Comparison of midterm outcomes between surgical treatment and endovascular reconstruction for chronic infrarenal aortoiliac occlusion.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the midterm results of aortoiliac stent (AIS) placement with those of surgical treatment in patients with chronic infrarenal aortoiliac occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Midterm outcomes in patients treated at a single center from 2005 to 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Correlations between baseline clinical factors and midterm outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: The technical success rate was significantly lower in the AIS group than in the surgery group (83.3% vs 100%; P = .016). Of 68 technically successfully treated patients, 33 underwent surgical revascularization and 35 received AIS placement. There were no significant differences in patient demographics, Rutherford classification, cardiovascular risk factors, and 30-day mortality rates. Surgically treated patients had a longer average postoperative hospital stay (P = .001) and higher rates of postoperative complications, including respiratory failure (P = .010), transient renal dysfunction (P = .002), and multiple organ dysfunction (P = .023). Mean ankle-brachial index increased significantly in both groups (P < .001), but to the same extent. The primary 1-, 3-, and 5-year patency rates were 93.6%, 90.2%, and 90.2%, respectively, in the surgery group, and 91.4%, 81.8%, and 64.2%, respectively, in the AIS group (P = .054). No differences were observed in survival rate (P = .945), limb salvage (P = .860), or secondary patency (P = .916). CONCLUSIONS: AIS for chronic infrarenal aortoiliac occlusion is associated with a shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative morbidity rates. Although midterm primary patency rate was lower than for traditional open surgery, AIS appears to be a safe, minimally invasive, and reliable procedure for patients with chronic infrarenal aortoiliac occlusion.