Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Response to Standardized MR Terminology and Reporting of Implants and Devices as Recommended by the American College of Radiology Subcommittee on MR Safety.
Woods, Terry O; Delfino, Jana G; Shein, Mitchell J.
Afiliación
  • Woods TO; From the Offices of Science and Engineering Laboratories (T.O.W.), In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health (J.G.D.), and Device Evaluation (M.J.S.), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993.
  • Delfino JG; From the Offices of Science and Engineering Laboratories (T.O.W.), In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health (J.G.D.), and Device Evaluation (M.J.S.), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993.
  • Shein MJ; From the Offices of Science and Engineering Laboratories (T.O.W.), In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health (J.G.D.), and Device Evaluation (M.J.S.), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993.
Radiology ; 279(3): 906-9, 2016 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26599665
ABSTRACT
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continually works toward the goal of safety. For patients with magnetic resonance (MR) Conditional devices, safety is achieved when MR Conditional labeling is clear and accessible and can be unambiguously interpreted and applied. The FDA supports the three facets of standardization listed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) Subcommittee on MR Safety in their special report (a) standardization in terminology and reporting of spatial gradient magnetic fields associated with MR systems; (b) standardization in reporting of ferromagnetic testing results for implants and devices; and (c) standardization, consistency, and clarity in radiofrequency power deposition guidelines and terminology. While the FDA is in agreement with the ACR Subcommittee on MR Safety that patient safety is of primary concern, the authors disagree with the Subcommittee on several important points and offer a point-by-point response to the Subcommittee's four recommendations. (©) RSNA, 2015.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prótesis e Implantes / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Radiology Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prótesis e Implantes / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Radiology Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article