Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Belatacept and Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation.
Vincenti, Flavio; Rostaing, Lionel; Grinyo, Joseph; Rice, Kim; Steinberg, Steven; Gaite, Luis; Moal, Marie-Christine; Mondragon-Ramirez, Guillermo A; Kothari, Jatin; Polinsky, Martin S; Meier-Kriesche, Herwig-Ulf; Munier, Stephane; Larsen, Christian P.
Afiliación
  • Vincenti F; From the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (F.V.), and Sharp Memorial Hospital, San Diego (S.S.) - both in California; University Hospital and INSERM Unité 563, IFR-BMT, Toulouse (L.R.), and Hôpital de La Cavale Blanche, Brest (M.-C.M.) - both in France; University Hospital Bellvitge, Barcelona (J.G.); Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas (K.R.); Clínica de Nefrología, Santa Fe, Argentina (L.G.); Instituto Mexicano de Trasplantes, Morelos, Mexico (G.A.M.-R.); Hinduja Hos
N Engl J Med ; 374(4): 333-43, 2016 Jan 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26816011
BACKGROUND: In previous analyses of BENEFIT, a phase 3 study, belatacept-based immunosuppression, as compared with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, was associated with similar patient and graft survival and significantly improved renal function in kidney-transplant recipients. Here we present the final results from this study. METHODS: We randomly assigned kidney-transplant recipients to a more-intensive belatacept regimen, a less-intensive belatacept regimen, or a cyclosporine regimen. Efficacy and safety outcomes for all patients who underwent randomization and transplantation were analyzed at year 7 (month 84). RESULTS: A total of 666 participants were randomly assigned to a study group and underwent transplantation. Of the 660 patients who were treated, 153 of the 219 patients treated with the more-intensive belatacept regimen, 163 of the 226 treated with the less-intensive belatacept regimen, and 131 of the 215 treated with the cyclosporine regimen were followed for the full 84-month period; all available data were used in the analysis. A 43% reduction in the risk of death or graft loss was observed for both the more-intensive and the less-intensive belatacept regimens as compared with the cyclosporine regimen (hazard ratio with the more-intensive regimen, 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.95; P=0.02; hazard ratio with the less-intensive regimen, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.94; P=0.02), with equal contributions from the lower rates of death and graft loss. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased over the 7-year period with both belatacept regimens but declined with the cyclosporine regimen. The cumulative frequencies of serious adverse events at month 84 were similar across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Seven years after transplantation, patient and graft survival and the mean eGFR were significantly higher with belatacept (both the more-intensive regimen and the less-intensive regimen) than with cyclosporine. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00256750.).
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trasplante de Riñón / Ciclosporina / Abatacept / Supervivencia de Injerto / Inmunosupresores / Fallo Renal Crónico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: N Engl J Med Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trasplante de Riñón / Ciclosporina / Abatacept / Supervivencia de Injerto / Inmunosupresores / Fallo Renal Crónico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: N Engl J Med Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article