Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How Do We Know What Works? A Review and Critique of Current Practices in Ethics Training Evaluation.
Steele, Logan M; Mulhearn, Tyler J; Medeiros, Kelsey E; Watts, Logan L; Connelly, Shane; Mumford, Michael D.
Afiliación
  • Steele LM; a Department of Psychology , University of Oklahoma , Norman , Oklahoma , USA.
  • Mulhearn TJ; a Department of Psychology , University of Oklahoma , Norman , Oklahoma , USA.
  • Medeiros KE; a Department of Psychology , University of Oklahoma , Norman , Oklahoma , USA.
  • Watts LL; a Department of Psychology , University of Oklahoma , Norman , Oklahoma , USA.
  • Connelly S; a Department of Psychology , University of Oklahoma , Norman , Oklahoma , USA.
  • Mumford MD; a Department of Psychology , University of Oklahoma , Norman , Oklahoma , USA.
Account Res ; 23(6): 319-50, 2016.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27159494
ABSTRACT
Training is a costly investment. As such, it is of great interest to know the extent to which that investment is yielding a positive return. Recent meta-analytic efforts have observed that ethics training programs are, indeed, having a positive effect, leading to the conclusion that the programs are working. However, they have also uncovered considerable variability in the effectiveness of ethics training programs, which leads to the purpose of the present study-to review current practices in ethics training evaluation. Through this review of 243 studies, consisting of 380 ethics trainings, we identified major themes in evaluation practices and training design. The tradeoffs associated with these evaluation procedures and designs are discussed, along with directions for future research.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conocimiento / Ética en Investigación Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Account Res Asunto de la revista: ETICA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conocimiento / Ética en Investigación Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Account Res Asunto de la revista: ETICA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos