Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prospective PET image quality gain calculation method by optimizing detector parameters.
Theodorakis, Lampros; Loudos, George; Prassopoulos, Vasilios; Kappas, Constantine; Tsougos, Ioannis; Georgoulias, Panagiotis.
Afiliación
  • Theodorakis L; Departments of aNuclear Medicine bMedical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, Larissa cDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Technological Educational Institute of Athens dPET/CT Department, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Nucl Med Commun ; 36(12): 1253-63, 2015 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26378489
BACKGROUND: Lutetium-based scintillators with high-performance electronics introduced time-of-flight (TOF) reconstruction in the clinical setting. Let G' be the total signal to noise ratio gain in a reconstructed image using the TOF kernel compared with conventional reconstruction modes. G' is then the product of G1 gain arising from the reconstruction process itself and (n-1) other gain factors (G2, G3, … Gn) arising from the inherent properties of the detector. METHODS: We calculated G2 and G3 gains resulting from the optimization of the coincidence and energy window width for prompts and singles, respectively. Both quantitative and image-based validated Monte Carlo models of Lu2SiO5 (LSO) TOF-permitting and Bi4Ge3O12 (BGO) TOF-nonpermitting detectors were used for the calculations. RESULTS: G2 and G3 values were 1.05 and 1.08 for the BGO detector and G3 was 1.07 for the LSO. A value of almost unity for G2 of the LSO detector indicated a nonsignificant optimization by altering the energy window setting. G' was found to be ∼1.4 times higher for the TOF-permitting detector after reconstruction and optimization of the coincidence and energy windows. CONCLUSION: The method described could potentially predict image noise variations by altering detector acquisition parameters. It could also further contribute toward a long-lasting debate related to cost-efficiency issues of TOF scanners versus the non-TOF ones. Some vendors re-engage nowadays to non-TOF product line designs in an effort to reduce crystal costs. Therefore, exploring the limits of image quality gain by altering the parameters of these detectors remains a topical issue.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador / Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Nucl Med Commun Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Grecia

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador / Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Nucl Med Commun Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Grecia