Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison between point-of-care dermatophyte test medium and mycology laboratory culture for diagnosis of dermatophytosis in dogs and cats.
Kaufmann, Ronnie; Blum, Shlomo E; Elad, Daniel; Zur, Gila.
Afiliación
  • Kaufmann R; Dermatology Department, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Koret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, POB 12, Rehovot, 7610001, Israel.
  • Blum SE; Department of Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, The Kimron Veterinary Institute, Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Bet Dagan, 5020001, Israel.
  • Elad D; Department of Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, The Kimron Veterinary Institute, Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Bet Dagan, 5020001, Israel.
  • Zur G; Dermatology Department, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Koret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, POB 12, Rehovot, 7610001, Israel.
Vet Dermatol ; 27(4): 284-e68, 2016 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27237544
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Point-of-care Dermatophyte Test Medium (PoC-DTM) is a diagnostic procedure to rule in/rule out dermatophytosis in veterinary clinics.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the performance of PoC-DTM in the clinic compared to DTM plate culture in a mycology laboratory and to compare results obtained by general practitioners and referral clinicians. ANIMALS Hair samples were collected from 47 cats and 54 dogs with suspected dermatophytosis and from nine healthy controls (seven cats and two dogs).

METHODS:

This was a multicentre blinded study. In one group (65 suspected cases, 9 healthy controls), PoC-DTM results were evaluated by clinicians in a referral clinic (SP group) who examined the colony morphology macroscopically and microscopically. In the other group (36 suspected cases) PoC-DTM results were evaluated by clinicians from general practice for colour change only, with no macroscopic or microscopic examination (GP group). All hair samples were also cultured on DTM plates in a mycology laboratory. Laboratory culture was considered the gold standard for comparison.

RESULTS:

Agreements between tests were 97% (two false positive; κ = 0.839) and 80.6% (five false positives and two false negatives; κ = 0.466) in the SP and GP groups, respectively. This difference between groups was significant (P = 0.024). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE When applying macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of the colony, PoC-DTM is accurate for diagnosing dermatophytes with only a 3% chance of error. However, when macroscopic and microscopic examination is not included there is significant (19.4%) chance for an incorrect diagnosis.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades de los Gatos / Técnicas de Tipificación Micológica / Sistemas de Atención de Punto / Dermatomicosis / Enfermedades de los Perros / Hongos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Vet Dermatol Asunto de la revista: DERMATOLOGIA / MEDICINA VETERINARIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades de los Gatos / Técnicas de Tipificación Micológica / Sistemas de Atención de Punto / Dermatomicosis / Enfermedades de los Perros / Hongos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Vet Dermatol Asunto de la revista: DERMATOLOGIA / MEDICINA VETERINARIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel