Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of distinct energy delivery protocols comparing two biphasic defibrillators for cardiac arrest.
Walsh, Simon J; McClelland, Anthony J J; Owens, Colum G; Allen, James; Anderson, John McC; Turner, Colin; Adgey, A A Jennifer.
Afiliación
  • Walsh SJ; Regional Medical Cardiology Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Am J Cardiol ; 94(3): 378-80, 2004 Aug 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15276112
ABSTRACT
Limited data have been published on the use of external defibrillators that deliver impedance compensated biphasic (ICB) waveforms in patients. We compared 2 ICB defibrillators, the Heartstream XL (150-150-150 J protocol) and Heartsine Samaritan (100-150-200 J protocol) in 78 consecutive patients in cardiac arrest. The performance of the 2 devices over the first 2 shocks was statistically equivalent. By the third shock, the Heartsine Samaritan had significantly better performance in removing ventricular fibrillation (p = 0.029). Energy selection for ICB waveforms requires further validation.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Ventricular / Cardioversión Eléctrica / Paro Cardíaco Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Cardiol Año: 2004 Tipo del documento: Article
Buscar en Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Ventricular / Cardioversión Eléctrica / Paro Cardíaco Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Cardiol Año: 2004 Tipo del documento: Article