Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
Improving reporting standards for polygenic scores in risk prediction studies.
Nature
; 591(7849): 211-219, 2021 03.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33692554
2.
Do we measure or compute polygenic risk scores? Why language matters.
Hum Genet
; 141(5): 1093-1097, 2022 May.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33587168
3.
Validity of polygenic risk scores: are we measuring what we think we are?
Hum Mol Genet
; 28(R2): R143-R150, 2019 11 21.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31504522
4.
Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods.
Qual Life Res
; 30(12): 3325-3342, 2021 Dec.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33595827
5.
Novel citation-based search method for scientific literature: a validation study.
BMC Med Res Methodol
; 20(1): 25, 2020 02 07.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32028894
6.
Finding Wealth in Waste: Irreplicability Re-Examined.
Bioessays
; 40(12): e1800173, 2018 12.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30311678
7.
Cost Effectiveness of Age-Specific Screening Intervals for People With Family Histories of Colorectal Cancer.
Gastroenterology
; 154(1): 105-116.e20, 2018 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28964749
8.
Evaluation of polygenic risk models using multiple performance measures: a critical assessment of discordant results.
Genet Med
; 21(2): 391-397, 2019 02.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29895851
9.
Correction: A collaborative translational research framework for evaluating and implementing the appropriate use of human genome sequencing to improve health.
PLoS Med
; 15(8): e1002650, 2018 08.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30114233
10.
A collaborative translational research framework for evaluating and implementing the appropriate use of human genome sequencing to improve health.
PLoS Med
; 15(8): e1002631, 2018 08.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30071015
11.
A systematic review and critical assessment of 11 discordant meta-analyses on reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes in clopidogrel users.
Genet Med
; 17(1): 3-11, 2015 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24946154
12.
Family history and the natural history of colorectal cancer: systematic review.
Genet Med
; 17(9): 702-12, 2015 Sep.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25590981
13.
A critical evaluation of the algorithm behind the Relative Citation Ratio (RCR).
PLoS Biol
; 15(10): e2002536, 2017 10.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28968388
14.
Novel citation-based search method for scientific literature: application to meta-analyses.
BMC Med Res Methodol
; 15: 84, 2015 Oct 13.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26462491
15.
Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing?
J Med Ethics
; 41(4): 322-6, 2015 Apr.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24872596
16.
Genome-wide association study identifies novel loci associated with circulating phospho- and sphingolipid concentrations.
PLoS Genet
; 8(2): e1002490, 2012.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22359512
17.
Predictive or not predictive: understanding the mixed messages from the patient's DNA sequence.
J Clin Nurs
; 24(23-24): 3730-5, 2015 Dec.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26542756
18.
Variations in predicted risks in personal genome testing for common complex diseases.
Genet Med
; 16(1): 85-91, 2014 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23807614
19.
Defining Evidence for Precision Medicine: A Patient Is More Than a Set of Covariates.
Epidemiology
; 30(3): 342-344, 2019 05.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30789433
20.
Quality criteria for health checks: development of a European consensus agreement.
Prev Med
; 67: 238-41, 2014 Oct.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25117528