Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Addressing the key communication barriers between microbiology laboratories and clinical units: a qualitative study.
Skodvin, Brita; Aase, Karina; Brekken, Anita Løvås; Charani, Esmita; Lindemann, Paul Christoffer; Smith, Ingrid.
Afiliación
  • Skodvin B; Norwegian Advisory Unit for Antibiotic Use in Hospitals, Department of Research and Development, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
  • Aase K; Department of Health Studies, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway.
  • Brekken AL; Department of Microbiology, Stavanger University Hospital, 4068 Stavanger, Norway.
  • Charani E; National Institute of Health Research Health Protection Research Unit-Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infection, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 OHS, UK.
  • Lindemann PC; Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
  • Smith I; Department of Microbiology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 72(9): 2666-2672, 2017 09 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28633405
Background: Many countries are on the brink of establishing antibiotic stewardship programmes in hospitals nationwide. In a previous study we found that communication between microbiology laboratories and clinical units is a barrier to implementing efficient antibiotic stewardship programmes in Norway. We have now addressed the key communication barriers between microbiology laboratories and clinical units from a laboratory point of view. Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 employees (managers, doctors and technicians) from six diverse Norwegian microbiological laboratories, representing all four regional health authorities. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was applied, identifying emergent themes, subthemes and corresponding descriptions. Results: The main barrier to communication is disruption involving specimen logistics, information on request forms, verbal reporting of test results and information transfer between poorly integrated IT systems. Furthermore, communication is challenged by lack of insight into each other's area of expertise and limited provision of laboratory services, leading to prolonged turnaround time, limited advisory services and restricted opening hours. Conclusions: Communication between microbiology laboratories and clinical units can be improved by a review of testing processes, educational programmes to increase insights into the other's area of expertise, an evaluation of work tasks and expansion of rapid and point-of-care test services. Antibiotic stewardship programmes may serve as a valuable framework to establish these measures.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Laboratorios de Hospital / Barreras de Comunicación / Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos / Microbiología Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Antimicrob Chemother Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Laboratorios de Hospital / Barreras de Comunicación / Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos / Microbiología Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Antimicrob Chemother Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega