BIOBRAD Study: The Search for Biomarkers of Bradykinin-Mediated Angio-Oedema Attacks.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aetiology of angio-oedema (AE) is difficult to determine; however, it is essential in emergency situations when two major contexts may be present mast cell-mediated AE and bradykinin-mediated AE. Different forms of AE are currently distinguished based on clinical criteria (spontaneous duration of the attack, presence of concomitant or late-appearing superficial urticaria, history of atopy, and others), but specific biomarkers could improve patient management. OBJECTIVE: In this prospective study, potential biomarkers have been identified, and their statistical characteristics were examined. METHODS: Samples were taken on day 0 (D0) and D7 for 3 patient groups (n = 11 each) bradykinin-mediated AE [peripheral site of attack, ear, nose, throat (ENT), and abdominal involvement], mast cell-mediated AE, and non-bradykinin-mediated abdominal pain. RESULTS: Assay of the potential biomarkers revealed no significant differences in C1 inhibitor and C4 levels. In contrast, D-dimer levels peaked during bradykinin-mediated AE attacks (median 2.2 mg/l at D0 vs. 0.52 mg/l at D7; p < 10-3) as well as during mast cell-mediated AE attacks (1.97 vs. 0.65 mg/l; p = 0.04) and were high in bradykinin-mediated AE compared to the control group (0.69 mg/l; p = 0.01). A threshold value of 0.62 mg/l was found to have a negative predictive value of 100% for bradykinin-mediated AE compared to other causes of abdominal pain (group 3). Circulating VE-cadherin levels were also increased during an attack (1,990 at D0 vs. 1,566 ng/ml at D7; p = 0.01), but could not distinguish between bradykinin-mediated and mast cell-mediated AE, like D-dimers. CONCLUSIONS: Exploration of changes in fibrinolysis-related markers (particularly D-dimers) is thus promising for the diagnosis of AE attacks in difficult-to-diagnose abdominal forms, although it was not able to differentiate between bradykinin and mast cell-mediated AE.