Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clarifying the role of theory of mind areas during visual perspective taking: Issues of spontaneity and domain-specificity.
Schurz, Matthias; Kronbichler, Martin; Weissengruber, Sebastian; Surtees, Andrew; Samson, Dana; Perner, Josef.
Afiliación
  • Schurz M; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Austria. Electronic address: Matthias.Schurz@sbg.ac.at.
  • Kronbichler M; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Austria; Neuroscience Institute, Christian Doppler Clinic, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  • Weissengruber S; Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research, Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Surtees A; School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, UK.
  • Samson D; Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium.
  • Perner J; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Austria.
Neuroimage ; 117: 386-96, 2015 Aug 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25907759
ABSTRACT
Visual perspective taking is a fundamental feature of the human social brain. Previous research has mainly focused on explicit visual perspective taking and contrasted brain activation for other- versus self-perspective judgements. This produced a conceptual gap to theory of mind studies, where researchers mainly compared activation for taking another's mental perspective to non-mental control conditions. We compared brain activation for visual perspective taking to activation for non-mental control conditions where the avatar was replaced by directional (arrow, lamp) or non-directional (brick-wall) objects. We found domain-specific activation linked to the avatar's visual perspective in right TPJ, ventral mPFC and ventral precuneus. Interestingly, we found that these areas are spontaneously processing information linked to the other's perspective during self-perspective judgements. Based on a review of the visual perspective taking literature, we discuss how these findings can explain some of the inconsistent/negative results found in previous studies comparing other- versus self-perspective judgements.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Lóbulo Parietal / Reconocimiento Visual de Modelos / Desempeño Psicomotor / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Corteza Prefrontal / Teoría de la Mente Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Neuroimage Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Lóbulo Parietal / Reconocimiento Visual de Modelos / Desempeño Psicomotor / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Corteza Prefrontal / Teoría de la Mente Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Neuroimage Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article