kg, respectively. The success rate of costoclavicular block in our cohort is 100%. Sonographic visualization was graded as excellent (Likert Scale 2) in 90% of cases. The plexus was located at a depth of 1.4 ± 0.3 cm from the skin, the lateral extent of cords from the artery was 0.8 ± 0.4 cm and they were observed inferior and lateral to the artery. The mean needling time was 3.6 ± 1.1 min. None of the children experienced complications such as vascular or pleural puncture, hematoma, Horner's syndrome or diaphragmatic palsy. Postoperative pain scores were low, and no rescue analgesia was required. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the costoclavicular block exhibited a notably high success rate in pediatric population. This study substantiates that the three cords of the brachial plexus are consistently visible and superficial during ultrasound examination using this approach, confirming their separation from vascular structures and the reliable achievement of blockade without observed complications.

Application and Research Progress of Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block Through Costoclavicular Space Approach in Upper Limb Surgery.

Objective: Exploring newer approaches to brachial plexus block is crucial for improving surgical outcomes and patient comfort. This study aims to review the application and research progress of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block via the costoclavicular space approach in upper limb surgery. Methods: This study provides a comprehensive review of existing literature, studies, and clinical cases related to the costoclavicular approach. The advantages and disadvantages of conventional approaches for brachial plexus block, including the intermuscular groove method, supraclavicular method, and axillary approach, are discussed. The anatomical characteristics of the costoclavicular space are examined, and the methods of brachial plexus nerve block using ultrasound-guided costoclavicular space approach are described. It holds great promise for enhancing patient care and increasing the overall success rate of surgical procedures. Results: The costoclavicular space approach for brachial plexus block offers several advantages, including stable anatomical structure, low nerve variation rate, and clear visualization of each nerve bundle under ultrasound imaging. Compared to traditional approaches, ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block via the costoclavicular space approach has a high success rate, rapid onset of anesthesia, and high safety. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block via the costoclavicular space approach is effective and safe in upper limb surgery. It provides good anesthesia and postoperative analgesia, making it a valuable technique for various upper limb surgeries. The potential clinical significance of our findings lies in the possibility that ultrasound-guided costoclavicular space approach, with its enhanced precision and patient outcomes, could play a pivotal role in improving upper limb surgical procedures.

Diaphragm-sparing efficacy of subparaneural upper trunk block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Inter-scalene block (ISB) is associated with an inevitable risk of hemi-diaphragmatic paresis (HDP). To reduce the risk of HDP, an upper trunk block (UTB) has been proposed at the brachial plexus division level. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesised that UTB would be associated with a lower incidence of HDP than ISB while providing sufficient analgesia following arthroscopic shoulder surgery. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: A tertiary teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy patients aged 20 to 80 years undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. INTERVENTION: Ultrasound-guided ISB or UTB was performed with 5 ml 0.75% ropivacaine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the incidence of complete HDP, assessed by diaphragm excursion using ultrasound, defined as a decrease to 25% or less of baseline or occurrence of paradoxical movement. Postoperative pulmonary function change, pain scores, opioid consumption and pain-related outcomes were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The UTB group had a significantly lower incidence of complete HDP than the ISB group [5.9% (2/34) vs. 41.7% (15/36); absolute difference, 35.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 17.8 to 53.7%; P  < 0.001]. The postblockade decline in pulmonary function was more pronounced in the ISB group than that in the UTB group. The pain score at 1 h postoperatively was not significantly different between the groups (ISB vs. UTB group: median 0 vs. 1; median difference, -1; 95% CI, -2 to 0.5). No significant difference was observed in any other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: UTB was associated with a lower incidence of HDP compared with ISB while providing excellent analgesia in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of Korea ( https://cris.nih.go.kr ) identifier: KCT0007002. IRB NUMBER: Chungnam National University Hospital Institutional Review Board No. 2021-12-069.

Opioid-free anesthesia with esketamine-dexmedetomidine versus opioid-based anesthesia with propofol-remifentanil in shoulder arthroscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: OFA (Opioid-free anesthesia) has the potential to reduce the occurrence of opioid-related adverse events and enhance postoperative recovery. Our research aimed to investigate whether OFA, combining esketamine and dexmedetomidine, could serve as an alternative protocol to traditional OBA (opioid-based anesthesia) in shoulder arthroscopy, particularly in terms of reducing PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting). METHODS: A total of 60 patients treated with shoulder arthroscopy from September 2021 to September 2022 were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to the OBA group (n = 30) and OFA group (n = 30), receiving propofol-remifentanil TIVA (total intravenous anesthesia) and esketamine-dexmedetomidine intravenous anesthesia, respectively. Both groups received ultrasound-guided ISBPB(interscalene brachial plexus block)for postoperative analgesia. RESULTS: The incidence of PONV on the first postoperative day in the ward (13.3% vs. 40%, P < 0.05) was significantly lower in the OFA group than in the OBA group. Moreover, the severity of PONV was less severe in the OFA group than in the OBA group in PACU (post-anesthesia care unit) (0 [0, 0] vs. 0 [0, 3], P<0.05 ) and in the ward 24 h postoperatively ( 0 [0, 0] vs. 0 [0, 2.25], P<0.05). Additionally, the OFA group experienced a significantly shorter length of stay in the PACU compared to the OBA group (39.4 ± 6.76 min vs. 48.7 ± 7.90 min, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the OBA with propofol-remifentanil, the OFA with esketamine- dexmedetomidine proved to be feasible for shoulder arthroscopy, resulting in a reduced incidence of PONV and a shorter duration of stay in the PACU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No: ChiCTR2100047355), 12/06/2021.

Liposomal bupivacaine provides superior pain control compared to bupivacaine with adjuvants in interscalene block for total shoulder replacement: a prospective double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Optimal pain control methods after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) achieve reduced opioid consumption, shortened hospital stay, and improved patient satisfaction in addition to adequate analgesia. Interscalene brachial plexus block is the gold standard for TSA, yet it typically does not provide pain relief lasting beyond 24 hours. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) purportedly provides prolonged analgesia, yet it has been minimally explored for interscalene block, and it is significantly more expensive than standard bupivacaine. METHODS: This is a prospective, 2-arm, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Subjects presenting for anatomic or reverse TSA were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive interscalene brachial plexus block with either LB plus bupivacaine (LBB group) or bupivacaine plus dexamethasone and epinephrine (BDE group). The primary outcome was 120-hour postoperative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were pain scores up to 96 hours postoperatively, pain control satisfaction, complications, level of distress from block numbness, and hospital stay. RESULTS: Ninety patients, 45 per group, were included in the intention-to-treat analysis and randomized. Because of withdrawal of consent and loss to follow-up, 40 in each group completed enrollment through postoperative day 60. Total 120-hour postoperative opioid consumption was similar between groups (P = .127), with no differences within 24- or 48-hour time intervals. Postoperative pain scores at 24-48 hours, 48-72 hours, 72-96 hours, and day 60 were significantly lower for the LBB group. DISCUSSION: LB interscalene brachial plexus block before total shoulder arthroplasty did not reduce 120-hour postoperative opioid consumption but significantly reduced postoperative pain between 24 and 96 hours and at postoperative day 60.

[Comparison of analgesic effect of modified superior trunk block and traditional interscalene brachial plexus block with liposomal bupivacaine after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair].

Objective: To compare the postoperative analgesic effect of modified superior trunk block and traditional interscalene brachial plexus block in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: A total of 40 patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from October to November 2023 were prospectively included, whose American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade were Ⅰ-Ⅱ. They were divided into modified superior trunk block group (group S) and interscalene brachial plexus block group (group I) by random number table according to different nerve block methods, with 20 cases in each group. Local anesthetics was a mixture of 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine hydrochloride injection in equal volume. Patients in group S were injected 5 ml mixture for ultrasound-guided modified superior trunk block, and patients in group I were injected with 15 ml mixture for ultrasound-guided traditional interscalene block respectively. Both groups underwent superficial cervical plexus block (5 ml mixture). Standardized general anesthesia and standardized postoperative analgesia were followed. The primary outcome measures included 48 h resting numerical rating scale (NRS) scores after surgery and the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP) at 30 min after block. The secondary outcome measures included resting NRS scores during the post anesthesia care unit (PACU), 12, 24, and 36 h after surgery, postoperative opioid consumption and satisfaction with analgesia, pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) at 30 min after block, sensory and motor block duration, and the incidence of perioperative adverse reactions. The non-inferiority cut-off value of resting NRS scores for patients in group S was set as"1 point"at each observation time point after surgery. Results: In group S, one patient was excluded because the target nerve was blocked by the subclavian vein and could not be blocked, nineteen patients [11 males and 8 females, aged (52.2±9.0) years] were eventually included. In group I, there were 7 males and 13 females, aged (55.0±5.1) years. Resting NRS scores of group S and Group I at 48 h after surgery were 0 (0, 0) and 0 (0, 0.8) point, respectively, with no statistical significance (P>0.05). The median difference was 0 (95%CI:0-0) point and the upper 95%CI was 0 point, which was lower than the preset non-inferiority cut-off value"1 point"(non-inferiority P<0.001). The incidence of HDP in group S and group I were 5% (1/19) and 75% (15/20), respectively, with statistically significant (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in resting NRS scores at PACU and 12, 24, 36 h after surgery, opioid dosage, satisfaction with analgesia, SpO2 at 30 min after block, sensory and motor block duration between two groups (all P>0.05). No respiratory adverse events such as hypoxemia and airway spasm occurred in two groups after extubation. One patient in group I showed symptoms of breath shortness when entering PACU, and 3 patients felt uncomfortable due to prolonged numbness and weakness of the blockade limb (>2 days). No nerve block procedures and opioid drugs relative adverse reactions and no neurological complications happened in both groups. Conclusion: Liposomal bupivacaine usage for modified superior trunk block can provide long-term postoperative analgesic effects which is noninferior to traditional interscalene brachial plexus block and causes less HDP in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Continuous Interscalene Brachial Plexus Blocks: An Anatomical Challenge between Scylla and Charybdis?

Brachial plexus blocks at the interscalene level are frequently chosen by physicians and recommended by textbooks for providing regional anesthesia and analgesia to patients scheduled for shoulder surgery. Published data concerning interscalene single-injection or continuous brachial plexus blocks report good analgesic effects. The principle of interscalene catheters is to extend analgesia beyond the duration of the local anesthetic's effect through continuous infusion, as opposed to a single injection. However, in addition to the recognized beneficial effects of interscalene blocks, whether administered as a single injection or through a catheter, there have been reports of consequences ranging from minor side effects to severe, life-threatening complications. Both can be simply explained by direct mispuncture, as well as undesired local anesthetic spread or misplaced catheters. In particular, catheters pose a high risk when advanced or placed uncontrollably, a fact confirmed by reports of fatal outcomes. Secondary catheter dislocations explain side effects or loss of effectiveness that may occur hours or days after the initial correct function has been observed. From an anatomical and physiological perspective, this appears logical: the catheter tip must be placed near the plexus in an anatomically tight and confined space. Thus, the catheter's position may be altered with the movement of the neck or shoulder, e.g., during physiotherapy. The safe use of interscalene catheters is therefore a balance between high analgesia quality and the control of side effects and complications, much like the passage between Scylla and Charybdis. We are convinced that the anatomical basis crucial for the brachial plexus block procedure at the interscalene level is not sufficiently depicted in the common regional anesthesia literature or textbooks. We would like to provide a comprehensive anatomical survey of the lateral neck, with special attention paid to the safe placement of interscalene catheters.

Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block by Costoclavicular Space Approach: A Narrative Review.

In recent years, ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block (CCB) has gained attention as a novel approach for brachial plexus nerve block. Human anatomy studies have identified the costoclavicular space as the area between the midpoint of the clavicle and the first rib. This space accommodates the brachial plexus, axillary arteries, and veins. Its superficial and fixed position makes it a promising option for infraclavicular brachial plexus blockage, providing a safe and reliable analgesic effect. CCB combines the benefits of real-time ultrasound visualization of the nerve block needle, avoidance of peripheral blood vessels, and targeted delivery of local anesthetics to the nerve. Consequently, it significantly reduces the associated complications of other classical approaches such as interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB), supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCB), lateral sagittal infraclavicular brachial plexus block (LS-ICB), and axillary brachial plexus block. These complications include phrenic paralysis, incomplete brachial plexus block, and pneumothorax. This narrative review examines the literature on brachial plexus block in the costoclavicular space, discussing the anatomical position, the procedure, clinical indications, choice of local anesthetic concentration and volume, and continuous nerve block of CCB. The aim is to provide a basis for future clinical practice and enhanced safety.

Single injection combined suprascapular and axillary nerve block: A randomised controlled non-inferiority trial in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: A shoulder block without lung affection is desirable. In this study, we compared a low versus a high volume of a modified supraclavicular brachial plexus block. We hypothesised that a low volume of local anaesthetic would provide non-inferior block success rate with better preserved lung function. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were randomised to receive ultrasound guided 5 or 20 ml ropivacaine 0.5% at the departure of the suprascapular nerve from the brachial plexus. Primary outcome was successful shoulder block-defined as cutaneous sensory affection of the axillary nerve and motor affection of the suprascapular nerve (>50% reduction in external rotation force measured with dynamometry). We used a non-inferiority margin of 20%. Secondary outcome was change in lung function measured with spirometry. RESULTS: Thirteen of 16 (81.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 57.0% to 93.4%) in the 5 ml group and 15 of 16 (93.8%; 95% CI 71.7% to 98.9%) in the 20 ml group had successful shoulder block (p = .6). The ratio of the event rates of the 20 ml (standard) and 5 ml (intervention) groups was (15/16)/(13/16) = 0.937/0.813 = 1.15 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.51). All mean reductions in lung function parameters were non-significantly lower in the 5 ml group compared with the 20 ml group. CONCLUSION: For our primary outcome, the 95% CI of the difference of event ratio included the non-inferiority margin. We are therefore unable to conclude that 5 ml LA is non-inferior to 20 ml LA with respect to block success rate.

Comparison of the efficacy of costoclavicular space brachial plexus blockade with 0.5% versus 0.375% ropivacaine: a randomized, double-blind, single-centre, noninferiority clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Recently, more attention has been given to the costoclavicular space (CCS) as an alternative pathway for ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block (BPB). While 0.5% ropivacaine was used in most related studies, research has shown effective ultrasound-guided supraclavicular BPB using lower local anesthetic concentrations, and our preliminary data have indicated that 0.375% ropivacaine may be effective when given in the CCS. Hence, we hypothesized that the efficacy of 0.375% ropivacaine would be noninferior compared with 0.5% in ultrasound-guided BPB via the CCS. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, single-centre, noninferiority clinical trial. Seventy patients undergoing elective forearm or hand surgery were randomly assigned to receive either 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine (experimental group) or 0.5% ropivacaine (control group) in the CCS for BPB. We assessed sensory and motor blockade at five, ten, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min after the injection. The primary outcome was the rate of successful BPB. Secondary outcomes included onset time, duration of sensory and motor blockade, and adverse reactions. The depth from the skin to the CCS was also recorded during the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were evaluable for block success. There was one failed block in both groups, yielding a BPB block success rate of 97% in both groups. 0.375% Ropivacaine was noninferior to 0.5% ropivacaine (P = 0.98). There was no significant difference in the median [interquartile range (IQR)] onset time of sensory-motor blockade in the experimental group (15 [15-20] min; N = 34) compared with the control group (15 [13-20] min; N = 33; Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.48). The median [IQR] duration of sensory blockade was significantly shorter in the experimental group (455 [398-490] min vs 610 [570-655] min in the control group; Hodges-Lehmann estimator of the difference, 165 min; 95.08% confidence interval (CI), 130 to 195; P < 0.001). Likewise, the median [IQR] duration of motor blockade was significantly shorter in the experimental group (470 [409-500] min vs 625 [578-665] min in the control group; Hodges-Lehmann estimator of the difference, 165 min; 95.08% CI, 130 to 195; P < 0.001). There were no adverse reactions directly related to the technique or the ropivacaine injection in either group. CONCLUSIONS: 0.375% Ropivacainewas noninferior to 0.5% ropivacaine with regard to rate of successful ultrasound-guided costoclavicular BPB. STUDY REGISTRATION: chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR20000306570); registered 8 March 2020.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'espace costo-claviculaire (ECC) a récemment bénéficié d'un regain d'intérêt comme voie de substitution pour le bloc du plexus brachial (BPB) échoguidé. La ropivacaïne 0,5 % a été utilisée dans la majorité des études sur ce sujet, mais la recherche a montré un BPB supra-claviculaire échoguidé efficace en utilisant de plus faibles concentrations d'anesthésique local et nos données préliminaires ont indiqué que la ropivacaïne à 0,375 % pouvait être efficace en administration dans l'ECC. En conséquence, nous avons émis l'hypothèse selon laquelle l'efficacité de la ropivacaïne 0,375 % serait non inférieure à la ropivacaïne 0,5 % dans le BPB échoguidé via l'ECC. MéTHODES: Nous avons mené un essai clinique monocentrique de non-infériorité, randomisée en double insu. Soixante-dix patients subissant une chirurgie élective de l'avant-bras ou de la main ont été randomisés dans un groupe recevant 20 mL de ropivacaïne 0,375 % (groupe expérimental) ou de ropivacaïne 0,5 % (groupe contrôle) dans l'ECC pour un BPB. Nous avons évalué les blocs sensoriel et moteur à 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 et 30 minutes après l'injection. Le critère d'évaluation principal était le taux de succès du BPB. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires étaient, notamment, le délai d'action, la durée des blocs sensoriel et moteur, et les événements indésirables. La profondeur de la peau à l'ECC a aussi été consignée pendant la procédure. RéSULTATS: Un total de 69 patients était évaluable pour le succès du bloc. Il y a eu un échec du bloc dans chacun des deux groupes, ramenant le taux de succès du BPB à 97 % dans les deux groupes. La ropivacaïne 0,375 % a été non inférieure à la ropivacaïne 0,5 % (P = 0,98). Il n'y a pas eu de différence significative concernant le délai d'action médian (plage interquartile [PIQ]) du bloc sensori-moteur dans le groupe expérimental (15 [15 à 20] minutes; n = 34) comparativement au groupe contrôle (15 [13 à 20] minutes; n = 33; test de Mann­Whitney, P = 0,48). La durée médiane [PIQ] du bloc sensitif a été significativement plus courte dans le groupe expérimental (455 [398 à 490] minutes contre 610 [570 à 655] minutes dans le groupe contrôle; estimateur de la différence de Hodges­Lehmann, 165 minutes; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95,08 % : 130 à 195; P < 0,001). De même, la durée médiane [PIQ] du bloc moteur a été significativement plus courte dans le groupe expérimental (470 [409 à 500] minutes contre 625 [578 à 665] minutes dans le groupe contrôle; estimateur de la différence de Hodges­Lehmann, 165 minutes; IC à 95,08 %, 130 à 195; P < 0,001). Il n'y a pas eu d'événement indésirable directement lié à la technique ou à l'injection de ropivacaïne dans l'un ou l'autre groupe. CONCLUSIONS: La ropivacaïne 0,375 % a été non inférieure à la ropivacaïne 0,5 % en ce qui concerne le taux de succès du BPB costo-claviculaire échoguidé. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR20000306570); Enregistrée le 8 mars 2020.

Single injection technique with ultrasound-guided superficial cervical fascia block combined with brachial plexus block in clavicular surgery: a prospective randomized comparative trial.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effects of a single injection technique with ultrasound-guided superficial cervical fascia block combined with brachial plexus block in clavicular surgery. METHODS: Forty patients, 25 males and 15 females, aged 18-85 years with ASA class I or II underwent unilateral clavicular fracture internal fixation. The patients were randomly divided into a superficial cervical plexus block group (group S, n = 20) and a superficial cervical fascia block group (group F, n = 20). First, the brachial plexus of the intermuscular sulcus of all patients was blocked with an ultrasound-guided injection of one injection with 15ml 0.33% ropivacaine 15ml in both groups. Second, the superficial cervical plexus was blocked by another injection of 5-8ml 0.33% ropivacaine in group S, and the superficial cervical fascia was blocked by an injection with 5-8ml 0.33% ropivacaine in Group F. We evaluated operation time, onset time of anaesthesia, effective time and the grades of nerve block effect in the two groups. Additionally, we evaluated the incidences of local anaesthetic poisoning, hoarseness, dyspnoea, and postoperative nausea and vomiting, and the number of patients requiring remedial analgesia within 24 h. Repeated measurements were analysed by repeated data analysis of variance, and count data were compared by the χ2 test. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The operation time and onset time in Group F were significantly shorter than those in group S (P < 0.05); the effect of intraoperative block was better than that in group S (P < 0.05), and the effective time was significantly longer in group F than in group S (P < 0.05). However, no severe case of dyspnoea, local anaesthetic poisoning or hoarseness after anaesthesia occurred in either of two groups. There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative salvage analgesia or that of postoperative nausea and vomiting between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The application of the single injection technique with ultrasound-guided superficial cervical fascia block combined with brachial plexus block in clavicular surgery is beneficial because it shortens the operation time, has a faster onset, produces a more effective block and prolongs the longer analgesia time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry- ChiCTR2200064642(13/10/2022).

Comparison of pulmonary function during interscalene block vs. supraclavicular block: a single-center, double-blind, randomized trial.

BACKROUND: The supraclavicular plexus block (SCB) and interscalene plexus block (ISB) have the potential to pulmonary function, the duration of the potential remains uncertain. So, we compared the effect of SCB and ISB on pulmonary function, especially the duration time. METHODS: Ninety-six patients were finally allocated to group I and group S. The ISB and the SCB procedures were performed with ultrasound guidance before anesthesia induction. An investigator recorded the diaphragm mobility and respiratory function test indicators before the block (T0) and at 30 min (T30 min), 4 h (T4), 8 h (T8), and 12 h (T12) after the block. The diaphragmatic paralysis rate was calculated for above timepoint. The VAS, the recovery time for the sensory and motor block, and adverse reactions within 24 h of administering the block were also recorded. RESULTS: The recovery times of diaphragm mobility in group I were longer than those in group S. Compared with group I, group S had a significantly lower diaphragmatic paralysis rate during eupnea breathing at T30 min and T8 after the block. Similarly, group S had a significantly lower diaphragmatic paralysis rate at deep breathing at T30 min, T8, and T12 after the block. The recovery times of FEV1 and FVC in group I were longer than those in group S. The other results were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided ISB resulted in a longer periods with a suppressive effect on pulmonary function than SCB. TRIALS REGISTRATION: 17/12/2019, ChiCTR1900028286.

Intravenous Versus Perineural Dexamethasone for Reducing Rebound Pain After Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is a common regional technique to manage acute postoperative pain for arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair. However, rebound pain may compromise its overall benefit. Our aim was to investigate the primary hypothesis that perineural and intravenous dexamethasone have different effects on rebound pain after resolution of ISB for arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair. METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 20 years scheduled for elective arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair under general anesthesia with preoperative ISB were included. The participants were randomized to receive dexamethasone either perineurally (perineural group) or intravenously (intravenous group). In the perineural group, patients received ISB with 12 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine containing 5 mg of dexamethasone; simultaneously, 1 mL of 0.9% normal saline was administered intravenously. In the intravenous group, patients received ISB with 12 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine; simultaneously, 1 mL of dexamethasone 5 mg was administered intravenously. The primary outcome was the difference in the pain score (0-10 on numeric rating scale) between before and after ISB resolution. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of rebound pain; onset, duration, and intensity of rebound pain; time to the first analgesic request; and pain-related sleep disturbance. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were randomized to either perineural group (n = 36) or intravenous group (n = 35). After block resolution, pain scores increased significantly more in the perineural group (mean ± standard deviation, 4.9 ± 2.1) compared to the intravenous group (4.0 ± 1.7, P = 0.043). The duration of ISB was more prolonged in the perineural group (median [interquartile range], 19.9 [17.2-23.1] hours) than the intravenous group (15.1 [13.7-15.9] hours, P < 0.001). The incidence of rebound pain and pain-related sleep disturbance during the first postoperative week was significantly higher in the perineural group than in the intravenous group (rebound pain: 44.4% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.028; sleep disturbance: 55.6% vs. 25.7%, P = 0.011). The duration and intensity of rebound pain were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Although perineural dexamethasone provided longer postoperative analgesia, intravenous dexamethasone was more beneficial in reducing pain increase after ISB resolution, incidence of rebound pain, and pain-related sleep disturbance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0006795.

Unanticipated costs associated with interscalene nerve catheters for shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia has become a mainstay of analgesia following shoulder arthroscopic and reconstructive procedures. Local anesthetic can be injected in the perineural space of the brachial plexus by a single shot or continuously by an indwelling catheter. Although previous studies have compared efficacy and direct cost of single shot to catheters, few have evaluated unanticipated costs of ongoing care or complications. Pulmonary complications can lead to unexpected admissions and emergency department visits. The purpose of the study was to identify unplanned hospital admissions or emergency department visits related to regional anesthesia after shoulder surgery and determine the additional associated costs. METHODS: A series of 1888 shoulder surgeries were identified in 1856 unique patients at a single, large academic center. As part of an interscalene nerve catheter program, a continuous interscalene block (CIB) was given to 1728 patients, whereas 160 patients had a single-shot interscalene block (SSIB). A hospital-employed quality control nurse contacted all patients receiving a CIB at 1, 2, 7, and 14 days following surgery. All emergency department visits and readmissions were recorded, and the associated billing charges were reviewed for the inpatient and any outpatient visits immediately preceding or immediately following the readmission. The regional average Medicare fee schedule was used to determine a cost for these episodes of care. RESULTS: Of the 1728 patients who had CIB, 10 patients were readmitted following open or arthroscopic surgery or presented to the emergency department in the immediate postoperative period for pulmonary compromise. No patient in the SSIB group had an emergency department visit or readmission. The average age of the 10 patients with readmission was 60 years (7 females, 3 males). The majority were diagnosed with hypoxemia on admission (R09.02). Length of stay during readmission ranged from 0 to 4 days, with 1 patient requiring admission to the intensive care unit. The average cost of admission to the hospital or visit to the emergency department was $6849 (range, $1988-$19,483). These costs were primarily related to chest radiographs and electrocardiogram (9/10), chest computed tomography (CT) with contrast (3/10), and head CT (2/10). CONCLUSION: Although uncommon, unanticipated pulmonary complications after CIB can result in significant cost compared to SSIB. The indirect costs of pulmonary workup after readmission or emergency department workup may be overlooked if only considering direct costs, such as medication charges, medical supplies, and physician fees.

Interscalene block vs. periarticular liposomal bupivacaine for pain control following reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Interscalene nerve blocks and local anesthetic infiltration are 2 methods commonly used in multimodal analgesia regimens for shoulder arthroplasty. Liposomal bupivacaine is a novel anesthetic that can be detected more than 24 hours following local administration. Studies comparing liposomal bupivacaine with conventional analgesic methods have found mixed results regarding pain and narcotic consumption, and there is little information available regarding patient satisfaction and the role of psychosocial variables. METHODS: This is a randomized study of 76 adult patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty who were assigned to receive a preoperative interscalene nerve block with ropivacaine (Block = 38) or an intraoperative periarticular injection of liposomal bupivacaine (Local = 38). The primary outcomes were narcotic consumption (MEq, morphine equivalents), visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and satisfaction (0-10). The secondary outcomes were the effect of patient group preference (Block vs. Local) and psychosocial variables (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Brief Resilience Scale) on satisfaction. Length of stay, pain-related phone calls, pain-related readmissions, and the number of narcotic refills were tracked from the day of surgery through the first postoperative appointment, which was routinely 7-14 days following surgery. RESULTS: Intraoperative and day 0 narcotic consumption was lower in the Block group by 17.3 and 21.6 MEq (P < .001, P = .035) with no differences on day 1 or 2. There was no difference in VAS pain scores, length of stay, pain-related phone calls, pain-related readmissions, or the number of narcotic refills. Patient satisfaction was higher in the Block group (8.3 vs. 6.8, P = .017). Pain catastrophizing, resilience, and patient group preference did not have any significant relationship with patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty have higher satisfaction with a conventional interscalene block compared to a periarticular injection of liposomal bupivacaine. There were no clinically important differences in narcotic consumption, VAS pain scores, length of stay, pain-related phone calls, pain-related readmissions, or the number of narcotic refills. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Brief Resilience Scale, and patient preferences did not have any relationship with patient satisfaction.

Intra-articular injection versus interscalene brachial plexus block for acute-phase postoperative pain management after arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: The minimally invasive approach of arthroscopic shoulder surgery is beneficial; however, for optimal outcomes, perioperative pain management is essential. This cross-sectional study aimed to examine the analgesic effectiveness of intra-articular injection (IA) versus interscalene brachial plexus block (ISPB) among patients treated with arthroscopic shoulder surgeries. METHODS: We reviewed 100 consecutive patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopic surgery, of whom 50 each underwent IA (February 2019─January 2020; IA group) and ISPB (October 2018─July 2019; ISPB group). The primary outcome was the postoperative pain score measured using a Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale preoperatively and at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. We performed multiple regression analysis to examine whether IA/ISPB selection is associated with acute-phase postoperative pain and adjusted for intra-articular injection, interscalene brachial plexus block, postoperative pain management, arthroscopic shoulder surgery, IA with 10 mg of morphine previously reported prognostic factors for postoperative pain (e.g., surgical procedures, operative time, older age, and preoperative pain). Furthermore, we examined induction time, total pentazocine dosage, and total postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) events. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the IA and ISPB groups in perioperative pain control during the acute-phase periods (p = 0.12, repeated analysis of variance). The difference in anesthesia method was not a prognostic factor for acute-phase postoperative pain (p = 0.11). The IA group (15.06 ± 4.00 min) had a significantly shorter mean anesthesia induction time than the ISPB group (29.23 ± 9.22 min) (p = 0.0001). There was no significant between-group difference in the total pentazocine dosage during the first 7 days (p = 0.3934) postoperatively. PONV was observed in eight (17.0%) and two (4.2%) patients in the IA and ISPB groups, respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the PONV incidence (p = 0.1582). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in acute-phase postoperative pain management between the IA and ISPB groups. The induction time was significantly shorter in IA. IRB: Approval number: UOEHCRB20-078, IRB approval date: September 9th, 2020; study duration: October 2018 to January 2020.