Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hotspots of uncertainty in land-use and land-cover change projections: a global-scale model comparison.
Prestele, Reinhard; Alexander, Peter; Rounsevell, Mark D A; Arneth, Almut; Calvin, Katherine; Doelman, Jonathan; Eitelberg, David A; Engström, Kerstin; Fujimori, Shinichiro; Hasegawa, Tomoko; Havlik, Petr; Humpenöder, Florian; Jain, Atul K; Krisztin, Tamás; Kyle, Page; Meiyappan, Prasanth; Popp, Alexander; Sands, Ronald D; Schaldach, Rüdiger; Schüngel, Jan; Stehfest, Elke; Tabeau, Andrzej; Van Meijl, Hans; Van Vliet, Jasper; Verburg, Peter H.
Afiliación
  • Prestele R; Environmental Geography Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Alexander P; School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh, EH89XP, UK.
  • Rounsevell MD; School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh, EH89XP, UK.
  • Arneth A; Department Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kreuzeckbahnstr. 19, 82467, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
  • Calvin K; Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, College Park, MD, 20740, USA.
  • Doelman J; PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, P.O. Box 303, 3720, AH Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
  • Eitelberg DA; Environmental Geography Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Engström K; Department of Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Sölvegatan 12, Lund, Sweden.
  • Fujimori S; Center for Social and Environmental Systems Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan.
  • Hasegawa T; Center for Social and Environmental Systems Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan.
  • Havlik P; Ecosystem Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A-2361, Laxenburg, Austria.
  • Humpenöder F; Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412, Potsdam, Germany.
  • Jain AK; Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
  • Krisztin T; Ecosystem Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A-2361, Laxenburg, Austria.
  • Kyle P; Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, College Park, MD, 20740, USA.
  • Meiyappan P; Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
  • Popp A; Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412, Potsdam, Germany.
  • Sands RD; Resource and Rural Economics Division, Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 20250, USA.
  • Schaldach R; Center for Environmental Systems Research, University of Kassel, Wilhelmshöher Allee 47, D-34109, Kassel, Germany.
  • Schüngel J; Center for Environmental Systems Research, University of Kassel, Wilhelmshöher Allee 47, D-34109, Kassel, Germany.
  • Stehfest E; PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, P.O. Box 303, 3720, AH Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
  • Tabeau A; LEI, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 29703, 2502, LS The Hague, The Netherlands.
  • Van Meijl H; LEI, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 29703, 2502, LS The Hague, The Netherlands.
  • Van Vliet J; Environmental Geography Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Verburg PH; Environmental Geography Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Glob Chang Biol ; 22(12): 3967-3983, 2016 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27135635
ABSTRACT
Model-based global projections of future land-use and land-cover (LULC) change are frequently used in environmental assessments to study the impact of LULC change on environmental services and to provide decision support for policy. These projections are characterized by a high uncertainty in terms of quantity and allocation of projected changes, which can severely impact the results of environmental assessments. In this study, we identify hotspots of uncertainty, based on 43 simulations from 11 global-scale LULC change models representing a wide range of assumptions of future biophysical and socioeconomic conditions. We attribute components of uncertainty to input data, model structure, scenario storyline and a residual term, based on a regression analysis and analysis of variance. From this diverse set of models and scenarios, we find that the uncertainty varies, depending on the region and the LULC type under consideration. Hotspots of uncertainty appear mainly at the edges of globally important biomes (e.g., boreal and tropical forests). Our results indicate that an important source of uncertainty in forest and pasture areas originates from different input data applied in the models. Cropland, in contrast, is more consistent among the starting conditions, while variation in the projections gradually increases over time due to diverse scenario assumptions and different modeling approaches. Comparisons at the grid cell level indicate that disagreement is mainly related to LULC type definitions and the individual model allocation schemes. We conclude that improving the quality and consistency of observational data utilized in the modeling process and improving the allocation mechanisms of LULC change models remain important challenges. Current LULC representation in environmental assessments might miss the uncertainty arising from the diversity of LULC change modeling approaches, and many studies ignore the uncertainty in LULC projections in assessments of LULC change impacts on climate, water resources or biodiversity.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ecosistema / Conservación de los Recursos Naturales / Modelos Teóricos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Glob Chang Biol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ecosistema / Conservación de los Recursos Naturales / Modelos Teóricos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Glob Chang Biol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos