Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of nonionic and ionic contrast agents in the rabbit lung.
Moore, D E; Carroll, F E; Dutt, P L; Reed, G W; Holburn, G E.
Afiliación
  • Moore DE; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-2675.
Invest Radiol ; 26(2): 134-42, 1991 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2055713
The objective of this study was to determine the short- and long-term radiographic, physiologic and histologic changes elicited in the lung of rabbits following the aspiration of commonly used radiographic contrast agents. All agents used, including nonionic agents, caused radiographically evident pulmonary edema which cleared by 24 hours. The contrast materials with higher osmolality, viscosity, and iodine content elicited the greatest physiologic and pathologic changes. No differences were found between an ionic and a nonionic agent with similar viscosities and iodine content, despite a lower osmolality in the nonionic agent. No contrast agent is innocuous when introduced into the lung.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Edema Pulmonar / Medios de Contraste / Pulmón Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Invest Radiol Año: 1991 Tipo del documento: Article
Buscar en Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Edema Pulmonar / Medios de Contraste / Pulmón Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Invest Radiol Año: 1991 Tipo del documento: Article