Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gray matter network differences between behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.
Vijverberg, E G B; Tijms, B M; Dopp, J; Hong, Y J; Teunissen, C E; Barkhof, F; Scheltens, P; Pijnenburg, Y A L.
Afiliación
  • Vijverberg EGB; Alzheimer Centre and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Haga Ziekenhuis, The Hague, the Netherlands. Electronic address: E.Vijverberg@vumc.nl.
  • Tijms BM; Alzheimer Centre and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Dopp J; Alzheimer Centre and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Hong YJ; Alzheimer Centre and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Teunissen CE; Department of Clinical Chemistry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Barkhof F; Department of Radiology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, UCL, London, UK.
  • Scheltens P; Alzheimer Centre and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Pijnenburg YAL; Alzheimer Centre and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Neurobiol Aging ; 50: 77-86, 2017 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27940352
ABSTRACT
We set out to study whether single-subject gray matter (GM) networks show disturbances that are specific for Alzheimer's disease (AD; n = 90) or behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD; n = 59), and whether such disturbances would be related to cognitive deficits measured with mini-mental state examination and a neuropsychological battery, using subjective cognitive decline subjects as reference. AD and bvFTD patients had a lower degree, connectivity density, clustering, path length, betweenness centrality, and small world values compared with subjective cognitive decline. AD patients had a lower connectivity density than bvFTD patients (F = 5.79, p = 0.02; mean ± standard deviation bvFTD 16.10 ± 1.19%; mean ± standard deviation AD 15.64 ± 1.02%). Lasso logistic regression showed that connectivity differences between bvFTD and AD were specific to 23 anatomical areas, in terms of local GM volume, degree, and clustering. Lower clustering values and lower degree values were specifically associated with worse mini-mental state examination scores and lower performance on the neuropsychological tests. GM showed disease-specific alterations, when comparing bvFTD with AD patients, and these alterations were associated with cognitive deficits.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cognición / Demencia Frontotemporal / Enfermedad de Alzheimer / Sustancia Gris Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Neurobiol Aging Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cognición / Demencia Frontotemporal / Enfermedad de Alzheimer / Sustancia Gris Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Neurobiol Aging Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article