Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Use of Re-irradiation in Locally Recurrent, Non-metastatic Rectal Cancer.
Susko, Matthew; Lee, Jason; Salama, Joseph; Thomas, Samantha; Uronis, Hope; Hsu, David; Migaly, John; Willett, Christopher; Czito, Brian; Palta, Manisha.
Afiliación
  • Susko M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Lee J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Salama J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Thomas S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Uronis H; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Hsu D; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Migaly J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Willett C; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Czito B; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Palta M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Center, Durham, NC, USA. manisha.palta@duke.edu.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 23(11): 3609-3615, 2016 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27169769
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The optimal approach to patients with locally recurrent, non-metastatic rectal cancer is unclear. This study evaluates the outcomes and toxicity associated with pelvic re-irradiation.

METHODS:

Patients undergoing re-irradiation for locally recurrent, non-metastatic, rectal cancer between 2000 and 2014 were identified. Acute and late toxicities were assessed using common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4.0. Disease-related endpoints included palliation of local symptoms, surgical outcomes, and local progression-free survival (PFS), distant PFS and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS:

Thirty-three patients met the criteria for inclusion in this study. Two (6 %) experienced early grade 3+ toxicity and seven (21 %) experienced late grade 3+ toxicity. Twenty-three patients presented with symptomatic local recurrence and 18 (78 %) reported symptomatic relief. Median local PFS was 8.7 (95 % CI 3.8-15.2) months, with a 2-year rate of 15.7 % (4.1-34.2), and median time to distant progression was 4.4 (2.2-33.3) months, with a 2-year distant PFS rate of 38.9 % (20.1-57.3). Median OS time for patients was 23.1 (11.1-33.0) months. Of the 14 patients who underwent surgery, median survival was 32.3 (13.8-48.0) months compared with 13.3 (2.2-33.0) months in patients not undergoing surgery (p = 0.10). A margin-negative (R0) resection was achieved in 10 (71 %) of the surgeries. Radiation treatment modality (intensity-modulated radiation therapy, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intraoperative radiation therapy) did not influence local or distant PFS or OS.

CONCLUSION:

Re-irradiation is a beneficial treatment modality for the management of locally recurrent, non-metastatic rectal cancer. It is associated with symptom improvement, low rates of toxicity, and similar benefits among radiation modalities.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Recto / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Recto / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos