Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review of brief dietary questionnaires suitable for clinical use in the prevention and management of obesity, cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes.
England, C Y; Andrews, R C; Jago, R; Thompson, J L.
Afiliación
  • England CY; Centre for Exercise Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Andrews RC; School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Learning and Research, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
  • Jago R; Centre for Exercise Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Thompson JL; University of Birmingham, School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 69(9): 977-1003, 2015 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25711954
ABSTRACT
The aim of this systematic review was to identify and describe brief dietary assessment tools suitable for use in clinical practice in the management of obesity, cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Papers describing development of brief (<35 items) dietary assessment questionnaires, that were accessible, simple to score and assessed aspects of the diet of relevance to the conditions of interest were identified from electronic databases. The development of 35 tools was described in 47 papers. Ten tools assessed healthy eating or healthy dietary patterns, 2 assessed adherence to the Mediterranean diet, 18 assessed dietary fat intake, and 5 assessed vegetable and/or fruit intake. Twenty tools were developed in North America. Test-retest reliability was conducted on 18 tools; correlation coefficients for total scores ranged from 0.59 to 0.95. Relative validation was conducted on 34 tools. The most common reference variable was percentage energy from fat (15 tools) and correlation coefficients ranged from 0.24, P<0.001 to 0.79, P<0.002. Tools that have been evaluated for reliability and/or relative validity are suitable for guiding clinicians when providing dietary advice. Variation in study design, settings and populations makes it difficult to recommend one tool over another, although future developers can enhance the understanding and use of tools by giving clear guidance as to the strengths and limitations of the study design. When selecting a tool, clinicians should consider whether their patient population is similar in characteristics to the evaluation sample.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades Cardiovasculares / Encuestas sobre Dietas / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Obesidad Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Nutr Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades Cardiovasculares / Encuestas sobre Dietas / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Obesidad Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Nutr Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido