Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The ABMS MOC Part III Examination: Value, Concerns, and Alternative Formats.
Hawkins, Richard E; Irons, Mira Bjelotomich; Welcher, Catherine M; Pouwels, Mellie Villahermosa; Holmboe, Eric S; Reisdorff, Earl J; Cohen, Joshua M; Dentzer, Susan; Nichols, David G; Lien, Cynthia A; Horn, Thomas D; Noone, R Barrett; Lipner, Rebecca S; Eva, Kevin W; Norcini, John J; Nora, Lois Margaret; Gold, Jeffrey P.
Afiliación
  • Hawkins RE; R.E. Hawkins is vice president, Medical Education Outcomes, American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois. M.B. Irons is senior vice president, Academic Affairs, American Board of Medical Specialties, Chicago, Illinois. C.M. Welcher is senior policy analyst, Medical Education Outcomes, American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois. M.V. Pouwels is director, Medical Education Collaborations, American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois. E.S. Holmboe is senior vice president, Milestone Deve
Acad Med ; 91(11): 1509-1515, 2016 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27355778
This article describes the presentations and discussions at a conference co-convened by the Council on Medical Education of the American Medical Association (AMA) and by the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS). The conference focused on the ABMS Maintenance of Certification (MOC) Part III Examination. This article, reflecting the conference agenda, covers the value of and evidence supporting the examination, as well as concerns about the cost of the examination, and-given the current format-its relevance. In addition, the article outlines alternative formats for the examination that four ABMS member boards are currently developing or implementing. Lastly, the article presents contrasting views on the approach to professional self-regulation. One view operationalizes MOC as a high-stakes, pass-fail process while the other perspective holds MOC as an organized approach to support continuing professional development and improvement. The authors hope to begin a conversation among the AMA, the ABMS, and other professional stakeholders about how knowledge assessment in MOC might align with the MOC program's educational and quality improvement elements and best meet the future needs of both the public and the physician community.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Certificación / Competencia Clínica / Educación Médica Continua / Evaluación Educacional País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Acad Med Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article
Buscar en Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Certificación / Competencia Clínica / Educación Médica Continua / Evaluación Educacional País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Acad Med Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article