Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Curr Cardiol Rep
; 16(3): 455, 2014 Mar.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-24482012
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the preferred treatment in patients with complex coronary artery disease. However, whether the procedure should be performed with or without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, referred to as off-pump and on-pump CABG, is still up for debate. Intuitively, avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass seems beneficial as the systemic inflammatory response from extracorporeal circulation is omitted, but no single randomized trial has been able to prove off-pump CABG superior to on-pump CABG as regards the hard outcomes death, stroke or myocardial infarction. In contrast, off-pump CABG is technically more challenging and may be associated with increased risk of incomplete revascularization. The purpose of the review is to summarize the current literature comparing outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
Texto completo:
1
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria
/
Puente de Arteria Coronaria
Tipo de estudio:
Clinical_trials
/
Etiology_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
/
Systematic_reviews
Límite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Curr Cardiol Rep
Asunto de la revista:
CARDIOLOGIA
Año:
2014
Tipo del documento:
Article