Analysis of the relationship between MYCN gene and serum NSE and urinary VMA levels and neuroblastoma pathological features and prognosis.

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between the MYCN gene, serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE), urinary vanillylmandelic acid (VMA) levels, and neuroblastoma pathological features and prognosis. Ninety-four children with neuroblastoma treated in the hospital were selected to compare the differences in MYCN gene amplification, serum NSE, and urinary VMA levels in children with different clinicopathological features and prognoses. The proportion of children with MYCN gene copy number ≥10 in INSS stage 3-4 was higher than that of children with INSS stage 1-2 (P < 0.05); the proportion of children with MYCN gene copy number ≥10 in high-risk children in the COG risk stratification was higher than that of children with intermediate and low risk (P < 0.05); the serum NSE of children aged >12 months higher than that of children aged ≤12 months (P < 0.05); serum NSE of children with tumors >500 cm3 higher than that of children with tumors ≤500 cm3 (P < 0.05); serum NSE and urinary VMA of children with INSS staging of stages 3-4 were higher than that of children with stages 1 to 2 (P < 0.05); serum NSE and urinary VMA in children with lymph node metastasis were higher than that of children without lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05); serum NSE of children with MYCN gene copy number ≥10 was higher than that of children without lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05); the proportion of children with MYCN gene copy number ≥10 who died, and the percentages of serum NSE and urinary VMA were higher than those of the surviving children (P < 0.05). MYCN gene amplification and serum NSE and urinary VMA levels were related to the age, tumor size, INSS stage, COG stage, lymph node metastasis, and prognosis of the children with neuroblastoma.

Combination of the non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of endometriosis.

BACKGROUND: About 10% of women of reproductive age suffer from endometriosis, a costly chronic disease causing pelvic pain and subfertility. Laparoscopy is the gold standard diagnostic test for endometriosis, but is expensive and carries surgical risks. Currently, there are no non-invasive tests available in clinical practice to accurately diagnose endometriosis. This review assessed the diagnostic accuracy of combinations of different non-invasive testing modalities for endometriosis and provided a summary of all the reviews in the non-invasive tests for endometriosis series. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of any combination of non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis (peritoneal and/or ovarian or deep infiltrating) compared to surgical diagnosis as a reference standard. The combined tests were evaluated as replacement tests for diagnostic surgery and triage tests to assist decision-making to undertake diagnostic surgery for endometriosis. SEARCH METHODS: We did not restrict the searches to particular study designs, language or publication dates. We searched CENTRAL to July 2015, MEDLINE and EMBASE to May 2015, as well as the following databases to April 2015: CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, LILACS, OAIster, TRIP, ClinicalTrials.gov, DARE and PubMed. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered published, peer-reviewed, randomised controlled or cross-sectional studies of any size, including prospectively collected samples from any population of women of reproductive age suspected of having one or more of the following target conditions: ovarian, peritoneal or deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). We included studies comparing the diagnostic test accuracy of a combination of several testing modalities with the findings of surgical visualisation of endometriotic lesions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently collected and performed a quality assessment of the data from each study by using the QUADAS-2 tool. For each test, the data were classified as positive or negative for the surgical detection of endometriosis and sensitivity and specificity estimates were calculated. The bivariate model was planned to obtain pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity whenever sufficient data were available. The predetermined criteria for a clinically useful test to replace diagnostic surgery were a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specificity of 0.79 to detect endometriosis. We set the criteria for triage tests at a sensitivity of 0.95 and above and a specificity of 0.50 and above, which 'rules out' the diagnosis with high accuracy if there is a negative test result (SnOUT test), or a sensitivity of 0.50 and above and a specificity of 0.95 and above, which 'rules in' the diagnosis with high accuracy if there is a positive result (SpIN test). MAIN RESULTS: Eleven eligible studies included 1339 participants. All the studies were of poor methodological quality. Seven studies evaluated pelvic endometriosis, one study considered DIE and/or ovarian endometrioma, two studies differentiated endometrioma from other ovarian cysts and one study addressed mapping DIE at specific anatomical sites. Fifteen different diagnostic combinations were assessed, including blood, urinary or endometrial biomarkers, transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and clinical history or examination. We did not pool estimates of sensitivity and specificity, as each study analysed independent combinations of the non-invasive tests.Tests that met the criteria for a replacement test were: a combination of serum IL-6 (cut-off >15.4 pg/ml) and endometrial PGP 9.5 for pelvic endometriosis (sensitivity 1.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91 to 1.00), specificity 0.93 (95% CI, 0.80, 0.98) and the combination of vaginal examination and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) for rectal endometriosis (sensitivity 0.96 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.99), specificity 0.98 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.00)). Tests that met the criteria for SpIN triage tests for pelvic endometriosis were: 1. a multiplication of urine vitamin-D-binding protein (VDBP) and serum CA-125 (cut-off >2755) (sensitivity 0.74 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.84), specificity 0.97 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.00)) and 2. a combination of history (length of menses), serum CA-125 (cut-off >35 U/ml) and endometrial leukocytes (sensitivity 0.61 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.69), specificity 0.95 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.98)). For endometrioma, the following combinations qualified as SpIN test: 1. TVUS and either serum CA-125 (cut-off ≥25 U/ml) or CA 19.9 (cut-off ≥12 U/ml) (sensitivity 0.79 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.91), specificity 0.97 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.00)); 2. TVUS and serum CA 19.9 (cut-off ≥12 U/ml) (sensitivity 0.54 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.70), specificity 0.97 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.0)); 3-4. TVUS and serum CA-125 (cut-off ≥20 U/ml or cut-off ≥25 U/ml) (sensitivity 0.69 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.85), specificity 0.96 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.99)); 5. TVUS and serum CA-125 (cut-off ≥35 U/ml) (sensitivity 0.52 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.71), specificity 0.97 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.00)). A combination of vaginal examination and TVUS reached the threshold for a SpIN test for obliterated pouch of Douglas (sensitivity 0.87 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.96), specificity 0.98 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.00)), vaginal wall endometriosis (sensitivity 0.82 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.95), specificity 0.99 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.0)) and rectovaginal septum endometriosis (sensitivity 0.88 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.00), specificity 0.99 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.00)).All the tests were evaluated in individual studies and displayed wide CIs. Due to the heterogeneity and high risk of bias of the included studies, the clinical utility of the studied combination diagnostic tests for endometriosis remains unclear. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: None of the biomarkers evaluated in this review could be evaluated in a meaningful way and there was insufficient or poor-quality evidence. Laparoscopy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of endometriosis and using any non-invasive tests should only be undertaken in a research setting.

Urology pertinent neuroendocrine tumors: focusing on renal pelvis, bladder, prostate located sympathetic functional paragangliomas.

Urology pertinent neuroendocrine neoplasias are more and more driving to research attractive contributions mainly as regards the urinary tract paragangliomas, besides the prostate cancer neuroendocrine differentiation. About such visceral sympathetic paragangliomas, a considerable attention is aroused by those concerning the renal pelvis, urinary bladder and, particularly, the prostate gland. Essential catecholamine/adrenergic signal-mediated pathophysiological implications and outlined diagnostic approaches are here taken into consideration. Particularly, to reach an accurate functional diagnostic assessment, both plasma and urine catecholamine level tests are required together with ¹²³I or ¹³¹I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan while ¹³¹I-, instead of ¹²³I-, labeled MIBG, proving to be also useful to targeted radionuclide therapy of sympathetic paragangliomas. Nevertheless, a thorough diagnostic confirmation should be obtained by a proper histologic/ immunohistochemical study, so that it respectively highlighting the typical "zellballen" cell setting and neuroendocrine tumor cell specific biomarkers such as chromogranin-A, synaptophysin, neuron-specific enolase. Open/laparoscopic/robot-assisted surgical procedures are performed under α1 (doxazosin, prazosin) - and ß(propranolol)-adrenergic blockade to avoid the risk of an intraoperative adrenergic signal-triggered hypertensive crisis, what moreover may occur also during cystoscopy and biopsy in case of bladder or prostate paraganglioma. Given a conceivable likeness, about some adrenergic-mediated pathophysiological implications, between prostate paraganglioma and prostate cancer neuroendocrine transdifferentiation - although as regards two obviously different diseases - a reliable pathogenetic matter concerning prostate paraganglioma is requiring novel research approaches.

Urinary biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

BACKGROUND: About 10% of reproductive-aged women suffer from endometriosis which is a costly chronic disease that causes pelvic pain and subfertility. Laparoscopy is the 'gold standard' diagnostic test for endometriosis, but it is expensive and carries surgical risks. Currently, there are no simple non-invasive or minimally-invasive tests available in clinical practice that accurately diagnoses endometriosis. OBJECTIVES: 1. To provide summary estimates of the diagnostic accuracy of urinary biomarkers for the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis compared to surgical diagnosis as a reference standard.2. To assess the diagnostic utility of biomarkers that could differentiate ovarian endometrioma from other ovarian masses.Urinary biomarkers were evaluated as replacement tests for surgical diagnosis and as triage tests to inform decisions to undertake surgery for endometriosis. SEARCH METHODS: The searches were not restricted to particular study design, language or publication dates. We searched the following databases to 20 April - 31 July 2015: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, LILACS, OAIster, TRIP and ClinicalTrials.gov (trial register). MEDION, DARE, and PubMed were also searched to identify reviews and guidelines as reference sources of potentially relevant studies. Recently published papers not yet indexed in the major databases were also sought. The search strategy incorporated words in the title, abstract, text words across the record and the medical subject headings (MeSH) and was modified for each database. SELECTION CRITERIA: Published peer-reviewed, randomised controlled or cross-sectional studies of any size were considered, which included prospectively collected samples from any population of reproductive-aged women suspected of having one or more of the following target conditions: ovarian, peritoneal or deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). We included studies comparing the diagnostic test accuracy of one or more urinary biomarkers with surgical visualisation of endometriotic lesions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently collected and performed a quality assessment of the data from each study. For each diagnostic test, the data were classified as positive or negative for the surgical detection of endometriosis and sensitivity and specificity estimates were calculated. If two or more tests were evaluated in the same cohort, each was considered as a separate data set. The bivariate model was used to obtain pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity whenever sufficient data sets were available. The predetermined criteria for a clinically useful urine test to replace diagnostic surgery was one with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 79% to detect endometriosis. The criteria for triage tests were set at sensitivity of equal or greater than 95% and specificity of equal or greater than 50%, which in case of negative result rules out the diagnosis (SnOUT test) or sensitivity of equal or greater than 50% with specificity of equal or greater than 95%, which in case of positive result rules the diagnosis in (SpIN test). MAIN RESULTS: We included eight studies involving 646 participants, most of which were of poor methodological quality. The urinary biomarkers were evaluated either in a specific phase of menstrual cycle or irrespective of the cycle phase. Five studies evaluated the diagnostic performance of four urinary biomarkers for endometriosis, including three biomarkers distinguishing women with and without endometriosis (enolase 1 (NNE); vitamin D binding protein (VDBP); and urinary peptide profiling); and one biomarker (cytokeratin 19 (CK 19)) showing no significant difference between the two groups. All of these biomarkers were assessed in small individual studies and could not be statistically evaluated in a meaningful way. None of the biomarkers met the criteria for a replacement test or a triage test. Three studies evaluated three biomarkers that did not differentiate women with endometriosis from disease-free controls. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There was insufficient evidence to recommend any urinary biomarker for use as a replacement or triage test in clinical practice for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Several urinary biomarkers may have diagnostic potential, but require further evaluation before being introduced into routine clinical practice. Laparoscopy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of endometriosis, and diagnosis of endometriosis using urinary biomarkers should only be undertaken in a research setting.

Evaluation of elevated urinary enolase I levels in patients with endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to validate and investigate the clinical value of urinary enolase I in patients with endometriosis. METHODS: Urine samples of 39 patients with histologically confirmed endometriosis and 20 patients without endometriosis were collected. Western blot analysis and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were used to detect the increase of enolase I in patients' urine. RESULTS: Urinary enolase I expression corrected for creatinine ratio (non neuronal enolase (NNE)-Cr) was significantly greater in patients with endometriosis (p = 0.026). When the diagnostic performance of NNE-Cr was evaluated with serum CA-125 combination, the area under the curve was 0.821 (95% confidence interval 0.713-0.928) with sensitivity and specificity of 76.9% and 85.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Elevated urinary enolase I, in conjunction with serum CA-125, may be used as a potential biomarker for endometriosis.

Urinary vitamin D-binding protein is elevated in patients with endometriosis.

BACKGROUND: Recently, proteomic technologies have demonstrated that several proteins are differently expressed in various body fluids of patients with endometriosis compared with those without this condition. The aim of this study was to investigate proteins secreted in urine of patients with endometriosis using proteomic techniques in order to identify potential markers for the clinical diagnosis of endometriosis. METHODS: Urine samples were collected from women undergoing laparoscopy for different indications including pelvic masses, pelvic pain, suspicious endometriosis, infertility and diagnostic evaluation. Proteomic techniques and mass spectrometry were used to identify proteins secreted in the urine of the patients with and without endometriosis and quantification of identified protein was performed using western blot and specific commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). RESULTS: Twenty-two protein spots were differentially expressed in the urine of patients with and without endometriosis, one of which was identified as urinary vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP). ELISA quantification of urinary VDBP corrected for creatinine expression (VDBP-Cr) revealed that urinary VDBP-Cr was significantly greater in patients with endometriosis than in those without (111.96 ± 74.59 versus 69.90 ± 43.76 ng/mg Cr, P = 0.001). VDBP-Cr had limited value as a diagnostic marker for endometriosis (Sensitivity 58%, Specificity 76%). When combined with serum CA-125 levels (the product of serum CA-125 and urinary VDBP-Cr), it did not significantly increase the diagnostic power of serum CA-125 alone. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary VDBP levels are elevated in patients with endometriosis. They have limited value as a potential diagnostic biomarker for endometriosis but suggest it would be worthwhile to investigate other urinary proteins for this purpose.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Enolase/Cr, CA125, and CA19-9 in the Detection of Endometriosis.

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to verify the accuracy of the noninvasive biomarkers enolase/Cr, CA125, and CA19-9 as a clinical diagnostic tool for the detection of endometriosis. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed at Rasool-e-Akram Hospital affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, from April 2015 to April 2018. Eighty-six women were scheduled to undergo laparoscopy due to chronic pelvic pain, infertility, pelvic mass, and abnormal uterine bleeding. Serum and urine samples of all patients were collected preoperatively. Serum levels of CA125 and CA19-9, and urine levels of enolase-1 were measured. Serum levels of CA125 and CA19-9 were determined by the electrochemiluminescence method (ECL). Urinary enolase-1 was measured by the ELISA method. RESULT: Serum levels of CA125 and CA19-9 were significantly higher in the endometriosis group than in controls (p < 0.001, p = 0.004, respectively). Levels of enolase I and enolase/Cr were higher in patients with endometriosis, but the differences were not statistically significant. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of combined enolase/Cr, CA125, and CA19-9 were 65%, 66.6%, 71%, and 60.1%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of combined enolase/Cr, CA125, and CA19-9 was 1.94 and 0.52, respectively. The area under the ROC curve for enolase/Cr + CA125 + CA19 - 9 was 0.675 (95% confidence interval 0.573-0.710). CONCLUSION: The present study revealed that concurrent measurement of enolase-1, CA125, and CA19-9 might be a valuable noninvasive test for the identification of endometriosis.

Noninvasive Biomarker Candidates for Cadmium-Induced Nephrotoxicity by 2DE/MALDI-TOF-MS and SILAC/LC-MS Proteomic Analyses.

Cadmium (Cd(2+)) is a major environmental pollutant that induces cytotoxicity by heavy-metal accumulation. Prolonged Cd(2+) exposure leads to cell damage by oxidative stress mainly in the kidneys, a critical organ for detoxification. To identify reliable on invasive protein biomarkers for Cd(2+)-induced nephrotoxicity, we performed 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis/matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectra and stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture/liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analyses using conditioned media (CM) of HK-2 human kidney epithelial cells treated with CdCl2. Here, we identified heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein isoform1 (HSPA8) and α-enolase (ENO1) as potential biomarker candidates for the evaluation of Cd(2+)-induced nephrotoxicity. Treatment with CdCl2 increased the protein level of HSPA8 in CM and lysates of HK-2 cells. The mRNA level of HSPA8 was also increased by CdCl2 treatment, indicating transcriptional regulation. The level of ENO1 was increased in CM, but not in lysates of CdCl2-treated HK-2 cells. CdCl2 did not affect the mRNA level of ENO1. We provide evidence that the increases of HSPA8 and ENO1 in CM were due to Cd(2+)-induced cell death through oxidative stress. The increases of HSPA8 and ENO1 levels were also detected in CM of HK-2 cells treated with other nephrotoxic agents, such as HgCl2, NaAsO2, cisplatin, amphotericin B, and cyclosporine A. Urine and kidney tissues of CdCl2-treated rats showed increased levels of HSPA8. Taken together, this study identified HSPA8 and ENO1 as noninvasive biomarker candidates by 2 comparative proteomic analyses. These new biomarker candidates may have potential as alternatives to traditional biomarkers for the efficient and sensitive assessment of nephrotoxicity.

Tumour markers are poor predictors for relapse or progression in neuroblastoma.

The value of the tumour markers vanillylmandelic acid (VMA) and homovanillic acid (HVA) in urine (u) and serum (s), neurone-specific enolase (NSE), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the early prediction of relapse/progression in neuroblastoma is not known. We analysed the data of neuroblastoma patients who had successfully completed first-line treatment and had laboratory results available from their initial diagnosis and from relapse/progression (n=196). Patients' overall survival from relapse or progression was 21.5+/-4.2% (mean+/-standard deviation). At diagnosis, we found abnormal results in 75% for VMA and/or HVA (s), 92% for VMA and/or HVA (u), 90% for NSE, and 81% for LDH. We found a lower incidence of abnormal results at relapse or progression with 40% for VMA and/or HVA (s), 54% for HVA and/or VMA (u), 61% for NSE, and 48% for LDH. Sensitivity of all markers was higher for metastatic compared with local recurrence. NSE was the best, being able to detect 42% of the localised relapses, 77% of the combined local/metastatic relapses, and 69% of the metastatic recurrences. Relapse or progression in neuroblastoma cannot be detected reliably by monitoring tumour markers alone. Therefore, follow-up of neuroblastoma patients must include clinical assessment and imaging studies.

[Follow up control of stage IV neuroblastoma: 123I-MIBG scintigraphy, bone scintigraphy and catecholamine metabolites]. / Verlaufskontrolle des Neuroblastoms Stadium IV: 123I-mIBG-Szintigraphie, Knochenszintigraphie und Katecholaminmetabolite.

AIM: The diagnostic value of 123I-mIBG-scintigraphy, bone scintigraphy and catecholamine metabolites in the follow up of neuroblastoma stage IV will be evaluated. METHODS: Nineteen children suffering from neuroblastoma were analysed retrospectively by 123I-mIBG-scintigraphy, bone scintigraphy and measurement of homovanillic acid, vanillic acid, neuronspecific enclose, lactate dehydrogenase, and ferritine. Follow up was 7-132 (median 36) months. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The significance of the methods was dependent on the time of diagnostic use. In principal, 123I-mIBG-scintigraphy has the highest diagnostic impact. For initial staging and diagnosis of recurrence a combination of all three methods can be used. On the contrary, follow up during chemotherapy is best documented by 123I-mIBG-scintigraphy, whereas bone scintigraphy is of limited and measurement of catecholamine metabolites of less diagnostic value.

Determination of urine neuron-specific enolase levels in neuroblastoma patients.

Urine levels of neuron-specific enolase were determined in 3 neuroblastoma patients (1 in an advanced state and 2 in remission), 25 control children, 37 control adults and 4 children with hematuria by means of the double-antibody inhibition radioimmunoassay specific to the gamma subunit of enolase isozymes. The levels of neuron-specific enolase mean +/- S.D. ng/creatinine mg in an advanced neuroblastoma patient were elevated (1.25 +/- 0.29 before or after treatment and range 1.61-74.2 during treatment) when compared with those of control subjects (0.51 +/- 0.26 in children and 0.36 +/- 0.17 in adults). The levels in 2 neuroblastoma patients in remission were within normal range. Urine samples with hematuria were not used for the assay.

Urine neuron-specific enolase and its clinical implication in patients with neuroblastoma.

Urine levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were determined in 6 patients with neuroblastoma, in 72 controls and in 5 infants with hematuria by means of a double-antibody inhibition radioimmunoassay method. Urine levels (NSE ng/creatinine mg) in 2 patients with advanced neuroblastoma were elevated (3.03 +/- 0.28 (S.D.)), when compared with those of 4 patients with neuroblastoma in remission (0.65 +/- 0.26 (S.D.], 10 healthy neonates (1.26 +/- 0.42 (S.D.)), 25 healthy infants (0.51 +/- 0.26 (S.D.)), and 37 healthy adults (0.37 +/- 0.17 (S.D.)). Urine levels in 4 infants with microhematuria and an infant with macrohematuria were 1.62 +/- 0.10 (S.D.) and 33.83, respectively. Serial measurements in 3 patients with neuroblastoma receiving various therapies have revealed that there was a good correlation between urine NSE level and the response to therapy. These results indicate that NSE in urine may be a valuable marker for monitoring the effectiveness of therapy in patients with neuroblastoma.

Serum neuron-specific enolase in children with neuroblastoma. Relationship to stage and disease course.

Serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) was measured in 61 children at diagnosis with all stages of neuroblastoma. The median serum values for Stages I, II, III, IV, and IV-S were 13, 23, 40, 214, and 40 ng/ml, respectively. Mean serum levels were different between groups I versus IV, (P = 0.0004) II versus IV (P = 0.0001) and IV-S versus IV (P = 0.004). The prognostic value of serum NSE for disease-free survival was determined in 54 patients at risk for relapse 2 or more years after diagnosis. The disease-free survival rate of all patients with levels of less than 100 ng/ml was 27/34 (79%), whereas it was 2/20 (10%) for those with higher levels. In 28 patients with lower stage disease and a good prognosis (Stages I, II, and IV-S) NSE levels were not predictive of relapse. Only 1 of these 28 patients had a raised level (greater than 100 ng/ml) and survived without relapse, whereas 4 patients who relapsed had serum NSE less than 100 ng/ml at diagnosis. In patients with Stages III and IV disease, a raised serum NSE level was associated with poor outcome: only 1/19 (5%) survived with NSE levels greater than 100 ng/ml, whereas survival was 5/8 (63%) with values below 100 ng/ml. Serial samples were analyzed on 17 patients; all 8 patients with initial NSE levels greater than 100 ng/ml achieved near normal levels during remission (median, 21 ng/ml). However, in only 4/10 patients studied at time of relapse, did the levels rise coincident with relapse. The sera of 47 patients with other forms of cancer and 19 siblings of cancer patients were at or near the normal limits (0-15 ng/ml), with three exceptions: acute lymphoblastic leukemia (286 ng/ml), hepatoblastoma (176 ng/ml), and primitive neuroectodermal tumor (105 ng/ml). Serum NSE is a useful marker for patients with advanced neuroblastoma in whom elevated levels were associated with a poor outcome; the raised NSE levels returned to near normal after therapy. In patients with Stage IV-S disease serum NSE levels were significantly lower than those in Stage IV despite their extensive tumor burden. Serum NSE estimation may confirm Stage IV-S status and suggest a more benign clinical course.