Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The sexual health of female rectal and anal cancer survivors: results of a pilot randomized psycho-educational intervention trial.
DuHamel, Katherine; Schuler, Tammy; Nelson, Christian; Philip, Errol; Temple, Larissa; Schover, Leslie; Baser, Raymond E; Starr, Tatiana D; Cannon, Kathleen; Jennings, Sabrina; Jandorf, Lina; Carter, Jeanne.
Afiliación
  • DuHamel K; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. duhamelk@mskcc.org.
  • Schuler T; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Nelson C; Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, New York, NY, USA.
  • Philip E; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Temple L; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Schover L; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Baser RE; University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Starr TD; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Cannon K; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Jennings S; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Jandorf L; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Carter J; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai School, New York, NY, USA.
J Cancer Surviv ; 10(3): 553-63, 2016 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26667358
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Sexual dysfunction is a frequently reported consequence of rectal/anal cancer treatment for female patients.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to conduct a small randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of a telephone-based, four-session Cancer Survivorship Intervention-Sexual Health (CSI-SH).

METHODS:

Participants (N = 70) were stratified by chemotherapy, stoma, and menopause statuses before randomization to CSI-SH or assessment only (AO). Participants were assessed at baseline, 4 months (follow-up 1), and 8 months (follow-up 2).

RESULTS:

The intervention had medium effect sizes from baseline to follow-up 1, which decreased by follow-up 2. Effect sizes were larger among the 41 sexually active women. Unadjusted means at the follow-ups were not significantly different between the treatment arms. Adjusting for baseline scores, demographics, and medical variables, the intervention arm had significantly better emotional functioning at follow-ups 1 and 2 and less cancer-specific stress at follow-up 1 compared to the AO arm.

CONCLUSION:

The data supported the hypothesized effects on improved sexual and psychological functioning and quality of life in CSI-SH female rectal/anal cancer survivors compared to the AO condition. This pilot study (N = 70) of CSI-SH supported the impact of this intervention on sexual and psychological functioning and quality of life on rectal and anal cancer survivors compared with an AO condition. However, intervention effects were stronger at follow-up 1 as compared to follow-up 2 and were stronger for sexually active women. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Women may benefit from a brief, four-session, sexual health intervention after treatment from rectal and anal cancer.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Ano / Neoplasias del Recto / Educación del Paciente como Asunto / Sobrevivientes / Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas / Salud Reproductiva Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Surviv Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Ano / Neoplasias del Recto / Educación del Paciente como Asunto / Sobrevivientes / Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas / Salud Reproductiva Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Surviv Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos