Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20.306
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 35(1): 85-93, 2024 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37846202

RESUMEN

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The Advancing American Kidney Health Initiative aims to increase rates of utilization of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the United States. One of the first steps to PD is successful catheter placement, which can be performed by surgeons, interventional radiologists, or nephrologists. We examined the association between operator subspecialty and risk of needing a follow-up procedure in the first 90 days after initial PD catheter implantation. Overall, we found that 15.5% of catheters required revision, removal, or a second catheter placement within 90 days. The odds of requiring a follow-up procedure was 36% higher for interventional radiologists and 86% higher for interventional nephrologists compared with general surgeons. Further research is needed to understand how to optimize the function of catheters across different operator types. BACKGROUND: The US government has implemented incentives to increase the use of PD. Successful placement of PD catheters is an important step to increasing PD utilization rates. Our objective was to compare initial outcomes after PD catheter placement by different types of operators. METHODS: We included PD-naïve patients insured by Medicare who had a PD catheter inserted between 2010 and 2019. We examined the association between specialty of the operator (general surgeon, vascular surgeon, interventional radiologist, or interventional nephrologist) and odds of needing a follow-up procedure, which we defined as catheter removal, replacement, or revision within 90 days of the initial procedure. Mixed logistic regression models clustered by operator were used to examine the association between operator type and outcomes. RESULTS: We included 46,973 patients treated by 5205 operators (71.1% general surgeons, 17.2% vascular surgeons, 9.7% interventional radiologists, 2.0% interventional nephrologists). 15.5% of patients required a follow-up procedure within 90 days of the initial insertion, of whom 2.9% had a second PD catheter implanted, 6.6% underwent PD catheter removal, and 5.9% had a PD catheter revision within 90 days of the initial insertion. In models adjusted for patient and operator characteristics, the odds of requiring a follow-up procedure within 90 days were highest for interventional nephrologists (HR, 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56 to 2.22) and interventional radiologists (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.58) followed by vascular surgeons (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.14) compared with general surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of needing a follow-up procedure after initial PD catheter placement varied by operator specialty and was higher for interventionalists and lowest for general surgeons.


Asunto(s)
Diálisis Peritoneal , Cirujanos , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Nefrólogos , Medicare , Catéteres , Diálisis Peritoneal/métodos , Radiólogos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos
2.
Eur Respir J ; 63(2)2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37996243

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The principal aim of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) management is to improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptoms. METHODS: In this open-label randomised controlled trial, patients with symptomatic MPE were randomly assigned to either indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) insertion with the option of talc pleurodesis or chest drain and talc pleurodesis. The primary end-point was global health status, measured with the 30-item European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) at 30 days post-intervention. 142 participants were enrolled from July 2015 to December 2019. RESULTS: Of participants randomly assigned to the IPC (n=70) and chest drain (n=72) groups, primary outcome data were available in 58 and 56 patients, respectively. Global health status improved in both groups at day 30 compared with baseline: IPC (mean difference 13.11; p=0.001) and chest drain (mean difference 10.11; p=0.001). However, there was no significant between-group difference at day 30 (mean intergroup difference in baseline-adjusted global health status 2.06, 95% CI -5.86-9.99; p=0.61), day 60 or day 90. No significant differences were identified between groups in breathlessness and chest pain scores. All chest drain arm patients were admitted (median length of stay 4 days); seven patients in the IPC arm required intervention-related hospitalisation. CONCLUSIONS: While HRQoL significantly improved in both groups, there were no differences in patient-reported global health status at 30 days. The outpatient pathway using an IPC was not superior to inpatient treatment with a chest drain.


Asunto(s)
Pacientes Ambulatorios , Derrame Pleural Maligno , Humanos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Derrame Pleural Maligno/terapia , Derrame Pleural Maligno/etiología , Pacientes Internos , Calidad de Vida , Talco/uso terapéutico , Pleurodesia , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Blood Cells Mol Dis ; 108: 102862, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38889659

RESUMEN

This retrospective study at Beijing Children's Hospital (2020-2023) analyzed surgical procedures and complications in 24 pediatric hemophilia patients undergoing Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) insertion, primarily in the right jugular vein (RJV). We detailed the surgical process, including patient demographics and intraoperative imaging use. The choice of the RJV for TIVAP placement was influenced by its larger diameter and superficial anatomical position, potentially reducing risks like thrombosis and infection. Our findings support the RJV as a safer alternative for port placement in pediatric patients, aligning with current literature. Statistical analysis revealed no significant correlation between complications and baseline characteristics like weight and diagnosis type. However, the length of hospital stay and implant brand were significant risk factors for catheter or port displacement and removal. The limited patient number may introduce bias, suggesting a need for further studies with larger samples. Despite a 14.7 %-33 % complication rate and 5 port removals, the advantages of TIVAP, including reliable venous access, reduced discomfort, and treatment convenience, were evident. Most complications improved with symptomatic treatment, and there were no deaths due to port-related complications, underscoring the impact of TIVAP on improving pediatric hemophilia treatment.


Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Humanos , Hemofilia A/complicaciones , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Niño , Masculino , Preescolar , Adolescente , Femenino , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Lactante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Venas Yugulares
4.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 83(4): 445-455, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38061534

RESUMEN

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Hemodialysis catheter dysfunction is an important problem for patients with kidney failure. The optimal design of the tunneled catheter tip is unknown. This study evaluated the association of catheter tip design with the duration of catheter function. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study using data from the nationwide REDUCCTION trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 4,722 adults who each received hemodialysis via 1 or more tunneled central venous catheters in 37 Australian nephrology services from December 2016 to March 2020. EXPOSURE: Design of tunneled hemodialysis catheter tip, classified as symmetrical, step, or split. OUTCOME: Time to catheter dysfunction requiring removal due to inadequate dialysis blood flow assessed by the treating clinician. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Mixed, 3-level accelerated failure time model, assuming a log-normal survival distribution. Secular trends, the intervention, and baseline differences in service, patient, and catheter factors were included in the adjusted model. In a sensitivity analysis, survival times and proportional hazards were compared among participants' first tunneled catheters. RESULTS: Among the study group, 355 of 3,871 (9.2%), 262 of 1,888 (13.9%), and 38 of 455 (8.4%) tunneled catheters with symmetrical, step, and split tip designs, respectively, required removal due to dysfunction. Step tip catheters required removal for dysfunction at a rate 53% faster than symmetrical tip catheters (adjusted time ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.33-0.67) and 76% faster than split tip catheters (adjusted time ratio, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.11-0.51) in the adjusted accelerated failure time models. Only symmetrical tip catheters had performance superior to step tip catheters in unadjusted and sensitivity analyses. Split tip catheters were infrequently used and had risks of dysfunction similar to symmetrical tip catheters. The cumulative incidence of other complications requiring catheter removal, routine removal, and death before removal were similar across the 3 tip designs. LIMITATIONS: Tip design was not randomized. CONCLUSIONS: Symmetrical and split tip catheters had a lower risk of catheter dysfunction requiring removal than step tip catheters. FUNDING: Grants from government (Queensland Health, Safer Care Victoria, Medical Research Future Fund, National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia), academic (Monash University), and not-for-profit (ANZDATA Registry, Kidney Health Australia) sources. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ANZCTR with study number ACTRN12616000830493. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Central venous catheters are widely used to facilitate vascular access for life-sustaining hemodialysis treatments but often fail due to blood clots or other mechanical problems that impede blood flow. A range of adaptations to the design of tunneled hemodialysis catheters have been developed, but it is unclear which designs have the greatest longevity. We analyzed data from an Australian nationwide cohort of patients who received hemodialysis via a tunneled catheter and found that catheters with a step tip design failed more quickly than those with a symmetrical tip. Split tip catheters performed well but were infrequently used and require further study. Use of symmetrical rather than step tip hemodialysis catheters may reduce mechanical failures and unnecessary procedures for patients.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Adulto , Humanos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Australia , Diálisis Renal , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos
5.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 84(2): 195-204.e1, 2024 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447707

RESUMEN

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: A history of prior abdominal procedures may influence the likelihood of referral for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion. To guide clinical decision making in this population, this study examined the association between prior abdominal procedures and outcomes in patients undergoing PD catheter insertion. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing their first PD catheter insertion between November 1, 2011, and November 1, 2020, at 11 institutions in Canada and the United States participating in the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis North American Catheter Registry. EXPOSURE: Prior abdominal procedure(s) defined as any procedure that enters the peritoneal cavity. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was time to the first of (1) abandonment of the PD catheter or (2) interruption/termination of PD. Secondary outcomes were rates of emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and procedures. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Cumulative incidence curves were used to describe the risk over time, and an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the association between the exposure and primary outcome. Models for count data were used to estimate the associations between the exposure and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Of 855 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 31% had a history of a prior abdominal procedure and 20% experienced at least 1 PD catheter-related complication that led to the primary outcome. Prior abdominal procedures were not associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome (adjusted HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.68-1.84). Upper-abdominal procedures were associated with a higher adjusted hazard of the primary outcome, but there was no dose-response relationship concerning the number of procedures. There was no association between prior abdominal procedures and other secondary outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Observational study and cohort limited to a sample of patients believed to be potential candidates for PD catheter insertion. CONCLUSION: A history of prior abdominal procedure(s) does not appear to influence catheter outcomes following PD catheter insertion. Such a history should not be a contraindication to PD. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a life-saving therapy for individuals with kidney failure that can be done at home. PD requires the placement of a tube, or catheter, into the abdomen to allow the exchange of dialysis fluid during treatment. There is concern that individuals who have undergone prior abdominal procedures and are referred for a catheter might have scarring that could affect catheter function. In some institutions, they might not even be offered PD therapy as an option. In this study, we found that a history of prior abdominal procedures did not increase the risk of PD catheter complications and should not dissuade patients from choosing PD or providers from recommending it.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia , Diálisis Peritoneal , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Diálisis Peritoneal/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Canadá/epidemiología , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Abdomen/cirugía , Adulto , Cateterismo/métodos , Cateterismo/efectos adversos
6.
Respir Res ; 25(1): 47, 2024 Jan 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38243259

RESUMEN

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common complication of thoracic and extrathoracic malignancies and is associated with high mortality and elevated costs to healthcare systems. Over the last decades the understanding of pathophysiology mechanisms, diagnostic techniques and optimal treatment intervention in MPE have been greatly advanced by recent high-quality research, leading to an ever less invasive diagnostic approach and more personalized management. Despite a number of management options, including talc pleurodesis, indwelling pleural catheters and combinations of the two, treatment for MPE remains symptom directed and centered around drainage strategy. In the next future, because of a better understanding of underlying tumor biology together with more sensitive molecular diagnostic techniques, it is likely that combined diagnostic and therapeutic procedures allowing near total outpatient management of MPE will become popular. This article provides a review of the current advances, new discoveries and future directions in the pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of MPE.


Asunto(s)
Derrame Pleural Maligno , Humanos , Derrame Pleural Maligno/diagnóstico , Derrame Pleural Maligno/terapia , Pleurodesia , Talco , Catéteres de Permanencia , Drenaje/métodos
7.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 469, 2024 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39110241

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: About 50% of individuals with long-term indwelling catheters are affected by catheter encrustations and bladder stone formation. Therefore, prophylaxis of catheter encrustations is important. Currently, however, neither an established prophylaxis nor a standardized in-vitro model to test different measures exist. We have therefore developed and qualitatively evaluated an in-vitro model of catheter encrustation. METHODS: Size 14 French suprapubic catheters were incubated under sterile conditions at 37 degrees Celsius in five different media: (1) sterile artificial urine (n = 16), (2) artificial urine with E. coli (n = 8), (3) with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 8), (4) with Proteus mirabilis (n = 8), and (5) with a mix of these three strains (n = 8). Catheter balloons were inflated either a glycerine or a bactericidal solution. After 6 weeks, the catheters were removed from the solution, dried, and weighed, and a photometric determination of the retrieved encrustations was performed. RESULTS: Most frequently and pronounced encrustations were detected in the Pseudomonas group. The median weight of these encrustations (50% struvite and brushite) was 84.4 mg (47.7 mg / 127.3 mg). Even on catheters stored in sterile urine, encrustations (69.2% struvite) were found. Bacterial growth was not affected by the medium used for catheter blockage. CONCLUSION: Although in-vitro models appear to be limited because they lack "the human factor", they are valuable for systematically assessing physico-chemical factors affecting encrustations. Therefore, our model, being reliable and cost-effective, may foster further research despite its limitations.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres Urinarios , Humanos , Catéteres Urinarios/microbiología , Catéteres Urinarios/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Proteus mirabilis/aislamiento & purificación , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Técnicas In Vitro , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Escherichia coli , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Urinario/instrumentación , Modelos Biológicos
8.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 379, 2024 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38888747

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Indwelling catheterization following radical prostatectomy is used to aid healing and urinary drainage. While early removal is well investigated, prolonged catheterization has only been investigated in terms of urinary incontinence. Other complications such as anastomotic strictures are unexplored so far. This study aims to analyze the sequelae of catheterization lasting more than 14 days after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: A prospective database of 3087 patients undergoing RARP was analyzed, focusing on 180 patients with catheterization exceeding 14 days (Group A) and 88 matched controls (Group B). Outcome measures included subsequent surgeries, complications, and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Prolonged catheterization did not significantly increase the need for subsequent surgeries (6% in Group A vs. 7% in Group B, p = .95). However, anastomotic strictures were more common in Group A (3%) compared to Group B (0%) after exclusion of risk factors. Incontinence rates were similar between groups, although a subgroup analysis revealed higher incontinence rates in patients with catheterization exceeding 28 days. No significant differences were observed in erectile function or quality of life between the groups. CONCLUSION: Prolonged catheterization after RARP does not independently increase the risk of anastomotic strictures in the general population. However, in patients without risk factors, prolonged catheter dwell time may elevate the risk of strictures and subsequent surgeries. Additionally, patients with catheterization exceeding 28 days may experience higher rates of long-term incontinence. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings and elucidate the long-term implications of prolonged catheterization.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Prostatectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Cateterismo Urinario , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prostatectomía/métodos , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estudios Prospectivos
9.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 35(4): 592-600.e5, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38128721

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the port infection rate between single-lumen (SL) and double-lumen (DL) ports and to determine whether the use of a DL port is an independent risk factor for port infection among patients with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 2,573 adult oncologic patients (aged >18 years) who had either a SL (n = 841) or a DL (n = 1,732) chest port implanted between 2013 and 2020 at a single institution. Patients who had port infection, including port-site infection and port-related bloodstream infection, were identified through chart review. After propensity score matching based on 13 potentially confounding variables, a total of 493 pairs of patients with either SL (SL group) or DL (DL group) ports were subjected to analysis. The port infection rate was compared between the 2 groups using Poisson regression. Multivariate proportional subdistribution hazards regression (PSHREG) analysis was conducted to determine whether use of a DL port is an independent risk factor for port infection. RESULTS: The cumulative follow-up period for the matched cohort was 371,853 catheter-days (median, 297 catheter-days per port; range, 0-1,903 catheter-days). The port infection rate of the DL group was significantly higher than that of the SL group (0.232 vs 0.113 infections per 1,000 catheter-days; P = .001). PSHREG analysis demonstrated that use of a DL port was an independent risk factor of port infection (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.33-3.78; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: DL ports were associated with a higher risk of port infection compared with SL ports in adult oncologic patients.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Neoplasias , Adulto , Humanos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Puntaje de Propensión
10.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 35(5): 759-766, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38244918

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report the safety and effectiveness of fibrin sheath stripping of pediatric chest ports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fibrin sheath stripping procedures for pediatric chest ports between 2018 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The treatment indication was the inability to aspirate blood from the port. The technical success, adverse events, days of primary and secondary service intervals, fluoroscopy time, and fluoroscopy dose were recorded. RESULTS: Fibrin sheath stripping procedures were performed in 15 patients for a total of 18 procedures. All patients treated with fibrin sheath stripping had failed fibrinolytic treatment and a preprocedural fluoroscopy examination suggestive of fibrin sheath before attempting stripping. All fibrin sheath stripping procedures were technically successful. The median and mean total days of primary service interval from the date of port placement to the date of suspected fibrin sheath were 666 and 617 days, respectively. The median and mean total number of days of secondary service interval were 385 and 561 days, respectively. The mean fluoroscopy time was 16.9 minutes. The mean fluoroscopy air kerma was 29.8 mGy. No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Fibrin sheath stripping is a safe and effective minimally invasive option to maintain the function of pediatric chest ports.


Asunto(s)
Fibrina , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Preescolar , Resultado del Tratamiento , Niño , Factores de Tiempo , Lactante , Radiografía Intervencional , Adolescente , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Fluoroscopía , Catéteres de Permanencia , Factores de Riesgo , Dosis de Radiación , Punciones
11.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 35(8): 1203-1208, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704139

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of fluoroscopic versus portable placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and central venous catheters (CVCs) in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective review of 346 upper-extremity PICC placements (286 fluoroscopic and 60 portable; mean age, 9.83 years [SD ± 5.58]; 49.1% female) and 138 tunneled femoral CVC placements (56 fluoroscopic and 82 portable; mean age, 0.23 years [SD ± 0.36]; 57.0% female). Portable placements used mobile plain-film radiography. All lines were placed by board-certified interventional radiologists. RESULTS: Fluoroscopic PICC placements had a lower procedure time (43.9 vs 57.9 minutes; P < .001), radiation dosage (342 vs 590 mGy·cm2; P < .001), incidence of technical failure (0% vs 3.3%; P = .029), and incidence of catheter malfunction (1.7% vs 12.1%; P < .001) compared with portable PICC placements. Fluoroscopic CVC placements had a lower procedure time (42.6 vs 54.8 minutes; P < .001) and radiation dosage (63.8 vs 405 mGy·cm2; P < .001) compared with portable CVC placements. No technical failures were found in either CVC groups and the difference was nonsignificant for catheter malfunction (0% vs 7.3%; P = .081). Fluoroscopic placements of PICCs and CVCs had a lower incidence rate of central line-associated bloodstream infection compared with portable placements (0.71 vs 2.22 cases per 1,000 line-days; P = .046). Overall, fluoroscopic placements of PICCs and CVCs had fewer adverse events compared with portable placements (3.2% vs 14.8%; P < .001). Portable procedure setting was the only significant factor associated with adverse events (odds ratio, 33.77; 95% CI, 4.56-757.01). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopic placements of PICCs and CVCs are associated with lower procedure time, radiation dose, and risk of adverse events compared with portable placements in pediatric patients.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Periférico , Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía Intervencional , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Niño , Fluoroscopía , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Adolescente , Preescolar , Lactante , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Riesgo , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Falla de Equipo , Factores de Edad , Catéteres de Permanencia
12.
Semin Dial ; 37(3): 273-276, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432229

RESUMEN

Mechanical problems like break or crack in Luer connectors or hubs, clamps, and tubings are common non-infectious complications of tunneled dialysis catheters (TDC), which may lead to other TDC complications and the need to insert a new catheter. These can be tackled using TDC repair kits or spare parts, which are often not available, resulting in the insertion of a new TDC that increases morbidity, TDC-related procedures, and healthcare costs. We discuss two cases of broken Luer connections of TDC, which were managed by exchanging the broken Luer connector of TDC with the similar Luer connector of a temporary dialysis catheter. Both the repaired TDCs are thereafter functioning well. This improvised technique provides an easy, effective, long-lasting option that salvages the existing TDC and reduces the cost factor.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia , Falla de Equipo , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Diálisis Renal/economía , Diálisis Renal/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/economía , Masculino , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/economía , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Remoción de Dispositivos/economía , Diseño de Equipo
13.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(6): 355, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750256

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The position of the catheter tip of totally implantable venous access devices (TIVAD) is a risk factor for postoperative complications. The study aim was to assess the early and late complications (EC and LC) associated with the position of the catheter tip in cancer patients. METHODS: We reviewed cancer patients who had a TIVAD placed in 2020. EC (≤ 90 days), LC (> 90 days) and risk factors for TIVAD-associated complications were assessed. The vertical mismatch of the catheter tip was compared to an "ideal position" (> 10 mm below the carina and ≥ 20 mm below the right main bronchus (RMB)) using chest x-ray, post-implantation. RESULTS: 301 patients were included. Median follow-up after TIVAD implantation was 9.4 months. All TIVAD catheters were inserted via the internal jugular vein (IJV). The mean distance between the catheter tip and the carina and the RMB was 21.3 mm and 6.63 mm respectively. In total, 11.3% patients developed EC and 5.6% had LC. An association was found between the position of the catheter tip from the carina (≤ 10 mm vs. > 10 mm) and the occurrence of EC (18.3% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.01) and for the catheter insertion side (left IJV vs. right IJV) (19.1% vs. 9.0% p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that left IJV catheter insertion (OR 2.76), and a catheter tip located ≤ 10 mm below the carina (OR 2.71) are significant independent risk factors of EC. CONCLUSIONS: TIVAD catheter tip located at ≤ 10 mm below the carina, and a left-side inserted catheter, are higher risk of EC.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Neoplasias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Trombosis , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Trombosis/etiología , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento
14.
Surg Endosc ; 38(1): 1-23, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37989887

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has been used for both de novo insertion and salvage of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters. Advanced laparoscopic, basic laparoscopic, open, and image-guided techniques have evolved as the most popular techniques. The aim of this guideline was to develop evidence-based guidelines that support surgeons, patients, and other physicians in decisions on minimally invasive peritoneal dialysis access and the salvage of malfunctioning catheters in both adults and children. METHODS: A guidelines committee panel of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons reviewed the literature since the prior guideline was published in 2014 and developed seven key questions in adults and four in children. After a systematic review of the literature, by the panel, evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Recommendations for future research were also proposed. RESULTS: After systematic review, data extraction, and evidence to decision meetings, the panel agreed on twelve recommendations for the peri-operative performance of laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis access surgery and management of catheter dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: In the adult population, conditional recommendations were made in favor of: staged hernia repair followed by PD catheter insertion over simultaneous and traditional start over urgent start of PD when medically possible. Furthermore, the panel suggested advanced laparoscopic insertion techniques rather than basic laparoscopic techniques or open insertion. Conditional recommendations were made for either advanced laparoscopic or image-guided percutaneous insertion and for either nonoperative or operative salvage. A recommendation could not be made regarding concomitant clean-contaminated surgery in adults. In the pediatric population, conditional recommendations were made for either traditional or urgent start of PD, concomitant clean or clean-contaminated surgery and PD catheter placement rather than staged, and advanced laparoscopic placement rather than basic or open insertion.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Laparoscopía , Diálisis Peritoneal , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Cateterismo/métodos , Catéteres de Permanencia , Diálisis Peritoneal/métodos , Peritoneo
15.
Clin Nephrol ; 102(4): 212-222, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38994593

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Catheter malfunctions are associated with reduced blood flow and interrupted dialysis during hemodialysis. AIM: This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether the use of urokinase to lock hemodialysis catheters can maintain their patency and prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and Chinese medical databases were searched for controlled trials of hemodialysis catheter locking using urokinase from database inception until July 15, 2021. The primary outcome was catheter malfunction, and the secondary outcomes were the peak catheter blood flow rate (Qb) and CRBSIs. RESULTS: Across 16 trials, 1,041 patients were randomized to receive either urokinase/urokinase mixture (treated) or heparin (control) locks once or thrice a week. Locking with urokinase alone or in combination with another substance significantly prevented catheter malfunction. The effect on Qb was significant, with that in the treated group being better than in the control group. Similarly, the incidence of CRBSIs in the treated group was lower. CONCLUSION: Urokinase locking maintains catheter patency more effectively than heparin. Prophylactic locking with urokinase or urokinase mixtures reduces incidences of catheter malfunction, which ensures the smooth progression of hemodialysis and reduces patient medical costs. The results of this study have important clinical implications and will provide guidance to medical practitioners globally.


Asunto(s)
Diálisis Renal , Activador de Plasminógeno de Tipo Uroquinasa , Humanos , Activador de Plasminógeno de Tipo Uroquinasa/uso terapéutico , Activador de Plasminógeno de Tipo Uroquinasa/administración & dosificación , Diálisis Renal/instrumentación , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Heparina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Respirology ; 29(2): 176-182, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37696757

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) and indwelling peritoneal catheter (IPeC) have established roles in the management of malignant pleural and peritoneal effusions but catheter-related infections remain a major concern. Topical mupirocin prophylaxis has been shown to reduce peritoneal dialysis catheter infections. This study aimed to assess the (i) compatibility of IPC with mupirocin and (ii) feasibility, tolerability and compliance of topical mupirocin prophylaxis in patients with an IPC or IPeC. METHODS: (i) Three preparations of mupirocin were applied onto segments of IPC thrice weekly and examined with scanning electron microscope (SEM) at different time intervals. (ii) Consecutive patients fitted with IPC or IPeC were given topical mupirocin prophylaxis to apply to the catheter exit-site following every drainage/dressing change (at least twice weekly) and followed up for 6 months. RESULTS: (i) No detectable structural catheter damage was found with mupirocin applied for up to 6 months. (ii) Fifty indwelling catheters were inserted in 48 patients for malignant pleural (n = 41) and peritoneal (n = 9) effusions. Median follow-up was 121 [median, IQR 19-181] days. All patients tolerated mupirocin well; one patient reported short-term local tenderness. Compliance was excellent with 95.8% of the 989 scheduled doses delivered. Six patients developed catheter-related pleural (n = 3), concurrent peritoneal/local (n = 1) and skin/tract (n = 2) infections from Streptococcus mitis (with Bacillus species or anaerobes), Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CONCLUSION: This first study of long-term prevention of IPC- or IPeC-related infections found topical mupirocin prophylaxis feasible and well tolerated. Its efficacy warrants future randomized studies.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Mupirocina , Humanos , Mupirocina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Proyectos Piloto , Administración Tópica , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Drenaje
17.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(7): 1381-1387, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38780626

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: After vaginal pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery a vaginal pack and indwelling bladder catheter are inserted to reduce blood loss and bladder overdistension. The ideal timing of removal remains unclear. In this study we compared removal of vaginal pack and indwelling catheter 3 h post-surgery with removal the next day. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study performed in the Netherlands included patients undergoing POP surgery between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020. Patients in whom the vaginal pack and catheter were removed the day after surgery (group A) were compared with patients in which the vaginal pack and catheter were removed 3 h post-surgery (group B). Both groups were compared regarding urinary retention and the need for re-intervention owing to active blood loss within 6 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, such as age, type of operation and type of anaesthesia in group A (n = 280) and group B (n = 207) were comparable. No significant differences were found regarding complications such as urinary retention (17.2 versus 23.2%; p = 0.255). The rates of re-intervention because of active blood loss and occurrence of infection were also comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of the indwelling catheter and vaginal pack 3 h after vaginal POP surgery does not lead to more postoperative complications than removal the 1st day after surgery. Therefore, early removal is a feasible and safe alternative to the standard timing of removal the morning after surgery of women undergoing POP surgery. In the future this could help with introducing same-day discharge.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia , Remoción de Dispositivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Retención Urinaria/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Países Bajos , Prolapso Uterino/cirugía , Vagina/cirugía , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos
18.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 28(3): 245-253, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37962745

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Compared with the conventional peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion, embedding PD catheter implantation is one of the procedures for planned PD initiation. However, facilities where embedded PD catheter implantation is available are limited, and the impact of embedded PD catheter implantation on hospitalization cost and length of hospitalization is unknown. METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study included 132 patients with PD initiation between 2005 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: 64 patients in the embedding group and 68 patients in the conventional insertion group. We created a multivariable generalized linear model (GLM) with the gamma family and log-link function to evaluate the association among catheter embedding, the duration and medical costs of hospitalization for PD initiation. We also evaluated the effect modification between age and catheter embedding. RESULTS: Catheter embedding (ß coefficient - 0.13 [95% confidence interval - 0.21, - 0.05]) and age (per 10 years 0.08 [0.03, 0.14]) were significantly associated with hospitalization costs. Catheter embedding (- 0.21 [- 0.32, - 0.10]) and age (0.11 [0.03, 0.19]) were also identified as factors significantly associated with length of hospitalization. The difference between the embedding group and the conventional insertion group in hospitalization costs for PD initiation (P for interaction = 0.060) and the length of hospitalization (P for interaction = 0.027) was larger in young-to-middle-aged patients than in elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter embedding was associated with lower hospitalization cost and shorter length of hospitalization for PD initiation than conventional PD catheter insertion, especially in young-to-middle-aged patients.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Diálisis Peritoneal , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Humanos , Niño , Catéteres de Permanencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Hospitalización
19.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 28(6): 547-556, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38340245

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Upward-directed exit-site has been believed to be the worst for frequent ESI by an old retrospective study using straight catheters. No comparison study of 3 exit-site directions using swan-neck catheter has been performed regarding which direction is the best for our endpoints, Easy-to-see the backside area of exit-site: ESBE, Easy-to-disinfect the backside area of exit-site: EDBE, reduction of both exit-site infection (ESI), symptomatic catheter dislocation and peritonitis. METHODS: We assessed the relationship of exit-site direction with our endpoints in a quantitative cross-sectional, multicentered questionnaire survey. Patients who received either non-surgical catheter implantation or exit-site surgery were excluded. RESULTS: The numbers (percentage) of exit-site directions in included 291 patients were upward 79 (26.0), lateralward 108 (37.5) and downward 105 (36.5). Cochran-Armitage analysis showed a significant step-ladder increase in the prevalence of ESI as the direction changed from upward to lateralward to downward (0.15 ± 0.41, 0.25 ± 0.54, 0.38 ± 0.69 episodes/patient-year, p = 0.03). Multivariable regression analysis revealed the upward exit-site independently associates with both higher frequency of ESBE (OR 5.55, 95% CI 2.23-16.45, p < 0.01) and reduction of prevalence of ESI (OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.27-0.98, p = 0.04). Positive association between the prevalence of symptomatic catheter dislocation and ESI (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.27-7.82, p = 0.01), and inverse association between EDBE and either prevalence of symptomatic catheter dislocation (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11-0.72) or peritonitis (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23-0.99) observed. CONCLUSION: Upward-directed swan-neck catheter exit-site may be the best for both ESBE and prevention of ESI. EDBE may reduce catheter dislocation and peritonitis. Symptomatic catheter dislocation may predict ESI.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Catéteres de Permanencia , Diálisis Peritoneal , Peritonitis , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Anciano , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Peritonitis/prevención & control , Peritonitis/etiología , Peritonitis/epidemiología , Diálisis Peritoneal/instrumentación , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Riesgo
20.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 25(5): e232-e238, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695702

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Ethanol lock therapy (ELT) is a potential method of central catheter salvage following central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) although there is potential risk of catheter damage in polyurethane catheters. Further, there is limited efficacy data across the spectrum of common pediatric catheters, and published ELT protocols describe dwell times that are not feasible for critically ill children. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ELT in polyurethane catheters using brief (30 min to 2 hr) dwell times in our PICU. DESIGN: Investigational pilot study using historical control data. SETTING: PICU in quaternary care, free-standing children's hospital. INTERVENTIONS: ELT in polyurethane central venous catheters for catheter salvage. RESULTS: ELT with brief dwell times was used in 25 patients, 22 of whom were bacteremic. Ultimately 11 patients, comprising 14 catheters, were diagnosed with a primary CLABSI. The catheter salvage rate in primary CLABSI patients receiving ELT was 92% (13/14) and significantly higher than the salvage rate in patients receiving antibiotics alone (non-ELT) (62%, 39/64; mean difference 0.32, 95% CI [0.14-0.50], p = 0.03). The rate of catheter fracture in all patients receiving ELT was 8% (2/25) while the rate of fracture in the non-ELT group was 13% (8/64; mean difference -0.05, 95% CI [-0.18 to 0.09], p = 0.72). The rate of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) use in the ELT group was 8% (2/25), whereas the rate of tPA use in the non-ELT group was significantly higher at 42% (26/64; mean difference -0.34, 95% CI [-0.49 to -0.17], p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ELT for catheter salvage and prophylaxis in the PICU is safe in a variety of polyurethane catheters. Dwell times ranging from 30 minutes to 2 hours were effective in sterilizing the catheters while allowing other therapies to continue. This approach may decrease the need for frequent line changes in a medically fragile pediatric population.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Etanol , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Poliuretanos , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Niño , Proyectos Piloto , Etanol/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Preescolar , Femenino , Lactante , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Bacteriemia/etiología , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA