Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of horn bud wound healing following cautery disbudding of preweaned dairy calves treated with aluminum-based aerosol bandage.
Huebner, K L; Kunkel, A K; McConnel, C S; Callan, R J; Dinsmore, R P; Caixeta, L S.
Afiliación
  • Huebner KL; Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523.
  • Kunkel AK; Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523.
  • McConnel CS; Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523.
  • Callan RJ; Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523.
  • Dinsmore RP; Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523.
  • Caixeta LS; Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523. Electronic address: luciano.caixeta@colostate.edu.
J Dairy Sci ; 100(5): 3922-3929, 2017 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28259415
ABSTRACT
Pain management during and following disbudding procedures has been studied extensively, though few studies have evaluated wound healing following cautery disbudding in dairy calves. The purpose of this study was to observe wound healing following cautery disbudding with or without treatment using a topical aluminum-based aerosol bandage (ALU) in preweaned dairy calves. Dairy calves were disbudded within the first 3 wk of life using a standard cautery disbudding protocol. The ALU treatment was randomly allocated to the right or left horn bud within each animal. The outcomes measured were lesion score (LS) and wound diameter (WD). The LS was evaluated on a scale of 1 to 3, with LS = 1 representing normal healing without a scab or exudate, LS = 2 having the presence of a scab, and LS = 3 showing the presence of wound exudate. Lesion score and WD were evaluated on a weekly basis following dehorning for 3 wk. A total of 209 animals completed the study. No difference was observed in LS between groups during the first 2 wk postdisbudding, but the proportion of LS = 3 on wk 3 postdisbudding was greater for the control group when compared with ALU (17 vs. 8%, respectively). During wk 1 and 2 postdisbudding, the odds of having delayed healing, or a LS ≥2, were similar for both groups. However, the odds tended to be different at wk 3 postdisbudding with control disbudding sites being 1.42 times more likely to have delayed healing than ALU. In wk 3, WD was 1 mm smaller in the treatment group compared with the control, and treatment decreased diameter over time compared with controls. Overall, once abnormal wound healing was observed, the likelihood of having abnormal wound healing the following week was increased. However, treatment with ALU diminished this effect on delayed healing during the follow-up period. Based on these results, the use of ALU improved wound healing following cautery disbudding of preweaned dairy calves.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cauterización / Aluminio Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Dairy Sci Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cauterización / Aluminio Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Dairy Sci Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article