Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Serratia liquefaciens bloodstream infections from contamination of epoetin alfa at a hemodialysis center.
Grohskopf, L A; Roth, V R; Feikin, D R; Arduino, M J; Carson, L A; Tokars, J I; Holt, S C; Jensen, B J; Hoffman, R E; Jarvis, W R.
Afiliación
  • Grohskopf LA; Division of Applied Public Health Training, Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. lkg6@cdc.gov
N Engl J Med ; 344(20): 1491-7, 2001 May 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11357151
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In a one month period, 10 Serratia liquefaciens bloodstream infections and 6 pyrogenic reactions occurred in outpatients at a hemodialysis center.

METHODS:

We performed a cohort study of all hemodialysis sessions on days that staff members reported S. liquefaciens bloodstream infections or pyrogenic reactions. We reviewed procedures and cultured samples of water, medications, soaps, and hand lotions and swabs from the hands of personnel.

RESULTS:

We analyzed 208 sessions involving 48 patients. In 12 sessions, patients had S. liquefaciens bloodstream infections, and in 8, patients had pyrogenic reactions without bloodstream infection. Sessions with infections or reactions were associated with higher median doses of epoetin alfa than the 188 other sessions (6500 vs. 4000 U, P=0.03) and were more common during afternoon or evening shifts than morning shifts (P=0.03). Sessions with infections or reactions were associated with doses of epoetin alfa of more than 4000 U (multivariate odds ratio, 4.0; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 12.3). A review of procedures revealed that preservative-free, single-use vials of epoetin alfa were punctured multiple times, and residual epoetin alfa from multiple vials was pooled and administered to patients. S. liquefaciens was isolated from pooled epoetin alfa, empty vials of epoetin alfa that had been pooled, antibacterial soap, and hand lotion. All the isolates were identical by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. After the practice of pooling epoetin alfa was discontinued and the contaminated soap and lotion were replaced, no further S. liquefaciens bloodstream infections or pyrogenic reactions occurred at this hemodialysis facility.

CONCLUSIONS:

Puncturing single-use vials multiple times and pooling preservative-free epoetin alfa caused this outbreak of bloodstream infections in a hemodialysis unit. To prevent similar outbreaks, medical personnel should follow the manufacturer's guidelines for the use of preservative-free medications.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infección Hospitalaria / Contaminación de Medicamentos / Brotes de Enfermedades / Eritropoyetina / Infecciones por Serratia / Bacteriemia Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged80 País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: N Engl J Med Año: 2001 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
Buscar en Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infección Hospitalaria / Contaminación de Medicamentos / Brotes de Enfermedades / Eritropoyetina / Infecciones por Serratia / Bacteriemia Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged80 País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: N Engl J Med Año: 2001 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos