Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg in diabetic macular oedema (PHOTON): 48-week results from a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 2/3 trial.

BACKGROUND: A high-dose formulation of intravitreal aflibercept (8 mg) could improve treatment outcomes in diabetic macular oedema (DMO) by requiring fewer injections than the standard comparator, aflibercept 2 mg. We report efficacy and safety results of aflibercept 8 mg versus 2 mg in patients with DMO. METHODS: PHOTON was a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 2/3 trial performed at 138 hospitals and specialty retina clinics in seven countries. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 years or older with type 1 or 2 diabetes and centre-involved DMO. Patients were randomly assigned (1:2:1) to intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks (2q8), aflibercept 8 mg every 12 weeks (8q12), or aflibercept 8 mg every 16 weeks (8q16), following initial monthly dosing. From week 16, dosing intervals for the aflibercept 8 mg groups were shortened if patients met prespecified dose regimen modification criteria denoting disease activity. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 48 (non-inferiority margin of 4 letters). Efficacy and safety analyses included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04429503). FINDINGS: Between June 29, 2020, and June 28, 2021, 970 patients were screened for eligibility. After exclusions, 660 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive aflibercept 8q12 (n=329), 8q16 (n=164), or 2q8 (n=167); two patients were randomly assigned in error and did not receive treatment. 658 (99·7%) patients were treated and included in the full analysis set and safety analysis set (8q12 n=328, 8q16 n=163, and 2q8 n=167). Mean patient age was 62·3 years (SD 10·4). 401 (61%) patients were male. 471 (72%) patients were White. Aflibercept 8q12 and 8q16 demonstrated non-inferior BCVA gains to aflibercept 2q8 (BCVA mean change from baseline 8·8 letters [SD 9·0] in the 8q12 group, 7·9 letters [8·4] in the 8q16 group, and 9·2 letters [9·0] in the 2q8 group). The difference in least squares means was -0·57 letters (95% CI -2·26 to 1·13, p value for non-inferiority <0·0001) between 8q12 and 2q8 and -1·44 letters (-3·27 to 0·39, p value for non-inferiority 0·0031) between aflibercept 8q16 and 2q8. Proportions of patients with ocular adverse events in the study eye were similar across groups (8q12 n=104 [32%], 8q16 n=48 [29%], and 2q8 n=46 [28%]). INTERPRETATION: Aflibercept 8 mg demonstrated efficacy and safety with extended dosing intervals and could decrease treatment burden in patients with DMO. FUNDING: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Bayer.

Aflibercept Monotherapy or Bevacizumab First for Diabetic Macular Edema.

BACKGROUND: In eyes with diabetic macular edema, the relative efficacy of administering aflibercept monotherapy as compared with bevacizumab first with a switch to aflibercept if the eye condition does not improve sufficiently (a form of step therapy) is unclear. METHODS: At 54 clinical sites, we randomly assigned eyes in adults who had diabetic macular edema involving the macular center and a visual-acuity letter score of 24 to 69 (on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better visual acuity; Snellen equivalent, 20/320 to 20/50) to receive either 2.0 mg of intravitreous aflibercept or 1.25 mg of intravitreous bevacizumab. The drug was administered at randomization and thereafter according to the prespecified retreatment protocol. Beginning at 12 weeks, eyes in the bevacizumab-first group were switched to aflibercept therapy if protocol-specified criteria were met. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity over the 2-year trial period. Retinal central subfield thickness and visual acuity at 2 years and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 312 eyes (in 270 adults) underwent randomization; 158 eyes were assigned to receive aflibercept monotherapy and 154 to receive bevacizumab first. Over the 2-year period, 70% of the eyes in the bevacizumab-first group were switched to aflibercept therapy. The mean improvement in visual acuity was 15.0 letters in the aflibercept-monotherapy group and 14.0 letters in the bevacizumab-first group (adjusted difference, 0.8 letters; 95% confidence interval, -0.9 to 2.5; P = 0.37). At 2 years, the mean changes in visual acuity and retinal central subfield thickness were similar in the two groups. Serious adverse events (in 52% of the patients in the aflibercept-monotherapy group and in 36% of those in the bevacizumab-first group) and hospitalizations for adverse events (in 48% and 32%, respectively) were more common in the aflibercept-monotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial of treatment of moderate vision loss due to diabetic macular edema involving the center of the macula, we found no evidence of a significant difference in visual outcomes over a 2-year period between aflibercept monotherapy and treatment with bevacizumab first with a switch to aflibercept in the case of suboptimal response. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; Protocol AC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03321513.).

Imaging the Retinal Vascular Mural Cells In Vivo: Elucidating the Timeline of Their Loss in Diabetic Retinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Vascular mural cells (VMCs) are integral components of the retinal vasculature with critical homeostatic functions such as maintaining the inner blood-retinal barrier and vascular tone, as well as supporting the endothelial cells. Histopathologic donor eye studies have shown widespread loss of pericytes and smooth muscle cells, the 2 main VMC types, suggesting these cells are critical to the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy (DR). There remain, however, critical gaps in our knowledge regarding the timeline of VMC demise in human DR. METHODS: In this study, we address this gap using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy to quantify retinal VMC density in eyes with no retinal disease (healthy), subjects with diabetes without diabetic retinopathy, and those with clinical DR and diabetic macular edema. We also used optical coherence tomography angiography to quantify capillary density of the superficial and deep capillary plexuses in these eyes. RESULTS: Our results indicate significant VMC loss in retinal arterioles before the appearance of classic clinical signs of DR (diabetes without diabetic retinopathy versus healthy, 5.0±2.0 versus 6.5±2.0 smooth muscle cells per 100 µm; P<0.05), while a significant reduction in capillary VMC density (5.1±2.3 in diabetic macular edema versus 14.9±6.0 pericytes per 100 µm in diabetes without diabetic retinopathy; P=0.01) and capillary density (superficial capillary plexus vessel density, 37.6±3.8 in diabetic macular edema versus 45.5±2.4 in diabetes without diabetic retinopathy; P<0.0001) is associated with more advanced stages of clinical DR, particularly diabetic macular edema. CONCLUSIONS: Our results offer a new framework for understanding the pathophysiologic course of VMC compromise in DR, which may facilitate the development and monitoring of therapeutic strategies aimed at VMC preservation and potentially the prevention of clinical DR and its associated morbidity. Imaging retinal VMCs provides an unparalleled opportunity to visualize these cells in vivo and may have wider implications in a range of diseases where these cells are disrupted.

Continuous glucose monitoring metrics following sub-Tenon's injection of triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema.

PURPOSE: This pilot study aims to comprehensively evaluate the effects of sub-Tenon's injection of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) on glycemic control in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) using professional continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed changes in glycemic control in 20 patients with type 2 mellitus and DME following single STTA (20 mg/0.5 mL) using The FreeStyle Libre Pro system. Professional CGM provides core CGM metrics such as the percentage of time that glucose levels fall within a target range and include the time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL), time above range (TAR) (> 180 mg/dL), and time below range (TBR) (< 70 mg/dL). Outcome measures were the changes in CGM metrics (TIR, TAR and TBR) and the percentage of patients in whom TAR increased by at least 10 percentage points (ppt) 4 days before to 4 days after STTA administration. RESULTS: The mean CGM metrics (TIR/TAR/TBR) were 75.5%/19.9%/4.4% 4 days before STTA and 73.7%/22.4%/3.5% 4 days after STTA; the metrics 4 days before and 4 days after STTA were not significantly different (P = 0.625 for TIR, P = 0.250 for TAR, and P = 0.375 for TBR). TAR increased by more than 10 ppt in four (20%) patients treated with sulfonylurea and/or insulin. CONCLUSION: Although there were no significant changes in the CGM metrics, four patients developed CGM-measured hyperglycemia after STTA for DME.

Baseline intraocular pressure: an independent risk factor in severe steroid-induced ocular hypertension after intravitreal dexamethasone implant.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the baseline intraocular pressure (IOP)-related risk of severe steroid-induced ocular hypertension (SIOH). We hypothesized that the incidence and severity of SIOH may differ according to baseline IOP in patients who received intravitreal dexamethasone implants. METHODS: A total of 889 eyes treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implants and a baseline IOP of ≤ 23 mmHg were enrolled. Enrolled patients were divided into two groups: the steroid-responders (127 eyes) and the non-steroid-responders (762 eyes). The steroid-responders group was subdivided into post-injection IOP of ≥ 25, > 30, or > 35 mmHg or IOP elevation of ≥ 10 mmHg over the baseline value. The odds ratio of SIOH was calculated using univariable logistic regression analysis, and significant variables were analyzed with a multivariable model. IOP was measured before (baseline IOP) and after dexamethasone implant injection at 1 week and 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Although baseline IOP was significantly associated with the development of SIOH in logistic regression analysis, the results from the subgroup analysis differed. In the group with IOP elevation of ≥ 10 mmHg over the baseline, SIOH was not significantly associated with baseline IOP, but it was significantly related to higher baseline IOP in the severe SIOH group (IOP > 30 and > 35 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: Higher baseline IOP is a risk factor for severe SIOH. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of SIOH when administering steroids intravitreally to patients with high baseline IOP (IOP > 19 mmHg).

SGLT2 inhibitors and diabetic retinopathy progression.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors affect progression of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) compared to standard of care. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study compared subjects enrolled in a commercial and Medicare Advantage medical claims database who filled a prescription for a SGLT2 inhibitor between 2013 and 2020 to unexposed controls, matched up to a 1:3 ratio. Patients were excluded if they were enrolled for less than 2 years in the plan, had no prior ophthalmologic exam, had no diagnosis of NPDR, had a diagnosis of diabetic macular edema (DME) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), had received treatment for vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR), or were younger than 18 years. To balance covariates of interest between the cohorts, an inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) propensity score for SGLT2 inhibitor exposure was used. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was employed to assess the hazard ratio (HR) for VTDR, PDR, or DME relative to SGLT2 exposure. RESULTS: A total of 6065 patients who initiated an SGLT2 inhibitor were matched to 12,890 controls. There were 734 (12%), 657 (10.8%), and 72 (1.18%) cases of VTDR, DME, and PDR, respectively, in the SGLT2 inhibitor cohort. Conversely, there were 1479 (11.4%), 1331 (10.3%), and 128 (0.99%) cases of VTDR, DME, and PDR, respectively, among controls. After IPTW, Cox regression analysis showed no difference in hazard for VTDR, PDR, or DME in the SGLT2 inhibitor-exposed cohort relative to the unexposed group [HR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.15 for VTDR; HR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.14 for DME; HR = 1.22, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.67 for PDR]. CONCLUSION: Exposure to SGLT2 inhibitor therapy was not associated with progression of NPDR compared to patients receiving other diabetic therapies.

Relationship between ischemic index, leakage index, and macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion.

PURPOSE: To investigate the combined association of the ischemic index and leakage index with macular edema on ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWFFA) in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: Retrospective image analysis study. The leakage index and ischemic index were calculated using Fiji after aligning early and late UWFFA images. Differences in the ischemic index, leakage index, and central macular thickness (CMT) between ischemic and non-ischemic BRVO were compared. Moreover, the association between the ischemic index, leakage index, and macular edema was analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients with BRVO were enrolled, including 53 non-ischemic BRVO and 30 ischemic BRVO patients. No significant differences were observed in leakage index and CMT between ischemic BRVO and non-ischemic BRVO (all P > 0.05). In all included patients, CMT correlated with the panretina and all subregion leakage indexes (all P < 0.01), but not with the ischemic index (all P > 0.05). In the ischemic BRVO group, CMT showed a correlation with the leakage index in several regions, but not with the ischemic index. After adjusting for the ischemic index and other clinical features, CMT remained significantly correlated with the leakage index in all regions. CONCLUSION: The leakage index may be a more effective biomarker for monitoring BRVO-associated macular edema compared to the ischemic index. Further follow-up studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Biomarkers determining treatment interval of diabetic macular edema after initial resolution by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor.

PURPOSE: To identify predictive factors that help determine the interval of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection after the initial resolution of diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: This retrospective case-control study enrolled treatment-naïve DME patients who had achieved DME resolution after intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. Patients were classified into the recurrence and no-recurrence groups, depending on the development of recurrent DME after deferring intravitreal anti-VEGF injection. The demographics and clinical features, including optical coherence tomography findings, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: We enrolled 105 eyes. Sixty eyes (57.1%) belonged to the no-recurrence group, and 45 (42.9%), belonged to the recurrence group. The severity of diabetic retinopathy at baseline was related to early DME recurrence (P = 0.009). At the treatment deferring point, the non-recurrence group had both thinner central subfield thickness (289.5 ± 27.2 µm vs. 307.0 ± 38.2 µm, P = 0.011) and thinner central retinal thickness (214.9 ± 41.4 µm vs. 231.8 ± 41.2 µm, P = 0.043) compared to the recurrence group. Intraretinal cyst was observed in 34 eyes (56.7%) in the no-recurrence group and 42 eyes (93.3%) in the recurrence group at the deferring point (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A low risk of early DME recurrence is anticipated in the eyes with foveal thinning and no intraretinal cyst when anti-VEGF injection is deferred. These predictive biomarkers can be useful for patient monitoring and determining treatment strategies for DME patients.

Flare levels after intravitreal injection of brolucizumab for diabetic macular edema.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate anterior flare intensity (AFI) after intravitreal injection of brolucizumab (IVBr) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), and to identify the factors associated with the change of AFI after IVBr. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study was conducted at five sites in Japan for patients with DME who underwent a single IVBr. AFI and central retinal thickness (CRT) were measured using a laser flare meter and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, respectively, at weeks 0 and 6. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (phakia, 37 eyes; pseudophakia, 28 eyes) were enrolled. Six weeks after IVBr, CRT and best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved (p < 0.0001). AFI (p = 0.0003) and age (p = 0.0054) were significantly higher in patients with pseudophakic eyes than those with phakic eyes. The AFI of the phakic eyes decreased after IVBr (p = 0.043). As the AFI before injection is higher (p = 0.0363) and the age is lower (p = 0.0016), the AFI decreases after IVBr. There was a significant positive correlation between the rates of change in CRT and AFI (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: After IVBr, AFI decreases in phakic eyes but not in pseudophakic eyes. The age, AFI and CRT before injection and changes of CRT are involved in the change in AFI after IVBr.

Optical coherence tomography angiography macular biomarkers of peripheral retinal ischemia in diabetic macular edema: secondary endpoints from the clinical study "FOVEA".

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between the macular values of fractal dimension (FD) and lacunarity (LAC) on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images and the presence of peripheral retina non-perfusion areas (NPAs) on fluorescein angiography (FA) in patients with treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Fifty patients with treatment-naïve DME underwent a full ophthalmic examination, including best-corrected visual acuity measurement, FA, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and OCTA. Specifically, FA was performed to detect the presence of retinal NPAs, whereas fractal OCTA analysis was used to determine macular FD and LAC values at the level of the superficial and deep capillary plexus (SCP and DCP). FA montage frames of the posterior pole and peripheral retina, as well as macular OCTA slabs of the SCP and DCP, were obtained. RESULTS: Thirty (60%) eyes with FA evidence of peripheral retinal NPAs in at least one quadrant showed significantly lower FD and higher LAC in both SCP and DCP, when compared with eyes presenting a well-perfused peripheral retina. Furthermore, macular FD and LAC values were found to be significantly associated with the extent of retinal NPAs. CONCLUSIONS: Macular FD and LAC of both SCP and DCP seem to be strongly associated with the extent of peripheral retinal NPAs, thus suggesting that may be useful predictive biomarkers of peripheral ischemia in treatment-naïve DME eyes.

Changes in wider field swept-source OCT angiography vascular metrics with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in central retinal vein occlusion.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of anti-VEGF therapy on vascular metrics in eyes with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) using wider field swept-source OCT angiography (WF SS-OCTA). METHODS: We included 23 eyes with macular edema associated with non-ischemic CRVO from 22 patients treated with anti-VEGF therapy (median number of injections: 5 [2-9]). Changes in vessel density (VD), vessel skeletonized density (VSD), and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) parameters were measured using WF SS-OCTA. Visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST) were also measured. RESULTS: Median CST decreased significantly from 369 µm (305-531) to 267 µm (243-300, p < 0.001). VD and VSD parameters in 12 × 12 mm images showed significant reductions. For instance, VSD in the whole retina decreased from a median of 13.37 (11.22-13.74) to 11.29 (9.36-12.97, p = 0.013). Additionally, a significant increase in FAZ circularity was found, suggesting improved microvascular integrity. Significant inverse correlations were found between the number of anti-VEGF injections and all VSD and VD parameters on the 12 × 12 mm images (p < 0.05). Notably, the reductions in VSD and VD on 12 × 12 mm angiograms in the deep capillary plexus (DCP) after each injection significantly correlated with increased logMAR VA (worse VA). CONCLUSION: Anti-VEGF therapy in CRVO patients not only mitigates macular edema but also alters the overall microvascular morphology and functionality as revealed by WF SS-OCTA.

ASSOCIATION OF DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA WITH QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES: The Fushun Diabetic Retinopathy Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: To report the vision-related quality of life in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in a population-based study. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed 1,659 subjects with type 2 diabetes. Questionnaires were administered to assess the patient's vision-related quality of life. Diabetic macular edema severity was graded according to the established protocols. A subject's DME score ranged from 1 (no DME in either eye) to 7 (severe bilateral DME) using predefined criteria. RESULTS: Composite 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) scores for participants with DME were 88.9 (interquartile range [IQR]: 76.2-94.9) compared with 92.0 (IQR: 82.7-96.0) for those without DME ( P < 0.001). Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing plots depicted a consistent decline in composite NEI-VFQ-25 scores corresponding to the escalation of bilateral DME severity: starting from 88.59 for no DME in either eye, progressing through 86.65, 85.83, 85.31, 84.91, 83.85, and culminating at 82.71 for bilateral severe DME. Notably, the locally weighted scatterplot smoothing plots highlighted significant NEI-VFQ-25 composite score reduction at unilateral mild DME (slope m = -1.94). CONCLUSION: Significant changes in vision-related quality of life manifest in the early stage of DME. Therefore, early identification and intervention for these patients are crucial clinical objectives.

DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT VERSUS TOPICAL CARBONIC ANHYDRASE INHIBITORS IN PATIENTS WITH BILATERAL RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA-RELATED CYSTOID MACULAR EDEMA: A Prospective, Paired-Eye Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: To compare within-subject efficacy and safety of intravitreal dexamethasone implant and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa-related cystoid macular edema. METHODS: Patients with bilateral retinitis pigmentosa-related cystoid macular edema were treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implant in one eye and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in the contralateral eye. The primary endpoint was a change in central macular thickness. Secondary endpoints were changes in best-corrected visual acuity and microperimetric central retinal sensitivity. Intraocular pressure and other ocular complications were evaluated for safety assessment. RESULTS: Nine patients were recruited for this 12-month follow-up study. Central macular thickness was significantly lower in intravitreal dexamethasone implant-treated eyes than in topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors-treated eyes at Months 1 and 7, whereas mean best-corrected visual acuity was better in eyes treated with topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors at Month 12 (borderline significant P = 0.0510). There was no difference in microperimetric sensitivity between the two treatments. Three patients developed ocular hypertension after intravitreal dexamethasone implant. Intravitreal dexamethasone implant showed an effect on the contralateral eye in five of nine patients. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal dexamethasone implant was more effective than topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in reducing retinitis pigmentosa-related cystoid macular edema 1 month after treatment. Corticosteroids can play a key role in the management of retinitis pigmentosa-related cystoid macular edema; however, their routes, timing, and modes of administration should be further explored.

Management of diabetic ocular complications: from cellular insights to community strategies.

The editorial outlines an integrated approach to managing diabetic ocular complications, combining advanced scientific research with practical public health strategies to improve the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diabetic retinopathy and macular edema globally.

Comparison of intravitreal preservative-free triamcinolone versus posterior sub-tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection for bevacizumab-resistant diabetic macular edema.

BACKGROUND: Triamcinolone acetonide (TA) is administered as an intravitreal or posterior sub-Tenon's capsule injection, as treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME). The intravitreal use of TA is limited because commercially available triamcinolone acetonide contains benzyl alcohol, a neurotoxic preservative. Few studies have compared effects of preservative-free intravitreal TA (IVTA) and posterior sub-Tenon capsule TA (STTA) injections for DME. Thus, herein, we compared the effectiveness of preservative-free IVTA and STTA for treatment of bevacizumab-resistant DME. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, bevacizumab-resistant DME was defined as a lack of response to at least three consecutive intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections. Changes in mean central macula thickness (CMT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intraocular pressure (IOP) between IVTA and STTA groups were compared at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: Forty eyes from 40 patients were included in this study. In the IVTA group, the mean CMT improved significantly from 400.2 ± 144.42 µm at baseline to 288.35 ± 151.74 µm at 3 months after treatment (p = 0.01). Similarly, in the STTA group, the mean CMT improved significantly from 446.65 ± 120.74 µm at baseline to 382.9 ± 113.58 µm at 3 months after treatment (p = 0.009). The mean BCVA of the IVTA group also showed improvement, decreasing from 0.75 ± 0.55 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at baseline to 0.625 ± 0.50 logMAR at 3 months after treatment (p = 0.089). Similarly, the mean BCVA of the STTA group improved, from 0.6 ± 0.36 logMAR at baseline to 0.54 ± 0.35 logMAR at 3 months after treatment (p = 0.094). CONCLUSION: Given that IVTA and STTA demonstrated statistically equivalent anatomical and functional effects in patients with bevacizumab-resistant DME, the less invasive STTA may be considered the preferred treatment approach for the management of bevacizumab-resistant DME. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

Short-term effect of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in refractory diabetic macular edema.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short-term effects (hours-days) of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-arm, interventional clinical series. Eyes with DME and 3-9 injections of ranibizumab without a good response were included. Patients underwent a single IDI. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, complete ophthalmic evaluation, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were performed at baseline, 2 h, 3 h, 24 h, 7 days, and 1 month. The main outcomes were change in central retinal thickness (CRT) on SD-OCT and BCVA. RESULTS: Fifteen eyes of 15 patients were included. Mean CRT decreased after treatment from 515.87 µm ± 220.00 µm at baseline to 489.60 µm ± 176.53 µm after 2 h (p = 0.126), and 450.13 µm ± 163.43 at 24 h (p = 0.006). Change in BCVA was from 0.85 ± 0.44 logMAR baseline to 0.58 ± 0.37 log MAR at 1 month (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Eyes treated with IDI showed significant decrease in CRT detectable 1 day after injection. In some patients, the effect could be observed 3 h post-implantation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05736081 . Registered 20 February 2023, Retrospectively registered.

Association between the response of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injection and systemic factors of diabetic macular edema.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effects of systemic factors in response to intravitreal injections in patients with macular edema due to non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients treated with intravitreal injections for macular edema secondary to NPDR between January 2018 and January 2021. The patients were divided into three groups according to the injection response. When patients with diabetic macular edema showed 20µ or more reduction in central retinal thickness compared to baseline, they were classified as responsive group, and if not, they were classified as refractory group. The responsive group was further divided into the complete and incomplete response groups. Patients with complete disappearance of edema at seven months were classified as the complete response group, whereas those in which edema did not disappear were classified as the incomplete response group. The clinical characteristics of each group, including medical history, ophthalmic examination results, and laboratory examination results at the time of diagnosis, were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 112 eyes (91 patients) that satisfied the inclusion criteria, 89 (77 patients) in the responsive group and 23 (14 patients) in the refractory group were included in the analysis. The responsive group was further divided into the complete (51 eyes) and incomplete (38 eyes) response groups. The refractory group had significantly higher glycated hemoglobin levels and significantly lower estimated glomerular filtration rates than the responsive group (p = 0.026 and p = 0.012, respectively). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, both factors were found to be significant in predicting the degree of response (all p < 0.05). No factor showed a significant difference between the incomplete and complete response groups(all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In macular edema caused by NPDR, low glomerular filtration rates and high glycated hemoglobin levels may be used as predictors of poor response to intravitreal injection therapy. In addition to blood glucose control, education should be provided regarding the need for the continuous monitoring of renal function.

Characteristics of macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion showing poor anatomic response to three loading anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections: an optical coherence tomography analysis.

PURPOSE: To analyze the clinical features of refractory cystoid macular edema related to retinal vein occlusion associated with the response to three consecutive loading doses of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on retinal vein occlusion patients treated by three anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. They were divided into a group according to resolution of macular edema in optical coherence tomography (Group 1) and with persistent macular edema (Group 2). We analyzed qualitative and quantitative morphologic features of optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 120 eyes from 120 patients (Group 1: n = 54, Group 2: n = 66). The baseline choroidal thickness differed significantly between groups 1 and 2 (290.70 ± 19.58 µm and 311.06 ± 17.87 µm P < 0.001). The presence of Hyperreflective foci (16.70% vs. 36.40% P < 0.001), Disorganization of the retinal inner layers (14.80% vs. 87.90%) and external limiting membrane disruption (16.60% vs. 39.3% P < 0.001) differed significantly. Logistic regression analysis showed that the initial central macular thickness (B = 0.012; P = 0.006), baseline choroidal thickness (B = 0.232; P = 0.016) and presence of hyperreflective foci (B = 1.050; P = 0.019), disorganization of the retinal inner layers (B = 1.132; P = 0.001) and external limiting membrane disruption (B = 1.575; P = 0.012) significantly affected the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment response. CONCLUSION: A thicker sub-fovea choroid and the presence of hyperreflective foci, disruption of the external limiting membrane and disorganization of the retinal inner layers associated with a poorer response to three loading anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections in macular edema associated retinal vein occlusion.

Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide for Diabetic Macular Edema and Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The comparative safety and efficacy of different doses of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) for diabetic macular edema (DME) and macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is unclear. OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of different doses of IVTA in this setting. METHODS: A systematic literature search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was conducted on Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE from January 2005 to May 2022. Studies that reported on patients with DME or ME secondary to RVO that received treatment with different doses of IVTA were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool 2 was used to assess the risk of bias, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines were used to assess certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Five RCTs reporting on 1,041 eyes at baseline were included in this meta-analysis. In eyes with ME secondary to RVO, high-dose (4 mg) IVTA achieved a significantly better change in best-corrected visual acuity (WMD = -4.75 ETDRS letters, 95% CI = [-7.73, -1.78], p = 0.002) and reduction in retinal thickness (WMD = -93.02 µm, 95% CI = [-153.23, -32.82], p = 0.002) at months 4-6 compared to low-dose (1-2 mg) IVTA. However, high-dose IVTA had a higher risk of intraocular pressure-related adverse events (RR = 2.99, 95% CI = [1.05, 8.50], p = 0.04) and cataract surgery (RR = 5.67, 95% CI = [3.09, 10.41], p < 0.00001) than low-dose IVTA in eyes with ME secondary to RVO. These efficacy and safety differences in high-dose and low-dose IVTA were not observed in DME eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The RCT evidence in this setting is limited. High-dose IVTA achieved greater improvements in visual acuity and reductions in retinal thickness than low-dose IVTA at months 4-6. However, high-dose IVTA had a less favorable safety profile than low-dose IVTA. The significance of these outcomes was based on patients with ME secondary to RVO, but not DME.

Clinical Characteristics of Microcystic Macular Edema in Chronic Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the clinical characteristics of and risk factors for microcystic macular edema (MME) in patients with chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma (CPACG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 1,588 eyes from 926 glaucoma inpatients and analyzed the patients' basic demographic information, visual field parameters, macular scans, and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. RESULTS: Our findings were that the incidence rate of MME was 3.97% (34/857) in CPACG and 5.88% (43/731) in POAG. MME was predominantly diagnosed at an advanced stage in CPACG (almost 100%) compared to POAG (93.02%). MME was most frequently involved in the inferior (83.12%) quadrant of the peri-macular region in both CPACG and POAG. Risk factors for MME occurrence in CPACG and POAG included lower visual field mean deviation (OR = 1.14, 95%: CI 1.05-1.24, p = 0.003; OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06-1.21, p < 0.001) and younger age (OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88-0.96, p < 0.001; OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99, p = 0.003), while female sex (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11-0.84, p = 0.022) reduced the MME occurrence in POAG. CONCLUSION: MME could develop in both CPACG and POAG patients, occurring earlier in POAG. The inferior peri-macular region is commonly affected. Younger age and poorer visual field are risk factors for MME in glaucoma patients.