Comparative analysis of radical prostatectomy techniques using perineal or suprapubic approach in the treatment of localized prostate cancer / Análise comparativa das técnicas de prostatectomia radical perineal e suprapúbica na abordagem do câncer de próstata localizado
Amorim, Gelbert Luiz Chamon do Carmo; Cruz, Geraldo Magela Gomes da; Veloso, Denny Fabrício Magalhães; Kartabil, José David; Vieira, José Carlos; Alves, Paulo Roberto.
Einstein (Säo Paulo)
; 8(2)abr.-jun. 2010. tab
Artículo
en Inglés, Portugués
| LILACS | ID: lil-550965
Objective:
To compare the results of radical prostatectomy by perineal and suprapubic approaches as to operative time, procedure costs, and surgical site complications.Methods:
The medical records of localized prostate cancer patients (PSA less than or equal to 10 ng/ml and Gleason score less than or equal to 6) were analyzed. Fifty-five patients were submitted to radical prostatectomy by perineal approach and 54 via suprapubic approach.Results:
There were statistical differences between groups as to operative time (p < 0.05); for perineal approach it was in average 114 minutes (SD ± 0.03) and for suprapubic approach, an average of 167 minutes (SD ± 0.041). Prostatectomy via perineal approach resulted in 11 cases of surgical complications, and suprapubic approach, 3 cases.Conclusions:
Radical prostatectomy via perineal approach took less time at a lower cost as compared to the suprapubic approach. However, there were more complications in patients submitted to perineal approach, mainly rectal lesions.
Biblioteca responsable:
BR500.1
Texto completo
Documentos relacionados