Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Screening for adolescent alcohol and drug use in pediatric health-care settings: predictors and implications for practice and policy.
Sterling, Stacy; Kline-Simon, Andrea H; Wibbelsman, Charles; Wong, Anna; Weisner, Constance.
Afiliación
  • Sterling S; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, 3rd Floor, Oakland, CA 94612, USA. stacy.a.sterling@kp.org
Addict Sci Clin Pract ; 7: 13, 2012 Aug 16.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23186254
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This paper used data from a study of pediatric primary care provider (PCP) screening practices to examine barriers to and facilitators of adolescent alcohol and other drug (AOD) screening in pediatric primary care.

METHODS:

A web-based survey (N = 437) was used to examine the influence of PCP factors (attitudes and knowledge, training, self-efficacy, comfort with alcohol and drug issues); patient characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, comorbidities and risk factors); and organizational factors (screening barriers, staffing resources, confidentiality issues) on AOD screening practices. Self-reported and electronic medical record (EMR)-recorded screening rates were also assessed.

RESULTS:

More PCPs felt unprepared to diagnose alcohol abuse (42%) and other drug abuse (56%) than depression (29%) (p < 0.001). Overall, PCPs were more likely to screen boys than girls, and male PCPs were even more likely than female PCPs to screen boys (23% versus 6%, p < 0.0001). Having more time and having other staff screen and review results were identified as potential screening facilitators. Self-reported screening rates were significantly higher than actual (EMR-recorded) rates for all substances. Feeling prepared to diagnose AOD problems predicted higher self-reported screening rates (OR = 1.02, p < 0.001), and identifying time constraints as a barrier to screening predicted lower self-reported screening rates (OR = 0.91, p < 0.001). Higher average panel age was a significant predictor of increased EMR-recorded screening rates (OR = 1.11, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Organizational factors, lack of training, and discomfort with AOD screening may impact adolescent substance-abuse screening and intervention, but organizational approaches (e.g., EMR tools and workflow) may matter more than PCP or patient factors in determining screening.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Tamizaje Masivo / Servicios de Salud del Adolescente / Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Addict Sci Clin Pract Asunto de la revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina / Tamizaje Masivo / Servicios de Salud del Adolescente / Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Addict Sci Clin Pract Asunto de la revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos