Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analytical validation of BRAF mutation testing from circulating free DNA using the amplification refractory mutation testing system.
Aung, Kyaw L; Donald, Emma; Ellison, Gillian; Bujac, Sarah; Fletcher, Lynn; Cantarini, Mireille; Brady, Ged; Orr, Maria; Clack, Glen; Ranson, Malcolm; Dive, Caroline; Hughes, Andrew.
Afiliación
  • Aung KL; Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology Group, CRUK Manchester Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Donald E; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Alderley Park, Cheshire, United Kingdom.
  • Ellison G; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Alderley Park, Cheshire, United Kingdom.
  • Bujac S; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Alderley Park, Cheshire, United Kingdom.
  • Fletcher L; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Alderley Park, Cheshire, United Kingdom.
  • Cantarini M; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Alderley Park, Cheshire, United Kingdom.
  • Brady G; Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology Group, CRUK Manchester Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Orr M; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Alderley Park, Cheshire, United Kingdom.
  • Clack G; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Alderley Park, Cheshire, United Kingdom.
  • Ranson M; Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology Group, CRUK Manchester Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Dive C; Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology Group, CRUK Manchester Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom. Electronic address: cdive@picr.man.ac.uk.
  • Hughes A; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Alderley Park, Cheshire, United Kingdom. Electronic address: andrew.hughes@astrazeneca.com.
J Mol Diagn ; 16(3): 343-9, 2014 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24631158
ABSTRACT
BRAF mutation testing from circulating free DNA (cfDNA) using the amplification refractory mutation testing system (ARMS) holds potential as a surrogate for tumor mutation testing. Robust assay validation is needed to establish the optimal clinical matrix for measurement and cfDNA-specific mutation calling criteria. Plasma- and serum-derived cfDNA samples from 221 advanced melanoma patients were analyzed for BRAF c.1799T>A (p.V600E) mutation using ARMS in two stages in a blinded fashion. cfDNA-specific mutation calling criteria were defined in stage 1 and validated in stage 2. cfDNA concentrations in serum and plasma, and the sensitivities and specificities of BRAF mutation detection in these two clinical matrices were compared. Sensitivity of BRAF c.1799T>A (p.V600E) mutation detection in cfDNA was increased by using mutation calling criteria optimized for cfDNA (these criteria were adjusted from those used for archival tumor biopsies) without compromising specificity. Sensitivity of BRAF mutation detection in serum was 44% (95% CI, 35% to 53%) and in plasma 52% (95% CI, 43% to 61%). Specificity was 96% (95% CI, 90% to 99%) in both matrices. Serum contains significantly higher total cfDNA than plasma, whereas the proportion of tumor-derived mutant DNA was significantly higher in plasma. Using mutation calling criteria optimized for cfDNA improves sensitivity of BRAF c.1799T>A (p.V600E) mutation detection. The proportion of tumor-derived cfDNA in plasma was significantly higher than in serum.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: ADN / Análisis Mutacional de ADN / Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf / Melanoma Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Mol Diagn Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: ADN / Análisis Mutacional de ADN / Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf / Melanoma Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Mol Diagn Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido