Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of outcomes of kidney transplantation from donation after brain death, donation after circulatory death, and donation after brain death followed by circulatory death donors.
Chen, Guodong; Wang, Chang; Ko, Dicken Shiu-Chung; Qiu, Jiang; Yuan, Xiaopeng; Han, Ming; Wang, Changxi; He, Xiaoshun; Chen, Lizhong.
Afiliación
  • Chen G; Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Wang C; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China.
  • Ko DS; Organ Transplantation, Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, China.
  • Qiu J; Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Yuan X; Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Han M; Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Wang C; Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • He X; Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Chen L; Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Clin Transplant ; 31(11)2017 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28886219
BACKGROUND: There are three categories of deceased donors of kidney transplantation in China, donation after brain death (DBD), donation after circulatory death (DCD), and donation after brain death followed by circulatory death (DBCD) donors. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of kidney transplantation from these three categories of deceased donors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 469 recipients who received deceased kidney transplantation in our hospital from February 2007 to June 2015. The recipients were divided into three groups according to the source of their donor kidneys: DBD, DCD, or DBCD. The primary endpoints were delayed graft function (DGF), graft loss, and patient death. RESULTS: The warm ischemia time was much longer in DCD group compared to DBCD group (18.4 minutes vs 12.9 minutes, P < .001). DGF rate was higher in DCD group than in DBD and DBCD groups (22.5% vs 10.2% and 13.8%, respectively, P = .021). Urinary leakage was much higher in DCD group (P = .049). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 1-, 2-, and 3-year patient survivals were all comparable among the three groups. CONCLUSION: DBCD kidney transplantation has lower incidences of DGF and urinary leakage than DCD kidney transplant. However, the overall patient and graft survival were comparable among DBD, DCD, and DBCD kidney transplantation.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Donantes de Tejidos / Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos / Trasplante de Riñón / Muerte / Selección de Donante / Fallo Renal Crónico Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transplant Asunto de la revista: TRANSPLANTE Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Donantes de Tejidos / Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos / Trasplante de Riñón / Muerte / Selección de Donante / Fallo Renal Crónico Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transplant Asunto de la revista: TRANSPLANTE Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China