The immunopathogenesis and immunotherapy of cutaneous T cell lymphoma: Current and future approaches.

In the past few decades, immunotherapy has emerged as an effective therapeutic option for patients with cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL). CTCL is characterized by progressive impairment of multiple arms of the immune system. Immunotherapy targets these deficits to stimulate a more robust antitumor response, thereby both clearing the malignant T cells and repairing the immune dysfunction. By potentiating rather than suppressing the immune system, immunotherapy can result in longer treatment responses than alternatives such as chemotherapy. In recent years, advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of CTCL have led to the development of several new agents with promising efficacy profiles. The second article in this continuing medical education series describes the current immunotherapeutic options for treatment of CTCL, with a focus on how they interact with the immune system and their treatment outcomes in case studies and clinical trials. We will discuss established CTCL immunotherapies, such as interferons, photopheresis, and retinoids; emerging therapies, such as interleukin-12 and Toll-like receptor agonists; and new approaches to targeting tumor antigens and checkpoint molecules, such as mogamulizumab, anti-programmed cell death protein 1, anti-CD47, and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy. We also describe the principles of multimodality immunotherapy and the use of total skin electron beam therapy in such regimens.

Impact of diffusing lung capacity before and after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation on postoperative pulmonary complications among patients with stage IIIA/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the impact of diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) before and after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) on postoperative pulmonary complication (PPC) among stage IIIA/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 324 patients with stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC between 2009 and 2016. Patients were classified into 4 groups according to DLco before and after neoadjuvant CCRT; normal-to-normal (NN), normal-to-low (NL), low-to-low (LL), and low-to-very low (LVL). Low DLco and very low DLco were defined as DLco < 80% predicted and DLco < 60% predicted, respectively. RESULTS: On average, DLco was decreased by 12.3% (±10.5) after CCRT. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for any PPC comparing patients with low DLco to those with normal DLco before CCRT was 2.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.36-3.36). Moreover, the IRR for any PPC was 3.78 (95% CI = 1.68-8.49) in LVL group compared to NN group. The significant change of DLco after neoadjuvant CCRT had an additional impact on PPC, particularly after bilobectomy or pneumonectomy with low baseline DLco. CONCLUSIONS: The DLco before CCRT was significantly associated with risk of PPC, and repeated test of DLco after CCRT would be helpful for risk assessment, particularly in patients with low DLco before neoadjuvant CCRT.

Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Radiation Therapy Alone Must Be Avoided.

BACKGROUND: Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is the most common histological subtype of anal cancer. Rates have been observed to increase in recent years. Combined chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is currently the gold standard of treatment. The aim of this study is to assess ASCC prevalence, treatment trends, and overall survival (OS) in the United States. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage I-IV ASCC were identified from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015. The primary outcome was 5-year OS, which was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: 34,613 cases were included (stage I: 21.45%; II: 41.00%; III: 31.62%; IV: 5.94%), with an increasing trend in prevalence. CCRT was the most used treatment. Multimodal treatment, combining surgery with CCRT, offered the best OS rates for stage I, II, and IV cancers (I: 84.87%; II: 75.12%; IV: 33.08%), comparable with survival of stage III patients treated with CCRT (III: 61.14%). Radiation alone had the worse OS rates, and on adjusted analysis, radiation treatment alone had the greatest risk of mortality (I: hazard ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.54; P = 0.016; II: 2.05, 1.44-2.93, P < 0.001; IV: 1.99, 0.99-4.02, P = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: ASCC has increased in prevalence, notably in stage III and IV disease. Although CCRT is the most commonly used treatment type for all stages of ASCC, multimodal treatment offers better OS in stages I, II, and IV. Treatment with radiation alone offers the worst OS no matter the stage and should no longer be used as a solitary treatment modality.

Trends in combined radio-chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a survey among radiation oncology centers of Sicily region on behalf of AIRO.

AIM: To conduct a survey among Sicilian centers of radiation oncology belonging to Associazione Italiana di Radioterapia ed Oncologia Clinica (AIRO), to record the different methods of integration of radio-chemotherapy both in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, to evaluate surgical procedures in relation to the sphincter preservation and to report the different toxicity profiles of the treatment strategies. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent at the end of 2017 to all the radiation oncology centers of Sicily region in order to collect the data from individual centers and the treatment characteristics retrospectively over the previous 5 years, from 2012 to 2016. The required data were collected from 13 centers out of 17 which, in relation to the single catchment areas, correspond to approximately 85% of the Sicilian population. The requested data concerned the type of integrated treatment (neoadjuvant vs adjuvant vs radical), combination with chemotherapy (induction, concomitant, adjuvant), type of surgical intervention (sphincter-saving vs abdomino-perineal resection), disease stage, schedule and radiotherapy technique adopted, as well as toxicity detected over the treatment period. RESULTS: A total of 784 pts (M/F: 509/275) were treated between 2012 and 2016, with a median age of 67 years (range 25-92). The majority of patients was treated in the neoadjuvant phase (62% of the total) compared to the adjuvant phase (31%) and to those treated radically (7%). Twenty-five percent of patients did not receive combination chemotherapy mainly for cardiovascular problems. Chemotherapy used concomitantly to radiotherapy was single-agent capecitabine (73% of patients) or 5-fluorouracil (27%). The use of chemotherapy alone before concomitant treatment is more common for patients treated in the adjuvant phase (64% of this subgroup), while 14% of patients treated in the neoadjuvant phase received induction chemotherapy before the concomitant phase; in both cases of chemotherapy alone, the majority of patients (91%) received oxaliplatin-based protocols (FOLFOX/XELOX/CAPOX). Few patients (3%) received chemotherapy alone after the concomitant phase. Information on the surgical treatment received is available for 88% of the sample. Of these, 93% received a surgical treatment. The overall rate of sphincter-saving surgery (anterior resection) was 72%, but the contribution of neoadjuvant treatment allowed to reach a rate of 83% in this subgroup (against 65% found in the subgroup of patients treated in adjuvant phase). Traditional radiotherapy schedule (45-50 Gy in 25-28 fractions) was used in 90% of patients, of which an intensified treatment in neoadjuvant phase (45 Gy + boost of 9-10 Gy) was used in 11% of patients. A short-course regimen (25 Gy in 5 fraction) in neoadjuvant setting was opted rarely (7%). Three-dimensional conformal technique was preferred over intensity-modulated ones (73% vs 27%). Toxicity was mainly of grade I-II CTCAE (skin 23%, gastrointestinal 39%, genitourinary 14%) compared to grade III (gastrointestinal 4%, genitourinary and hematological < 1%). Interestingly, the toxicity rates were significantly higher in the adjuvant group compared to the neoadjuvant (GI: 58% vs 31%, GU: 21% vs 10%). CONCLUSION: The present survey shows that in the Sicily region integrated therapies for rectal cancer have allowed a neoadjuvant approach in the majority of patients, thus resulting in a greater use of sphincter conservative surgery. The toxicity has also been reported to be significantly less in this treatment setting.

Trends in treatment, incidence and survival of hypopharynx cancer: a 20-year population-based study in the Netherlands.

Hypopharynx cancer has the worst prognosis of all head and neck squamous cell cancers. Since the 1990s, a treatment shift has appeared from a total laryngectomy towards organ preservation therapies. Large randomized trials evaluating treatment strategies for hypopharynx cancer, however, remain scarce, and frequently this malignancy is evaluated together with larynx cancer. Therefore, our aim was to determine trends in incidence, treatment and survival of hypopharynx cancer. We performed a population-based cohort study including all patients diagnosed with T1-T4 hypopharynx cancer between 1991 and 2010 in the Netherlands. Patients were recorded by the national cancer registry database and verified by a national pathology database. 2999 patients were identified. The incidence increased significantly with 4.1% per year until 1997 and decreased non-significantly afterwards. For women, the incidence increased with 1.7% per year during the entire study period. Total laryngectomy as primary treatment significantly decreased, whereas radiotherapy and chemoradiation increased. The 5-year overall survival significantly increased from 28% in 1991-2000 to 34% in 2001-2010. Overall survival for T3 was equal for total laryngectomy and (chemo)radiotherapy, but for T4-patients the survival was significantly better after primary total laryngectomy (± adjuvant radiotherapy). This large population-based study demonstrates a shift in treatment preference towards organ preservation therapies. The 5-year overall survival increased significantly in the second decade. The assumed equivalence of organ preservation and laryngectomy may require reconsideration for T4 disease.

The clinical application of angiostatic therapy in combination with radiotherapy: past, present, future.

Although monotherapy with angiostatic drugs is still far from effective, there is abundant evidence that angiostatic therapy can improve the efficacy of conventional treatments like radiotherapy. This has instigated numerous efforts to optimize and clinically implement the combination of angiostatic drugs with radiation treatment. The results from past and present clinical trials that explored this combination therapy indeed show encouraging results. However, current findings also show that the combination has variable efficacy and is associated with increased toxicity. This indicates that combining radiotherapy with angiostatic drugs not only holds opportunities but also provides several challenges. In the current review, we provide an update of the most recent insights from clinical trials that evaluated the combination of angiostatic drugs with radiation treatment. In addition, we discuss the outstanding questions for future studies in order to improve the clinical benefit of combining angiostatic therapy with radiation therapy.

Checkpoint inhibitors and radiation treatment in Hodgkin's lymphoma : New study concepts of the German Hodgkin Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Patients with classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL) have a good prognosis even in advanced stages. However, combined chemo- and radiotherapy, as the standard of care, is also associated with treatment-related toxicities such as organ damage, secondary neoplasias, infertility, or fatigue and long-term fatigue. Many patients suffer from this burden although their cHL was cured. Therefore, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors like anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies in the treatment of solid cancers and also in HL offers new options. A remarkable and durable response rate with a favorable toxicity profile was observed in heavily pretreated cHL patients. METHODS: Planning to perform prospective randomized clinical trials in the content of radio-immune treatment in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), we transferred the results of preliminary clinical studies and basic research in clinical relevant study concepts. RESULTS: Based on these promising early phase trial data, the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) will investigate innovative treatment regimens in upcoming phase II trials. CONCLUSION: The therapeutic efficacy and potential synergies of anti-PD1 antibodies in combination with chemo- or radiotherapy will be investigated in various settings of HL.

Neoadjuvant Therapy of Pancreatic Cancer: Definitions and Benefits.

The standard treatment of resectable pancreatic cancer is surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Due to the complication rate of pancreatic surgery and the high rate of primary irresectability, neoadjuvant concepts are increasingly used for pancreatic cancer. Neoadjuvant therapy is better tolerated than adjuvant and might decrease the surgical complication rate from pancreatic surgery. In contrast to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, the nutritional status improves during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Also, the survival of patients who develop postoperative complications after neoadjuvant therapy is comparable to those without complications whereas the survival of patients who underwent upfront surgery and then develop surgical complications is impaired. Moreover, large data base analyses suggest a down-sizing effect and improvement of overall survival by neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to be equally efficient in converting irresectable in resectable disease and more efficient with regard to systemic tumor progression and overall survival compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Despite these convincing findings from mostly small phase II trials, neoadjuvant therapy has not yet proven superiority over upfront surgery in randomized trials.

Therapies in the pipeline for small-cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION OR BACKGROUND: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents ~15% of all cases of lung cancer and is characterized by a rapid tumour doubling time, early onset disease dissemination and high sensitivity to chemotherapy. SOURCES OF DATA: We searched MEDLINE and OVID databases for articles in English published from January 1980 to February 2015. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Platinum-based chemotherapy, thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation are standard of care. Benefit from second-line chemotherapy is limited. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: The role of platinum/irinotecan chemotherapy in the Western population and the role of maintenance therapies remain to be established. GROWING POINTS: Knowledge of the biology of SCLC has expanded exponentially and many potential therapeutic targets have been identified. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: The use of circulating tumour cells can help investigating molecular alterations occurring within tumour cells, understanding drug resistance mechanisms and evaluating new treatments.

What is changing in radiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer patients? A review.

Radiotherapy treatment continues to have a relevant impact in the treatment of nonsmall cell cancer (NSCLC). Use of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy is considered the gold standard in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC but clinical outcomes are not satisfactory. Introduction of new radiotherapy technology and chemotherapy regimens are under investigation in this setting with the goal to improve unsatisfactory results. We report how radiotherapy is changing in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC.

Multimodality Therapy for NSCLC.

The standard therapy for patients with unrespectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Although the concurrent use of both treatment modalities has been shown to be superior to sequential therapy, the role for additional chemotherapy, either as induction or as consolidation, remains unclear. Targeted therapy has met limited success in the treatment of unselected patients with stage III NSCLC. New studies using induction therapy with erlotinib or crizotinib for molecularly selected patients and consolidation therapy with checkpoint inhibitors are currently ongoing, and the results are eagerly awaited.

Improvement in survival for patients with synchronous metastatic esophageal cancer in the south of the Netherlands from 1994 to 2013.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the use of external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer and evaluated the effect on overall survival. METHODS: We included all patients diagnosed with synchronous metastatic esophageal cancer in the south of the Netherlands between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 2013. Proportions of patients treated with external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy were described with respect to the period of diagnosis, patient and tumor characteristics. Independent risk factors for death were discriminated. RESULTS: A total of 1020 patients were included, 61.5% of these patients received palliative treatment with external beam radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, brachytherapy and/or chemotherapy. The use of external beam radiotherapy decreased from 44.5% in 1994 to 22.2% in 2013 (p = 0.0001), whereas the use of chemoradiotherapy increased from 2.9% in 1994 to 19.1% in 2013 (p < 0.0001). The prescription of systemic chemotherapy as single modality increased from 13.9% to 30.5% (p < 0.0001). The use of brachytherapy decreased from 20.9% in 1994 to 7.4% in 2013 (p = 0.0013). The odds of receiving external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy were influenced by different tumor and patient characteristics, such as age, gender, histologic subtype and number of metastatic sites. The median overall survival in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer significantly improved over time from 18 weeks (one-year survival rate 14.4%) in 1994-1998 to 25 weeks (one-year survival rate 22.4%) in 2009-2013. Patients treated with chemoradiotherapy had the most favorable prognosis, followed by patients treated with chemotherapy as a single modality. CONCLUSION: The median overall survival of patients diagnosed with metastatic esophageal cancer improved from 18 weeks in 1994-1998 to 25 weeks in 2009-2013. Although this increase could be attributed to stage migration, our population-based study suggests that major changes in treatment strategies and appropriate patient selection might have played a role as well.

Neoadjuvant Combined-Modality Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and Its Future Direction.

Rectal cancer treatment presents a challenge, and its optimal management requires a multidisciplinary approach involving surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists. Advances in surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and medical imaging technology have transformed the therapeutic landscape and have led to substantial improvements in both local disease control and patient survival. The currently established standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer involves preoperative (neoadjuvant) concurrent radiotherapy and infusional fluorouracil-based or oral capecitabine-based chemotherapy, also known as chemoradiotherapy (CRT), followed by surgery. Surgery is often followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Here we discuss the evolution of standard therapy for rectal cancer patients and the use of preoperative CRT for the treatment of locally advanced disease. Treatment schemes that have attempted to broaden the horizons of standard therapy include the use of induction chemotherapy and "watch-and-wait" approaches. We examine several novel trials using these and other treatment approaches, which may eventually lead to better patient selection and the avoidance of overtreatment and unnecessary adverse effects.

Is treatment de-escalation a reality in HPV related oropharyngeal cancer?

The incidence of HPV related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is rapidly increasing. It is now well recognised as a distinct clinical and biologic entity, compared to traditional OPSCC. The majority of these patients have an excellent prognosis due to the chemo-radiosensitive nature of these tumours. The de-escalation of current treatment regimens have therefore been proposed in an attempt to reduce the long term treatment related morbidity of this much younger patient cohort. Several of the more pertinent points regarding safe de-escalation strategies are considered within this manuscript.

Update on advances and controversy in rectal cancer treatment.

Changes in the multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer have been recently proposed. We performed a comprehensive review of the current data on neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer, focussing on chemoradiotherapy treatment and timing of surgery. Six components were proposed as the framework for the treatment of rectal cancer: neoadjuvant therapy and changing patterns in patient selection, long- or short-course radiotherapy, adverse effects of radiotherapy, timing of surgery, non-operative management of rectal cancer and postoperative adjuvant therapy. Lack of a consistent difference in terms of local recurrence has been observed between short-course radiotherapy and long-course chemoradiotherapy. Indications for preoperative radiotherapy have been reconsidered in the last years. An interval of 10-11 weeks seemed to be the optimal timing, with no impact on patient safety. Since assessment criteria of clinical complete response are not well defined, and the basis for non-operative management of rectal cancer is still not clear, further investigations are required. There is controversy about standard treatments for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer that are being analyzed by ongoing studies. Tailored treatments could avoid over-treatment for a large number of patients without any impairment of the oncologic results.

[New aspects in the treatment of thyroid cancer : Highlights of the ASCO Annual Meeting 2016]. / Neue Aspekte in der Therapie von Schilddrüsenkarzinomen : Highlights des ASCO-Kongresses 2016.

The annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) took place at the beginning of June 2016 in Chicago. This year a total of 28 studies on the treatment of patients with thyroid cancer were presented, described in this review article according to the degree of cancer cell differentiation. The leading curative treatment modality is still surgery. In contrast, kinase inhibitors are being used increasingly within palliative concepts. The latest state of the art of thyroid cancer treatment, both surgical and medical, is summarized in this review.

[Is (chemo)radiotherapy really the future standard in the treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma?]. / Ist Radio(chemo)therapie wirklich der zukünftige Standard für die Behandlung von Oropharynxkarzinomen?

Treatment of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) requires interdisciplinary collaboration. Besides oncologic control, organ and function preservation are important priorities. One treatment option is primary concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), particularly for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Another option is sequential CRT, where induction chemotherapy may be followed either by radiation alone or by CRT. An important aspect of these modalities is the development of functional sequelae with regards to swallowing as a direct consequence of radiogenic fibrosis, as well as tissue ctoxicity associated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Conventional open surgical approaches are being increasingly replaced by transoral surgical modalities with less treatment-related morbidity. As a further, equally important goal of appropriately indicated surgery, adjuvant (C)RT may be omitted or the dose significantly reduced. The advantages of primary surgery over primary CRT may be less obvious in cases still requiring adjuvant treatment, although not necessarily completely eliminated. For patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven OPSCC, it is important to note that primary surgery may provide comparable or even increased survival benefit. To date, there is no evidence for a clear advantage of primary CRT over primary surgery in this group. In these cases, a de-escalated treatment package may be the preferred option. Here, the application of radioimmunotherapy as well as a reduced radiation dose may minimize long-term treatment-related morbidities.

[Study results of primary therapy for head and neck tumors : Highlights of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting]. / Studienergebnisse zur Primärtherapie von Kopf-Hals-Tumoren : Highlights der ASCO-Jahrestagung 2016.

At the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2016, results of current trials dealing with primary therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) were presented. Current trials investigate in particular therapy regimens for the treatment of locally advanced HNSCC. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains the standard therapy approach. Current trials focus on sequential chemoradiation with modifications in induction chemotherapy (ICT) or the subsequent CRT schedule. Studies investigating the combination of targeted therapy with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab and concomitant, sequential, or adjuvant therapy were presented. The most important trials are summarized in this article.

[Treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma recurrences and distant metastases : Highlights of the ASCO Meeting 2016]. / Therapie der rezidivierten und fernmetastasierten Kopf-Hals-Tumoren : Highlights des ASCO-Meetings 2016.

This year particularly phase II studies were presented at the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, in which new drugs (monoclonal antibodies, small molecules) were investigated in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-HNSCC). Notably, there was a great number of studies investigating carcinoma of the nasopharynx. The studies presented in this article summarize the different therapeutic concepts in the treatment of R/M-HNSCC and represent the variety of therapeutic approaches in the recurrent and metastatic setting.

Long-term results of chemoradiotherapy for stage II-III thoracic esophageal cancer in a single institution after 2000 -with a focus on comparison of three protocols.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the long-term results of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage II-III thoracic esophageal cancer mainly by comparing results of three protocols retrospectively. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2012, 298 patients with stage II-III thoracic esophageal cancer underwent CRT. Patients in Group A received two cycles of cisplatin (CDDP) at 70 mg/m(2) (day 1 and 29) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at 700 mg/m(2)/24 h (day 1-4 and 29-32) with radiotherapy (RT) of 60 Gy without a break. Patients in Group B received two cycles of CDDP at 40 mg/m(2) (day 1, 8, 36 and 43) and 5-FU at 400 mg/m(2)/24 h (day 1-5, 8-12, 36-40 and 43-47) with RT of 60 Gy with a 2-week break. Patients in Group C received two cycles of nedaplatin at 70 mg/m(2) (day 1 and 29) and 5-FU at 500 mg/m(2)/24 h (day 1-4 and 29-32) with RT of 60-70 Gy without a break. Differences in prognostic factors between the groups were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rates for patients in Group A, Group B and Group C were 52.4, 45.2 and 37.2%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates for patients in Stage II, Stage III (non-T4) and Stage III (T4) were 64.0, 40.1 and 22.5%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates for patients who received 1 cycle and 2 cycles of concomitant chemotherapy were 27.9 and 46.0%, respectively. In univariate analysis, stage, performance status and number of concomitant chemotherapy cycles were significant prognostic factors (p < 0.001, p = 0.008 and p < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, stage, protocol and number of concomitant chemotherapy cycles were significant factors (p < 0.001, p = 0.043 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The protocol used in Group A may be an effective protocol of CRT for esophageal cancer. It may be important to complete the scheduled concomitant chemotherapy with the appropriate intensity of CRT.