Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Repeat Rifaximin for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: No Clinically Significant Changes in Stool Microbial Antibiotic Sensitivity.
Pimentel, M; Cash, B D; Lembo, A; Wolf, R A; Israel, R J; Schoenfeld, P.
Afiliación
  • Pimentel M; GI Motility Program, Division of Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8730 Alden Drive, Suite 225E, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. Mark.Pimentel@cshs.org.
  • Cash BD; Division of Gastroenterology, University of South Alabama, 6000 University Commons, 75 University Blvd, S, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
  • Lembo A; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
  • Wolf RA; , 400 Somerset Corporate Blvd., Bridgewater, NJ, 08807, USA.
  • Israel RJ; , 400 Somerset Corporate Blvd., Bridgewater, NJ, 08807, USA.
  • Schoenfeld P; Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, 4646 John R Street, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Dig Dis Sci ; 62(9): 2455-2463, 2017 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28589238
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Rifaximin has demonstrated efficacy and safety for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D).

AIM:

To determine the rifaximin repeat treatment effect on fecal bacterial antibiotic susceptibility.

METHODS:

Patients with IBS in Trial 3 (TARGET 3) study who responded to open-label rifaximin 550 mg three times daily for 2 weeks, with symptom recurrence within 18 weeks, were randomized to double-blind treatment two 2-week repeat courses of rifaximin or placebo, separated by 10 weeks. Prospective stool sample collection occurred before and after open-label rifaximin, before and after the first repeat course, and at the end of the study. Susceptibility testing was performed with 11 antibiotics, including rifaximin and rifampin, using broth microdilution or agar dilution methods.

RESULTS:

Of 103 patients receiving open-label rifaximin, 73 received double-blind rifaximin (n = 37) or placebo (n = 36). A total of 1429 bacterial and yeast isolates were identified, of which Bacteroidaceae (36.7%) and Enterobacteriaceae (33.9%) were the most common. In the double-blind phase, Clostridium difficile was highly susceptible to rifaximin [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range 0.008-1 µg/mL] and rifampin (MIC range 0.004-0.25 µg/mL). Following double-blind rifaximin treatment, Staphylococcus isolates remained susceptible to rifaximin at all visits (MIC50 range ≤0.06-32 µg/mL). Rifaximin exposure was not associated with long-term cross-resistance of Bacteroidaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, and Enterococcaceae to rifampin or nonrifamycin antibiotics tested.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this study, short-term repeat treatment with rifaximin has no apparent long-term effect on stool microbial susceptibility to rifaximin, rifampin, and nonrifamycin antibiotics. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER NCT01543178.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Rifamicinas / Farmacorresistencia Microbiana / Síndrome del Colon Irritable / Heces / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Dig Dis Sci Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Rifamicinas / Farmacorresistencia Microbiana / Síndrome del Colon Irritable / Heces / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Dig Dis Sci Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos