Overall quality of diabetes care in a defined geographic region: different sides of the same story.
Br J Gen Pract
; 58(550): 339-45, 2008 May.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-18482488
BACKGROUND: In diabetes care, knowledge about what is achievable in primary and secondary care is important. There is a need for an objective method to assess the quality of care in different settings. A quality-of-care summary score has been developed based on process and outcome measures. An adapted version of this score was used to evaluate diabetes management in different settings. AIM: To evaluate the quality of diabetes management in primary and secondary care in a defined geographic region in the Netherlands, using a quality score. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Thirty general practices in the Netherlands. METHOD: A study of 2042 patients with type 2 diabetes (1640 primary care and 402 secondary care) was conducted. Quality of diabetes management was assessed by a score of process and outcome indicators (range 0-40). Clustering at practice level and differences in patient characteristics (case mix) were taken into account. RESULTS: At the outpatient clinic, patients were younger (mean age 64.1 years, standard deviation (SD)=12.5 years, versus mean age 67.1 years, SD=11.7, P<0.001), had more diabetes-related complications (macrovascular: 39.7% versus 24.3%, P<0.001; and microvascular: 25.9% versus 7.3%, P<0.001), and lower quality-of-life scores (EuroQol-5D: mean=0.60, SD=0.29, versus mean=0.80, SD=0.21, P<0.001). After adjusting for case mix and clustering, there was a weak association between the setting of treatment and haemoglobin A1c (primary care: mean 7.1%, SD=1.1, versus secondary care: mean 7.6%, SD=1.2, P<0.016), and between setting and systolic blood pressure (primary: mean 145.7 mmHg, SD=19.2, versus secondary care: 147.77 mmHg, SD 21.0, P<0.035). Quality-of-care summary scores in primary and secondary care differed significantly, with a higher score in primary care (mean 19.6, SD=8.5 versus, mean 18.1, SD=8.7, P<0.01). However, after adjusting for case mix and clustering, this difference lost significance. CONCLUSION: GPs and internists are treating different categories of patients with type 2 diabetes. However, overall quality of diabetes management in primary and secondary care is equal. There is much room for improvement. Future guidelines may differentiate between different categories of patients.
Texto completo:
1
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Calidad de la Atención de Salud
/
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2
/
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria
/
Atención Ambulatoria
Tipo de estudio:
Clinical_trials
/
Evaluation_studies
/
Guideline
/
Observational_studies
/
Prevalence_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Límite:
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
País/Región como asunto:
Europa
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Br J Gen Pract
Año:
2008
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Países Bajos