Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Structural typology of Brazilian primary healthcare units: the 5 Rs]. / Tipologia da estrutura das unidades básicas de saúde brasileiras: os 5 R.
Bousquat, Aylene; Giovanella, Ligia; Fausto, Marcia Cristina Rodrigues; Fusaro, Edgard Rodrigues; Mendonça, Maria Helena Magalhães de; Gagno, Juliana; Viana, Ana Luiza d'Ávila.
Afiliación
  • Bousquat A; Faculdade de Saúde Publica, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.
  • Giovanella L; Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
  • Fausto MCR; Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
  • Fusaro ER; Departamento Intersindical de Estatística e Estudos Socioeconômicos, São Paulo, Brasil.
  • Mendonça MHM; Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
  • Gagno J; Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
  • Viana ALD; Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.
Cad Saude Publica ; 33(8): e00037316, 2017 Aug 21.
Article en Pt | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28832772
ABSTRACT
The structural typology of Brazil's 38,812 primary healthcare units (UBS) was elaborated on the basis of the results from a survey in cycle 1 of the National Program for Improvement in Access and Quality of Primary Care. Type of team, range of professionals, shifts open to the public, available services, and installations and inputs were the sub-dimensions used. For each sub-dimension, a reference standard was defined and a standardized score was calculated, with 1 as the best. The final score was calculated by factor analysis. The final mean score of Brazilian UBS was 0.732. The sub-dimension with the worst score was "installations and inputs" and the best was "shifts open to the public". The primary healthcare units were classified according to their final score in five groups, from best to worst A, B, C, D, and E. Only 4.8% of the Brazilian UBS attained the maximum score. The typology showed specific characteristics and a regional distribution pattern units D and/or E accounted for nearly one-third of the units in the North, and two-thirds of units A were situated in the South and Southeast of Brazil. Based on the typology, primary healthcare units were classified according to their infrastructure conditions and possible strategies for intervention, as follows failed, rudimentary, limited, fair, and reference (benchmark). The lack of equipment and inputs in all the units except for type A limits their scope of action and case-resolution capacity, thus restricting their ability to respond to health problems. The typology presented here can be a useful tool for temporal and spatial monitoring of the quality of infrastructure in UBS in Brazil.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Regionalización / Atención a la Salud / Instituciones de Salud / Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: Pt Revista: Cad Saude Publica Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Regionalización / Atención a la Salud / Instituciones de Salud / Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: Pt Revista: Cad Saude Publica Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil