Impact of antibiotic prophylaxis in second-stage surgery in joint prosthesis infection treated with two-stage exchange. A multicenter case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: After two-stage exchange due to prosthetic joint infection (PJI), the new prosthesis carries a high risk of reinfection (RePJI). There isn`t solid evidence regarding the antibiotic prophylaxis in 2nd-stage surgery. The objective of this study is to describe what antibiotic prophylaxis is used in this surgery and evaluate its impact on the risk of developing RePJI. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter case-control study in Spanish hospitals. The study included cases of PJI treated with two-stage exchange and subsequently developed a new infection. For each case, two controls were included, matched by prosthesis location, center, and year of surgery. The prophylaxis regimens were grouped based on their antibacterial spectrum, and we calculated the association between the type of regimen and the development of RePJI using conditional logistic regression, adjusted for possible confounding factors. RESULTS: We included 90 cases from 12 centers, which were compared with 172 controls. The most frequent causative microorganism was Staphylococcus epidermidis with 34 cases (37.8%). Staphylococci were responsible for 50 cases (55.6%), 32 of them (64%) methicillin-resistant. Gram-negative bacilli were involved in 30 cases (33.3%), the most common Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In total, 83 different antibiotic prophylaxis regimens were used in 2nd-stage surgery, the most frequent a single preoperative dose of cefazolin (48 occasions; 18.3%); however, it was most common a combination of a glycopeptide and a beta-lactam with activity against Pseudomonas spp (99 cases, 25.2%). In the adjusted analysis, regimens that included antibiotics with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci AND Pseudomonas spp were associated with a significantly lower risk of RePJI (adjusted OR = 0.24; 95% IC: 0.09-0.65). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of standardization in 2nd-satge surgery prophylaxis explains the wide diversity of regimens used in this procedure. The results suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis in this surgery should include an antibiotic with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci and Pseudomonas.

16S rRNA sequencing reveals microbiota differences in orthopedic implants between aseptic loosening and prosthetic joint infection cases.

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic loosening (AL) are common complications of total joint arthroplasty. An accumulation of evidence indicates the presence of microbial communities on prosthetic implants, but the overall microbial profile is unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the differences in the microbial composition of prosthetic implants obtained from PJI and AL patients using the 16S rRNA sequencing method. Patients who underwent revision hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty caused by PJI (n = 20) or AL (n = 10) were enrolled in the study. 16S rRNA sequencing targeting the V3-V4 region was performed on the microbial specimens collected from synovial fluid, periprosthetic deep-tissue, and biofilm during the revision surgery. The sequenced raw data were analysed for microbial composition and ecological and differential abundance analyses using bioinformatics tools. The AL group had relatively balanced and higher diversity, with Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella being prominent. In the PJI group, Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas were predominant, especially in deep-tissue samples and biofilm samples, respectively. The differential abundance analysis identified 15 and 2 distinctive taxa in the AL and PJI groups, respectively. Our findings provided preliminary insights supporting the existence of periprosthetic microbiota in orthopedic implants and explaining the differences in microbial composition between the AL and PJI groups.

Can Topical Vancomycin Prevent Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip and knee arthroplasty is a leading cause of revision surgery, inferior function, complications, and death. The administration of topical, intrawound vancomycin (vancomycin powder) has appeared promising in some studies, but others have found it ineffective in reducing infection risk; for that reason, a high-quality systematic review of the best-available evidence is needed. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this systematic review, we asked: (1) Does topical vancomycin (vancomycin powder) reduce PJI risk in hip and knee arthroplasty? (2) Does topical vancomycin lead to an increased risk of complications after hip and knee arthroplasty? METHODS: A search of Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases as of June 2020 was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies comparing topical vancomycin in addition to standard infection prevention regimens (such as routine perioperative intravenous antibiotics) with standard regimens only in primary hip and knee arthroplasty were identified. Patients 18 years or older with a minimum follow-up of 3 months were included. No restrictions on maximal loss to follow-up or PJI definition were imposed. Studies were excluded if they included patients with a history of septic arthritis, used an antibiotic other than vancomycin or a different route of administration for the intervention, performed additional interventions that differed between groups, or omitted a control group. A total of 2408 studies were screened, resulting in nine eligible studies reviewing 3371 patients who received topical vancomycin (vancomycin powder) during a primary THA or TKA and 2884 patients who did not receive it. Groups were comparable with respect to duration of follow-up and loss to follow-up when reported. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, showing moderate-to-high quality for the included studies. The risks of PJI and overall complications in the topical vancomycin group were compared with those in the control group. RESULTS: One of nine studies found a lower risk of PJI after primary THA or TKA, while eight did not, with odds ratios that broadly bracketed the line of no difference (range of odds ratios across the nine studies 0.09 to 1.97). In the six studies where overall complications could be compared between topical vancomycin and control groups in primary THA or TKA, there was no difference in overall complication risks with vancomycin (range of ORs across the six studies 0.48 to 0.94); however, we caution that these studies were underpowered to detect differences in the types of uncommon complications associated with vancomycin use (such as allergy, ototoxicity, and nephrotoxicity). CONCLUSION: In the absence of clear evidence of efficacy, and without a sufficiently large evidence base reporting on safety-related endpoints, topical vancomycin (vancomycin powder) should not be used in routine primary THA and TKA. Adequately powered, multicenter, prospective trials demonstrating clear reductions in infection risk and large registry-driven audits of safety-related endpoints are required before the widespread use of topical vancomycin can be recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Prolonged suppressive antibiotic therapy is successful in the management of prosthetic joint infection.

INTRODUCTION: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains one of the major challenges facing orthopaedic surgeons. There is a paucity of evidence on non-operative management of PJI. We present the results of prolonged antibiotic suppression therapy (PSAT) in PJI from a single centre. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed. Twenty-six patients were included. Two patients were excluded due to the lack of follow-up data. Failure was defined as admission for sepsis from the joint or amputation. RESULTS: Average age was 72 years (range 35-93). Mean Charlson co-morbidity index was 4.3. Mean follow-up was 3.2 years (range 1.3-5.7). Staphylococcal species were isolated in 11 cases (44%) (MRSA 1, MSSA 5, Staph. epidermidis 4 and Staph Pasteuri 1). Other bacteria included E. Coli (2), Streptococci spp. (3), Propionebacterium acnes (1) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1). Four cases were polymicrobial infection (16%), and no organisms were identified in two cases (8%). Candida albicans was identified in one case. All cases of bacterial infection were treated with prolonged oral doxycycline or amoxicillin. Twenty patients (80%) received 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics prior to commencing prolonged oral antibiotics. Two patients experienced persistent symptoms and required amputation (both TKA). Two patients experienced sepsis but were treated successfully with IV antibiotics alone. The success rate of PSAT was 84% (21/25) successful at an average 3.2-year follow-up. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Prolonged suppressive antibiotic therapy is a viable option for the management of PJI with a low incidence of complications.

Sonication Culture of Antimicrobial Agent-Containing Cement Spacers Removed during Staged Revisions for Arthroplasty Infection.

Diagnosis of persistent infection at the time of reimplantation for staged revision of infected arthroplasties is challenging. Implant sonication culture for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) has improved sensitivity compared to standard periprosthetic tissue culture. We report our experience with periprosthetic tissue culture and sonication culture of antimicrobial agent-containing cement spacers (ACSs) collected during second stages of staged revisions for arthroplasty infection. We studied 87 ACSs from 66 patients undergoing two-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI submitted for sonication culture, along with conventional periprosthetic tissue cultures. Two or more positive periprosthetic tissue cultures with the same organism were considered a positive tissue culture. For sonication culture, ≥20 CFU of bacteria per 10 ml of sonicate fluid was considered positive. The sensitivity and specificity of periprosthetic tissue and ACS sonication culture in detecting persistent infection, as well as their association with outcome, were assessed. Persistent infection occurred in 26% of cases. Periprosthetic tissue and sonicate fluid culture had specificities of 96.3 and 100% (P = 0.50), respectively, and sensitivities of 31.6 and 26.3% (P = 1.00), respectively, for the diagnosis of persistent infection. Thirteen subjects deemed not to have persistent infection at time of reimplantation and who had negative periprosthetic tissue and sonicate fluid cultures subsequently developed overt infection. Sonication culture of cement spacers identifies a similar proportion of patients with persistent infection during staged revisions, as detected by periprosthetic tissue cultures; both have low sensitivities to detect persistent infection.

Evaluation of the CosmosID Bioinformatics Platform for Prosthetic Joint-Associated Sonicate Fluid Shotgun Metagenomic Data Analysis.

We previously demonstrated that shotgun metagenomic sequencing can detect bacteria in sonicate fluid, providing a diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). A limitation of the approach that we used is that data analysis was time-consuming and specialized bioinformatics expertise was required, both of which are barriers to routine clinical use. Fortunately, automated commercial analytic platforms that can interpret shotgun metagenomic data are emerging. In this study, we evaluated the CosmosID bioinformatics platform using shotgun metagenomic sequencing data derived from 408 sonicate fluid samples from our prior study with the goal of evaluating the platform vis-à-vis bacterial detection and antibiotic resistance gene detection for predicting staphylococcal antibacterial susceptibility. Samples were divided into a derivation set and a validation set, each consisting of 204 samples; results from the derivation set were used to establish cutoffs, which were then tested in the validation set for identifying pathogens and predicting staphylococcal antibacterial resistance. Metagenomic analysis detected bacteria in 94.8% (109/115) of sonicate fluid culture-positive PJIs and 37.8% (37/98) of sonicate fluid culture-negative PJIs. Metagenomic analysis showed sensitivities ranging from 65.7 to 85.0% for predicting staphylococcal antibacterial resistance. In conclusion, the CosmosID platform has the potential to provide fast, reliable bacterial detection and identification from metagenomic shotgun sequencing data derived from sonicate fluid for the diagnosis of PJI. Strategies for metagenomic detection of antibiotic resistance genes for predicting staphylococcal antibacterial resistance need further development.

Culturing periprosthetic tissue in blood culture bottles results in isolation of additional microorganisms.

Despite low sensitivity, culture of periprosthetic tissue (PPT) specimens on agars and in broths has traditionally been used for the detection of causative microorganisms in patients suspected for prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the added diagnostic value of culturing PPT in blood culture bottles (BCB) over the conventional combination of standard agar and broth alone. This prospective cohort study was conducted over a 12-month period and included consecutive patients undergoing revision arthroplasty. Overall, 113 episodes from 90 subjects were studied; 45 subjects (50.0%) met the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria for PJI, of whom the majority (75.6%) had an acute infection. Sensitivity and specificity of culture were assessed using IDSA criteria for PJI as gold standard. Although the increase in sensitivity from 84.44 (CI 70.54; 93.51) to 93.33% (81.73; 98.60) was not significant, added diagnostic value of culturing PPT in BCBs was demonstrated by the significantly higher number of detected pathogens in culture sets with BCBs compared to culture without BCBs (61 pathogens in conventional set versus 89 when BCBs were included for 57 PJI episodes, P = <0.0001). In 17 (29.8%) episodes, microorganisms were cultured from BCBs only, and in 9 (52.9%) of these episodes, virulent pathogens were found. This study demonstrates that PPT culture in BCBs leads to isolation of additional microorganisms, both virulent and low-virulent, which were not cultured with use of agars and broths alone. Isolation of additional causative microorganisms has serious consequences for the treatment strategy in PJI.

Zirconium Nitride Coating Reduced Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilm Formation on Orthopaedic Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro Study.

BACKGROUND: One of the most commonly identified pathogens responsible for orthopaedic implant infection is Staphylococcus epidermidis, which can form biofilms on surfaces. Currently, orthopaedic implants made of various surface materials are available, each with features influencing osseointegration, biocompatibility, and adherence of bacteria to the surface, which is the first step in biofilm formation. The aim of this experimental study was to investigate the effect of a high tribologic-resistant 2.5-µm zirconium nitride top coat on an antiallergic multilayer ceramic-covered cobalt-chromium-molybdenum surface on the formation of S. epidermidis biofilm compared with other commonly used smooth and rough orthopaedic implant surface materials. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) When evaluating the surfaces of a cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) alloy with a zirconium (Zr) nitride coating, a CoCrMo alloy without a coating, titanium alloy, a titanium alloy with a corundum-blasted rough surface, and stainless steel with a corundum-blasted rough surface, does a Zr coating reduce the number of colony-forming units of S. epidermidis in an in vitro setting? (2) Is there quantitatively less biofilm surface area on Zr-coated surfaces than on the other surfaces tested in this in vitro model? METHODS: To determine bacterial adhesion, five different experimental implant surface discs were incubated separately with one of 31 different S. epidermidis strains each and subsequently sonicated. Twenty test strains were obtained from orthopaedic patients undergoing emergency hip prosthesis surgeries or revision of implant infection and 10 further strains were obtained from the skin of healthy individuals. Additionally, one reference strain, S. epidermidis DSM 3269, was tested. After serial dilutions, the number of bacteria was counted and expressed as colony-forming units (CFUs)/mL. For biofilm detection, discs were stained with 0.1% Safranin-O for 15 minutes, photographed, and analyzed with computer imaging software. RESULTS: The lowest bacterial count was found in the CoCrMo + Zr surface disc (6.6 x 10 CFU/mL ± 4.6 x 10 SD) followed by the CoCrMo surface (1.1 x 10 CFU/mL ± 1.9 x 10 SD), the titanium surface (1.36 x 10 CFU/mL ± 1.8 x 10 SD), the rough stainless steel surface (2.65 x 10 CFU/mL ± 3.8 x 10 SD), and the rough titanium surface (2.1 x 10 CFU/mL ± 3.0 x 10 SD). The mean CFU count was lower for CoCrMo + Zr discs compared with the rough stainless steel surface (mean difference: 2.0 x 10, p = 0.021), the rough titanium alloy surface (mean difference: 1.4 x 10, p = 0.002), and the smooth titanium surface (mean difference: 7.0 x 10, p = 0.016). The results of biofilm formation quantification show that the mean covered area of the surface of the CoCrMo + Zr discs was 19% (± 16 SD), which was lower than CoCrMo surfaces (35% ± 23 SD), titanium alloy surface (46% ± 20 SD), rough titanium alloy surface (66% ± 23 SD), and rough stainless steel surface (58% ± 18 SD). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that a multilayer, ceramic-covered, CoCrMo surface with a 2.5-µm zirconium nitride top coat showed less S. epidermidis biofilm formation compared with other surface materials used for orthopaedic implants. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CoCrMo with a 2.5-µm zirconium nitride top coat seems to be a promising surface modification technology able to reduce bacterial attachment on the surface of an implant and, hence, may further prevent implant infection with S. epidermidis biofilm formation.

Real-time analysis of nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing from infected orthopaedic devices.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infections are clinically difficult to diagnose and treat. Previously, we demonstrated metagenomic sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq replicates the findings of current gold standard microbiological diagnostic techniques. Nanopore sequencing offers advantages in speed of detection over MiSeq. Here, we report a real-time analytical pathway for Nanopore sequence data, designed for detecting bacterial composition of prosthetic joint infections but potentially useful for any microbial sequencing, and compare detection by direct-from-clinical-sample metagenomic nanopore sequencing with Illumina sequencing and standard microbiological diagnostic techniques. RESULTS: DNA was extracted from the sonication fluids of seven explanted orthopaedic devices, and additionally from two culture negative controls, and was sequenced on the Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION platform. A specific analysis pipeline was assembled to overcome the challenges of identifying the true infecting pathogen, given high levels of host contamination and unavoidable background lab and kit contamination. The majority of DNA classified (> 90%) was host contamination and discarded. Using negative control filtering thresholds, the species identified corresponded with both routine microbiological diagnosis and MiSeq results. By analysing sequences in real time, causes of infection were robustly detected within minutes from initiation of sequencing. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a novel, scalable pipeline for real-time analysis of MinION sequence data and use of this pipeline to show initial proof of concept that metagenomic MinION sequencing can provide rapid, accurate diagnosis for prosthetic joint infections. The high proportion of human DNA in prosthetic joint infection extracts prevents full genome analysis from complete coverage, and methods to reduce this could increase genome depth and allow antimicrobial resistance profiling. The nine samples sequenced in this pilot study have shown a proof of concept for sequencing and analysis that will enable us to investigate further sequencing to improve specificity and sensitivity.

A Real Pain: Diagnostic Quandaries and Septic Arthritis.

Rapid diagnosis and treatment of an infected joint are paramount in preserving orthopedic function. Here, we present a brief review of the many challenges associated with the diagnosis of both septic arthritis and prosthetic joint infections. We also discuss the many laboratory tests currently available to aid in the accurate diagnosis of joint infection, as well as emerging diagnostics that may have future utility in the diagnosis of these challenging clinical entities.

Unexpected synergistic and antagonistic antibiotic activity against Staphylococcus biofilms.

Objectives: To evaluate putative anti-staphylococcal biofilm antibiotic combinations used in the management of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Methods: Using the dissolvable bead biofilm assay, the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) was determined for the most commonly used antimicrobial agents and combination regimens against staphylococcal PJIs. The established fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index was modified to create the fractional biofilm eradication concentration (FBEC) index to evaluate synergism or antagonism between antibiotics. Results: Only gentamicin (MBEC 64 mg/L) and daptomycin (MBEC 64 mg/L) were observed to be effective antistaphylococcal agents at clinically achievable concentrations. Supplementation of gentamicin with daptomycin, vancomycin or ciprofloxacin resulted in a similar or lower MBEC than gentamicin alone (FBEC index 0.25-2). Conversely, when rifampicin, clindamycin or linezolid was added to gentamicin, there was an increase in the MBEC of gentamicin relative to its use as a monotherapy (FBEC index 8-32). Conclusions: This study found that gentamicin and daptomycin were the only effective single-agent antibiotics against established Staphylococcus biofilms. Interestingly the addition of a bacteriostatic antibiotic was found to antagonize the ability of gentamicin to eradicate Staphylococcus biofilms.

Evaluation of the use of sonication of retrieved implants for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection in a routine setting.

In order to evaluate the usefulness of sonication of retrieved implants for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in a large group of patients in a routine setting, we designed a 3-year retrospective study. Patients were classified into two groups: those meeting the clinical criteria of PJI and those that did not (control group). Two hundred patients and 276 samples were included. The types of infection were early (n = 44), delayed (n = 53), positive intraoperative cultures (n = 13) and late-acute (n = 8). The culture sensitivities of sonicate fluid, periprosthetic tissue, synovial fluid and combination of periprosthetic tissue and/or synovial fluid were 69.5, 52.8, 54.8 and 60.2%, respectively. The specificities were 97.6, 90.3, 93.0 and 89.9%, respectively. Sonicate fluid culture of implants was more sensitive than peri-implant tissue, synovial fluid and combination of periprosthetic tissue and/or synovial fluid for all infection types, though it was especially useful in delayed infection: 91.3% vs. 60.0% (p = 0.0015), 63.2% (p = 0.0005) and 66.7% (p = 0.0001), respectively. When sonicate fluid culture of implants was performed in addition to conventional cultures, the sensitivity increased significantly in total (from 60.2 to 77.1%) and delayed PJI (from 45.1 to 71.7%). On the other hand, for early PJI, sonicate fluid culture of prosthesis was not superior to conventional diagnostic methods.

Is the Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay More Accurate Than the Lateral Flow Alpha Defensin Test for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection?

BACKGROUND: Alpha defensin was proposed as a new biomarker in synovial fluid for the diagnostic workup of failed joint prostheses. To our knowledge, no comparative study of the performance of the quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and qualitative lateral flow alpha defensin test has been reported. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Using the proposed European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria for defining periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), is there a difference in the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative ELISA and qualitative lateral flow alpha defensin tests? (2) Is there a difference in the performance of the two alpha defensin tests when using three definition classification systems (Musculoskeletal Infection Society [MSIS], Infectious Diseases Society of America [IDSA], and proposed EBJIS)? METHODS: In this retrospective study of samples collected earlier as part of a related longitudinal study, we included patients in whom aspiration of the prosthetic hip or knee was performed as routine investigation before every revision arthroplasty. Between October 2016 and April 2017, a total of 73 patients were eligible for inclusion. As a result of an insufficient fluid volume for analysis (< 5 mL), two patients were excluded. Among the 71 patients in the final analysis, 54 had a knee and 17 a hip arthroplasty. Using the proposed EBJIS criteria, PJI was diagnosed in 22 patients (31%) and aseptic failure in 49 (69%). The alpha defensin ELISA and lateral flow tests were performed in synovial fluid. Patients were classified as having PJI or aseptic failure using the MSIS, the IDSA, and the proposed EBJIS criteria. Sensitivity and specificity of ELISA and the lateral flow alpha defensin test were calculated. Based on receiver operating characteristic analysis, area under the curve values were compared. RESULTS: When measured against the proposed EBJIS criteria, the sensitivity of alpha defensin ELISA and the lateral flow test was low and not different from one another with the numbers available at 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31%-69%) and 46% (95% CI, 27%-65%; p = 0.857), respectively, whereas both methods showed high specificity (98% [95% CI, 88%-100%]; p = 1.000). For sensitivity, the highest values were seen when compared against the MSIS criteria (ELISA: 85% [95% CI, 56%-97%], lateral flow: 77% [95% CI]; p = 0.871), intermediate with IDSA criteria (ELISA: 73% [95% CI, 48%-89%], lateral flow: 67% [95% CI]; p = 0.867), and lowest with proposed EBJIS criteria (ELISA: 50% [95% CI, 31%-69%], lateral flow: 46% [95% CI]; p = 0.763). Specificity, however, was high regardless of the criteria used, where ELISA and lateral flow produced results that were not different (MSIS: 98% [95% CI, 90%-100%], IDSA: 98% [95% CI, 90%-100%], EBJIS: 98% [95% CI, 88%-100%]; p = 1.000). The area under the curve of alpha defensin ELISA and the lateral flow test was similar, regardless of the definition criteria used (EBJIS: p = 0.566; IDSA: p = 0.425; MSIS: p = 0.339). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference between the quantitative and qualitative alpha defensin test for confirmation of PJI, irrespective of applied definition criteria. Having the advantage of providing results within 10 minutes without the need for a laboratory facility, the qualitative test may be of interest in the intraoperative setting, however, at a cost of higher test expense. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, diagnostic study.

The fate of immunocompromised patients in the treatment of chronic periprosthetic joint infection: a single-centre experience.

PURPOSE: Immunocompromised patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are rare and currently there are no reliable guidelines according to which these infections can be successfully managed. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical course of different strategies for treatment of PJI in frail patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis between 2004 and 2015 included 29 immunocompromised patients (13 hips and 16 knees) with chronic PJI who underwent one-stage revision or debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR). Patients were stratified according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) staging system and the clinical course included recurrence of infection and functional outcomes which were extracted from patients' charts. The average follow-up was 68 months (range, 26-149 months). RESULTS: Sixteen of the 29 patients had recurrent infections. At last follow-up, 13 patients were on chronic suppressive antibiotic therapy, three patients died but not one death was considered to be related to the infection. A recurrent infection was observed in 13 of the 24 medically compromised hosts (MSIS type B). Sixteen of the 24 patients underwent one-stage revision; another eight of them underwent DAIR. The infection recurred in three of the five patients (60%) with the worst host grades (MSIS type C). One-stage revision was performed in one of the five patients and the remaining four patients received DAIR. CONCLUSION: Our results show that we should compromise our expectation and intemperate treatment for such a population. The goals of PJI treatment in these patients should take into account their preferences and may pay more attention to the concept of disease control rather than cure, especially for patients with severe comorbidities (MSIS C). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV.

[Periprosthetic hip-TEP infections after dental procedures : Maybe an indication for antibiotic treatment after all?] / Periprothetische Hüft-TEP-Infektion nach zahnmedizinischem Eingriff : Vielleicht doch eine Indikation zur Antibiotikatherapie?

Periprosthetic infections are hazardous complications. After dental procedures, an antibiotic prophylaxis or treatment is actually not recommended according to the current guidelines. In the present work, a case of a hematogenous late infection after primary total hip arthroplasty due to a prior dental procedure is presented. Hereby, the question evolves as to whether in selected cases an antibiotic prophylaxis or treatment might be indicated at the site of dental procedures.

A Novel Prosthetic Joint Infection Pathogen, Mycoplasma salivarium, Identified by Metagenomic Shotgun Sequencing.

Defining the microbial etiology of culture-negative prosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be challenging. Metagenomic shotgun sequencing is a new tool to identify organisms undetected by conventional methods. We present a case where metagenomics was used to identify Mycoplasma salivarium as a novel PJI pathogen in a patient with hypogammaglobulinemia.

Reliability of a multiplex PCR system for diagnosis of early and late prosthetic joint infections before and after broth enrichment.

Early microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is essential for successful antimicrobial treatment; however, culture has limited sensitivity, particularly in patients who had received antibiotic therapy, and the utility of molecular methods for diagnosing PJIs remains debated. We investigated the reliability of a multiplex PCR system for the microbiological diagnosis of early and late PJIs. Samples of periprosthetic tissues, synovial fluid, and prosthetic implants from 47 patients with early (n=13) or late (n=34) PJI were analyzed by conventional culture and with the multiplex-PCR Unyvero ITI® (U-ITI) cartridge system. Samples treated with dithiothreitol (DTT) and synovial fluids were spread directly on agar plates and inoculated into enrichment broths. The synovial fluids, DTT eluates and enrichment broths were processed according to the U-ITI protocol. When compared against culture as the reference method, U-ITI analysis of DTT eluates had a sensitivity of 34.2%; sensitivity of U-ITI analysis increased up to 81.6% when enrichment broths were analyzed. In particular, sensitivity was 44.4% for synovial fluids, and 41.7%, and 23.5% for DTT eluates from early and late infections, respectively. Sensitivity of analysis of enrichment broths was 83.3% for early infections, 82.3% for late infections and 77.8% for synovial fluids. Our findings seem to suggest that, when coupled with the use of broth culture, U-ITI analysis may allow for more rapid microbial identification than biochemical methods, while no advantages in time to detect microbial growth were observed. Improvements, particularly in sensitivity, are needed to make it more suitable for diagnosis of early and late PJIs.

Performance of automated multiplex PCR using sonication fluid for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a prospective cohort.

PURPOSE: Sonication of explanted prostheses improved the microbiological diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). We evaluated the performance of automated multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using sonication fluid for the microbiological diagnosis of PJI. METHODS: In a prospective cohort using uniform definition criteria for PJI, explanted joint prostheses were investigated by sonication and the resulting sonication fluid was analyzed by culture and multiplex PCR. McNemar's Chi-squared test was used to compare the performance of diagnostic tests. RESULTS: Among 111 patients, PJI was diagnosed in 78 (70%) and aseptic failure in 33 (30%). For the diagnosis of PJI, the sensitivity and specificity of periprosthetic tissue culture was 51 and 100%, of sonication fluid culture 58 and 100%, and of sonication fluid PCR 51 and 94%, respectively. Among 70 microorganisms, periprosthetic tissue culture grew 52 (74%), sonication fluid culture grew 50 (71%) and sonication fluid PCR detected 37 pathogens (53%). If only organisms are considered, for which primers are included in the test panel, PCR detected 37 of 58 pathogens (64%). The sonication fluid PCR missed 19 pathogens (predominantly oral streptococci and anaerobes), whereas 7 additional microorganisms were detected only by PCR (including Cutibacterium spp. and coagulase-negative staphylococci). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of multiplex PCR using sonication fluid is comparable to culture of periprosthetic tissue or sonication fluid. The advantages of PCR are short processing time (< 5 h) and fully automated procedure. However, culture technique is still needed due to the low sensitivity and the need of comprehensive susceptibility testing. Modification of primers or inclusion of additional ones may improve the performance of PCR, especially of low-virulent organisms.

Comparison of Leukocyte Esterase Testing of Synovial Fluid with Synovial Histology for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The leukocyte esterase (LE) strip test and histology are diagnostic methods for PJI. The aims of this study were to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the LE strip test and to compare it with histology in the diagnosis of PJI. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between January and December 2015, 93 patients who underwent TJA with PJI were enrolled in the study. Synovial fluid samples were tested with an LE strip, and three synovial tissue samples from each patient underwent frozen section and formalin-fixed histology. Recent criteria from the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) were used for the diagnosis of PJI. RESULTS Ninety-three patients studied included 38 cases of PJI and 55 non-infected cases. Sensitivity and specificity of the LE strip test were 92.1% (95% CI, 77.5-97.9%) and 96.4% (95% CI, 86.4-99.4%), respectively. There was no significant difference in sensitivity (p=0.249) or specificity (p=0.480) between frozen and paraffin sections for histology; the two methods were strongly correlated (φ=0.892). Comparison of the LE test results with histology showed a strong correlation (φ=0.758, and φ=0.840). CONCLUSIONS The findings of this preliminary study have shown that the LE strip test on synovial fluid showed similar sensitivity and specificity as histology for the diagnosis of PJI, indicating that that further controlled clinical studies should be performed to investigate the role of the LE strip test for the early diagnosis of PJI.

Prosthetic Joint Infections and Cost Analysis?

Prosthetic joint infection is a devastating complication of arthroplasty surgery that can lead to debilitating morbidity for the patient and significant expense for the healthcare system. With the continual rise of arthroplasty cases worldwide every year, the revision load for infection is becoming a greater financial burden on healthcare budgets. Prevention of infection has to be the key to reducing this burden. For treatment, it is critical for us to collect quality data that can guide future management strategies to minimise healthcare costs and morbidity / mortality for patients. There has been a management shift in many countries to a less expensive 1-stage strategy and in selective cases to the use of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention. These appear very attractive options on many levels, not least cost. However, with a consensus on the definition of joint infection only clarified in 2011, there is still the need for high quality cost analysis data to be collected on how the use of these different methods could impact the healthcare expenditure of countries around the world. With a projected spend on revision for infection at US$1.62 billion in the US alone, this data is vital and urgently needed.