Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
POWER training in chronic stroke individuals: differences between responders and nonresponders.
Aaron, Stacey E; Hunnicutt, Jennifer L; Embry, Aaron E; Bowden, Mark G; Gregory, Chris M.
Afiliación
  • Aaron SE; a Department of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions , Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston , SC , USA.
  • Hunnicutt JL; a Department of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions , Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston , SC , USA.
  • Embry AE; a Department of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions , Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston , SC , USA.
  • Bowden MG; b Division of Physical Therapy, College of Health Professions , Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston , SC , USA.
  • Gregory CM; c Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center , Charleston , SC , USA.
Top Stroke Rehabil ; 24(7): 496-502, 2017 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28482762
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Lower extremity muscle weakness is a primary contributor to post-stroke dysfunction. Resistance training is an effective treatment for hemiparetic weakness and improves walking performance. Post-stroke subject characteristics that do or do not improve walking speed following resistance training are unknown.

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this paper was to describe baseline characteristics, as well as responses to training, associated with achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in walking speed (≥0.16 m/s) following Post-stroke Optimization of Walking Using Explosive Resistance (POWER) training.

METHODS:

Seventeen participants completed 24 sessions of POWER training, which included intensive progressive leg presses, jump training, calf raises, sit-to-stands, step-ups, and over ground fast walking. Outcomes included SSWS, FCWS, DGI, FMA-LE, 6-MWT, paretic knee power, non-paretic knee power, and paretic step ratio.

RESULTS:

Specific to those who reached MCID in SSWS (e.g. "responders"), significant improvements in SSWS, FCWS, 6-MWT, paretic knee power, and non-paretic knee power was realized. Paretic knee power and non-paretic knee power significantly improved in those who did not achieve MCID for gait speed (e.g. "non-responders").

CONCLUSION:

The potential for POWER training to enhance general locomotor function was confirmed. Baseline paretic knee strength/power may be an important factor in how an individual responds to this style of training. The lack of change within the non-responders emphasizes the contribution of factors other than lower extremity muscle power improvement to locomotor dysfunction.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Accidente Cerebrovascular / Fuerza Muscular / Entrenamiento de Fuerza / Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Top Stroke Rehabil Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / REABILITACAO Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Accidente Cerebrovascular / Fuerza Muscular / Entrenamiento de Fuerza / Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Top Stroke Rehabil Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / REABILITACAO Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos