Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Shock treatment in a cohort of Scandinavian intensive care units in 2014.
Kollind, M; Wickbom, F; Wilkman, E; Snäckestrand, M S C; Holmén, A; Oldner, A; Perner, A; Åneman, A; Chew, M S.
Afiliación
  • Kollind M; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Centalsjukhuset Kristianstad, Kristianstad, Sweden.
  • Wickbom F; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hallands Sjukhus, Halmstad, Sweden.
  • Wilkman E; Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Snäckestrand MS; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Holmén A; Department of Research, Development and Education, Region of Halland, Halmstad, Sweden.
  • Oldner A; Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgical Services and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Perner A; Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Åneman A; Intensive Care Unit, Liverpool Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Chew MS; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 60(7): 945-57, 2016 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27291070
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Shock is common in intensive care units, and treatment includes fluids, vasopressor and/or inotropic drugs, guided by hemodynamic monitoring. The aim of this study was to identify current practice for treatment of shock in Scandinavian intensive care units.

METHODS:

Seven-day inception cohort study in 43 intensive care units in Scandinavia. Patients ≥ 15 years old receiving more than 4 h of cardiovascular acting drug infusion were included. The use of fluids, vasopressor and inotropic drugs, type of monitoring, and target values were recorded.

RESULTS:

One hundred and seventy-one patients were included. At inclusion, 136/168 (81%) had received vasopressor and/or inotropic drug therapy for less than 24 h, and 143/171 (84%) had received volume loading before the onset of vasoactive drug treatment. Ringer's solution was given to 129/143 (90%) of patients and starches in 3/143 (2%) patients. Noradrenaline was the most commonly used cardiovascular acting drug, given in 168/171 (98%) of cases while dopamine was rarely used. Mean arterial pressure was considered the most important variable for hemodynamic monitoring. Invasive arterial blood pressure was monitored in 166/171 (97%) of patients, arterial pulse wave analysis in 11/171 (7%), and echocardiography in 50/171 (29%).

CONCLUSION:

In this survey, Ringer's solution and noradrenaline were the most common first-line treatments in shock. The use of starches and dopamine were rare. Almost all patients were monitored with invasive arterial blood pressure, but comprehensive hemodynamic monitoring was used only in a minority of patients.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vasoconstrictores / Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vasoconstrictores / Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia