Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Møller, Christian H; Steinbrüchel, Daniel A.
Afiliación
  • Møller CH; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark, chm@rh.regionh.dk.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 16(3): 455, 2014 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24482012
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the preferred treatment in patients with complex coronary artery disease. However, whether the procedure should be performed with or without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, referred to as off-pump and on-pump CABG, is still up for debate. Intuitively, avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass seems beneficial as the systemic inflammatory response from extracorporeal circulation is omitted, but no single randomized trial has been able to prove off-pump CABG superior to on-pump CABG as regards the hard outcomes death, stroke or myocardial infarction. In contrast, off-pump CABG is technically more challenging and may be associated with increased risk of incomplete revascularization. The purpose of the review is to summarize the current literature comparing outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Puente de Arteria Coronaria Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Cardiol Rep Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria / Puente de Arteria Coronaria Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Cardiol Rep Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article