Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Incidence of Spinal Cord Injury in Implantation of Percutaneous and Paddle Electrodes for Spinal Cord Stimulation.
Petraglia, Frank W; Farber, S Harrison; Gramer, Robert; Verla, Terence; Wang, Frances; Thomas, Steven; Parente, Beth; Lad, Shivanand P.
Afiliación
  • Petraglia FW; School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Farber SH; School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Gramer R; School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Verla T; School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Wang F; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Thomas S; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Parente B; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Lad SP; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Neuromodulation ; 19(1): 85-90, 2016 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26644210
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been proven effective for multiple chronic pain syndromes. Over the past 40 years of use, the complication rates of SCS have been well defined in the literature; however, the incidence of one of the most devastating complications, spinal cord injury (SCI), remains largely unknown. The goal of the study was to quantify the incidence of SCI in both percutaneous and paddle electrode implantation.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective review of the Thomson Reuter's MarketScan database of all patients that underwent percutaneous or paddle SCS implantation from 2000 to 2009. The main outcome measures of the study were the incidence of SCI and spinal hematoma within 30 days following operation.

RESULTS:

Overall 8326 patients met inclusion criteria for the study (percutaneous 5458 vs. paddle 2868). The overall incidence of SCI was 177 (2.13%) (percutaneous 128 (2.35%) vs. paddle 49 (1.71%), p = 0.0556). The overall incidence of spinal hematoma was 59 (0.71%) (percutaneous 41 (0.75%) vs. paddle 18 (0.63%), p = 0.5230).

CONCLUSION:

Our study shows that the overall incidence of SCI in SCS is low (2.13%), supporting that SCS is a safe procedure. No significant difference was found in the rates of SCI or spinal hematoma between the percutaneous and paddle groups. Further studies are needed to characterize the mechanisms of SCI in SCS and long-term outcomes in these patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal / Electrodos Implantados / Estimulación de la Médula Espinal Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Neuromodulation Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal / Electrodos Implantados / Estimulación de la Médula Espinal Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Neuromodulation Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos