Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of point-of-care hemostatic assays, routine coagulation tests, and outcome scores in critically ill patients.
Larsson, A; Tynngård, N; Kander, T; Bonnevier, J; Schött, U.
Afiliación
  • Larsson A; Medical Faculty, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden.
  • Tynngård N; Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Clinical Chemistry and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Kander T; Medical Faculty, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden; Department of Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skåne University Hospital Lund, 22185 Lund, Sweden.
  • Bonnevier J; Medical Faculty, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden; Department of Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skåne University Hospital Lund, 22185 Lund, Sweden.
  • Schött U; Medical Faculty, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden; Department of Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skåne University Hospital Lund, 22185 Lund, Sweden. Electronic address: ulf.schott@skane.se.
J Crit Care ; 30(5): 1032-8, 2015 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26190696
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purposes of the study are to compare point-of-care (POC) hemostatic devices in critically ill patients with routine laboratory tests and intensive care unit (ICU) outcome scoring assessments and to describe the time course of these variables in relation to mortality rate. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Patients admitted to the ICU with a prognosis of more than 3 days of stay were included. The POC devices, Multiplate platelet aggregometry, rotational thromboelastometry, and ReoRox viscoelastic tests, were used. All variables were compared between survivors and nonsurvivors. Point-of-care results were compared to prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, platelet count, fibrinogen concentration, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3.

RESULTS:

Blood was sampled on days 0 to 1, 2 to 3, and 4 to 10 from 114 patients with mixed diagnoses during 237 sampling events. Nonsurvivors showed POC and laboratory signs of hypocoagulation and decreased fibrinolysis over time compared to survivors. ReoRox detected differences between survivors and nonsurvivors better than ROTEM and Multiplate.

CONCLUSIONS:

All POC and routine laboratory tests showed a hypocoagulative response in nonsurvivors compared to survivors. ReoRox was better than ROTEM and Multiplate at detecting differences between surviving and nonsurviving ICU patients. However, Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 showed the best association to mortality outcome.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea / Sistemas de Atención de Punto / Hemostasis Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Crit Care Asunto de la revista: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea / Sistemas de Atención de Punto / Hemostasis Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Crit Care Asunto de la revista: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia